|
 
- 帖子
- 118
- 精華
- 0
- 威望
- 69
- 魅力
- 0
- 讚好
- 0
- 性別
- 男
|
5#
發表於 2005-4-4 11:12 PM
| 只看該作者
yes, it's correct.
$ w7 D9 O( f4 u- u+ L1 E6 z% y! h/ a; q& k+ N) O
according to the law, if anyone get anykind of hurt in the bank, the bank is liable of this.
7 f! a( z v9 G4 ~! o |- j, \, d& V' ?0 z, A* d
In the same case, if someone get pk or hurt in ur home and u hvn't warned that guy before,
$ Y! t+ ^: M% @and that guy sue u, u hv to pay a huge sum of money to him.
( f: S5 |6 V) g3 T6 q
8 c, C. W( f4 P7 U# ^so, at this case, a kind of insurance arouse. That's liable insurance, 責任保險7 h4 l1 W5 o0 h0 r* G Z- P
, m4 H# `) R+ Z; d* b7 |( y' vin 90s, a man got pk in a government department, since that was no sign of 小心地滑,
" U8 [+ |; N0 F& g% }! A( m3 a6 I$ Zat least, the government had to pay 10M to that guy |
|