Rika

由最好排到最壞
( L2 z# f: V, \: |' e" Z1 A. tF, He/She told a friend the turth. Nothing wrong
2 }0 @' q* k8 D! A! g* pB, He is just a business man, he works for money. He doesn't have the responsibility to help L or give her discount3 R1 B) X& l/ v8 w& i' g" T
S, He just pay for what he wants, he just gives offer. He doesn't force her
7 ^! g9 A" b4 [$ w7 S# w) pM, He cannot accept L had sex with other men. This is alright. he hurts too. But he should think about why L had sex. The purpose was pure. N' N2 ]( d& S- p9 _" |1 A
L, I think there must other way she can find to earn $20 for the transportation fee. She is pure but a bit stupid

左輪仔

最高就代表我最唔LIKE既人物:) x* ], p/ M* w$ D, L
( m' i! A2 m- u( h5 w: U' p
M - 點解佢唔搵條女先,要條女陪人一夜再過河搵佢,自己唔要錢過去,枉係男人; S- F  C! F3 d9 L( _

& s7 T' c# b0 D- SS - 我最唔鍾意呢D男人,呃女人一夜,仲要0趙完唱喎,(唔係F點會知呢件事)
% B/ E; P( z8 ~( I7 S     比我一定唔會做,正禽獸!!!5 c& m5 I# [1 K; F/ v7 {9 u7 B
. h, ?& }/ X: T% C
B - 呢D冇良船主,知道左件事就坐地起價,為左錢咩都咁做
. D! m: I8 D$ M( @9 Y' z2 J" @
& V% R# R4 [" O+ _: |; X" aL - 雖然佢咁做係為左同個男既一齊,但係為左咁而出賣色相,唔理志
* Q+ s4 ?# w2 M( G* p6 S; _
, g; v  M( f' ^( Q+ M2 m0 tF - 佢忠於朋友係一件好事,但有時D野,都要睇下環境可唔可以講嫁,
( p% q* o& e2 {7 _     正所謂"寧教人打仔,莫教人比妻"嘛,績下口得好
! g$ _8 f# B4 ^
5 L* R9 k* f6 M7 G2 o[ Last edited by 左輪仔 on 2005-4-25 at 01:17 AM ]

代仔

我以前都好似睇過.但唔記得個答案
& I* k5 ]* ]; ]) U8 T) N# C而家答多次
( f& M2 S( H- y& Mf: 因為佢只係張佢所知既事講比朋友聽- p5 n8 P2 ?+ b& a2 H
l: 為左見佢既既愛人, 肯跟一個唔識既人一齊過夜, 不過我唔讚成咁做架! C0 y. ?3 E/ H% l
b: 坐地起價.明知人地無錢
5 S/ ]$ m; I' a& `6 W1 Cs: 衰人一個, 明知人地等錢洗. 雖然係你情我願.. ^0 H' a2 ?$ }
m: 最衰既人, 條女以經唔好過架啦, 知道之後.重走人同人分手添

hk853

L>F>M>B>S8 W! Y8 X$ C9 U
1 B8 K( F1 y2 M6 V- s$ V
L為左同心愛既人一齊,甘願犧出賣自己肉體,好偉大# _, l6 V+ d# G: i$ J$ T& z
F排第二因為佢同M講都係純粹為朋友,唔係有心拆散M同L,因為決定權係M度
5 U2 ]& m7 W+ y1 j" HM冇原諒L為左佢而犧牲色相,但都尚可以原諒2 C  b6 M# o6 W* Y* D, p0 C2 A
S乘人之危,最壞,明知L有心上人,都要用佢肉體換金錢  h- L" ?; m2 i, k  z7 h
B都係乘人之危,但商業社會係咁,所以算比S好

JCer

最壞  F>S>M>L>B 唔壞
" i$ S2 H# D% ~8 bF: 如果佢唔講,物事都無, 佢應該學下"善良的沉默"
) G3 @* W$ K) Q. F7 U. dS: 如果係鍾意一個人, 唔應該承人之危, 學下明正言順地去爭取2 y5 b# x0 r  H  S4 a/ G1 k
M: 不明白L的負出, 自私的想法5 q1 _) z- p2 v# K- X$ W3 a
L: 太愛一個人, 愛得太傻, 無理後果
7 r3 _$ ]$ v* g+ h; O8 DB: 有危險的工作, 收多D $ ,人之常情
8 G& h# m: D# a: {' \' F2 p
, ^6 c2 y7 k3 k; v( K8 L6 N# D" b) D世上無絕對的正確, 也沒有絕對的錯誤

angellyz

最唔可以接受 S, then B, then M, L and last F.

tai1980

Originally posted by Asurada129 at 2005-4-24 11:24 PM:! ^# N9 a5 ?; P2 a; _
L = 為左自己鍾意既人寧願犠牲自己& |( u8 Y$ o7 E+ P& m) ^9 _
B = 一個為金錢暴利既船夫, 正常生意人都係甘% E6 e' u: k+ T) N4 l/ X+ M0 U8 x& G
S = 知道有人需要錢度河, 開出不道德條件7 `' z& L: S+ f& C7 H/ F  H" A# Z
F = 不理後果告知當事人, (估算係情敵)....拆散對方
- h! _, h: ^) h* F4 N! nM = 不知愛人為佢犠牲, 反而知道真相不理女方委屈...仲拋棄佢

2 [& m# P/ \" u1 k! v0 i
% Y6 }2 q6 A* z' P! P/ E same choices with u , but want to add some comments 4 z' N: p# I8 U" j7 t0 W7 V

2 u0 \) P9 Q, o+ s# ^* dB : not agree with u on this comment , cos he is at the shore of the woman (有一天, 在女人的這一岸, 有個船夫), so he has no way to know that the woman is in-love with the man across the river  $ |* |3 O. R9 e9 k5 A
( |" J2 U6 G9 \  a' V
S : there is ""no-free-lunch"" in this world , if u want something then u have to give-up something so this is a legal transaction ( the woman has the right to refuse ) ,and he is not that bad cos he fulfill their agreement in the end (  女人答應了, 她拿到錢後就由船夫載她過河 )
' j  A' }/ C1 c! }
- r9 V3 ]1 c# h# F% l7 GF : if this guy has a brain , then he should know the outcome   b, U) R/ O& ]
4 u: l# a- a- w# o
M : in the present-day this guy is call an asshole ( no need to explain further more ), but this story took place in the past time ( 從前有個男人和女人 ) so they should not be that open minded but it also said that they love each othe ( 非常相愛 ) , so......
% Y/ x; q5 E' }% J0 I# j; I/ y1 u6 x* P/ t4 G
[ Last edited by tai1980 on 2005-4-25 at 01:58 AM ]

waterfire

大概可以講....錯ge/ ^) t* t* R# B/ f
M, L 都係為左想見佢, 而犧牲左自己ge 肉體, M點解唔可以體諒下佢
" ^6 W3 x& x" K% ]9 A& F% `0 x2 rL, 為左想見M, 而唔考慮下件事如果穿左會點; ^) e, D/ m/ y9 h# l
F, 有時唔係樣樣野都講到咁明ga ma$ y' {% P2 P9 u( S( }) X& Z% h" d4 n
  o' o" d5 c5 i3 ?. ]- x& g
最錯就係, 點解F 唔叫L 同佢過一晚, 就唔會講俾M 聽....
/ z' {; C; q2 f  K& E有女唔食, 最大惡極!!

hiroraymond

好似好有趣咁，- S' u, U4 n4 \- W% S5 E9 d
由最好開始排起既話，& A4 n8 H2 n: R6 {( u( b( |6 E  J
L B M F S 啦，
6 J: n- c9 K4 S7 V/ ?' |0 d( L' v" c, c5 h: D# n
其實不少人都會話肯為自己鐘意既人就算要埋自己條命都得，
! X/ c0 Y  F$ a- s) t- M但當真係需要既時候，又有幾多個會呢？2 Y" \% t$ \6 ]2 ~5 r" p& y
如果覺得自己真係做得到既，又點會唔明 L 有幾鐘意 M 呢？* E& F6 y, |; }% Z
又點會唔諒解 L 會咁樣做呢。5 Q0 v, F& H: Z
0 \5 H1 l) R5 y$ G
而 B 都只不過係做生意，同 L 做個交易，$ U2 w, |" X) g, ^9 }# n+ X
所謂現實世界中既商人 ( 傷人 )，
8 t! r) z; B5 y6 n" T明知你咁想過去緊係開高價啦。
. K! F, F" {+ }- \( s- ?5 }7 b! Q: u: c
而由第三個開始我就覺得係壞，! G* h; \: B1 {4 j3 R3 f
M 唔能夠體諒到 L 背叛佢既原因，& @9 _4 T. O! M( T( E; H
亦從未為令雙方可以重逢呢件事上作出任何貢獻，( |0 d  o, V6 o
知道一切後更即刻放棄一個甘為自己犠牲一切既人，/ C; y# G3 e  x" h/ u
M 都可算壞了。* |- @: B, d# v

3 h0 O9 q! u/ G7 ` F 呢個人仲掂，+ N" e4 U# k& R1 p) @( h
知道既唔等於要講，$ b' h& Y3 |% {% P
如果呢件事發生係自己身上，
" G5 o6 [/ @( Y( [7 e我諗會即刻毒啞 F 呢條友。
) `5 g7 {' ~! q$ L! e) v; f# H$ B7 k9 x0 ?- o& K& O3 g
最衰個個緊係 S 啦，
* X0 M' r, C9 ^( W始終都係討厭提出不道德交易的人。; |4 U% j" }" c! L

. Q, D0 H! f  s" {4 l6 y
4 A/ }1 \7 k1 k+ r2 V6 w; R- p5 G' `2 @+ i# Z9 C  A4 V* h
題外話：$ R' D$ y$ o! v& F2 n7 u2 P
唔知點解睇呢個故事個陣，% B4 X. B4 U* [' I
睇到 S 呢條友，* `# s" X% ^. k9 F" Q9 j
我就即刻諗起英皇老細。

newman2005

由壞至好: S<F<M<B<L
$ F* N* S/ o+ W. h" B8 W! K, g% b1 q" i2 P2 b: a+ s
S: 看中別人的弱點而作出不道德的交易去滿足自己私慾, 最賤格!
# K* e/ s; o% j8 @' j5 w; F/ uF: 不顧後果爆響口, 影響L和M的關係
6 E1 l& w) y( ]( J, yM: 沒有理解L所作的事背後真正原因而拋棄她) ]# ~1 }- H0 R
B: 坐地起價想得到金錢上的利益 .... 但不是對別人造成傷害
8 t4 [# Y3 ^$ q, }" n  h. PL: 寧願犧牲卻換來分手收場...