奪命老妖

Originally posted by seafireson2 at 2007-5-15 02:29 PM:0 I, Q& ^3 K  D, ]0 ?- T/ Z5 f

5 i1 I5 |; P/ C* Sagree,
' e9 |  g1 c5 [2 c( ^: T我都未睇過,根本唔知係點,可能真係討論成份為主,
3 c% M0 s4 d, ^$ L但我估同方向生果比,係小兒科,3 L1 ~! Z% R( t* }' X& i
期盼方向生果比人被定性二級不雅!

; ?" Y! ~$ o1 u! x
http://www.xanga.com/cusp_07/590 ... 76362152636620.html
9 ~! Z2 P( ]! \. P6 P# u7 c0 n已經睇左幾期,性質傾向於性教育,同某報既果d嫖妓指南,差天共地
: }  w- C/ y5 j5 I% J搞成咁,都係兩個原因,第一係香港人係性方面真係好保守,探討下都唔得,第二係欺善怕惡,見係學生就恰你

chicken

Read the student post and find that it's not as evil as described by the media.2 [1 k! J$ G8 P. l& ^) C! B8 S
Just some extreme-conservative people too nervous about it.

sakura310

Originally posted by d228216 at 2007-5-15 01:58 PM:- n3 t: l9 h2 g; w
有罪就要罸, 冇罪就要平反, 法庭應申張正義！
6 V5 \1 E9 ?% j4 R- b) ^- x9 F" z' x# \6 L: d
係咪大學生根本冇關係....大學生巴閉d?? 有免死金牌???
2 g: {3 K0 f) i0 I# E% C& U: T9 S$ p
& U" W; v- r) R' M為自己既行為負責, 係今日既年青人最需要學習既野!

7 `- g/ s1 Y( j( ?% ~0 E" v+ k7 D" T! L
絕對支持啦
- F- f5 O" j# K( L% i( m- u* C: C3 J
有錯就認,打就企定$ [& E& ]9 c6 o) ~9 @
( {$ ]* J$ [9 Z/ l
無錯當然要撐到底0 [& i: m# A: _; }: t; G
& @4 [2 U: s$ Z8 ~
但今次我覺得係班大學生唔0岩0 z8 {& G! u  X; g1 n( @

+ b7 ~. g5 I& T+ C4 G. w" O7 v在發佈一份公眾讀物時,內容應該注意下,唔同私人交談,你講咩都得3 P% G- u* `' ~3 P! X4 l
. y; r: \* p2 h" j
一份公眾讀物係好有影響力* u1 \; n% r) ]
" W3 x5 p6 E' a
我唔認為學校方今次要幫班學生
$ T: X0 V: v0 t1 `' {' m* s/ n  J  L
& s) n+ u. G3 l! ~- u9 X3 g4 E唔通第時出到去做野做錯事就有亞head幫你頂?7 \! B4 G0 {- @& c& G( d, Y. d

: \4 u  N/ h4 ]4 J4 W我唔認為lor
5 U# ^# a- h0 G; {! `$ x  J& X1 ?  ^& B% p, t  X5 L( X# Q
唔係話要整死佢地, w& Q( m2 t/ g1 [) N5 ?
1 V$ Z& m, g' i. r
而係今次件事,如果判得成的話,自然起到警惕作用
. [1 v) v7 D; m  ^- f' U6 D; o/ H9 K+ r8 g0 v1 ?0 ]
我覺得係d人將言論自由ge範圍放得太大6 ]$ ^: F9 t0 e. j
  g' ^' f/ e9 S- E
有d野係應該講,有d野係唔應該係公眾場合講的
3 X( o9 @5 a, l* P$ m# N1 x
- D9 B+ s0 B: s& R* `唔係話唔應該講就係防礙言論自由1 T7 Y4 y8 d1 t. c

% b* b3 w; M6 Y/ \大家都知偷錢搶錢係唔唔法,唔通咁又話政府防礙你搵錢?

浪子

睇完, 真係冇野好講, 咁所有中小學性教育書籍都可以列做不雅

hackenli

一日一金句4 m# T+ e+ n! }0 ~1 g% H& l
"佢地有比一般市民較高o既學歷,就更應該能夠明辨是非"
$ o( [7 R3 {0 x: z  K  \4 S$ I8 O0 L/ T- m5 V+ ?
我們的大學生" {$ K4 N+ u. J" w) G/ a

' ]$ d0 E' S) g) L, x1 h4 \) m: R, l% u8 M
: F9 g0 Z# A3 R" \0 F

; b4 C6 ~6 S8 [; g

Originally posted by easy_man at 2007-5-15 02:13 PM:
& v" \9 u% T1 ?+ j/ X, i0 s/ }& |) [- B! Q
7 o3 D8 |# ?5 Y8 B
有見地 !!!; l& k) r8 W  ?- Y
現今大學生部份以為...

vv1668vv

反映大學生對法律認知不足。自以為是

支持者

http://www.xanga.com/cusp_07/590 ... 76362152636620.html7 G* _% `. Q+ E& i- k

* M3 J2 k& y* P% [! P0 j' \" s( oI think the content is rather premature, i.e. not a porn stuff compare with some HK newspapers. / z, u( i, g# K0 i# o
I never think of any porn or sexual stuff after the reading, but just have some moment to retreat the social life in mind. 1 X( u. `0 I+ q8 I# H; I
I pretty sad that about the University official.; l2 h- e" y1 r3 B0 ~9 k
It's them making the stuff worse.

bigfish

我覺得份報刊以市井中文刊出就顯得不雅, 如果轉用華麗英文刊登就乜事都冇 la
4 t3 g# h$ ^  @
/ _3 j6 ^/ v, R6 f[ Last edited by bigfish on 2007-5-15 at 05:26 PM ]

mailcool7

有錯就認,打就企定

155220

Originally posted by bigfish at 2007-5-15 17:24:
# T* `% y& C3 c: P我覺得份報刊以市井中文刊出就顯得不雅, 如果轉用華麗英文刊登就乜事都冇 la7 ~( X& J9 H! e/ ^  e, w, m
4 b4 ^, F0 [4 v4 W' n) |
[ Last edited by bigfish on 2007-5-15 at 05:26 PM ]

" C$ a& a1 \0 ^2 K' Y5 G# h. B

1 W+ b" ]4 l" ^7 B. x2 T9 K! g+ _兩者有何分別?6 U3 s2 K! E& u8 N0 d
中文就市井,英文就華麗,有咩根據?