Rika

由最好排到最壞
- @6 U7 M% b" z& U4 `& CF, He/She told a friend the turth. Nothing wrong* I( S5 }4 w9 \+ f: b6 g" ~
B, He is just a business man, he works for money. He doesn't have the responsibility to help L or give her discount
2 @! ?. q" X# Z- _4 n) C( p: \2 o( mS, He just pay for what he wants, he just gives offer. He doesn't force her
1 _: q* K. u- m9 Z" PM, He cannot accept L had sex with other men. This is alright. he hurts too. But he should think about why L had sex. The purpose was pure
* e+ w( ~% R; J4 {. DL, I think there must other way she can find to earn $20 for the transportation fee. She is pure but a bit stupid

左輪仔

最高就代表我最唔LIKE既人物:
  W5 N2 x  j/ h! w+ N7 ]5 h8 z. b7 G/ ^, i. I# x( g
M - 點解佢唔搵條女先,要條女陪人一夜再過河搵佢,自己唔要錢過去,枉係男人8 l: u+ w8 x7 W% v6 }+ R' h: h

, t# C" q& j' B( _3 mS - 我最唔鍾意呢D男人,呃女人一夜,仲要0趙完唱喎,(唔係F點會知呢件事)
3 X/ T$ J2 d! E7 P; \( t+ m     比我一定唔會做,正禽獸!!!
' {4 d) C4 u) [7 ?* l8 j. {! A- C5 }' l$ h  ?- l, Y  n9 h4 Y
B - 呢D冇良船主,知道左件事就坐地起價,為左錢咩都咁做8 X. [3 n8 J+ ]7 R' \

8 \6 [9 G/ v; a* R( N. e/ @L - 雖然佢咁做係為左同個男既一齊,但係為左咁而出賣色相,唔理志" a. Y: [- \; X& e8 j

7 j+ y+ n2 o, ]* g& vF - 佢忠於朋友係一件好事,但有時D野,都要睇下環境可唔可以講嫁,5 @  f8 Q# ]) H. l1 j. j7 M
     正所謂"寧教人打仔,莫教人比妻"嘛,績下口得好5 Z! x& X$ ~# c: s/ n  E( l8 b4 _: t

; ]: |: m5 a; N+ x& s! o[ Last edited by 左輪仔 on 2005-4-25 at 01:17 AM ]

代仔

我以前都好似睇過.但唔記得個答案1 i, C% ^8 T+ A# ?8 J* M$ S5 N$ j
而家答多次0 T$ x4 G3 B. }0 T4 T/ r9 v" E
f: 因為佢只係張佢所知既事講比朋友聽
. t( K% A9 ?( c/ {7 pl: 為左見佢既既愛人, 肯跟一個唔識既人一齊過夜, 不過我唔讚成咁做架/ R, M" C8 m/ ~' X
b: 坐地起價.明知人地無錢
/ D) S2 H4 e  ~; k4 Js: 衰人一個, 明知人地等錢洗. 雖然係你情我願.- s, s+ p( D; }* {
m: 最衰既人, 條女以經唔好過架啦, 知道之後.重走人同人分手添

hk853

L>F>M>B>S
* q' S6 y9 [" t& ~2 @
: Q% G  e3 K5 {1 K6 Z& XL為左同心愛既人一齊,甘願犧出賣自己肉體,好偉大
% j* B% D2 r* ~F排第二因為佢同M講都係純粹為朋友,唔係有心拆散M同L,因為決定權係M度
6 b( t  [6 b& o# K$ SM冇原諒L為左佢而犧牲色相,但都尚可以原諒5 o; b/ f- y* ?
S乘人之危,最壞,明知L有心上人,都要用佢肉體換金錢  E. s$ u- S! f# F; W( M+ E3 \; g
B都係乘人之危,但商業社會係咁,所以算比S好

JCer

最壞  F>S>M>L>B 唔壞
) d* C4 f3 O& G0 s, Y/ iF: 如果佢唔講,物事都無, 佢應該學下"善良的沉默"; E  \; C& y% O0 P  w
S: 如果係鍾意一個人, 唔應該承人之危, 學下明正言順地去爭取9 M9 h7 ^6 e0 P' f
M: 不明白L的負出, 自私的想法
5 z( x- B, e( `; k& PL: 太愛一個人, 愛得太傻, 無理後果  M+ o' ]. i$ y/ T7 A8 x
B: 有危險的工作, 收多D $ ,人之常情
2 v7 d6 [# }/ |6 x1 `" e! l4 w3 T) T, Q4 ~0 h
世上無絕對的正確, 也沒有絕對的錯誤

angellyz

最唔可以接受 S, then B, then M, L and last F.

tai1980

Originally posted by Asurada129 at 2005-4-24 11:24 PM:$ @. p" |! [. m" s7 F; c9 @# n" u
L = 為左自己鍾意既人寧願犠牲自己# u! J) z0 [/ s9 V0 U: i9 h
B = 一個為金錢暴利既船夫, 正常生意人都係甘
4 r' ^% \/ Y7 ~0 ]/ H/ CS = 知道有人需要錢度河, 開出不道德條件0 u3 n; o7 t8 P" ^( \2 l, r
F = 不理後果告知當事人, (估算係情敵)....拆散對方
; r4 S' [) K( d4 Y( jM = 不知愛人為佢犠牲, 反而知道真相不理女方委屈...仲拋棄佢

! c! B6 O. x. l  P& Q

: V* r: A- @6 a& I; Z same choices with u , but want to add some comments
$ F5 u4 W" l4 a8 m# l( H5 T* u6 q5 B- r0 j! m
B : not agree with u on this comment , cos he is at the shore of the woman (有一天, 在女人的這一岸, 有個船夫), so he has no way to know that the woman is in-love with the man across the river  0 a* A6 n, N" k. O2 c1 P

! U% r2 `* F' B* G! H; p* sS : there is ""no-free-lunch"" in this world , if u want something then u have to give-up something so this is a legal transaction ( the woman has the right to refuse ) ,and he is not that bad cos he fulfill their agreement in the end (  女人答應了, 她拿到錢後就由船夫載她過河 )/ M7 a0 `' ~$ h% p: ^" J4 d

9 {) O; @% C. P( uF : if this guy has a brain , then he should know the outcome 8 M5 q% k% C8 {- x0 H! W

  t* k. X/ @* B1 a& yM : in the present-day this guy is call an asshole ( no need to explain further more ), but this story took place in the past time ( 從前有個男人和女人 ) so they should not be that open minded but it also said that they love each othe ( 非常相愛 ) , so......9 D3 l: A5 H) y  D3 L0 I, E0 e

2 V. u7 d- h# o; n' J3 _+ j% @[ Last edited by tai1980 on 2005-4-25 at 01:58 AM ]

waterfire

大概可以講....錯ge3 E# W5 B( x" F. K' P
M, L 都係為左想見佢, 而犧牲左自己ge 肉體, M點解唔可以體諒下佢
; ?( h0 M+ P% u" y1 j# NL, 為左想見M, 而唔考慮下件事如果穿左會點
  `( p: z* a5 m4 m( p$ i  wF, 有時唔係樣樣野都講到咁明ga ma8 }3 p  O# |/ ]! V& S
" k) m- f& P7 Z2 f
最錯就係, 點解F 唔叫L 同佢過一晚, 就唔會講俾M 聽....# @1 Q# Q9 S, b6 Z
有女唔食, 最大惡極!!

hiroraymond

好似好有趣咁，
! E# o4 p( s5 x; P由最好開始排起既話，
' R; J4 Q, L; S5 v1 ~& ML B M F S 啦，
& d  _" o% o- w9 s4 h
- F' E4 ~8 Z' i* A/ H7 ?其實不少人都會話肯為自己鐘意既人就算要埋自己條命都得，
" y* m7 m0 g9 d  q; \. m但當真係需要既時候，又有幾多個會呢？7 M( X! Y) r3 ~+ \  p; u" e
如果覺得自己真係做得到既，又點會唔明 L 有幾鐘意 M 呢？
! T. g0 V/ F5 `" \! f0 h( k" ^又點會唔諒解 L 會咁樣做呢。
# k, ^$ v& U; |7 F2 M
( z% }8 X) p$ G: u  y) E而 B 都只不過係做生意，同 L 做個交易，
: a) x# c! p" m  [' k. p( a5 F所謂現實世界中既商人 ( 傷人 )，3 b+ ^8 U5 \0 r: q: ~! @5 H5 A4 i
明知你咁想過去緊係開高價啦。
- n* R* r! M. C3 N1 M9 k1 G, k* \
6 k: }4 p  ?1 H( S% k; |9 i2 t而由第三個開始我就覺得係壞，- ~) g# y5 @. Y5 ^& {
M 唔能夠體諒到 L 背叛佢既原因，
( Q+ y# Q4 K- o7 }& y9 r- u) g亦從未為令雙方可以重逢呢件事上作出任何貢獻，
. `) k; R+ {; A  ?) r知道一切後更即刻放棄一個甘為自己犠牲一切既人，) ]3 W: d- _  Y' q* F  q' H+ Y+ ~
M 都可算壞了。
! p: I* r: W" Y5 ?4 `: s5 h: S( k5 {$ z$ d
F 呢個人仲掂，$ W- b! P& D3 A: Q) O6 T" T  s/ a( J
知道既唔等於要講，. M  X, M7 e- Z& u4 [# s2 N, p- e, I
如果呢件事發生係自己身上，
, o! E6 u- T. {1 a. k我諗會即刻毒啞 F 呢條友。
5 ?) M3 Y! P' [' G+ T" `5 o
  f% X: @/ a# l: b3 o$ D3 A* W最衰個個緊係 S 啦，% Q+ L( N2 ?! P" n9 o
始終都係討厭提出不道德交易的人。
% H! M5 O& L( B* X: `. E" j
8 I& X$ N, @# G0 _
; L. X$ Q7 q4 Y9 {9 ~- u& T, _8 M  K' t: T% a6 w. b
題外話：- J, S! o$ v6 R
唔知點解睇呢個故事個陣，% @) C# E* R7 O- a3 B  Z
睇到 S 呢條友，
+ N' V; m" E; B我就即刻諗起英皇老細。

newman2005

由壞至好: S<F<M<B<L" `8 N4 A9 L- i9 z

0 R+ n$ W- v9 C- eS: 看中別人的弱點而作出不道德的交易去滿足自己私慾, 最賤格!, _4 t6 S8 v; f- |
F: 不顧後果爆響口, 影響L和M的關係
) H' ^5 X" F/ t) W4 z* V0 @9 OM: 沒有理解L所作的事背後真正原因而拋棄她3 k1 u# O' [  C+ Y% R5 K
B: 坐地起價想得到金錢上的利益 .... 但不是對別人造成傷害
7 a/ A# u3 D1 t  w8 fL: 寧願犧牲卻換來分手收場...