奪命老妖

Originally posted by seafireson2 at 2007-5-15 02:29 PM:/ j2 E6 l+ ^# [' s# o* C3 [
% [! }% M& @' L# I9 E. s- I
agree,& w/ Z& P) H  y. W% w% c
我都未睇過,根本唔知係點,可能真係討論成份為主,: L& ]' H8 v5 S: {; P8 F
但我估同方向生果比,係小兒科,
2 G. N( k) t* j) G8 }期盼方向生果比人被定性二級不雅!

; g( }) ~6 H! V# r0 O
http://www.xanga.com/cusp_07/590 ... 76362152636620.html
/ I8 G% ], E! |9 n已經睇左幾期,性質傾向於性教育,同某報既果d嫖妓指南,差天共地
: Z8 L8 V* @( T搞成咁,都係兩個原因,第一係香港人係性方面真係好保守,探討下都唔得,第二係欺善怕惡,見係學生就恰你

chicken

Read the student post and find that it's not as evil as described by the media.$ Q% {9 A! F5 }- J. z: E
Just some extreme-conservative people too nervous about it.

sakura310

Originally posted by d228216 at 2007-5-15 01:58 PM:
: }. r' I3 v, c有罪就要罸, 冇罪就要平反, 法庭應申張正義！ ' {5 o8 m, t1 d

; g& C, d  j4 I, I: i; T) h+ O' f係咪大學生根本冇關係....大學生巴閉d?? 有免死金牌???
6 N! m/ R9 c' J9 j* z& C
/ j* O5 y* E" O& b. h' @- p為自己既行為負責, 係今日既年青人最需要學習既野!

7 l5 H  x( I2 Q/ F$ g" V3 P
2 ?2 Q0 E4 T# t# y/ N0 t, ^: \絕對支持啦
, Z1 Y4 }0 ^* ^- I9 K) v
# D1 Q$ u2 u) {1 X有錯就認,打就企定& g- ]5 }1 P3 G4 S- Q4 T
: v3 ?6 \+ n3 f# H) b. g7 z) N
無錯當然要撐到底
9 t9 B, D5 u7 x* M" @3 e' w
9 c8 W. O5 u6 \0 G但今次我覺得係班大學生唔0岩3 n$ T' Y  i+ {" ]6 D5 R* e+ W

. m8 F: t& ^! G7 u5 F在發佈一份公眾讀物時,內容應該注意下,唔同私人交談,你講咩都得
# f0 T/ L4 W5 e
' R8 e0 p3 `; Y# ^一份公眾讀物係好有影響力
( e2 |; T7 B7 ^: ~! ]
! B9 b# o  p' _" N我唔認為學校方今次要幫班學生2 p/ \4 {& P2 x$ A; K$ x* y
. J, Q+ l' D7 Z9 U
唔通第時出到去做野做錯事就有亞head幫你頂?
: {1 {9 n1 C" b% _( a. k  o* D7 Q, ~
2 k5 w3 F. @( ^9 n$ S, y我唔認為lor
2 |* z! k0 G: Y) K6 s" x0 v$ |7 q) j  e' @' _
唔係話要整死佢地
+ `+ D$ @, Z+ e/ C
  P: I* B, {& j3 ]* C/ b而係今次件事,如果判得成的話,自然起到警惕作用; F! ^/ a* H, U! Z0 l  ^" o' Y
2 }1 k# j; k7 f/ b& G
我覺得係d人將言論自由ge範圍放得太大
9 x% k% [9 L* s+ k3 ?3 }* D* L3 R; L6 s, V
有d野係應該講,有d野係唔應該係公眾場合講的
7 _' ], f( ]% t( l# e6 h
4 F- ~+ l- L* I$ j5 @唔係話唔應該講就係防礙言論自由( A5 s* q. D( ^, V4 E9 e; K# {

; u4 N/ Q# }* }, w大家都知偷錢搶錢係唔唔法,唔通咁又話政府防礙你搵錢?

浪子

睇完, 真係冇野好講, 咁所有中小學性教育書籍都可以列做不雅

hackenli

一日一金句
3 v. h3 K% |) U, ?! R"佢地有比一般市民較高o既學歷,就更應該能夠明辨是非"
) D2 ~( ~  P+ n% W- X, Q* _, v. Q
我們的大學生
9 W! ?2 {: ?) U: ?" c7 ]$ k
) S- }- R* S& u5 J6 M7 Q3 O* T
8 J; p' y2 Z8 t& Y$ o: S  z" L& h; o) u, \- z( H

2 g* B  n1 B9 c, m! J. e0 K

Originally posted by easy_man at 2007-5-15 02:13 PM:
1 i: \  g' N) I; l( @% G, f/ n/ L, }8 y9 o
. N2 ~$ H- z, [3 r/ t
有見地 !!!
0 c8 u5 B  L4 c: X, e, t" a/ D現今大學生部份以為...

vv1668vv

反映大學生對法律認知不足。自以為是

支持者

http://www.xanga.com/cusp_07/590 ... 76362152636620.html* e9 b5 X  Q* a

. P  P1 z6 U7 w9 Q! \& _) OI think the content is rather premature, i.e. not a porn stuff compare with some HK newspapers. , C& g+ y8 d6 S
I never think of any porn or sexual stuff after the reading, but just have some moment to retreat the social life in mind. ' J! R- F+ M/ f' G: @
I pretty sad that about the University official.
0 o/ E+ i, M. i1 N, W( y: \, ~It's them making the stuff worse.

bigfish

我覺得份報刊以市井中文刊出就顯得不雅, 如果轉用華麗英文刊登就乜事都冇 la
# b' n) k) S. O! f( `/ m3 P5 N. |3 Y6 c' h+ ^
[ Last edited by bigfish on 2007-5-15 at 05:26 PM ]

mailcool7

有錯就認,打就企定

155220

Originally posted by bigfish at 2007-5-15 17:24:
9 n0 N3 G7 u  Q  y+ q% O0 `我覺得份報刊以市井中文刊出就顯得不雅, 如果轉用華麗英文刊登就乜事都冇 la* o) S; |9 @. ?1 C: v6 U
; l3 \% a6 k4 ~' {. k4 o0 D+ e5 D
[ Last edited by bigfish on 2007-5-15 at 05:26 PM ]

" J. W. z: a- w( j: Q" c; u3 n" ~' p* I4 `" r
兩者有何分別?5 E# w2 [8 y9 _0 W6 Q% p) Y1 C* E1 _3 H- V
中文就市井,英文就華麗,有咩根據?