Chingy

Originally posted by crap at 2005-4-27 01:20 AM:
) Y+ G& Z' _4 g1 F/ P" ]: y5 {: w2 N
1 T+ _! P  X/ I/ I& c+ l6 B& _' |8 r$ `5 f. j
我都覺得錯不在他們, 是他們的父母 ...

2 F( |0 X1 P' p" Q6 c: q7 J" p& s3 J- G8 [
In Spider-Man 2.Spider man did stop a train

crap

Originally posted by Chingy at 2005-4-27 07:12 AM:
- h4 p$ a9 @: p0 E* ?- o  U
/ K, }' c8 D& b; [5 A2 x# W
" }# {& w9 g8 K: P: vIn Spider-Man 2.Spider man did stop a train

' e6 @8 ^" t* @1 R& F- ~; n3 X- d. D5 L
oh really...& ^1 _, n& V# D3 Z  G
hahhaa, thx a lot^^"
3 d1 o& q6 ~+ q" |4 r" f# [5 H" Ki didn't watch ch.2

springspring

挺出名，在偶理學的問題
, o! S6 P5 X6 O, _' U( j8 ]; u# \4 Z; B, M& N
當然這是個假設性問題
2 j+ }2 l8 o' q! R但將人數倍大: z' q6 k' W) V% m/ f
例如是十個一個，到一百個一個，到一千個一個: D8 d- q- V" |7 b6 B$ }
(情況可以換作其他)! u  B  ^2 L' P4 e2 @
始終有條界線

easonwing

絕情谷既問題...
. V/ A, K% d4 b3 I( f如果一個人個邊係我親人,我會好自私咁求佢...
- `3 B, _1 `; y3 ~* G8 S如果唔係親人,我會殺人警百...

easonwing

Originally posted by easonwing at 2005-4-27 12:12 PM:
. v1 G5 i5 B0 x3 h$ z% t0 X1 G絕情谷既問題...
( A" m' l* G) d) f" c0 s% |如果一個人個邊係我親人,我會好自私咁求佢...
4 O7 n8 @6 j7 a# G) K1 {/ K/ r如果唔係親人,我會殺人警百...

! [6 L' P( Q  ]1 S/ p" A- Y殺一警百...

srfqt1

其實我最初係即刻諗要救多d人,救得愈多愈好
! M" w# y1 I+ u' `8 R於是好像好順理成章要讓火車轉往停用的鐵軌,等多d小朋友逃生3 ]1 [0 }3 Z* U* g4 `7 u
但是諗深一層,咁樣真係好像唔係好o岩
! P; R6 |! @- k( D! \好像crap兄講一樣,停用軌玩的小孩, 因他始終才是守規則的人, 他可沒有預料過會有危險,點解要犧牲一個守規矩的小朋友,去換取其他唔守規矩的小朋友的性命呢' n$ [' S% k, H1 r
其實到底人數的多與少值唔值得去考慮呢
# y  B" g1 A6 t' n8 Z* O, l1 k! F- X+ n  H  E" w, \" Y
我估如果我有時間去想清楚的話,我都係會救係停用路軌玩的小孩,我都認為冇理由要犧牲守規矩的小朋友,去換取其他唔守規矩的小朋友的性命
- W, K2 A. \# w/ J& `不過,係千鈞一髮的時間要我去做抉擇的話,可能我應該會被表面上的人數的多與少去蒙蔽咗,而且眼前真係有一班小朋友,不過的確又好像maxfigo講話明係停用...咁條鐵軌一定有d問題ga la...如果轉左去好易累死果班乘客 !!,可能我係會其實為咗少數唔守規矩的小朋友,犧牲咗更多無辜的火車乘客

crap

Originally posted by srfqt1 at 2005-4-27 05:44 PM:
, Z+ b+ [1 Z3 v: ]1 v7 x其實我最初係即刻諗要救多d人,救得愈多 ...

& F* S- k4 M4 z
8 J: J1 N7 _/ X2 U0 Rhaha, srfqt1兄, 我們終能於球場外達成一致的睇法, 哈, 相當有趣6 ?( L) d$ k3 u8 u4 Q6 R) x3 J
你所說的也對, 下意識的確會選擇救人多的一方, 當時根本沒辦法分清誰對誰錯, 只好靠本能做決定..其他的要看天意了....5 T9 x( r% T. s. J
. `6 O" V; Q3 s% t6 K7 r
p.s. 小弟昨天在你於好文區發表的文章下留了言, srfqt1兄你有看到嗎

jason williams

i think i will help those children instead of that child
4 }6 w. r4 F; t! ^7 myes, my reason is helping more
* E  |& O0 D; e' w" pfor this sudden and short period, i dun think i can have so much time to think the background!3 G7 L, W2 l8 ?( S# M2 y) Y
if saying that child obey the rule but others are not, i think this is not a very good reason to help that child
* \% p5 E; Z3 T* H1 R& h) ?$ ~because no matter the rail is using or not, i think also no gd to play in that place, right?
5 ]( I* Z2 [6 m3 [" D. nalso i think the question hasn't tell us the background, none  know that child is obeyin the rule so that he play at the rail which is not using!!!; y! s$ S4 \# A8 _
may be other reasons so that he play himself at there, such as, he is a bad guy that none like to play with him, or all children also dunno which is using and which is not using!
) o" H! ?4 i( Tunder so much confusing on the background, i would choose help more than less, just a normal think during this short urgetn period!!!

sfxc0000

作為一個人類~~
' L; e' y: l/ \3 d4 q& G當我見到呢D咁危急o既事情~~
! P$ u: |0 k- z8 k# G6 v3 x( E我冇可能可以好理性去諗個後果~~" U, _7 ^2 j$ I; \6 b0 ^8 g9 C6 Y
正常黎講一定係以人數為先~~) a# r- x8 K! D5 w3 ^* P
即係我會救個一班唔守規矩o既細路而犧牲o個位守規矩o既細路~~
8 Z  o6 Y( ~# t9 H# q$ e! R6 _我只有o係事件過後先可以好似Crap同srfqt1好理性咁去分析輕重, 對錯~~
: m/ R+ |# E4 W3 K! \. O但如果o係當時o既情況中~~
( \. h3 g4 y4 _1 T, g+ B我只有犧牲一位細路的性命稷換取一班細路的性命

中華卡樂ｂ

我諗我不會搞到火車轉往停用的鐵軌，因為咁樣會搞到火車乘客犧牲，而且果個守規矩既細路冇理由要佢犧牲的！而且我睇到火車黎中，我會用我既本能去救果一班唔守規矩既壞細路，雖然我明白到一定會有人死，可能我自己都會死，但我咁做一定唔會後悔，減少犧牲的人數，而且可以令一班唔守規矩而且死唔去既壞細路知道錯誤！（個人意見）