Chingy

Originally posted by crap at 2005-4-27 01:20 AM:  {1 v0 V) z6 m, F

6 j" S, g5 N2 T2 |) M, W. {
  f, R+ L% |& x& k! j7 k我都覺得錯不在他們, 是他們的父母 ...

* k+ }/ b% K! a2 f* O: N3 b" N

  S0 S, {  H3 y( W% q$ CIn Spider-Man 2.Spider man did stop a train

crap

Originally posted by Chingy at 2005-4-27 07:12 AM:
2 f) p7 `: A0 d' \
4 ~& S9 B" _+ R# t( o" v6 Z: ?1 c* D  u7 A' _: a4 N
In Spider-Man 2.Spider man did stop a train

2 ]& c' E1 `% C6 J3 n8 k- R$ \, |
oh really...2 p0 M% V# o; V/ v) `- [
hahhaa, thx a lot^^"* P4 h/ T8 e0 m2 U
i didn't watch ch.2

springspring

挺出名，在偶理學的問題* n0 I# g% L$ K* n- n) `. ~3 |
3 z* @: G, k1 {" {" F" f
當然這是個假設性問題
! j$ r# D- `+ }但將人數倍大
+ G6 e& r0 J4 \! n例如是十個一個，到一百個一個，到一千個一個
- m* {1 I2 u! I0 M& ~& O(情況可以換作其他)
# R$ v- c. Z6 R: B始終有條界線

easonwing

絕情谷既問題...
& O1 @. g' @& l1 ]2 q如果一個人個邊係我親人,我會好自私咁求佢...; W9 C) `: w6 ?
如果唔係親人,我會殺人警百...

easonwing

Originally posted by easonwing at 2005-4-27 12:12 PM:9 K4 ]! G. y  G0 p  \9 {9 H
絕情谷既問題...8 h& W" A- Q8 j& ^. P: e
如果一個人個邊係我親人,我會好自私咁求佢...- r# k/ ^" f, a0 Y( I9 \: x  z" Y5 I$ U
如果唔係親人,我會殺人警百...

4 w( p0 B' z4 z- ?
殺一警百...

srfqt1

其實我最初係即刻諗要救多d人,救得愈多愈好
% F. C9 l: P+ y/ F( w, ^0 G於是好像好順理成章要讓火車轉往停用的鐵軌,等多d小朋友逃生
" f, B& j8 F) q3 y$ J# i但是諗深一層,咁樣真係好像唔係好o岩$ ?& L' {; [1 _" Q1 U
好像crap兄講一樣,停用軌玩的小孩, 因他始終才是守規則的人, 他可沒有預料過會有危險,點解要犧牲一個守規矩的小朋友,去換取其他唔守規矩的小朋友的性命呢
" u$ E: m/ L, ^- J- |" c; S  I其實到底人數的多與少值唔值得去考慮呢
3 r5 G2 [& M- d9 W# _4 b! i% B2 i. G4 `2 D% m  F
我估如果我有時間去想清楚的話,我都係會救係停用路軌玩的小孩,我都認為冇理由要犧牲守規矩的小朋友,去換取其他唔守規矩的小朋友的性命0 L9 `+ G. x9 h# {0 `
不過,係千鈞一髮的時間要我去做抉擇的話,可能我應該會被表面上的人數的多與少去蒙蔽咗,而且眼前真係有一班小朋友,不過的確又好像maxfigo講話明係停用...咁條鐵軌一定有d問題ga la...如果轉左去好易累死果班乘客 !!,可能我係會其實為咗少數唔守規矩的小朋友,犧牲咗更多無辜的火車乘客

crap

Originally posted by srfqt1 at 2005-4-27 05:44 PM:
8 u- P7 b( D* I' `6 o$ A其實我最初係即刻諗要救多d人,救得愈多 ...

8 A/ H: J+ j9 Y3 M* Q$ e

0 l* E4 N8 ^/ e, q& g1 k' bhaha, srfqt1兄, 我們終能於球場外達成一致的睇法, 哈, 相當有趣! B! {% n5 k8 U: J1 s
你所說的也對, 下意識的確會選擇救人多的一方, 當時根本沒辦法分清誰對誰錯, 只好靠本能做決定..其他的要看天意了....
. p# e/ Y/ H% n8 I
9 X, |, n- P. b  I! P0 kp.s. 小弟昨天在你於好文區發表的文章下留了言, srfqt1兄你有看到嗎

jason williams

i think i will help those children instead of that child
' R0 B, ?7 e! l  I# A* fyes, my reason is helping more
- K" p: E% ]0 |/ |( Gfor this sudden and short period, i dun think i can have so much time to think the background!! G3 y2 }2 `( H$ {$ C
if saying that child obey the rule but others are not, i think this is not a very good reason to help that child1 k( h4 C: m5 T
because no matter the rail is using or not, i think also no gd to play in that place, right?2 B* e9 a) h; ^
also i think the question hasn't tell us the background, none  know that child is obeyin the rule so that he play at the rail which is not using!!!
' B6 M) T% _/ g% _5 jmay be other reasons so that he play himself at there, such as, he is a bad guy that none like to play with him, or all children also dunno which is using and which is not using!2 E% [  d% h' w& H
under so much confusing on the background, i would choose help more than less, just a normal think during this short urgetn period!!!

sfxc0000

作為一個人類~~: V; u+ y6 \" r9 w
當我見到呢D咁危急o既事情~~
' i) x1 S6 N$ }( _" d( F我冇可能可以好理性去諗個後果~~- e2 j3 F# V' k
正常黎講一定係以人數為先~~
0 G( E  u: [  N5 B1 s8 t8 L即係我會救個一班唔守規矩o既細路而犧牲o個位守規矩o既細路~~  y( ]! `: F$ \1 B+ u2 |4 ~) K
我只有o係事件過後先可以好似Crap同srfqt1好理性咁去分析輕重, 對錯~~
" ?0 X- s+ T* i) {# T# s' e$ S但如果o係當時o既情況中~~
% _* t" s$ ?8 f+ F- p我只有犧牲一位細路的性命稷換取一班細路的性命

中華卡樂ｂ

我諗我不會搞到火車轉往停用的鐵軌，因為咁樣會搞到火車乘客犧牲，而且果個守規矩既細路冇理由要佢犧牲的！而且我睇到火車黎中，我會用我既本能去救果一班唔守規矩既壞細路，雖然我明白到一定會有人死，可能我自己都會死，但我咁做一定唔會後悔，減少犧牲的人數，而且可以令一班唔守規矩而且死唔去既壞細路知道錯誤！（個人意見）