Rika

由最好排到最壞
7 m$ D, B1 v& q  v; I0 HF, He/She told a friend the turth. Nothing wrong
6 ~& ~" w2 ~- J3 |" xB, He is just a business man, he works for money. He doesn't have the responsibility to help L or give her discount
! N7 C1 c7 l" i2 e' o6 NS, He just pay for what he wants, he just gives offer. He doesn't force her
# L( ]* s% r3 @0 h3 bM, He cannot accept L had sex with other men. This is alright. he hurts too. But he should think about why L had sex. The purpose was pure
6 m3 B1 n( @( A0 p6 F4 b3 RL, I think there must other way she can find to earn $20 for the transportation fee. She is pure but a bit stupid

左輪仔

最高就代表我最唔LIKE既人物:
* H& b0 \. P! n9 D3 h% A# C' {
, R- l& N% c) a# N* O: b! A& bM - 點解佢唔搵條女先,要條女陪人一夜再過河搵佢,自己唔要錢過去,枉係男人; t/ _. Y/ Q5 O" n! |- I3 J
- l/ F& h" m$ j. q" M
S - 我最唔鍾意呢D男人,呃女人一夜,仲要0趙完唱喎,(唔係F點會知呢件事)2 p$ N1 x9 K: y1 ]* K
     比我一定唔會做,正禽獸!!!
/ l. i! q7 _; p/ V) l# |- c( u$ G; d& |" u* F
B - 呢D冇良船主,知道左件事就坐地起價,為左錢咩都咁做4 u7 h+ C4 F7 n7 L2 ~/ n

+ ~- N. [3 T* \5 FL - 雖然佢咁做係為左同個男既一齊,但係為左咁而出賣色相,唔理志2 ^: p8 ?9 I* `* _) R. @/ j
: V# n# Q4 C  {* i
F - 佢忠於朋友係一件好事,但有時D野,都要睇下環境可唔可以講嫁,  F& H4 w) }! G$ a2 X
     正所謂"寧教人打仔,莫教人比妻"嘛,績下口得好
3 j1 n) y8 ^. ]7 o! W4 G
+ K8 ?0 y$ }/ W+ o8 ]2 n9 ?1 s  ~. j& w[ Last edited by 左輪仔 on 2005-4-25 at 01:17 AM ]

代仔

我以前都好似睇過.但唔記得個答案
; n  g' R2 l' X+ o- [而家答多次& \5 p2 B  o7 T
f: 因為佢只係張佢所知既事講比朋友聽. _. \/ [* ^. M: i! Z7 R/ B! |# I
l: 為左見佢既既愛人, 肯跟一個唔識既人一齊過夜, 不過我唔讚成咁做架
# W9 R1 L! o' ]: o/ A& fb: 坐地起價.明知人地無錢1 F5 A! ]$ s3 t; i! }% L& @
s: 衰人一個, 明知人地等錢洗. 雖然係你情我願.' f* o6 G- j, n
m: 最衰既人, 條女以經唔好過架啦, 知道之後.重走人同人分手添

hk853

L>F>M>B>S
2 X+ v% U( o. R; c3 }& R/ d5 f# [+ p) T0 k3 Z( J/ c, u+ L
L為左同心愛既人一齊,甘願犧出賣自己肉體,好偉大
6 U; C+ @; U3 g; }: \( y0 D$ w. uF排第二因為佢同M講都係純粹為朋友,唔係有心拆散M同L,因為決定權係M度
5 P5 z8 d7 C) }7 y3 \$ V9 Y/ nM冇原諒L為左佢而犧牲色相,但都尚可以原諒
" T3 F% G4 C+ v& t, O* eS乘人之危,最壞,明知L有心上人,都要用佢肉體換金錢
( i# b0 F6 u. u! J# f1 yB都係乘人之危,但商業社會係咁,所以算比S好

JCer

最壞  F>S>M>L>B 唔壞
/ U8 J( @# j% W- ^: X, A! ^F: 如果佢唔講,物事都無, 佢應該學下"善良的沉默"* \; a8 F3 \, {3 |+ }5 }" Q
S: 如果係鍾意一個人, 唔應該承人之危, 學下明正言順地去爭取4 r/ n: T$ O0 D/ r
M: 不明白L的負出, 自私的想法1 L* [, x0 i+ N& J  ~
L: 太愛一個人, 愛得太傻, 無理後果
/ ~) M. s9 x6 j% V/ S5 J" rB: 有危險的工作, 收多D $ ,人之常情. l. W, N$ l2 o+ g4 f

& J% @2 {2 D6 h8 L世上無絕對的正確, 也沒有絕對的錯誤

angellyz

最唔可以接受 S, then B, then M, L and last F.

tai1980

Originally posted by Asurada129 at 2005-4-24 11:24 PM:; r6 |' P* Z3 Z. f
L = 為左自己鍾意既人寧願犠牲自己7 z' e; n; m) V
B = 一個為金錢暴利既船夫, 正常生意人都係甘3 B& W" c7 O0 Q6 D
S = 知道有人需要錢度河, 開出不道德條件+ p. _, C9 ^+ L! _5 i) [# B
F = 不理後果告知當事人, (估算係情敵)....拆散對方; L' W" i3 q& c0 u
M = 不知愛人為佢犠牲, 反而知道真相不理女方委屈...仲拋棄佢

. F: k5 r) {+ ?/ O# k. \; l" }2 N( d* _2 m( i/ u
same choices with u , but want to add some comments
: j' v. c' R# R% j: T4 E* _- B$ D
  {0 l2 I! B3 Q* w, VB : not agree with u on this comment , cos he is at the shore of the woman (有一天, 在女人的這一岸, 有個船夫), so he has no way to know that the woman is in-love with the man across the river  " C* {( ?' z  Y4 A0 q, v

% \4 ~5 r" J0 B  y* U: i1 b) Z6 ~S : there is ""no-free-lunch"" in this world , if u want something then u have to give-up something so this is a legal transaction ( the woman has the right to refuse ) ,and he is not that bad cos he fulfill their agreement in the end (  女人答應了, 她拿到錢後就由船夫載她過河 )) j, H* z& c0 q' }- _( f0 a

( I2 a1 x2 I% U! r+ ZF : if this guy has a brain , then he should know the outcome . N  {& f, [2 c

4 k6 N8 l& ?" b. E5 {8 e0 b) {) W& QM : in the present-day this guy is call an asshole ( no need to explain further more ), but this story took place in the past time ( 從前有個男人和女人 ) so they should not be that open minded but it also said that they love each othe ( 非常相愛 ) , so......0 f- L( D+ U( c' Z% B. `# g
8 v1 A8 F7 O+ f
[ Last edited by tai1980 on 2005-4-25 at 01:58 AM ]

waterfire

大概可以講....錯ge9 n/ o( |$ [- f
M, L 都係為左想見佢, 而犧牲左自己ge 肉體, M點解唔可以體諒下佢; k7 H4 B$ s$ C
L, 為左想見M, 而唔考慮下件事如果穿左會點; u# @- I7 t. j1 J% t' R- W) d0 S# S
F, 有時唔係樣樣野都講到咁明ga ma
9 S1 W/ E" c# t/ z$ S6 L1 O) U( Y% D; I5 a" P9 X3 H
最錯就係, 點解F 唔叫L 同佢過一晚, 就唔會講俾M 聽....( ]1 R) y% @# [) N; H' J. c8 ?0 a
有女唔食, 最大惡極!!

hiroraymond

好似好有趣咁，8 W8 C5 S1 @; |) n/ s, m, X6 i
由最好開始排起既話，* ~+ i  W0 W/ f# {" h
L B M F S 啦，1 P9 W! A8 |$ m8 r( ]8 T" ]

- B) x/ k8 V% U其實不少人都會話肯為自己鐘意既人就算要埋自己條命都得，' n' z0 O9 E, Y. F. f
但當真係需要既時候，又有幾多個會呢？
. r- T" g. C3 c+ W! T2 k如果覺得自己真係做得到既，又點會唔明 L 有幾鐘意 M 呢？& S% L+ w: V5 S. X$ j  |* S4 h
又點會唔諒解 L 會咁樣做呢。
: [! v% M1 @" Q$ c6 |
4 t. k. Z6 a+ n; o! ?& B  K5 x而 B 都只不過係做生意，同 L 做個交易，
& k& C6 H  I% b$ N5 J/ X, z3 |所謂現實世界中既商人 ( 傷人 )，& o' t, _8 h4 O" i: V0 \; h
明知你咁想過去緊係開高價啦。" o2 B7 _4 W/ @8 S

' T5 C, D* d, u- [# h  S% [而由第三個開始我就覺得係壞，
6 o, [) z- J4 F4 S% g M 唔能夠體諒到 L 背叛佢既原因，
$ d$ P9 L3 i* Y: }* \亦從未為令雙方可以重逢呢件事上作出任何貢獻，
: f+ o2 C) I" I, y" D9 S9 r# i7 [知道一切後更即刻放棄一個甘為自己犠牲一切既人，! u! ]. S8 p% \# C& |4 A$ ]
M 都可算壞了。- d3 P3 x+ e8 ]  I' V( W# K/ F0 u2 I$ q

0 s7 H) Y* j* x! a& s9 U" H F 呢個人仲掂，& O. d, a0 m3 G/ Z$ k& |
知道既唔等於要講，6 W8 v3 w+ U% ^1 F! z( ?
如果呢件事發生係自己身上，
7 D1 ~5 |3 K+ i5 v我諗會即刻毒啞 F 呢條友。
: u3 X3 A4 g! y$ T! w& I9 E7 `  C- ~& l3 p# C; Q- N: k3 j
最衰個個緊係 S 啦，
' \% Y7 `* `, o% l' H始終都係討厭提出不道德交易的人。8 {  x/ T( l$ F. [% ]

+ ?2 y" M1 C3 `7 t3 Q
* g9 [2 ^$ R8 U* l; t  I. r9 I2 O5 V$ ^; [- `; u& V/ j
題外話：
/ [# Z0 {$ l% V; A+ A唔知點解睇呢個故事個陣，
. w) m2 \: y$ }$ s+ c睇到 S 呢條友，
5 r6 D% w$ M/ V& w  Z. n0 Z我就即刻諗起英皇老細。

newman2005

由壞至好: S<F<M<B<L+ F* h; ^, G! g* q; P* m7 ^2 e( s

! }0 \2 [+ _0 l( ~3 C' WS: 看中別人的弱點而作出不道德的交易去滿足自己私慾, 最賤格!* L- g4 n+ V2 B  U
F: 不顧後果爆響口, 影響L和M的關係5 V5 g$ _" d2 x# w' ^- S$ T
M: 沒有理解L所作的事背後真正原因而拋棄她6 |7 A; |1 @+ e( U0 l
B: 坐地起價想得到金錢上的利益 .... 但不是對別人造成傷害
+ \5 n# }: b& h; L+ H/ D5 a! {$ p  wL: 寧願犧牲卻換來分手收場...