ronald001120

D大學生好多都低低BB
, c# Z1 F! r/ T4 z# @好似今次事件" X" |' ^" ]/ }: |
識用個腦諗下
4 |: V' J' y8 @% Y唔好死讀書& `9 S" r, l0 Q4 T
都知登左出來會發生咩事7 M8 v, E" t( i3 w
錯左重要唔認錯
0 D) f) V# }! ?4 e6 v) C畀人見到香港D大學生有甘既質素3 u2 m. P* F) X
真係.........

shehboy

Originally posted by PG-13 at 2007-5-18 09:12 PM:( s, }" g$ J8 d- W5 U! [

6 K; [% w! h' L0 L& O" I+ F5 r- V/ x) i3 ]
I do respect CU students' good ...

7 o. a2 i. i/ A. d7 x- y; s3 q4 \
見你都好有heart寫個long ass boring reply,又不妨再boring一下. 如果係真係有所為而為,唔係搞噱頭,但做出黎既野人地完全get唔到你個message,咁個問題仲大,因為連最基本既判斷力同表達力都無.5 b$ n6 g- p7 {4 J4 h; C  J3 O
係認真定胡鬧,細心d睇多d就呃唔到人,講亂倫人獸交,可以話係挑戰社會禁忌,fine,但問人最想係校園邊度做愛,就明顯係玩,仲學坊間報刊整埋d乜乜信箱自己黎答,仲有語文粗劣市井...
3 s, M* ?$ S, E# t# c只從編輯同語文角度睇,都係好低水平好唔認真的產品,而你話其實佢地係好用心好認真咁做.你可以話我既judgement係subjective,我一樣可以話佢地既arguement係狡辯.: {" N5 u5 F# |: A8 i

; a! Z( L& @4 g& k" d4 n講多樣野你知,我見過一d睇黎畫得好馬虎既圖畫,後來發覺原來係d智障小朋友畫既,咁我會相信佢地真係用心畫既,係我怪錯左佢地.

PG-13

Originally posted by shehboy at 2007-5-19 04:37 AM:
1 P! l1 k/ D2 d4 s) ^; r/ p) U$ Q, C& N/ y+ M9 k

* _! k5 T/ [' @1 u見你都好有heart寫個long ass bor...

5 e- f& q) ]8 g+ K$ x8 D& \1 P" }* a* b5 ^/ x& e
Your last point is right into my heart.
" A" v1 H- b( I3 B  E' m1 CNot that I think they are retards Heehee
2 ]! t2 x, {  a  J5 Z. L
: b1 H+ o0 `/ iMaybe you have overestimated the ability of universities students. Don't put too much expectation, then you can appreciate their work.
8 s9 d& \$ X+ S& ?9 \4 [( |- i* \' _9 t
This time they has made a big and stupid mistake but I still bow for them. Its hard to see one who can stand out to make something different, something radical. 6 p! r: u6 g6 z" I" k9 k' n3 ?

# l: H4 k$ N2 M! {8 {1 CThey are still in school, the whole idea of conducting a student newspaper is only a leaning process. I still don't think they deserve too much of a blame, people make mistake and after this incident, they will become a better person.
8 O* f, ]- Y# I! Y
! J6 ?) a% T+ [' u, x2 F* D" W+ q# M( {
3 i$ ~7 g, z/ c7 i
Last, I do think they need some pressure from public.