Rika

由最好排到最壞
7 `% |) g* }  ?* ~F, He/She told a friend the turth. Nothing wrong
$ \0 Z$ s# E0 d+ O6 }; W8 DB, He is just a business man, he works for money. He doesn't have the responsibility to help L or give her discount3 g0 t6 j2 V% x' z# H
S, He just pay for what he wants, he just gives offer. He doesn't force her
  ^( |* L- w( u8 S) KM, He cannot accept L had sex with other men. This is alright. he hurts too. But he should think about why L had sex. The purpose was pure
: _# J! G9 s/ U; c! x. b. ~L, I think there must other way she can find to earn $20 for the transportation fee. She is pure but a bit stupid

左輪仔

最高就代表我最唔LIKE既人物:
4 Z( |5 s+ J7 W4 S& V. J: |$ X, _3 g) r$ c5 U7 \
M - 點解佢唔搵條女先,要條女陪人一夜再過河搵佢,自己唔要錢過去,枉係男人3 N5 C, y% D' L8 {! T" S& I
* v  U7 r3 w& @
S - 我最唔鍾意呢D男人,呃女人一夜,仲要0趙完唱喎,(唔係F點會知呢件事)
; \' P4 m5 X3 G* ^( ~     比我一定唔會做,正禽獸!!!
2 n, e  H; J- Y( V8 x7 ]
, r: @# T9 x5 t9 f* U. wB - 呢D冇良船主,知道左件事就坐地起價,為左錢咩都咁做
% M- _/ ~( a) F' i" o( Z& }& L) Z
+ E# j! S% R$ i5 o3 U) N- f: JL - 雖然佢咁做係為左同個男既一齊,但係為左咁而出賣色相,唔理志
0 A6 b" ?1 f: d( Z9 h% j" q% X3 E; X4 |: J9 d3 m1 Y# G
F - 佢忠於朋友係一件好事,但有時D野,都要睇下環境可唔可以講嫁,/ y+ ^9 Z& ^* Z6 O* @5 ^( K" ^1 D
     正所謂"寧教人打仔,莫教人比妻"嘛,績下口得好
8 h  x2 o* q: D$ I% D  x  ]# ~% D. J8 W; ?" y# i9 F* \
[ Last edited by 左輪仔 on 2005-4-25 at 01:17 AM ]

代仔

我以前都好似睇過.但唔記得個答案$ A- M# _# c1 P: T( P
而家答多次
: S3 r6 W7 M+ f9 \8 {# D: [f: 因為佢只係張佢所知既事講比朋友聽
) u9 f5 D  S4 i1 c( H' al: 為左見佢既既愛人, 肯跟一個唔識既人一齊過夜, 不過我唔讚成咁做架
, n$ N  z" O" Vb: 坐地起價.明知人地無錢# L& j+ R0 B4 [# j. h* @
s: 衰人一個, 明知人地等錢洗. 雖然係你情我願.) A; i1 S0 O( j: t
m: 最衰既人, 條女以經唔好過架啦, 知道之後.重走人同人分手添

hk853

L>F>M>B>S
/ u+ z" r8 Q3 C' q/ R) M
2 `+ @3 P& J0 @& }6 C# QL為左同心愛既人一齊,甘願犧出賣自己肉體,好偉大2 C4 V6 J+ v# R9 V3 [! d4 |
F排第二因為佢同M講都係純粹為朋友,唔係有心拆散M同L,因為決定權係M度1 X/ k9 f5 s4 D- l
M冇原諒L為左佢而犧牲色相,但都尚可以原諒7 }% k! ]8 D7 N, h/ x8 E
S乘人之危,最壞,明知L有心上人,都要用佢肉體換金錢7 x9 K2 |, L. I3 W
B都係乘人之危,但商業社會係咁,所以算比S好

JCer

最壞  F>S>M>L>B 唔壞
4 ]' A  C  t0 X/ |; |' J9 }( ZF: 如果佢唔講,物事都無, 佢應該學下"善良的沉默"
: {# E9 [- M/ {  T7 P: G; TS: 如果係鍾意一個人, 唔應該承人之危, 學下明正言順地去爭取
6 N3 T5 P& s" X6 e6 I" e7 jM: 不明白L的負出, 自私的想法4 @5 V7 G8 U4 U( v" [& [
L: 太愛一個人, 愛得太傻, 無理後果
2 \$ z( _6 N5 j5 U) I# @+ Y2 {8 FB: 有危險的工作, 收多D $ ,人之常情
' P# s) u: ]4 B; k8 I0 e# y' O6 [, |: `. V  K/ |
世上無絕對的正確, 也沒有絕對的錯誤

angellyz

最唔可以接受 S, then B, then M, L and last F.

tai1980

Originally posted by Asurada129 at 2005-4-24 11:24 PM:+ {1 E6 s! O- c% g& K9 _) N
L = 為左自己鍾意既人寧願犠牲自己3 e. J- s+ K) ~* ^7 R& U7 B. f
B = 一個為金錢暴利既船夫, 正常生意人都係甘. Z6 t- e' m" I" {
S = 知道有人需要錢度河, 開出不道德條件
! r8 N* P- N) `' ~+ CF = 不理後果告知當事人, (估算係情敵)....拆散對方1 ]. X7 ?: N7 M8 O
M = 不知愛人為佢犠牲, 反而知道真相不理女方委屈...仲拋棄佢

+ T3 S& x- l& \" h, L" f, V

9 b4 F$ F; {$ G same choices with u , but want to add some comments
2 l  v2 L5 y+ q9 O) O& F! W  D0 g) J' p  c& I2 Z& O
B : not agree with u on this comment , cos he is at the shore of the woman (有一天, 在女人的這一岸, 有個船夫), so he has no way to know that the woman is in-love with the man across the river  + k4 r# _  N7 c( H: K" S
2 i% q, A9 S4 H
S : there is ""no-free-lunch"" in this world , if u want something then u have to give-up something so this is a legal transaction ( the woman has the right to refuse ) ,and he is not that bad cos he fulfill their agreement in the end (  女人答應了, 她拿到錢後就由船夫載她過河 )
  O: Z$ W! y; M  L+ D+ }) O) ]3 ~
+ ^9 h6 V! _/ w+ D/ ]F : if this guy has a brain , then he should know the outcome + e8 D2 p$ k8 c5 W

" H  u; I0 L  }3 H0 N" h- L9 rM : in the present-day this guy is call an asshole ( no need to explain further more ), but this story took place in the past time ( 從前有個男人和女人 ) so they should not be that open minded but it also said that they love each othe ( 非常相愛 ) , so......
$ p! \6 p: `  k  R
; w  E9 B2 u8 m" ^& e4 t[ Last edited by tai1980 on 2005-4-25 at 01:58 AM ]

waterfire

大概可以講....錯ge" f2 N; T" l0 A! \- K% y
M, L 都係為左想見佢, 而犧牲左自己ge 肉體, M點解唔可以體諒下佢  i& @* _) w& I. B7 k
L, 為左想見M, 而唔考慮下件事如果穿左會點
9 e7 d" l( ?: EF, 有時唔係樣樣野都講到咁明ga ma
! B4 Z) p2 s. ^8 Y) b6 W+ n/ x0 e) a/ ^& O$ x
最錯就係, 點解F 唔叫L 同佢過一晚, 就唔會講俾M 聽....& J; _  m1 N" t+ \% {2 C" A
有女唔食, 最大惡極!!

hiroraymond

好似好有趣咁，* V4 E7 B1 U# u6 L4 J% h
由最好開始排起既話，$ @& @" u! G2 Y4 L* l0 p0 H
L B M F S 啦，8 O5 n* N" g1 T: g- F. U" l
! t# x# B* Y% A2 T+ s
其實不少人都會話肯為自己鐘意既人就算要埋自己條命都得，0 `' I4 l7 x& ]" @
但當真係需要既時候，又有幾多個會呢？
; b; t9 u- Q" _9 |如果覺得自己真係做得到既，又點會唔明 L 有幾鐘意 M 呢？
5 |, f7 C: i8 N! t又點會唔諒解 L 會咁樣做呢。/ e1 q: @0 M/ T

$ k( e$ l8 v/ B2 O/ W而 B 都只不過係做生意，同 L 做個交易，
+ [' S: z$ g- j所謂現實世界中既商人 ( 傷人 )，" ?: \& z+ x7 i7 }' S
明知你咁想過去緊係開高價啦。5 D$ G: U8 P9 w# ~

7 z! d( L; |6 H- y8 e3 q, Q而由第三個開始我就覺得係壞，
; T+ u! J+ E0 t: c' C: Y; F M 唔能夠體諒到 L 背叛佢既原因，; x, V4 }$ t, A  ?
亦從未為令雙方可以重逢呢件事上作出任何貢獻，! J7 S- I( ^8 B3 ~, x* d4 s0 t9 ?
知道一切後更即刻放棄一個甘為自己犠牲一切既人，+ K4 a8 j% q' \- l) O; Y3 E
M 都可算壞了。
; S% q5 P+ s2 i, U% Z
( I3 ]* b5 R: N. v7 H  p/ }$ [ F 呢個人仲掂，0 D8 ?7 T1 b2 f) `9 ]! \
知道既唔等於要講，
* @; ?( }5 f) m如果呢件事發生係自己身上，
9 W1 D  c6 i0 D% G" c- H, p我諗會即刻毒啞 F 呢條友。
2 H. K3 m' B8 F$ i  K3 t/ X9 i3 b: t2 U# ^
最衰個個緊係 S 啦，3 H) @& K# }' w' y: ]
始終都係討厭提出不道德交易的人。, x- k" T7 P0 v
$ P* f. G# k. k

# r% e/ K3 F) y; B3 O
2 c8 n2 a& I+ {9 `1 a3 M6 l3 K題外話：& g" [! I6 Y2 Y3 O3 x, [
唔知點解睇呢個故事個陣，  C: E+ r( [- i) M; R: b8 v
睇到 S 呢條友，
! M9 E9 ^+ A  B6 X9 g我就即刻諗起英皇老細。

newman2005

由壞至好: S<F<M<B<L
+ Y- X3 a, }" m, c; C  l8 C% ?/ u: h9 k% D: ]+ ^" ^& F! {! W
S: 看中別人的弱點而作出不道德的交易去滿足自己私慾, 最賤格!5 j9 x/ g* d+ x: Q0 h
F: 不顧後果爆響口, 影響L和M的關係
) p: k% h* M" ]! hM: 沒有理解L所作的事背後真正原因而拋棄她
+ c  z3 p3 y1 \  ~. q1 B" G) m# `5 rB: 坐地起價想得到金錢上的利益 .... 但不是對別人造成傷害2 f- R& Z% y' Y0 N( x! s
L: 寧願犧牲卻換來分手收場...