Chingy

Originally posted by crap at 2005-4-27 01:20 AM:
" g) p! q0 h% y5 ?% x- ]% }2 O# s& a) G7 O7 J8 z5 F$ j
9 E! h) j' g$ ^# S
我都覺得錯不在他們, 是他們的父母 ...

+ C- _8 v0 ~9 B5 Q. f4 l' W
, j9 B: C4 K8 X- J$ V  Y! i
In Spider-Man 2.Spider man did stop a train

crap

Originally posted by Chingy at 2005-4-27 07:12 AM:' W$ y! V; H# t  `% s

0 X: B  t6 f9 z
( _! c5 R/ c2 CIn Spider-Man 2.Spider man did stop a train

0 w) j9 d; A4 q5 J
( J' f" r+ r2 I8 K& u- t
oh really...
3 ], ^% |1 V/ D. J& Y! C, qhahhaa, thx a lot^^"
! p1 X# u, B; ?, G1 @) ~" |5 Ui didn't watch ch.2

springspring

挺出名，在偶理學的問題
2 t2 ?2 l4 ]# K, q9 B
" `0 l+ Y( e8 ^: V8 P當然這是個假設性問題
, W. e; Z9 f- A. w  F# a4 P但將人數倍大
6 T8 L& ~+ l1 \" `1 @例如是十個一個，到一百個一個，到一千個一個. b$ e% O) K% z9 |5 t6 n) `$ e& w
(情況可以換作其他)
4 a6 ~/ K' b. Q& Q0 m始終有條界線

easonwing

絕情谷既問題...
  I  ]1 i2 u" X2 Z# c' k$ }, q/ J如果一個人個邊係我親人,我會好自私咁求佢...6 z0 s4 R* g4 ]# `
如果唔係親人,我會殺人警百...

easonwing

Originally posted by easonwing at 2005-4-27 12:12 PM:
  s% e- W" O0 _- u/ H絕情谷既問題...9 G# D) q, S3 f. R( T3 {, V) b! ^/ i
如果一個人個邊係我親人,我會好自私咁求佢...5 w  w: ]9 M4 p' T3 [( I3 j/ k
如果唔係親人,我會殺人警百...

# w( T1 _1 I/ A$ ~- r5 s7 e
殺一警百...

srfqt1

其實我最初係即刻諗要救多d人,救得愈多愈好' W" \7 g4 f4 n8 _. a1 V0 M
於是好像好順理成章要讓火車轉往停用的鐵軌,等多d小朋友逃生  L0 h5 X$ e0 y3 D( |
但是諗深一層,咁樣真係好像唔係好o岩  r# `% U" |$ Y9 d& i
好像crap兄講一樣,停用軌玩的小孩, 因他始終才是守規則的人, 他可沒有預料過會有危險,點解要犧牲一個守規矩的小朋友,去換取其他唔守規矩的小朋友的性命呢# r2 Q* }# c. x) C) `* e6 U
其實到底人數的多與少值唔值得去考慮呢
1 z* ^3 [7 e. o
7 _  W$ b: i% S% O我估如果我有時間去想清楚的話,我都係會救係停用路軌玩的小孩,我都認為冇理由要犧牲守規矩的小朋友,去換取其他唔守規矩的小朋友的性命8 B, S1 x7 {/ W2 J$ V" ]/ E
不過,係千鈞一髮的時間要我去做抉擇的話,可能我應該會被表面上的人數的多與少去蒙蔽咗,而且眼前真係有一班小朋友,不過的確又好像maxfigo講話明係停用...咁條鐵軌一定有d問題ga la...如果轉左去好易累死果班乘客 !!,可能我係會其實為咗少數唔守規矩的小朋友,犧牲咗更多無辜的火車乘客

crap

Originally posted by srfqt1 at 2005-4-27 05:44 PM:
0 ]" {- ]$ F2 S! |. M  D; m其實我最初係即刻諗要救多d人,救得愈多 ...

4 Z+ e# W( ]8 A" ^; f9 v2 O% P6 [
7 u) \% ]7 D- `2 e9 C" I5 G
haha, srfqt1兄, 我們終能於球場外達成一致的睇法, 哈, 相當有趣
0 K4 ~6 z: f$ M9 r- |0 u1 m你所說的也對, 下意識的確會選擇救人多的一方, 當時根本沒辦法分清誰對誰錯, 只好靠本能做決定..其他的要看天意了....
0 l, P0 E  V" h7 w% K+ R5 [/ b" y  y9 J  @
p.s. 小弟昨天在你於好文區發表的文章下留了言, srfqt1兄你有看到嗎

jason williams

i think i will help those children instead of that child
: X+ U" H0 r9 W% r/ M* [yes, my reason is helping more
9 [4 d1 w4 `9 k% Z% \/ J1 |for this sudden and short period, i dun think i can have so much time to think the background!5 r7 y. \4 s& O
if saying that child obey the rule but others are not, i think this is not a very good reason to help that child
' i, s. C8 j" G+ B* ubecause no matter the rail is using or not, i think also no gd to play in that place, right?* d6 [1 S, L  ?
also i think the question hasn't tell us the background, none  know that child is obeyin the rule so that he play at the rail which is not using!!!) r2 [& ^% Q: O) V$ s2 {: H
may be other reasons so that he play himself at there, such as, he is a bad guy that none like to play with him, or all children also dunno which is using and which is not using!
  z" `& e$ R8 n6 W9 A- M0 Lunder so much confusing on the background, i would choose help more than less, just a normal think during this short urgetn period!!!

sfxc0000

作為一個人類~~2 i! c% d  ^# t% X5 p8 I# |
當我見到呢D咁危急o既事情~~
1 @  m* ^$ t* y) @$ H我冇可能可以好理性去諗個後果~~' s0 j8 z3 Q! `) ^" L
正常黎講一定係以人數為先~~% p! ~+ K, ?3 P
即係我會救個一班唔守規矩o既細路而犧牲o個位守規矩o既細路~~0 }4 j- ^0 Y, a# l. Z1 v
我只有o係事件過後先可以好似Crap同srfqt1好理性咁去分析輕重, 對錯~~3 ^+ S8 t0 f3 u/ `
但如果o係當時o既情況中~~$ K- Z+ ^3 f. O
我只有犧牲一位細路的性命稷換取一班細路的性命

中華卡樂ｂ

我諗我不會搞到火車轉往停用的鐵軌，因為咁樣會搞到火車乘客犧牲，而且果個守規矩既細路冇理由要佢犧牲的！而且我睇到火車黎中，我會用我既本能去救果一班唔守規矩既壞細路，雖然我明白到一定會有人死，可能我自己都會死，但我咁做一定唔會後悔，減少犧牲的人數，而且可以令一班唔守規矩而且死唔去既壞細路知道錯誤！（個人意見）