Chingy

Originally posted by crap at 2005-4-27 01:20 AM:- g% ~/ f/ p( ^! Z1 X
, o+ J4 h  e& k
- Y# v6 d4 o0 v* i( \; s9 P% G3 I
我都覺得錯不在他們, 是他們的父母 ...

0 T: i8 _. z& p4 V8 `6 J

+ c& F+ e$ |2 `8 i8 X! i* F, \In Spider-Man 2.Spider man did stop a train

crap

Originally posted by Chingy at 2005-4-27 07:12 AM:
; k$ a# g8 y* ^0 }& N# p& k* X' R1 w9 ?% |, i
; ~6 C% m, |9 M) t8 D2 U
In Spider-Man 2.Spider man did stop a train

# h% m1 Q- O0 b/ S; e$ V9 j( C) h: u7 W( K
oh really...
$ l/ k6 s, G3 vhahhaa, thx a lot^^"
4 h  n6 W* J2 X- I; ]i didn't watch ch.2

springspring

挺出名，在偶理學的問題( d6 m; ^9 Q& H* R6 p

1 k3 f  o# L: K1 _* O9 Y' N當然這是個假設性問題
5 S% l' P' P2 T3 O' u9 u但將人數倍大
' s0 g- A! M7 G2 f例如是十個一個，到一百個一個，到一千個一個7 i5 y! G  e; [
(情況可以換作其他); N4 G% r4 S2 n- H5 C) @
始終有條界線

easonwing

絕情谷既問題...7 G0 _$ f8 c( [1 t
如果一個人個邊係我親人,我會好自私咁求佢...
( |" g% k  h. {) c  B' K  z如果唔係親人,我會殺人警百...

easonwing

Originally posted by easonwing at 2005-4-27 12:12 PM:! W" G4 H4 l- \% ~) C4 Q
絕情谷既問題...- r7 e& Q  F: ~5 m
如果一個人個邊係我親人,我會好自私咁求佢...* x, {/ m  Y, ?3 N5 m2 B
如果唔係親人,我會殺人警百...

; A) A' @3 u: |0 d3 p/ d殺一警百...

srfqt1

其實我最初係即刻諗要救多d人,救得愈多愈好
8 L- j% M+ L. [$ W8 K  m4 W# t, S% ~於是好像好順理成章要讓火車轉往停用的鐵軌,等多d小朋友逃生
' R+ s- ^4 f; N- O6 b但是諗深一層,咁樣真係好像唔係好o岩
$ J# q  E$ [7 A. V好像crap兄講一樣,停用軌玩的小孩, 因他始終才是守規則的人, 他可沒有預料過會有危險,點解要犧牲一個守規矩的小朋友,去換取其他唔守規矩的小朋友的性命呢
% T+ g- q+ C9 X& N$ ]其實到底人數的多與少值唔值得去考慮呢, f0 ~2 Y7 r  g4 \; J
  {$ G! O5 |# v/ v: A& @5 v
我估如果我有時間去想清楚的話,我都係會救係停用路軌玩的小孩,我都認為冇理由要犧牲守規矩的小朋友,去換取其他唔守規矩的小朋友的性命
6 J% }3 m9 m. X, O& e  u( n不過,係千鈞一髮的時間要我去做抉擇的話,可能我應該會被表面上的人數的多與少去蒙蔽咗,而且眼前真係有一班小朋友,不過的確又好像maxfigo講話明係停用...咁條鐵軌一定有d問題ga la...如果轉左去好易累死果班乘客 !!,可能我係會其實為咗少數唔守規矩的小朋友,犧牲咗更多無辜的火車乘客

crap

Originally posted by srfqt1 at 2005-4-27 05:44 PM:; R5 u, a* f: M3 o
其實我最初係即刻諗要救多d人,救得愈多 ...

/ r' G  q+ b) t+ g
3 d# q. m3 q2 h
haha, srfqt1兄, 我們終能於球場外達成一致的睇法, 哈, 相當有趣7 k. f3 F' E) P% s
你所說的也對, 下意識的確會選擇救人多的一方, 當時根本沒辦法分清誰對誰錯, 只好靠本能做決定..其他的要看天意了....& k, f3 m8 C* |9 e; V8 C
' B& p6 R- X2 |
p.s. 小弟昨天在你於好文區發表的文章下留了言, srfqt1兄你有看到嗎

jason williams

i think i will help those children instead of that child
. R. J% x7 {6 z: J% b" J; B) J; D1 syes, my reason is helping more
: ?% h. H) I1 X9 @2 m+ Lfor this sudden and short period, i dun think i can have so much time to think the background!' i, U/ M; t' X' \/ y
if saying that child obey the rule but others are not, i think this is not a very good reason to help that child
" k3 E, k+ U  d! k, A( a' n" h! n) S" Wbecause no matter the rail is using or not, i think also no gd to play in that place, right?
: w; E6 h4 U2 halso i think the question hasn't tell us the background, none  know that child is obeyin the rule so that he play at the rail which is not using!!!7 f" e- ~# a8 C" j; q; n6 j  k
may be other reasons so that he play himself at there, such as, he is a bad guy that none like to play with him, or all children also dunno which is using and which is not using!
' q: K6 I7 k* x( d* Y, ~under so much confusing on the background, i would choose help more than less, just a normal think during this short urgetn period!!!

sfxc0000

作為一個人類~~
; E- v- Z  B$ ~6 f* v當我見到呢D咁危急o既事情~~$ _% T, ~' V; g: j6 {( \! Q6 I
我冇可能可以好理性去諗個後果~~4 G: l& @0 ^5 j5 l' \; f( `4 x2 e
正常黎講一定係以人數為先~~
  t4 `, o/ }9 H4 ~即係我會救個一班唔守規矩o既細路而犧牲o個位守規矩o既細路~~" u  ~( r6 B1 w; M' i4 E( `
我只有o係事件過後先可以好似Crap同srfqt1好理性咁去分析輕重, 對錯~~' ^/ |9 J3 [; R$ m: a
但如果o係當時o既情況中~~
" p; S; C! m: n我只有犧牲一位細路的性命稷換取一班細路的性命

中華卡樂ｂ

我諗我不會搞到火車轉往停用的鐵軌，因為咁樣會搞到火車乘客犧牲，而且果個守規矩既細路冇理由要佢犧牲的！而且我睇到火車黎中，我會用我既本能去救果一班唔守規矩既壞細路，雖然我明白到一定會有人死，可能我自己都會死，但我咁做一定唔會後悔，減少犧牲的人數，而且可以令一班唔守規矩而且死唔去既壞細路知道錯誤！（個人意見）