<<新主題 | 舊主題>>
娛樂滿紛 26FUN » 吹水版 » 精彩辯論-----信耶穌不合科學
返回列表 回復 發帖
Originally posted by austin666 at 2005-4-5 12:13 AM:
( J1 b) H3 K" K" A3 X. a我係一個連自己都吳信的人
  l# N: c/ b" V: u* j" @又點會將自己交付俾上帝呢
) I/ n! @  K% ~0 c8 g道理我知道好多只係做吳到# v4 E$ {/ X& C9 D- ^
呢D就係做人的悲哀
8 h; y# [  r! ^* \: k% K

' T0 e, {" b* h: f# nNobody says you have to do it to win salvation.....the notion of 'giving yourself to God' is the biggest cliche and Christian jargon of all time!, y% s- X" `. d! H/ c+ x  S" ?
/ l: X1 ?" Q& Z+ k* v8 Y- A& ]
Nobody can give himself/herself to God....these are Puritian theologies...." d3 B/ `4 |! E" e( Y
! |7 w, e1 n+ |3 D
mr. austin 666, our pneumatology is a bit off...but I admire your willingness to dialouge....
9 V5 |  e. V# K, A% u
2 b+ f* i+ [1 {% f$ sstruggle with him and try to understand him.... that's my journey....may it be yours one day.
yes, of cos, we are limitation. and we cannot 'trust' or 'save' ourselves.....
1 p& [. K  i# N1 Z$ fcheer up.... and find the truth in HIM
We are blessed that we can watch sports, to do many things...
so be happy!
估唔到brightlee對足球咁熟識~~~連哲學都咁熟~~~~~~樣樣掂~~~~
我哲學就唔掂啦!  |' A/ s3 G* M# O% W! V
我只不過微小的基督徒...................
: `7 t8 r4 T. A: N% w0 Z' Q1 H1 A2 G真的!!這不是反話
* z  ~! r0 d& y/ I  N0 R% B因為我是情感比理性強的人, ^9 c. a( i; x" m% i4 p
所以哲學是不成的
We are blessed that we can watch sports, to do many things...
so be happy!
建立在虚假,謊言上的教派,不信也沒損失,* W4 [& A$ z) M; T
以一本七拼八“揪”的故事,作為真理有欠理據,
: ?7 O. t8 l5 a2 P在只有二千年的歷史中,不斷引起戰爭,屠殺,酷刑,權力鬥爭,強奪金錢,奴第...等等罪行,到現在還進行著...
' W8 p: \6 V; f  a& E7 ?正是萬惡之源
Originally posted by DXneo at 2005-4-5 11:42 AM:
) z1 g7 O+ m# H! ?建立在虚假,謊言上的教派,不信也沒損失 ...
! E; H% V" [$ Z# \3 v4 h3 R7 P

* G+ i' x) e6 \$ @$ F' t: T3 O8 kWhat a statement we have here?9 t5 O1 d1 {$ G  l* G6 f  u
9 A3 m/ j+ n3 W  [0 O: d8 _5 W6 g, V
Just wondering, what do you know about the syntax of ancient Greek, Hebrew and the history of the canonization of the bible? 5 B# \  P$ R: p# t2 k4 Y4 ]4 p  P

# G6 @) _* `+ P' A; g- s" k3 i# OI do agree with the bloodshed part....and my respond that this was posted a page ago in this thread.
4 ^7 I: e4 L7 ^* f4 c7 @4 ?  \3 n0 Q. q# F7 k. A7 C& T
Looking forward to see the support of your thesis. mr/ms Dxneo
8 i6 d( d$ m2 r% M" I) e) j
( k+ h" l9 t" c. f4 e* c% x( ?5 I' ~:cool:
% z2 p5 e, W" o4 L
. \6 k! }8 ?' t$ S6 Z[ Last edited by Gretzky on 2005-4-5 at 02:15 PM ]
Originally posted by DXneo at 2005-4-6 09:42:- q2 N$ Y) {2 w# A+ n; R
建立在虚假,謊言上的教派,不信也沒損失 ...
: v* l% u/ M$ k" [+ Z* S  ~) s! S7 x* z) e' d; b+ N
"不信也沒損失"
) |, E9 L" h- u; ?0 ?! Q, k, rYes, we can't "control" the religions from others.....  n( a! M4 [) O. k9 b9 ~" x
but if we look positively, we should find out the truth.. of GOD......., H& H3 v$ x. o( u
+ f0 r: F2 A3 B2 ]* l
it's starting because we have sins......
2 V- s% a7 `4 f9 ~, {8 @3 o4 Csatan dislike the creation from GOD..... (men) so .... attack us
9 ~% I8 o0 I( @" w9 dour jealous, our selfish.. etc... to let us unlike charatertists GOD
We are blessed that we can watch sports, to do many things...
so be happy!
"他們都見證了一個人生命的轉變,就是一位年青人的心智從謊言和教條轉向對真相樸實的追求"! t+ |0 |* M9 H- c" @0 s# n% U
只要把神和基督之名及不要問只要信的思想放在一邊,- j% U& y) `$ }5 Q& j4 e8 W" ?1 ?
用一些“腦”來看一看書中人的所說所作所為,% _9 g/ W/ f7 y/ s
這些只可說是故事,古猶太神話大全
+ c* V1 [: C0 e' e+ D' u+ m2 e如果把神和基督之名代入中國神話,更加神乎其神啦,% s4 n0 Y# N# {4 r: O4 ~
而中國五千年歷史也沒有大洪水浸沒全國,書要多看一點其他的~~
4 u% n4 Y6 ]2 U& R
4 C4 U! K# q* _" ?導人向善的道理可多多學習,無理的要求或信條不肖一看,
6 h( S# n! V9 L- Y1 b8 i好的宗教不必強迫人說認同,& B. \. ^2 A- H  g& i5 A

9 f* h" K' y3 k# B8 D5 x一直以宗教作“尋”略的西方國家,2 N* X" E) T* G9 E
改了方式但還離不開強列排他及非教友即罪(歒)人的作法
: h% c% C- }  o) P7 y9 K2 }美國的“布樹”更以救世信徒的姿態宣傳,開戰...
. D+ F9 V; Z2 B) m# K3 L# X+ r; P, \
$ b3 T- l6 M" f* ]. m6 @8 D宗教只是西方歷史上權力的道具$ o! E, {, H' \# e
# \4 x" N: E9 f* u% |6 k2 J+ T! k
吹水吹太多了,我看不必要花時間找理據了,4 @. ^( r# }3 O" [2 O' S& m4 g
信是你的事,不信是我的事,我既有言論宗教自由,與你何干9 t2 n7 Y% o/ w2 s* Y" Y
0 |7 c7 A* h2 U* G( [
以下是其他人的見解,
9 @, f) W) b4 V# O4 h看一下神的先知門徒在記錄他們偉大信仰的錯誤
; k) G( E% B% x( p6 l8 @% P3 Ghttp://hk.geocities.com/hpkong98/buybo.htm; N* ?7 b0 C+ Q$ [+ s9 {
' e: q+ V2 O0 ]4 }. c) N
[ Last edited by DXneo on 2005-4-6 at 02:17 PM ]
.............信耶穌..............只係心靈上既寄託............
# J* g8 d9 b  F. w: {6 ^* W9 G) f3 t1 ~* w( \! l4 o* u
信左,如果開心d,積極d,咪信囉! 0每個人有自己選擇!, }5 n. i$ O7 o+ V; @' C
! R  O% i8 F2 D  {- I. r: x
不過唔好吹噓到真係甘"神"!!!
& B) }2 I' [5 D5 {0 Z1 N8 q6 |8 {
: U: R# i- @' y1 [2 J; b我信"耶穌"真係出現過係世上...不過係1個自以為係"神之子"既宗教狂熱分子!!!& g# I$ L  s- ]; s4 g* x! n* o$ ?

" y+ {% W3 G0 G2 {, w" |9 V同埋希牲左自己,成就左天主教成為地球最多人信既宗教!
Originally posted by ilove---you at 2005-4-5 07:06 PM:
/ u0 l& w  ~* x7 w1 }4 H.............信耶穌... ...
7 h4 G& B8 C0 U7 N% o2 x
Regarding the resurrection....% b! f. {1 _& C3 y# ^  e; s

4 c, D$ S; E$ a4 |Actually even the Roman government had refereces of the resurrection account of Jesus. The great historian Josephus did some sociological and religious studies in the 1st Century....7 |. t  ]/ O6 e! t$ r; [

! q+ h. }/ f; v! M5 p3 p( r, VYou don't have to believe...but take a look at the historical documents before putting some horrendous claims, please.
返回列表 回復 發帖
<<新主題 | 舊主題>>
娛樂滿紛 26FUN » 吹水版 » 精彩辯論-----信耶穌不合科學

重要聲明:26fun.com為一個討論區服務網站。本網站是以即時上載留言的方式運作,26fun.com對所有留言的真實性、完整性及立場等,不負任何法律責任。而一切留言之言論只代表留言者個人意見,並非本網站之立場,用戶不應信賴內容,並應自行判斷內容之真實性。於有關情形下,用戶應尋求專業意見(如涉及醫療、法律或投資等問題)。 由於本討論區受到「即時上載留言」運作方式所規限,故不能完全監察所有留言,若讀者發現有留言出現問題,請聯絡我們。26fun.com有權刪除任何留言及拒絕任何人士上載留言,同時亦有不刪除留言的權利。切勿撰寫粗言穢語、誹謗、渲染色情暴力或人身攻擊的言論,敬請自律。本網站保留一切法律權利。