Chingy

Originally posted by crap at 2005-4-27 01:20 AM:! o' x" g& m  {. ^
" I' d+ {4 ~4 O3 O. |, z

1 s; A+ W2 W( Y. H0 B" z# X我都覺得錯不在他們, 是他們的父母 ...

0 H1 ?) S6 A. f* G' T% S

! B8 r4 o4 A- a4 X/ `8 P7 cIn Spider-Man 2.Spider man did stop a train

crap

Originally posted by Chingy at 2005-4-27 07:12 AM:' w8 z& T2 t/ |

$ m  F# q  l, l
3 o/ i" l- G2 K3 h$ l8 h/ y: KIn Spider-Man 2.Spider man did stop a train

5 `5 D& v" s% \* }
/ n% L" Z' f1 y8 v- uoh really...# X7 {2 U3 o9 }/ N4 N' @) R
hahhaa, thx a lot^^"$ d# Q0 ?- K" W1 r7 Y' F8 Y9 W7 H7 i- T
i didn't watch ch.2

springspring

挺出名，在偶理學的問題
& D7 Q. Y+ b3 F! Q
: @4 ^/ F  P' Y9 U* o當然這是個假設性問題
  Y( s+ V& M+ l, v; g5 p但將人數倍大
, p' E3 A* S# m例如是十個一個，到一百個一個，到一千個一個
# H' I- g$ b9 G" \8 E(情況可以換作其他)
0 X* N; z# c  @7 f' W* x# f始終有條界線

easonwing

絕情谷既問題.... V1 a* L1 D% ^" |
如果一個人個邊係我親人,我會好自私咁求佢...
5 q+ l& r! |2 ^+ F; O9 A' q如果唔係親人,我會殺人警百...

easonwing

Originally posted by easonwing at 2005-4-27 12:12 PM:
' m1 i% ?' f. {/ k- q絕情谷既問題...1 {5 s# L$ h+ k7 \9 T' x
如果一個人個邊係我親人,我會好自私咁求佢..." M% b1 ]: b: u$ f; S0 \
如果唔係親人,我會殺人警百...

- [) E( A& f5 j$ Q; a! X% `2 P5 f
殺一警百...

srfqt1

其實我最初係即刻諗要救多d人,救得愈多愈好# c6 I  g# S* c8 e/ D) t
於是好像好順理成章要讓火車轉往停用的鐵軌,等多d小朋友逃生
6 i9 K7 l6 M( W但是諗深一層,咁樣真係好像唔係好o岩
* k* ~0 T" H% ]' Q; A) g好像crap兄講一樣,停用軌玩的小孩, 因他始終才是守規則的人, 他可沒有預料過會有危險,點解要犧牲一個守規矩的小朋友,去換取其他唔守規矩的小朋友的性命呢2 Y# I/ I# c1 _: f: d
其實到底人數的多與少值唔值得去考慮呢
! N) f( l% ]  o* ?
7 {  a0 p  c; t  o3 T' j0 E% o我估如果我有時間去想清楚的話,我都係會救係停用路軌玩的小孩,我都認為冇理由要犧牲守規矩的小朋友,去換取其他唔守規矩的小朋友的性命+ ?& x/ Z; }, l! t! M
不過,係千鈞一髮的時間要我去做抉擇的話,可能我應該會被表面上的人數的多與少去蒙蔽咗,而且眼前真係有一班小朋友,不過的確又好像maxfigo講話明係停用...咁條鐵軌一定有d問題ga la...如果轉左去好易累死果班乘客 !!,可能我係會其實為咗少數唔守規矩的小朋友,犧牲咗更多無辜的火車乘客

crap

Originally posted by srfqt1 at 2005-4-27 05:44 PM:1 m1 z0 c7 z0 ], p. V
其實我最初係即刻諗要救多d人,救得愈多 ...

: L* B# [* j, q2 e; V8 m4 [0 \4 G, g0 M
haha, srfqt1兄, 我們終能於球場外達成一致的睇法, 哈, 相當有趣' h' e' U* j3 S; C# M2 a; H
你所說的也對, 下意識的確會選擇救人多的一方, 當時根本沒辦法分清誰對誰錯, 只好靠本能做決定..其他的要看天意了....
+ K2 Y% x) Y' b# m  t8 A3 z. [* \) N/ `
p.s. 小弟昨天在你於好文區發表的文章下留了言, srfqt1兄你有看到嗎

jason williams

i think i will help those children instead of that child# C3 u; J# y9 v. K
yes, my reason is helping more
5 u' {6 L5 G2 O! X: M; O+ Ufor this sudden and short period, i dun think i can have so much time to think the background!
5 V# w" T- b9 nif saying that child obey the rule but others are not, i think this is not a very good reason to help that child- h% e) i+ @2 S/ ]  U9 w/ n. [* I
because no matter the rail is using or not, i think also no gd to play in that place, right?4 t' `0 q9 r+ d# J$ b2 K
also i think the question hasn't tell us the background, none  know that child is obeyin the rule so that he play at the rail which is not using!!!
! k# T, B, F+ e+ |may be other reasons so that he play himself at there, such as, he is a bad guy that none like to play with him, or all children also dunno which is using and which is not using!; M# s# u3 K0 @3 b- f
under so much confusing on the background, i would choose help more than less, just a normal think during this short urgetn period!!!

sfxc0000

作為一個人類~~6 l3 I, q' x. i+ N" d: N1 c6 e
當我見到呢D咁危急o既事情~~% H$ Y$ j  W) {- a
我冇可能可以好理性去諗個後果~~- |/ a0 L& M; ~+ |8 H. t
正常黎講一定係以人數為先~~* T( x( G) S% M' J" J8 S; n
即係我會救個一班唔守規矩o既細路而犧牲o個位守規矩o既細路~~
9 s! F; M! e: j0 H# t我只有o係事件過後先可以好似Crap同srfqt1好理性咁去分析輕重, 對錯~~4 B, o* U# _7 I7 l- }" c
但如果o係當時o既情況中~~
  i9 k' V6 V% }! {6 N我只有犧牲一位細路的性命稷換取一班細路的性命

中華卡樂ｂ

我諗我不會搞到火車轉往停用的鐵軌，因為咁樣會搞到火車乘客犧牲，而且果個守規矩既細路冇理由要佢犧牲的！而且我睇到火車黎中，我會用我既本能去救果一班唔守規矩既壞細路，雖然我明白到一定會有人死，可能我自己都會死，但我咁做一定唔會後悔，減少犧牲的人數，而且可以令一班唔守規矩而且死唔去既壞細路知道錯誤！（個人意見）