Rika

由最好排到最壞
$ E/ G5 c7 O4 l6 v8 @. NF, He/She told a friend the turth. Nothing wrong( d6 O, A$ O0 o, q
B, He is just a business man, he works for money. He doesn't have the responsibility to help L or give her discount
1 P" s+ E# d% ~* PS, He just pay for what he wants, he just gives offer. He doesn't force her
' Q$ `+ q) v; O: V, BM, He cannot accept L had sex with other men. This is alright. he hurts too. But he should think about why L had sex. The purpose was pure* ^) L$ m* n- X- w. n
L, I think there must other way she can find to earn $20 for the transportation fee. She is pure but a bit stupid

左輪仔

最高就代表我最唔LIKE既人物:
& n8 m6 \8 D& {: K& y1 D0 H3 n9 Y  W5 G, k" k+ H$ f+ `# w2 v: z' }+ U
M - 點解佢唔搵條女先,要條女陪人一夜再過河搵佢,自己唔要錢過去,枉係男人/ H) ?+ o- b  b8 l+ @

$ E) ]) l* J$ d4 QS - 我最唔鍾意呢D男人,呃女人一夜,仲要0趙完唱喎,(唔係F點會知呢件事)
& a* P" w/ o# }6 v1 _     比我一定唔會做,正禽獸!!!
& w2 W3 n* [' W9 P+ H
+ d8 v6 c) I: {" QB - 呢D冇良船主,知道左件事就坐地起價,為左錢咩都咁做. C- o2 K" C/ P

, ^0 i6 H  A( ^4 M1 Z4 v- q& zL - 雖然佢咁做係為左同個男既一齊,但係為左咁而出賣色相,唔理志5 A7 `; f; q- w% V' j2 Y+ F# C+ H) F+ K+ ?

8 L# a( Q, A  m9 ?6 aF - 佢忠於朋友係一件好事,但有時D野,都要睇下環境可唔可以講嫁,
% O/ U  l$ G+ J     正所謂"寧教人打仔,莫教人比妻"嘛,績下口得好
& L+ o6 [2 Z: P5 Q6 N6 g. V- f
% Q" c8 |, j) b0 L  S! }  O[ Last edited by 左輪仔 on 2005-4-25 at 01:17 AM ]

代仔

我以前都好似睇過.但唔記得個答案2 T$ j$ @% B& I3 n* @# H
而家答多次( {( n/ I% ]/ D; @" K
f: 因為佢只係張佢所知既事講比朋友聽9 H! p* K9 s9 l0 }
l: 為左見佢既既愛人, 肯跟一個唔識既人一齊過夜, 不過我唔讚成咁做架
* y+ r! N' j& H6 p* Ab: 坐地起價.明知人地無錢
- [! k7 M+ M9 T6 Bs: 衰人一個, 明知人地等錢洗. 雖然係你情我願.$ s# F; |2 |( ]5 H
m: 最衰既人, 條女以經唔好過架啦, 知道之後.重走人同人分手添

hk853

L>F>M>B>S
, P+ }) X5 P9 z$ d* Q1 u
; M" D' v' x7 `4 V3 mL為左同心愛既人一齊,甘願犧出賣自己肉體,好偉大7 q5 {8 F: m1 n' c
F排第二因為佢同M講都係純粹為朋友,唔係有心拆散M同L,因為決定權係M度
1 Y+ G4 h& w! p2 s+ H9 g" f4 JM冇原諒L為左佢而犧牲色相,但都尚可以原諒& m, h1 Z; [/ D4 g
S乘人之危,最壞,明知L有心上人,都要用佢肉體換金錢
" ]  r: J% E! oB都係乘人之危,但商業社會係咁,所以算比S好

JCer

最壞  F>S>M>L>B 唔壞
" Q1 A% e+ g6 G+ v' q, ^: RF: 如果佢唔講,物事都無, 佢應該學下"善良的沉默"' }* Q% `: W3 }8 G" T6 F
S: 如果係鍾意一個人, 唔應該承人之危, 學下明正言順地去爭取
& Z2 M+ e6 c+ `" q+ m' HM: 不明白L的負出, 自私的想法
) f9 G, h! f7 J" t: C8 J! O# J7 xL: 太愛一個人, 愛得太傻, 無理後果
% M7 j% \% ~% P% DB: 有危險的工作, 收多D $ ,人之常情/ r) W' m( Z2 J$ D4 |- B

: [3 m" D6 Y: f% d/ z  ]) s0 w9 O世上無絕對的正確, 也沒有絕對的錯誤

angellyz

最唔可以接受 S, then B, then M, L and last F.

tai1980

Originally posted by Asurada129 at 2005-4-24 11:24 PM:& f% ]! Q- C8 D
L = 為左自己鍾意既人寧願犠牲自己# w" g$ X+ E- E3 T: I: p+ C1 B
B = 一個為金錢暴利既船夫, 正常生意人都係甘
$ Q( V% W+ V  ^* GS = 知道有人需要錢度河, 開出不道德條件
" h0 E+ w- L2 V. e4 a& h5 D5 {F = 不理後果告知當事人, (估算係情敵)....拆散對方2 {! K3 D/ o( }; b
M = 不知愛人為佢犠牲, 反而知道真相不理女方委屈...仲拋棄佢

7 Y5 u# W1 I. i3 E

4 f' N; a6 D" m same choices with u , but want to add some comments
: h1 t" t  W8 _8 X% e( `
# V- W3 x3 s0 s; fB : not agree with u on this comment , cos he is at the shore of the woman (有一天, 在女人的這一岸, 有個船夫), so he has no way to know that the woman is in-love with the man across the river  
2 G7 O4 X  Y8 _9 Z& i, q4 G3 u
, u' s  F3 j$ ], p; j: N8 oS : there is ""no-free-lunch"" in this world , if u want something then u have to give-up something so this is a legal transaction ( the woman has the right to refuse ) ,and he is not that bad cos he fulfill their agreement in the end (  女人答應了, 她拿到錢後就由船夫載她過河 )
: L8 ~3 A5 K$ l5 _0 D* M' Q0 {* r8 L( w3 m- N2 F3 m% A, I& h( `* u9 @
F : if this guy has a brain , then he should know the outcome : @& o/ \4 u( L
0 m5 I4 i* Z0 T2 Z
M : in the present-day this guy is call an asshole ( no need to explain further more ), but this story took place in the past time ( 從前有個男人和女人 ) so they should not be that open minded but it also said that they love each othe ( 非常相愛 ) , so......) F$ {5 \1 W6 r+ W
$ |6 J4 D* }  t4 D5 s  I1 |
[ Last edited by tai1980 on 2005-4-25 at 01:58 AM ]

waterfire

大概可以講....錯ge
  L3 l/ }2 G5 q7 bM, L 都係為左想見佢, 而犧牲左自己ge 肉體, M點解唔可以體諒下佢
% s# P: X+ V' @" C5 G2 dL, 為左想見M, 而唔考慮下件事如果穿左會點
; G  O" n% a- kF, 有時唔係樣樣野都講到咁明ga ma! W1 G0 y9 D# d

2 d, F( {2 S: g5 D$ C- ^/ d最錯就係, 點解F 唔叫L 同佢過一晚, 就唔會講俾M 聽....
9 S) C+ n" a2 A  [  @' \9 c- ^有女唔食, 最大惡極!!

hiroraymond

好似好有趣咁，
8 }& ?/ Q  X9 F5 @% |由最好開始排起既話，
  P! o) x; G" o5 |/ u+ P* `L B M F S 啦，
3 s" @7 u% e; O
  m' B: t6 A' ]1 Q' R其實不少人都會話肯為自己鐘意既人就算要埋自己條命都得，0 D+ r( i6 V4 Z/ b4 t3 u
但當真係需要既時候，又有幾多個會呢？- c' C( j  t+ J
如果覺得自己真係做得到既，又點會唔明 L 有幾鐘意 M 呢？
( w% S* f! y$ M$ d又點會唔諒解 L 會咁樣做呢。
3 ]5 Z+ _+ I/ G8 o
: f4 T* q. D! p% i3 M2 m3 x# Q5 y" ]! M而 B 都只不過係做生意，同 L 做個交易，# O# w+ ]! S+ A4 u
所謂現實世界中既商人 ( 傷人 )，
! ]4 w" g& w/ t' R明知你咁想過去緊係開高價啦。3 `# ~" n0 M# n( I9 Y0 D
$ T2 L. j. e: e5 ~( ]
而由第三個開始我就覺得係壞，9 {3 X1 o" F/ e- x
M 唔能夠體諒到 L 背叛佢既原因，
! a9 y$ o' t7 c6 ?: g+ f亦從未為令雙方可以重逢呢件事上作出任何貢獻，1 d- W) N" `: g
知道一切後更即刻放棄一個甘為自己犠牲一切既人，
' ~: @. W3 e7 l& l M 都可算壞了。- E6 n; L& q/ M, T  D' d. C7 M

2 G* z& q& Z; b  [ F 呢個人仲掂，
5 j( a; W" G1 y" K知道既唔等於要講，
4 V. W1 j; A- `& @2 u  k0 Z如果呢件事發生係自己身上，3 k& Y1 e4 ~( a- {9 _
我諗會即刻毒啞 F 呢條友。- w- J# n9 J1 ~
7 h- W& R1 h# n2 n2 T( {# G) F
最衰個個緊係 S 啦，! D# b3 `: h1 Z! D; W* v; ~: A3 Y
始終都係討厭提出不道德交易的人。: _* Z7 j) w3 V0 k, a- T
* Q) x7 d' Z+ R2 p
& a5 v: D9 r1 d$ z  l% D& u, ]6 g
5 Z7 _- J- v0 Y& a* Z
題外話：8 A0 \+ @& G* m. V* b
唔知點解睇呢個故事個陣，
& q. E! _& B  G% C( r! D$ R睇到 S 呢條友，/ o$ }- N( y7 V% k) B- M
我就即刻諗起英皇老細。

newman2005

由壞至好: S<F<M<B<L
, [0 J. a0 n" B3 n
- N; a/ a) Y' `4 [. @1 qS: 看中別人的弱點而作出不道德的交易去滿足自己私慾, 最賤格!
( \& k$ g6 T3 F6 O+ zF: 不顧後果爆響口, 影響L和M的關係5 \" g3 l# w9 z
M: 沒有理解L所作的事背後真正原因而拋棄她
- y' u+ i! x" fB: 坐地起價想得到金錢上的利益 .... 但不是對別人造成傷害/ v; N. `' ?& M! {6 m7 P' I- e4 F
L: 寧願犧牲卻換來分手收場...