Chingy

Originally posted by crap at 2005-4-27 01:20 AM:
& J: D8 ?; z. y; \' D5 M, e% i" L- M: ~, G# c6 w  [) G. }

4 g" C: q& d; Z' u' V8 P我都覺得錯不在他們, 是他們的父母 ...

/ q- z% z" w5 N- d, J. ?
" ?3 m3 H8 k, w  R, U) s# z9 ~
In Spider-Man 2.Spider man did stop a train

crap

Originally posted by Chingy at 2005-4-27 07:12 AM:
0 K$ D3 J( W. O; l' q# W( Z- d9 {6 |  _( t) I' P* C

. a( w5 w. x# P6 E. cIn Spider-Man 2.Spider man did stop a train

- s. O% U# S) U, V. U/ @

* W# s' y% J4 Y: f- D( p, ^oh really...
4 I" s2 [; j% P' _5 n+ L: I: Lhahhaa, thx a lot^^"
7 I: C2 J4 Z0 W( U8 U5 ai didn't watch ch.2

springspring

挺出名，在偶理學的問題1 e/ ~7 ^5 [2 Z3 |
  N$ `  ~! X$ W7 ^% r  |4 l
當然這是個假設性問題
' M6 X9 A% v( W但將人數倍大
* c: e- H# @+ }9 \$ N: B例如是十個一個，到一百個一個，到一千個一個
% X$ w! A, u0 T& f0 Z+ g(情況可以換作其他)
: |3 y9 Z/ k6 B* d3 {* O+ z, l9 r6 Z始終有條界線

easonwing

絕情谷既問題...
) }, t1 ]6 j+ W- B+ p) n如果一個人個邊係我親人,我會好自私咁求佢...# m3 U, V9 b! f; u0 R" O  C
如果唔係親人,我會殺人警百...

easonwing

Originally posted by easonwing at 2005-4-27 12:12 PM:- t  {- t' H( _7 S
絕情谷既問題...
/ R6 R* ^/ u1 Y* g如果一個人個邊係我親人,我會好自私咁求佢...
- I" z$ v. P# C; Q+ {如果唔係親人,我會殺人警百...

5 w# r- f+ w# Y1 F/ @殺一警百...

srfqt1

其實我最初係即刻諗要救多d人,救得愈多愈好: ?* T0 B0 v6 E
於是好像好順理成章要讓火車轉往停用的鐵軌,等多d小朋友逃生
2 L8 M2 R6 v5 T( Q% ?4 y但是諗深一層,咁樣真係好像唔係好o岩
7 ~- f$ k2 @3 f  c. J好像crap兄講一樣,停用軌玩的小孩, 因他始終才是守規則的人, 他可沒有預料過會有危險,點解要犧牲一個守規矩的小朋友,去換取其他唔守規矩的小朋友的性命呢0 n5 w1 b6 u5 Z
其實到底人數的多與少值唔值得去考慮呢0 C* W7 t6 G: q6 _

+ R! C- g6 j* L, D我估如果我有時間去想清楚的話,我都係會救係停用路軌玩的小孩,我都認為冇理由要犧牲守規矩的小朋友,去換取其他唔守規矩的小朋友的性命( z& I( p# C- c8 Z! _2 X# h
不過,係千鈞一髮的時間要我去做抉擇的話,可能我應該會被表面上的人數的多與少去蒙蔽咗,而且眼前真係有一班小朋友,不過的確又好像maxfigo講話明係停用...咁條鐵軌一定有d問題ga la...如果轉左去好易累死果班乘客 !!,可能我係會其實為咗少數唔守規矩的小朋友,犧牲咗更多無辜的火車乘客

crap

Originally posted by srfqt1 at 2005-4-27 05:44 PM:
& m1 B) i+ [( x1 I$ y2 ?0 I其實我最初係即刻諗要救多d人,救得愈多 ...

: X" f. `; V3 @% C- K
' b& E! R: p( F" Shaha, srfqt1兄, 我們終能於球場外達成一致的睇法, 哈, 相當有趣# ?( O: u% b) T$ b- I; P! G" v
你所說的也對, 下意識的確會選擇救人多的一方, 當時根本沒辦法分清誰對誰錯, 只好靠本能做決定..其他的要看天意了....
! M6 k7 Z! E6 h) v9 t3 u8 W/ F4 l2 @6 Y4 X3 U, I, L
p.s. 小弟昨天在你於好文區發表的文章下留了言, srfqt1兄你有看到嗎

jason williams

i think i will help those children instead of that child
' v7 u) i  i$ K' [" [" ]" byes, my reason is helping more# p& u3 H  Z) V0 f2 N, [
for this sudden and short period, i dun think i can have so much time to think the background!5 K7 h) s, l. [# B( |. P" X! f
if saying that child obey the rule but others are not, i think this is not a very good reason to help that child
% U3 i+ u- X/ d! u8 T9 ^4 Y# u4 N( {because no matter the rail is using or not, i think also no gd to play in that place, right?; Z, H* {6 P1 ]. F
also i think the question hasn't tell us the background, none  know that child is obeyin the rule so that he play at the rail which is not using!!!5 y4 T5 f/ T7 h& _
may be other reasons so that he play himself at there, such as, he is a bad guy that none like to play with him, or all children also dunno which is using and which is not using!( ~7 C/ Y6 A  u& Y# }  b
under so much confusing on the background, i would choose help more than less, just a normal think during this short urgetn period!!!

sfxc0000

作為一個人類~~2 ?7 T) ^' N! p  p
當我見到呢D咁危急o既事情~~
# m/ E! ^( i4 q4 X  K( F, M我冇可能可以好理性去諗個後果~~
0 k& s6 y/ `& @* V- K* I正常黎講一定係以人數為先~~
7 C6 |7 g3 G4 ?- ~4 n即係我會救個一班唔守規矩o既細路而犧牲o個位守規矩o既細路~~$ K$ ]# P; h4 I& B2 T  |
我只有o係事件過後先可以好似Crap同srfqt1好理性咁去分析輕重, 對錯~~5 Q: A) R6 G$ }& u/ z  `/ ~; j  d
但如果o係當時o既情況中~~+ g2 c# w" U+ v
我只有犧牲一位細路的性命稷換取一班細路的性命

中華卡樂ｂ

我諗我不會搞到火車轉往停用的鐵軌，因為咁樣會搞到火車乘客犧牲，而且果個守規矩既細路冇理由要佢犧牲的！而且我睇到火車黎中，我會用我既本能去救果一班唔守規矩既壞細路，雖然我明白到一定會有人死，可能我自己都會死，但我咁做一定唔會後悔，減少犧牲的人數，而且可以令一班唔守規矩而且死唔去既壞細路知道錯誤！（個人意見）