Chingy

Originally posted by crap at 2005-4-27 01:20 AM:
( ?9 T8 y, r% F6 U6 b: ?/ d8 Q5 K

" U+ D/ K  _, [+ c我都覺得錯不在他們, 是他們的父母 ...

# ]" E3 B% ^% d% M4 e' A# {: ?% z2 v+ C* S5 w0 s( P
In Spider-Man 2.Spider man did stop a train

crap

Originally posted by Chingy at 2005-4-27 07:12 AM:
& o5 b3 v/ A& Q) f6 L! [2 D: k! v% i; ]9 Q* l5 S" g
. A6 r( V& f1 N
In Spider-Man 2.Spider man did stop a train

( _; h, C& K2 i# ^
0 V. H/ r" Y$ z5 ^oh really...
" y7 y' [; l( l% F) @+ Lhahhaa, thx a lot^^"% m8 K0 R$ K" X4 ~8 R' N
i didn't watch ch.2

springspring

挺出名，在偶理學的問題
5 c  \) e' W) ^, Q3 m$ A
! H! E9 R( Z; a+ ?) r- H4 l當然這是個假設性問題
6 c- K6 Y8 B9 Z: _但將人數倍大  J: _, g6 b0 Z- ~/ y# l# k
例如是十個一個，到一百個一個，到一千個一個
! |7 W1 `9 U) {(情況可以換作其他)
7 R" ~3 J: h" V7 R  d始終有條界線

easonwing

絕情谷既問題...
& y9 e3 T' `( ~- @% d6 j8 o3 Q如果一個人個邊係我親人,我會好自私咁求佢...
7 y& U4 R7 G* p0 w+ t7 N. w  l如果唔係親人,我會殺人警百...

easonwing

Originally posted by easonwing at 2005-4-27 12:12 PM:
, p& S, k: T3 K8 L. M絕情谷既問題...
6 \8 S8 k7 t1 [  {9 ?! b: a$ E如果一個人個邊係我親人,我會好自私咁求佢...
8 R7 l4 \+ J: ], ^0 X如果唔係親人,我會殺人警百...

+ Y1 R" _8 r4 T# F' y' i3 Z5 z
殺一警百...

srfqt1

其實我最初係即刻諗要救多d人,救得愈多愈好6 E! x4 j' S/ }+ ~" B6 |0 g/ \
於是好像好順理成章要讓火車轉往停用的鐵軌,等多d小朋友逃生
8 y7 `7 t/ c; O3 t  U9 v* Q! x但是諗深一層,咁樣真係好像唔係好o岩
: J, O# k  G( w  [& m% H好像crap兄講一樣,停用軌玩的小孩, 因他始終才是守規則的人, 他可沒有預料過會有危險,點解要犧牲一個守規矩的小朋友,去換取其他唔守規矩的小朋友的性命呢
) p* \) X0 _9 _9 ?1 X" t其實到底人數的多與少值唔值得去考慮呢: a( Z( G, Y. D5 K
, J9 l9 ~9 k) z2 {* _% B
我估如果我有時間去想清楚的話,我都係會救係停用路軌玩的小孩,我都認為冇理由要犧牲守規矩的小朋友,去換取其他唔守規矩的小朋友的性命9 g# j$ h0 ~. F" _- a% ]
不過,係千鈞一髮的時間要我去做抉擇的話,可能我應該會被表面上的人數的多與少去蒙蔽咗,而且眼前真係有一班小朋友,不過的確又好像maxfigo講話明係停用...咁條鐵軌一定有d問題ga la...如果轉左去好易累死果班乘客 !!,可能我係會其實為咗少數唔守規矩的小朋友,犧牲咗更多無辜的火車乘客

crap

Originally posted by srfqt1 at 2005-4-27 05:44 PM:
4 X- g) x+ r: B1 @) C其實我最初係即刻諗要救多d人,救得愈多 ...

5 z  g. n4 F; {* U! H% V

3 X& D, O/ v% v7 W' @3 A, Y. Nhaha, srfqt1兄, 我們終能於球場外達成一致的睇法, 哈, 相當有趣
/ [" Q! I0 q4 d1 H你所說的也對, 下意識的確會選擇救人多的一方, 當時根本沒辦法分清誰對誰錯, 只好靠本能做決定..其他的要看天意了....
/ s6 H# B  H* p; i+ t5 L7 C
( w9 A2 v9 f% h7 d1 Ap.s. 小弟昨天在你於好文區發表的文章下留了言, srfqt1兄你有看到嗎

jason williams

i think i will help those children instead of that child! f# }# t0 i% n7 R1 H# `" p
yes, my reason is helping more
; r2 v! q3 ]5 L* j7 n' t& }for this sudden and short period, i dun think i can have so much time to think the background!
1 R( r4 R  s3 ^4 Y! q! Nif saying that child obey the rule but others are not, i think this is not a very good reason to help that child/ }$ r6 \% F, t/ _
because no matter the rail is using or not, i think also no gd to play in that place, right?8 E% v# ~: E% W3 C3 L
also i think the question hasn't tell us the background, none  know that child is obeyin the rule so that he play at the rail which is not using!!!5 L& p8 ~+ J7 ^+ ^
may be other reasons so that he play himself at there, such as, he is a bad guy that none like to play with him, or all children also dunno which is using and which is not using!
# m8 x( A# o! K% ]under so much confusing on the background, i would choose help more than less, just a normal think during this short urgetn period!!!

sfxc0000

作為一個人類~~* @" y4 E8 j9 x7 \
當我見到呢D咁危急o既事情~~) g1 |' M+ e' p
我冇可能可以好理性去諗個後果~~, J0 C& k3 y( C
正常黎講一定係以人數為先~~: |% G- i: ^9 z: A+ U' b
即係我會救個一班唔守規矩o既細路而犧牲o個位守規矩o既細路~~0 ~* A4 e5 z3 T% v
我只有o係事件過後先可以好似Crap同srfqt1好理性咁去分析輕重, 對錯~~: n* i4 S1 s( q6 Z5 b9 Y  R8 p) n
但如果o係當時o既情況中~~- b5 }, b" _: ~. `- J$ i
我只有犧牲一位細路的性命稷換取一班細路的性命

中華卡樂ｂ

我諗我不會搞到火車轉往停用的鐵軌，因為咁樣會搞到火車乘客犧牲，而且果個守規矩既細路冇理由要佢犧牲的！而且我睇到火車黎中，我會用我既本能去救果一班唔守規矩既壞細路，雖然我明白到一定會有人死，可能我自己都會死，但我咁做一定唔會後悔，減少犧牲的人數，而且可以令一班唔守規矩而且死唔去既壞細路知道錯誤！（個人意見）