Rika

由最好排到最壞' X% L% q9 S7 P1 X7 w
F, He/She told a friend the turth. Nothing wrong
2 j  s7 Q9 G7 k5 o0 f8 wB, He is just a business man, he works for money. He doesn't have the responsibility to help L or give her discount
9 ^2 I/ z  E- D& J9 W  m$ rS, He just pay for what he wants, he just gives offer. He doesn't force her
1 ^$ F6 ^. ?! e- \, _7 ]M, He cannot accept L had sex with other men. This is alright. he hurts too. But he should think about why L had sex. The purpose was pure3 j8 a% p+ `7 Y0 O
L, I think there must other way she can find to earn $20 for the transportation fee. She is pure but a bit stupid

左輪仔

最高就代表我最唔LIKE既人物:
" M! H7 I! U* M* I* u( D
+ a' p+ A4 K& b5 @1 U3 qM - 點解佢唔搵條女先,要條女陪人一夜再過河搵佢,自己唔要錢過去,枉係男人/ w" b& }& R6 j

% q% j1 k! C& U" U7 s3 g. Z' XS - 我最唔鍾意呢D男人,呃女人一夜,仲要0趙完唱喎,(唔係F點會知呢件事)
+ S# b& a+ d  @; }- e     比我一定唔會做,正禽獸!!!4 I8 N7 ~$ ^8 U. H+ S# _
6 _/ y: P1 b0 M6 z$ q& |
B - 呢D冇良船主,知道左件事就坐地起價,為左錢咩都咁做. \4 X. P, `/ F1 a* O
4 a1 \3 a( q4 J. M0 ]' c2 M
L - 雖然佢咁做係為左同個男既一齊,但係為左咁而出賣色相,唔理志
. V6 D- }- z8 I6 x
* Q  K7 S, i* F; T2 h1 {. b/ S- UF - 佢忠於朋友係一件好事,但有時D野,都要睇下環境可唔可以講嫁,  @& j8 K. a& [, D
     正所謂"寧教人打仔,莫教人比妻"嘛,績下口得好
  w0 a' A8 X9 w$ z$ c. y( [# u4 R1 l" I5 n; t$ \. f6 g! w
[ Last edited by 左輪仔 on 2005-4-25 at 01:17 AM ]

代仔

我以前都好似睇過.但唔記得個答案
6 Q- A* O# |% w2 C0 n7 z而家答多次7 H' B( z3 y& M8 ^# t7 S
f: 因為佢只係張佢所知既事講比朋友聽
5 s- ~! Q4 x) P* Q7 p8 G2 q2 W* H& o$ ol: 為左見佢既既愛人, 肯跟一個唔識既人一齊過夜, 不過我唔讚成咁做架0 o6 S. @& x: k  ]$ E  v) d
b: 坐地起價.明知人地無錢0 \. \7 t8 o; I5 ~1 Y
s: 衰人一個, 明知人地等錢洗. 雖然係你情我願.2 Y. W+ _& g  ?9 z# _0 P: h1 J4 W  H
m: 最衰既人, 條女以經唔好過架啦, 知道之後.重走人同人分手添

hk853

L>F>M>B>S' P! g  Z9 w# o( d7 ]/ q2 W0 V' o# K

" l" V" Q! [: ?2 n9 d% x1 xL為左同心愛既人一齊,甘願犧出賣自己肉體,好偉大) D1 E4 k4 K; m2 {% J+ D
F排第二因為佢同M講都係純粹為朋友,唔係有心拆散M同L,因為決定權係M度
1 x/ a. x8 d, c' [+ M9 t2 F4 r; V- IM冇原諒L為左佢而犧牲色相,但都尚可以原諒" S7 n1 p% `3 U# D% Y
S乘人之危,最壞,明知L有心上人,都要用佢肉體換金錢5 v3 q) l) d- O
B都係乘人之危,但商業社會係咁,所以算比S好

JCer

最壞  F>S>M>L>B 唔壞
! N9 W6 w9 S6 x9 ]+ UF: 如果佢唔講,物事都無, 佢應該學下"善良的沉默"
1 y8 s/ A8 ?7 i; ?0 mS: 如果係鍾意一個人, 唔應該承人之危, 學下明正言順地去爭取4 w8 g1 i  w$ i/ I0 c
M: 不明白L的負出, 自私的想法) \$ _9 f& B0 t& m% ?
L: 太愛一個人, 愛得太傻, 無理後果+ k/ F% g) Q; W7 d
B: 有危險的工作, 收多D $ ,人之常情  i) r2 Z1 G6 L3 v/ S
- `; O6 l7 g5 f5 q' J- I; |) @+ m
世上無絕對的正確, 也沒有絕對的錯誤

angellyz

最唔可以接受 S, then B, then M, L and last F.

tai1980

Originally posted by Asurada129 at 2005-4-24 11:24 PM:
- g) S  V! O& `. u4 XL = 為左自己鍾意既人寧願犠牲自己
0 T8 X6 A+ B4 M# H0 ]2 ?, h5 tB = 一個為金錢暴利既船夫, 正常生意人都係甘$ n+ \' Y( j. \& x$ C8 Y6 \
S = 知道有人需要錢度河, 開出不道德條件
% t- p$ Z3 t5 X! RF = 不理後果告知當事人, (估算係情敵)....拆散對方
1 c* W+ }) [6 s  o9 ]  L4 w& SM = 不知愛人為佢犠牲, 反而知道真相不理女方委屈...仲拋棄佢

& s) |' w. K: F6 M; s. v
0 w! _$ H6 |& X& g
same choices with u , but want to add some comments
: ^  w2 T. J( k- _% k6 p0 k( r8 V8 E0 G
B : not agree with u on this comment , cos he is at the shore of the woman (有一天, 在女人的這一岸, 有個船夫), so he has no way to know that the woman is in-love with the man across the river  
" m" {3 L9 L6 b& p/ i8 b
' D3 c8 b/ K8 C/ A- R! US : there is ""no-free-lunch"" in this world , if u want something then u have to give-up something so this is a legal transaction ( the woman has the right to refuse ) ,and he is not that bad cos he fulfill their agreement in the end (  女人答應了, 她拿到錢後就由船夫載她過河 )
5 g& \' t9 `: |' G" T
: L2 d$ [( d$ T6 bF : if this guy has a brain , then he should know the outcome # E: |0 O: d# J- C5 T; b7 ?
9 t9 d' |% k* m7 c( ~' P
M : in the present-day this guy is call an asshole ( no need to explain further more ), but this story took place in the past time ( 從前有個男人和女人 ) so they should not be that open minded but it also said that they love each othe ( 非常相愛 ) , so......
, s8 G  j3 }* l" P( U( o1 S5 U& l$ `, g
[ Last edited by tai1980 on 2005-4-25 at 01:58 AM ]

waterfire

大概可以講....錯ge% C5 g0 p. d2 v& d! Z5 K0 [% f$ }
M, L 都係為左想見佢, 而犧牲左自己ge 肉體, M點解唔可以體諒下佢4 ?' L  G5 a; x" H
L, 為左想見M, 而唔考慮下件事如果穿左會點$ ?% l8 Y6 p( I5 W
F, 有時唔係樣樣野都講到咁明ga ma6 k( x. b7 _, @0 K
- d3 m) L& U5 l+ ~$ N' o
最錯就係, 點解F 唔叫L 同佢過一晚, 就唔會講俾M 聽....
5 I3 W: v/ m  y# B5 v4 V. Y  U有女唔食, 最大惡極!!

hiroraymond

好似好有趣咁，
7 Q; _+ k: w( P1 U4 p" l0 @由最好開始排起既話，
( n2 I  P; t7 I& uL B M F S 啦，
" Q0 O# w3 p( l
2 D) e- u1 s5 v& v; M8 ?' k" t6 x其實不少人都會話肯為自己鐘意既人就算要埋自己條命都得，, e' b0 |& A2 M, F: F
但當真係需要既時候，又有幾多個會呢？; D/ F# @5 n8 j+ Q8 d/ i0 M
如果覺得自己真係做得到既，又點會唔明 L 有幾鐘意 M 呢？4 @; V8 c6 D, A9 L7 M+ _
又點會唔諒解 L 會咁樣做呢。6 v, n, |. f1 h* u1 Z- d, d

# u' w# r! Q; @% D% S2 _而 B 都只不過係做生意，同 L 做個交易，; ^- K9 f6 U' Q# B1 b
所謂現實世界中既商人 ( 傷人 )，
& p: E/ |1 {0 l" k. s  l. `8 v: y明知你咁想過去緊係開高價啦。
# n# h) x) j8 V  Q4 B8 w3 k
- Q( ?+ P9 ~- s( S' M而由第三個開始我就覺得係壞，* C! x) w2 M2 J2 b9 {, G& @
M 唔能夠體諒到 L 背叛佢既原因，
! d0 Q* N7 V/ P5 S" w! m亦從未為令雙方可以重逢呢件事上作出任何貢獻，
; H; F* F+ y0 [( y) W知道一切後更即刻放棄一個甘為自己犠牲一切既人，' t3 J& A; I* Y5 m4 |
M 都可算壞了。' L* \1 [" Z- w

0 w' D) W! X* l4 Q9 q  q5 X F 呢個人仲掂，( \( }9 ^- Y0 m
知道既唔等於要講，
9 f3 ?; M7 z5 A如果呢件事發生係自己身上，
! ~! u2 y2 D( v* u6 b' ~我諗會即刻毒啞 F 呢條友。
5 ~2 e/ I: H" U7 k" ]7 s9 c( W- `. q$ z: H, g
最衰個個緊係 S 啦，
6 c: S  n  u+ g2 p5 C  _& a1 T始終都係討厭提出不道德交易的人。# V6 }% _( U! G1 N0 \+ @- S" }; u
: C0 s& p* O% e

9 m, ]4 [+ M3 L! a1 \7 h/ o4 k+ h, G; r$ _
題外話：% Q+ z- y& D0 t( ^; M
唔知點解睇呢個故事個陣，
  K6 R1 z' k9 L: d5 q8 w$ ~0 x! k睇到 S 呢條友，
8 a. a% G: {; V我就即刻諗起英皇老細。

newman2005

由壞至好: S<F<M<B<L
3 f. ~' V' ?2 V: o! `
! f- Y: w1 G0 E: D. j) ]  C2 Q3 xS: 看中別人的弱點而作出不道德的交易去滿足自己私慾, 最賤格!
, k+ F2 H: r* ]! s0 X( I# cF: 不顧後果爆響口, 影響L和M的關係
- m# _( p2 i1 K  ?) b4 EM: 沒有理解L所作的事背後真正原因而拋棄她
. I5 f0 w' D' [- _- O+ SB: 坐地起價想得到金錢上的利益 .... 但不是對別人造成傷害, m; A/ |! q/ r+ X& U$ ?
L: 寧願犧牲卻換來分手收場...