Rika

由最好排到最壞
9 T- Q1 X/ g% z" F0 i: ~F, He/She told a friend the turth. Nothing wrong7 }* E, m! o1 n' ]$ f) i' y
B, He is just a business man, he works for money. He doesn't have the responsibility to help L or give her discount
8 H5 x# c3 Q% S( ?; t. o1 kS, He just pay for what he wants, he just gives offer. He doesn't force her
; D% {$ \6 R: B! NM, He cannot accept L had sex with other men. This is alright. he hurts too. But he should think about why L had sex. The purpose was pure! m' r" i  f4 O! E# K( r! a+ a
L, I think there must other way she can find to earn $20 for the transportation fee. She is pure but a bit stupid

左輪仔

最高就代表我最唔LIKE既人物:$ B6 {2 X# ^- D" f

* n2 y6 @. A% v8 _3 C. UM - 點解佢唔搵條女先,要條女陪人一夜再過河搵佢,自己唔要錢過去,枉係男人' a% J: X+ c( J( ]" N# J

' h0 J) W9 f. n9 ]  YS - 我最唔鍾意呢D男人,呃女人一夜,仲要0趙完唱喎,(唔係F點會知呢件事)
5 `5 v: ?  V) A6 ]5 B' \     比我一定唔會做,正禽獸!!!
7 a% f3 k' y; O; ~. j' j1 n( a' k" e  _% L( }9 h5 j
B - 呢D冇良船主,知道左件事就坐地起價,為左錢咩都咁做8 M' e/ A) n3 `
3 r. `; d, o8 L; U
L - 雖然佢咁做係為左同個男既一齊,但係為左咁而出賣色相,唔理志, o7 g/ E, c. O3 W) Y
$ S. J* Q$ p0 M6 @1 P, i
F - 佢忠於朋友係一件好事,但有時D野,都要睇下環境可唔可以講嫁,# I' i, N: F; D3 ^7 E
     正所謂"寧教人打仔,莫教人比妻"嘛,績下口得好( Z5 b* c% N( f/ e+ ~* Q

$ r2 m+ J5 M& I& N8 R% V[ Last edited by 左輪仔 on 2005-4-25 at 01:17 AM ]

代仔

我以前都好似睇過.但唔記得個答案
' P  p6 A' c+ m4 N而家答多次' S+ ^% k6 N+ U0 Y
f: 因為佢只係張佢所知既事講比朋友聽
1 o/ h. _% T3 s: C3 ql: 為左見佢既既愛人, 肯跟一個唔識既人一齊過夜, 不過我唔讚成咁做架' {; |* g! J& j- W
b: 坐地起價.明知人地無錢1 D. S1 s  g6 M& X! n" F+ ~
s: 衰人一個, 明知人地等錢洗. 雖然係你情我願.
- B; @4 o& a: @. Jm: 最衰既人, 條女以經唔好過架啦, 知道之後.重走人同人分手添

hk853

L>F>M>B>S
0 J  N" w/ Q! L( A- @# s$ C
! r- T  ~9 X+ I! FL為左同心愛既人一齊,甘願犧出賣自己肉體,好偉大; y) L7 h6 \4 L5 j6 A/ m; W
F排第二因為佢同M講都係純粹為朋友,唔係有心拆散M同L,因為決定權係M度
0 p' K- g% [, x6 [M冇原諒L為左佢而犧牲色相,但都尚可以原諒8 r+ h6 p# `' c4 y+ k
S乘人之危,最壞,明知L有心上人,都要用佢肉體換金錢( F% k9 n0 V* d3 e" n1 I9 n
B都係乘人之危,但商業社會係咁,所以算比S好

JCer

最壞  F>S>M>L>B 唔壞! @( L* k" N+ |: O
F: 如果佢唔講,物事都無, 佢應該學下"善良的沉默"+ c' {( B0 N9 s. R, N- h" R+ `/ G
S: 如果係鍾意一個人, 唔應該承人之危, 學下明正言順地去爭取0 {! w1 R" Y7 o* u; r
M: 不明白L的負出, 自私的想法
4 e! c4 t/ x$ {1 j( xL: 太愛一個人, 愛得太傻, 無理後果$ M% T% J0 V- \: j$ J* A
B: 有危險的工作, 收多D $ ,人之常情! i/ ~; I5 {8 d5 D5 y
. ~3 m$ u2 B8 `7 U! g9 t" P
世上無絕對的正確, 也沒有絕對的錯誤

angellyz

最唔可以接受 S, then B, then M, L and last F.

tai1980

Originally posted by Asurada129 at 2005-4-24 11:24 PM:
4 y- e1 m0 R4 WL = 為左自己鍾意既人寧願犠牲自己
* Z) ^. K) Y+ ?+ oB = 一個為金錢暴利既船夫, 正常生意人都係甘
9 N' o) M! @4 m: l% {S = 知道有人需要錢度河, 開出不道德條件
, _# j% s7 B5 K. q2 |. w- cF = 不理後果告知當事人, (估算係情敵)....拆散對方+ g. ^" `- j6 C7 U/ s( Z
M = 不知愛人為佢犠牲, 反而知道真相不理女方委屈...仲拋棄佢

4 I3 e- Y  q) e4 O2 e6 c
0 n0 g6 A3 `, X6 f, ]* d same choices with u , but want to add some comments 1 ?3 S: b) @# U! E, ~/ V! [4 C
8 O' w+ P$ |# t9 Q
B : not agree with u on this comment , cos he is at the shore of the woman (有一天, 在女人的這一岸, 有個船夫), so he has no way to know that the woman is in-love with the man across the river  4 X  |' S  p/ q. ~& j
! B" s6 @% k0 ~& d
S : there is ""no-free-lunch"" in this world , if u want something then u have to give-up something so this is a legal transaction ( the woman has the right to refuse ) ,and he is not that bad cos he fulfill their agreement in the end (  女人答應了, 她拿到錢後就由船夫載她過河 )
: y5 g; p* m( l( \3 |
' @% Z4 W; M5 ?F : if this guy has a brain , then he should know the outcome
/ F( c' i5 w" r) ^; i$ ]: j& n. j- [% @3 |4 Y- b+ j: b
M : in the present-day this guy is call an asshole ( no need to explain further more ), but this story took place in the past time ( 從前有個男人和女人 ) so they should not be that open minded but it also said that they love each othe ( 非常相愛 ) , so......
, I9 L* j6 T1 u- A; L# y3 |! U4 W* `7 S2 d
[ Last edited by tai1980 on 2005-4-25 at 01:58 AM ]

waterfire

大概可以講....錯ge/ Y( _0 \5 D9 {
M, L 都係為左想見佢, 而犧牲左自己ge 肉體, M點解唔可以體諒下佢  I" K% U, l9 U! j- j
L, 為左想見M, 而唔考慮下件事如果穿左會點
: O5 @, g3 E+ O% QF, 有時唔係樣樣野都講到咁明ga ma
4 P3 w# E  H4 H8 a! x8 {8 ]( ^% ?
最錯就係, 點解F 唔叫L 同佢過一晚, 就唔會講俾M 聽....9 L1 K; c: a* r1 s( ?  e8 U
有女唔食, 最大惡極!!

hiroraymond

好似好有趣咁，7 J4 J' \  e' F! E
由最好開始排起既話，
: ~3 l# k& J7 v. A1 T1 sL B M F S 啦，& ]0 B5 O, U' H, M
$ ~' t3 r+ B9 ^2 a" K
其實不少人都會話肯為自己鐘意既人就算要埋自己條命都得，6 m0 f1 F  F& n1 g8 r" K
但當真係需要既時候，又有幾多個會呢？3 C0 Y3 D6 U4 n" u
如果覺得自己真係做得到既，又點會唔明 L 有幾鐘意 M 呢？
3 R. T. A% p8 ~& h( ^! m0 r又點會唔諒解 L 會咁樣做呢。
* Y% D8 u. e0 C# U: e+ c; M
" {* v3 I% k* A6 T而 B 都只不過係做生意，同 L 做個交易，
+ s& }$ K  G$ B6 ?所謂現實世界中既商人 ( 傷人 )，
, n' G2 }; W, y8 S0 W/ K: |明知你咁想過去緊係開高價啦。. B  x; {$ y$ I' u- I8 P

/ P% v" p4 ?8 `0 D而由第三個開始我就覺得係壞，! a9 i$ U- a& r8 m& h
M 唔能夠體諒到 L 背叛佢既原因，8 U2 q) d4 h9 N, [) C/ Z
亦從未為令雙方可以重逢呢件事上作出任何貢獻，
  V3 f% z6 k$ v$ C8 J7 C知道一切後更即刻放棄一個甘為自己犠牲一切既人，  \4 \, R- L4 @0 K
M 都可算壞了。
; B% d4 ~! M4 ~- Y2 O. u: K( A8 D/ ^7 Q* Z" {
F 呢個人仲掂，0 z% N* e) G; M3 z/ n
知道既唔等於要講，
7 ^: c. G" T* r; H如果呢件事發生係自己身上，! z3 @2 m5 R* O& {; e8 \3 n
我諗會即刻毒啞 F 呢條友。
+ H3 M% c$ C6 R- N7 O6 y6 o8 z, B* u' g$ k9 v
最衰個個緊係 S 啦，4 T8 ?# S; r3 g. n
始終都係討厭提出不道德交易的人。
: Q8 V+ l" K  D( `# g+ o! n/ ~! l
: l2 ^8 a3 G  a3 A7 T3 @
6 n% A! \9 Q# n; y: r
# G: r' J! |* G9 |. b  s6 D題外話：% _7 [/ u' d8 e" S
唔知點解睇呢個故事個陣，; _* h+ `7 ]0 v; ^
睇到 S 呢條友，
% r$ v, u+ S" k我就即刻諗起英皇老細。

newman2005

由壞至好: S<F<M<B<L; J% g3 ^! I% G2 G% k

0 X' b: Q+ u5 T  mS: 看中別人的弱點而作出不道德的交易去滿足自己私慾, 最賤格!3 z0 r3 ^4 Z5 X8 b
F: 不顧後果爆響口, 影響L和M的關係) o3 ^6 e: E0 a/ S* @
M: 沒有理解L所作的事背後真正原因而拋棄她
( g% e* m8 l7 p! TB: 坐地起價想得到金錢上的利益 .... 但不是對別人造成傷害
8 {- C+ B8 m9 e8 O# UL: 寧願犧牲卻換來分手收場...