Rika

由最好排到最壞
" ?) b) @' @' V3 V5 Q1 C* VF, He/She told a friend the turth. Nothing wrong7 M+ p: o; G3 _- u
B, He is just a business man, he works for money. He doesn't have the responsibility to help L or give her discount. X! v9 X* e& E) v
S, He just pay for what he wants, he just gives offer. He doesn't force her" ^! p, \; a/ Q9 b7 X. |9 u9 a6 n& d
M, He cannot accept L had sex with other men. This is alright. he hurts too. But he should think about why L had sex. The purpose was pure  a8 o5 G5 ]1 B( S1 Y& j) v9 R% k
L, I think there must other way she can find to earn $20 for the transportation fee. She is pure but a bit stupid

左輪仔

最高就代表我最唔LIKE既人物:3 Q9 D* l/ X, u) C2 f3 o6 ?2 y
9 |2 R" @$ [+ a2 J' I4 Q
M - 點解佢唔搵條女先,要條女陪人一夜再過河搵佢,自己唔要錢過去,枉係男人
+ {# X$ M- i6 n! r' b) \" s
7 n* g$ E( J4 T; T0 U- O  R6 \! TS - 我最唔鍾意呢D男人,呃女人一夜,仲要0趙完唱喎,(唔係F點會知呢件事)7 t5 x- }2 H7 O3 C: \. _" Z+ W
     比我一定唔會做,正禽獸!!!) b5 w2 Z6 W0 b' g" u3 X4 U+ U$ x% p

# C2 u4 M4 f- ^% C+ oB - 呢D冇良船主,知道左件事就坐地起價,為左錢咩都咁做0 O8 }, w$ a. u

& f# D$ A3 x6 H4 ?L - 雖然佢咁做係為左同個男既一齊,但係為左咁而出賣色相,唔理志7 V) T: g. [' m* `0 F

; p$ T- P! x8 w6 ~$ IF - 佢忠於朋友係一件好事,但有時D野,都要睇下環境可唔可以講嫁,
& p: ~" p2 ~+ u4 R- h3 d     正所謂"寧教人打仔,莫教人比妻"嘛,績下口得好# x% J0 \/ J# g" L: T1 {# q

; z, s- o3 t! N; Y+ W9 j" n[ Last edited by 左輪仔 on 2005-4-25 at 01:17 AM ]

代仔

我以前都好似睇過.但唔記得個答案
( }7 S* y( u" `# t3 a4 f3 M而家答多次
$ _0 v7 {' @5 g1 W8 Cf: 因為佢只係張佢所知既事講比朋友聽
$ X7 `$ }# f5 h+ }  C  V4 _2 fl: 為左見佢既既愛人, 肯跟一個唔識既人一齊過夜, 不過我唔讚成咁做架
) B3 [( u- A# [b: 坐地起價.明知人地無錢
- S( T8 F9 {) j# M, y0 bs: 衰人一個, 明知人地等錢洗. 雖然係你情我願.: T4 O: ~6 N4 S, I; F2 [
m: 最衰既人, 條女以經唔好過架啦, 知道之後.重走人同人分手添

hk853

L>F>M>B>S  K% o1 {7 c( B  k3 w
3 E. W! L# L8 Z2 t3 Q
L為左同心愛既人一齊,甘願犧出賣自己肉體,好偉大1 t. j( ]) c2 `, F; ~, G
F排第二因為佢同M講都係純粹為朋友,唔係有心拆散M同L,因為決定權係M度
% p0 S9 z- f* j1 V, ]# aM冇原諒L為左佢而犧牲色相,但都尚可以原諒
7 n1 `5 G7 M% ~4 s' x! AS乘人之危,最壞,明知L有心上人,都要用佢肉體換金錢! ?" k# w# o, R: Y
B都係乘人之危,但商業社會係咁,所以算比S好

JCer

最壞  F>S>M>L>B 唔壞% }; i# C3 F& y
F: 如果佢唔講,物事都無, 佢應該學下"善良的沉默"
3 ~0 H3 V9 w4 X: Z3 yS: 如果係鍾意一個人, 唔應該承人之危, 學下明正言順地去爭取4 u7 h  L" K  j3 N
M: 不明白L的負出, 自私的想法
6 x) v5 y& p9 ?3 p7 HL: 太愛一個人, 愛得太傻, 無理後果
- ?" l/ B$ j0 ~3 A! GB: 有危險的工作, 收多D $ ,人之常情' J- c1 p0 f: I4 ~) c

  a5 `% X' L8 N; N% K( b世上無絕對的正確, 也沒有絕對的錯誤

angellyz

最唔可以接受 S, then B, then M, L and last F.

tai1980

Originally posted by Asurada129 at 2005-4-24 11:24 PM:* R; Z' h/ V' t: s( X
L = 為左自己鍾意既人寧願犠牲自己
2 O. b; Q0 w& y# w) l- JB = 一個為金錢暴利既船夫, 正常生意人都係甘
: ]- {) T+ N6 N8 m% g' [S = 知道有人需要錢度河, 開出不道德條件3 C5 x/ L( k# n8 P* j8 O$ l* `
F = 不理後果告知當事人, (估算係情敵)....拆散對方4 g. t. K: q* ^* q3 m8 }4 _8 L
M = 不知愛人為佢犠牲, 反而知道真相不理女方委屈...仲拋棄佢

: f) n6 g" D, ^5 i3 L4 @: y) V3 r

% m- t4 N$ X5 G- }' R; g same choices with u , but want to add some comments
& r" w7 A# m8 y6 Q5 X; b
0 W. u( u! r; b' GB : not agree with u on this comment , cos he is at the shore of the woman (有一天, 在女人的這一岸, 有個船夫), so he has no way to know that the woman is in-love with the man across the river  
4 @; g" t' W9 z7 |0 K+ q
8 H: Y1 ~9 w1 D# [7 CS : there is ""no-free-lunch"" in this world , if u want something then u have to give-up something so this is a legal transaction ( the woman has the right to refuse ) ,and he is not that bad cos he fulfill their agreement in the end (  女人答應了, 她拿到錢後就由船夫載她過河 ), T% P4 ?& f# S% q) \  L/ H; k
" y; [) e% l5 M  w. T, J
F : if this guy has a brain , then he should know the outcome 6 `8 X& a" m6 n" \$ W3 q2 I0 S0 h" e% _

8 u& g6 ^* b/ bM : in the present-day this guy is call an asshole ( no need to explain further more ), but this story took place in the past time ( 從前有個男人和女人 ) so they should not be that open minded but it also said that they love each othe ( 非常相愛 ) , so......
6 K7 y4 x* {* L. p5 q7 n2 C# K) |+ f8 o3 f4 ^
[ Last edited by tai1980 on 2005-4-25 at 01:58 AM ]

waterfire

大概可以講....錯ge
3 J6 E3 ], N- Y: N: @M, L 都係為左想見佢, 而犧牲左自己ge 肉體, M點解唔可以體諒下佢, G9 ~" F6 c; G# q2 @9 q
L, 為左想見M, 而唔考慮下件事如果穿左會點0 f3 ~+ E- ^% e% F  w
F, 有時唔係樣樣野都講到咁明ga ma
* a& q' f' q; K; M( L# p7 n7 _) t. B0 p
最錯就係, 點解F 唔叫L 同佢過一晚, 就唔會講俾M 聽....: m+ k5 Y% e# f8 R# w  C/ D
有女唔食, 最大惡極!!

hiroraymond

好似好有趣咁，
. v2 ^8 H* x2 d# F由最好開始排起既話，
; M' b+ g9 a6 s6 UL B M F S 啦，
2 C4 E1 e! S9 g- e" m# a* J* d5 s# `% \) K
其實不少人都會話肯為自己鐘意既人就算要埋自己條命都得，
6 k* T. t& c! l; o$ Z但當真係需要既時候，又有幾多個會呢？+ \, |9 ^2 r; O* j
如果覺得自己真係做得到既，又點會唔明 L 有幾鐘意 M 呢？: W" g( X# Z; [% M$ p% ?. u6 c
又點會唔諒解 L 會咁樣做呢。
& X7 n+ a" H9 ^0 _1 J
$ n3 k3 r7 h! Y: c; L. u而 B 都只不過係做生意，同 L 做個交易，/ j1 w0 ^* i' y( [, k
所謂現實世界中既商人 ( 傷人 )，
6 T9 Q" C' [7 k, U明知你咁想過去緊係開高價啦。
  S7 l2 l* H  ^" z4 n
7 ?& d8 p7 U: v  o而由第三個開始我就覺得係壞，
0 Y/ I$ k' v1 ]3 O" Y% q! ` M 唔能夠體諒到 L 背叛佢既原因，
4 s! d2 z. e0 m4 H$ f: u亦從未為令雙方可以重逢呢件事上作出任何貢獻，
' g  \; N" B2 h" Q知道一切後更即刻放棄一個甘為自己犠牲一切既人，: |0 Z; b# Z7 e' X% Y! x
M 都可算壞了。
9 j6 ?* D7 M/ }5 h: w: t) O
& l& `" X: P4 g4 } F 呢個人仲掂，: e, ]. B( f9 }
知道既唔等於要講，4 G9 n, l  _- d4 }4 m4 i$ N6 ^
如果呢件事發生係自己身上，" u- Y0 k, r, J  J, g. a
我諗會即刻毒啞 F 呢條友。# ]! y; k9 p- w9 v1 F' b
2 \3 r( F# j+ N  H3 S
最衰個個緊係 S 啦，
8 p% g0 n% s7 d" f3 H/ k始終都係討厭提出不道德交易的人。8 q  [, L& E9 b! A, i, u7 D1 f
/ q. \1 f$ M5 Z7 H
& c5 Y$ k/ t+ ^* W

1 k2 E# E, X, R; S/ x題外話：9 u, M' v- ^; q. T
唔知點解睇呢個故事個陣，
% l% v! g5 M& C4 w3 B. c/ e* [睇到 S 呢條友，
6 G/ c! B& _! f我就即刻諗起英皇老細。

newman2005

由壞至好: S<F<M<B<L
% y; X- z: L9 v. n: ?* J7 P( b( R/ c' B
S: 看中別人的弱點而作出不道德的交易去滿足自己私慾, 最賤格!
" Y/ d9 z! ?! J( L4 {F: 不顧後果爆響口, 影響L和M的關係: i6 H/ m' G- U
M: 沒有理解L所作的事背後真正原因而拋棄她
4 F% H: i8 C; {* G" e" J; }! q: yB: 坐地起價想得到金錢上的利益 .... 但不是對別人造成傷害# G1 g9 @  o, Z! Q
L: 寧願犧牲卻換來分手收場...