Chingy

Originally posted by crap at 2005-4-27 01:20 AM:5 Y9 R& p9 X1 B( @6 n
# r2 J6 o% d/ U- h# f
) z1 y0 o# I! f& @7 q2 J( @7 r1 e+ S
我都覺得錯不在他們, 是他們的父母 ...

; S* }' L% O. }
7 I; m9 \  A7 }# x5 v
In Spider-Man 2.Spider man did stop a train

crap

Originally posted by Chingy at 2005-4-27 07:12 AM:% K+ v& ?: I1 D9 J$ M, s! f" N. s
2 w0 U7 d. x% ?
$ ?1 x% g7 U4 Z: q6 Q7 F
In Spider-Man 2.Spider man did stop a train

. `* a1 L  M! q- C

/ W7 c3 Z$ x5 h; J' R, qoh really...
7 z2 K# ?/ U- U" q: n7 u( hhahhaa, thx a lot^^": ^; S& a( l: N+ K1 f! ^6 Z
i didn't watch ch.2

springspring

挺出名，在偶理學的問題2 B+ y3 @! Z+ [( `

7 |0 P, G, e! t1 Z  I# c/ l& W- @, M當然這是個假設性問題, y% H: y  _2 D* m% [  L
但將人數倍大4 f1 O3 a# u, ~% `7 R7 E2 @+ {
例如是十個一個，到一百個一個，到一千個一個( {8 r( C; C. j  a: B* g8 ~) p
(情況可以換作其他)
( }/ e% A9 O+ I始終有條界線

easonwing

絕情谷既問題...' k' i" w, i# o% t" P( Y* h
如果一個人個邊係我親人,我會好自私咁求佢...
% K7 z: `! v& m% K6 r% \/ q如果唔係親人,我會殺人警百...

easonwing

Originally posted by easonwing at 2005-4-27 12:12 PM:
# U. [: l, M2 Z7 @; D. N2 t絕情谷既問題...
9 I/ t' @; ]( B5 P2 T3 H如果一個人個邊係我親人,我會好自私咁求佢...
/ d. ^8 G% Q0 _" A7 J6 ?) ~如果唔係親人,我會殺人警百...

3 k: _5 `* K* u殺一警百...

srfqt1

其實我最初係即刻諗要救多d人,救得愈多愈好
9 E4 e. o3 G" N* d* i於是好像好順理成章要讓火車轉往停用的鐵軌,等多d小朋友逃生
* y5 ?( f2 v. a; h但是諗深一層,咁樣真係好像唔係好o岩
% v' t. W- m# H$ B" i好像crap兄講一樣,停用軌玩的小孩, 因他始終才是守規則的人, 他可沒有預料過會有危險,點解要犧牲一個守規矩的小朋友,去換取其他唔守規矩的小朋友的性命呢9 e; a+ H! u. ]& u5 v& s
其實到底人數的多與少值唔值得去考慮呢
* @$ S, }! _, u, U8 C6 v) m& H
/ [& T/ H7 ?) N8 {. r$ D, I# Q我估如果我有時間去想清楚的話,我都係會救係停用路軌玩的小孩,我都認為冇理由要犧牲守規矩的小朋友,去換取其他唔守規矩的小朋友的性命3 W# Z2 E9 v. t8 `/ P& \$ P: Q
不過,係千鈞一髮的時間要我去做抉擇的話,可能我應該會被表面上的人數的多與少去蒙蔽咗,而且眼前真係有一班小朋友,不過的確又好像maxfigo講話明係停用...咁條鐵軌一定有d問題ga la...如果轉左去好易累死果班乘客 !!,可能我係會其實為咗少數唔守規矩的小朋友,犧牲咗更多無辜的火車乘客

crap

Originally posted by srfqt1 at 2005-4-27 05:44 PM:" t3 _- g% o* W2 A
其實我最初係即刻諗要救多d人,救得愈多 ...

. S6 S+ k3 N9 s) S
' N: O, x% a0 V5 j# N+ l$ Ghaha, srfqt1兄, 我們終能於球場外達成一致的睇法, 哈, 相當有趣
4 f6 ]5 c1 m* I( }7 O% ^你所說的也對, 下意識的確會選擇救人多的一方, 當時根本沒辦法分清誰對誰錯, 只好靠本能做決定..其他的要看天意了....
: v. W; T& r9 z) t# [
! J: h5 P1 A+ [* Ap.s. 小弟昨天在你於好文區發表的文章下留了言, srfqt1兄你有看到嗎

jason williams

i think i will help those children instead of that child# C6 m# ~8 K  F7 r- b& B7 G
yes, my reason is helping more3 ?" }4 ]( \: P% v# ]% U6 T. u
for this sudden and short period, i dun think i can have so much time to think the background!' |4 W8 \) ~! K3 u0 x
if saying that child obey the rule but others are not, i think this is not a very good reason to help that child  c$ a* [! J% X- h3 K
because no matter the rail is using or not, i think also no gd to play in that place, right?# K' @. g7 Z2 C: {  g7 G
also i think the question hasn't tell us the background, none  know that child is obeyin the rule so that he play at the rail which is not using!!!
  m% o1 h( N! P9 Zmay be other reasons so that he play himself at there, such as, he is a bad guy that none like to play with him, or all children also dunno which is using and which is not using!$ Y% U$ c* a, e+ Z8 o6 v$ m
under so much confusing on the background, i would choose help more than less, just a normal think during this short urgetn period!!!

sfxc0000

作為一個人類~~
0 d1 a1 k) Z( t% v當我見到呢D咁危急o既事情~~
8 q/ _# B/ D$ ?/ m, A8 A我冇可能可以好理性去諗個後果~~
  O. L) A% A0 [( {. r# }正常黎講一定係以人數為先~~' h  L  D3 i6 i7 N
即係我會救個一班唔守規矩o既細路而犧牲o個位守規矩o既細路~~
  k- m- @5 k" D我只有o係事件過後先可以好似Crap同srfqt1好理性咁去分析輕重, 對錯~~
9 ~% O* E" M# ?: ^- M但如果o係當時o既情況中~~
. o4 N& K/ [6 \* d我只有犧牲一位細路的性命稷換取一班細路的性命

中華卡樂ｂ

我諗我不會搞到火車轉往停用的鐵軌，因為咁樣會搞到火車乘客犧牲，而且果個守規矩既細路冇理由要佢犧牲的！而且我睇到火車黎中，我會用我既本能去救果一班唔守規矩既壞細路，雖然我明白到一定會有人死，可能我自己都會死，但我咁做一定唔會後悔，減少犧牲的人數，而且可以令一班唔守規矩而且死唔去既壞細路知道錯誤！（個人意見）