Chingy

Originally posted by crap at 2005-4-27 01:20 AM:$ _2 \$ e1 ]2 w9 v
7 w8 P% C- R1 z$ n0 z% x
1 V* }3 D9 M4 C* z. y8 x
我都覺得錯不在他們, 是他們的父母 ...

1 c+ F1 Q$ a: D* E; R. A, O  Q; f0 O/ e% K
In Spider-Man 2.Spider man did stop a train

crap

Originally posted by Chingy at 2005-4-27 07:12 AM:) F( _8 Y2 b1 r! h5 |- I' R

. F( u! o3 o# Z* A' E' u
/ O% j+ Q0 B3 q* ^In Spider-Man 2.Spider man did stop a train

/ M/ K/ q$ q3 e- h4 ~# u( u7 W- a% [# |2 V) S; u" y
oh really...# n2 P4 K7 V* E* _( b
hahhaa, thx a lot^^"
" w, J1 C9 b% E% p; K& ki didn't watch ch.2

springspring

挺出名，在偶理學的問題( i/ K% A3 H3 r$ R2 y
0 P, y: `: L' l, k# h* Z
當然這是個假設性問題
/ ?4 r4 x) F* k. |( R. ~" g但將人數倍大4 S9 k$ ^2 ^* R. E5 y* I
例如是十個一個，到一百個一個，到一千個一個9 l6 D, V& C( {+ Y
(情況可以換作其他)( m1 Z8 o# E3 Y, Z7 w& r0 D/ s
始終有條界線

easonwing

絕情谷既問題...
  Q" B; \6 ^: Q1 V* c0 ]如果一個人個邊係我親人,我會好自私咁求佢...
6 o6 O! e! M+ J( s& m如果唔係親人,我會殺人警百...

easonwing

Originally posted by easonwing at 2005-4-27 12:12 PM:
) X: o- D  ^; @' l; a# M' F5 H絕情谷既問題...
& U3 L, X" o7 j如果一個人個邊係我親人,我會好自私咁求佢...
0 j* B% v- K5 l' X" z) `% ~如果唔係親人,我會殺人警百...

! G* \6 `: a" n. l
殺一警百...

srfqt1

其實我最初係即刻諗要救多d人,救得愈多愈好
4 G2 V# T$ Y9 K% R+ _; E7 O7 W於是好像好順理成章要讓火車轉往停用的鐵軌,等多d小朋友逃生/ |8 Y. P* t4 D" e9 E1 S
但是諗深一層,咁樣真係好像唔係好o岩. a, u/ K, x' ^/ I4 d
好像crap兄講一樣,停用軌玩的小孩, 因他始終才是守規則的人, 他可沒有預料過會有危險,點解要犧牲一個守規矩的小朋友,去換取其他唔守規矩的小朋友的性命呢
1 T4 F# m! V' ]. y% B9 M% x其實到底人數的多與少值唔值得去考慮呢$ Y' |. C( G! D) E2 J( T. g/ @

# M/ p& `8 U+ `3 i我估如果我有時間去想清楚的話,我都係會救係停用路軌玩的小孩,我都認為冇理由要犧牲守規矩的小朋友,去換取其他唔守規矩的小朋友的性命
5 N0 `+ P4 z: j3 g1 q. Y不過,係千鈞一髮的時間要我去做抉擇的話,可能我應該會被表面上的人數的多與少去蒙蔽咗,而且眼前真係有一班小朋友,不過的確又好像maxfigo講話明係停用...咁條鐵軌一定有d問題ga la...如果轉左去好易累死果班乘客 !!,可能我係會其實為咗少數唔守規矩的小朋友,犧牲咗更多無辜的火車乘客

crap

Originally posted by srfqt1 at 2005-4-27 05:44 PM:9 L: ^2 h' t0 b
其實我最初係即刻諗要救多d人,救得愈多 ...

+ C/ J3 O9 {  S4 ^4 ?& S$ E! A
: F$ H$ R" ^4 [; a, p- v2 |& U
haha, srfqt1兄, 我們終能於球場外達成一致的睇法, 哈, 相當有趣3 h* A: g3 o: e1 B. \. |3 C
你所說的也對, 下意識的確會選擇救人多的一方, 當時根本沒辦法分清誰對誰錯, 只好靠本能做決定..其他的要看天意了....& v3 N4 ~0 n; w! O: S: Q

. ^1 [8 a% F9 `2 Ip.s. 小弟昨天在你於好文區發表的文章下留了言, srfqt1兄你有看到嗎

jason williams

i think i will help those children instead of that child
% @( Q1 W. `. v8 ~yes, my reason is helping more" [) ~( F) f: J+ p8 S
for this sudden and short period, i dun think i can have so much time to think the background!# H' l& K3 j! G# j
if saying that child obey the rule but others are not, i think this is not a very good reason to help that child- H6 ?& B/ Y+ Y  [" [3 r. r
because no matter the rail is using or not, i think also no gd to play in that place, right?
# {5 A! C4 q, _also i think the question hasn't tell us the background, none  know that child is obeyin the rule so that he play at the rail which is not using!!!' F* T' C0 R8 q3 h1 ]: m
may be other reasons so that he play himself at there, such as, he is a bad guy that none like to play with him, or all children also dunno which is using and which is not using!5 q: [$ a# e/ z9 J
under so much confusing on the background, i would choose help more than less, just a normal think during this short urgetn period!!!

sfxc0000

作為一個人類~~$ Z' h$ W* {. J. M+ `" m/ j+ C
當我見到呢D咁危急o既事情~~9 C4 p& i, S5 @
我冇可能可以好理性去諗個後果~~
; T# v0 x% _0 o. B% S7 J0 m  b/ q3 M% w正常黎講一定係以人數為先~~7 ?0 s* x2 }7 M8 b) }" W8 ?
即係我會救個一班唔守規矩o既細路而犧牲o個位守規矩o既細路~~2 B5 s# @6 e; z* O$ v, x; ^
我只有o係事件過後先可以好似Crap同srfqt1好理性咁去分析輕重, 對錯~~
: W0 B( u/ H  X$ P& p' v. v6 B但如果o係當時o既情況中~~
; c$ J- s" U* \4 H5 r$ _3 l& G+ |我只有犧牲一位細路的性命稷換取一班細路的性命

中華卡樂ｂ

我諗我不會搞到火車轉往停用的鐵軌，因為咁樣會搞到火車乘客犧牲，而且果個守規矩既細路冇理由要佢犧牲的！而且我睇到火車黎中，我會用我既本能去救果一班唔守規矩既壞細路，雖然我明白到一定會有人死，可能我自己都會死，但我咁做一定唔會後悔，減少犧牲的人數，而且可以令一班唔守規矩而且死唔去既壞細路知道錯誤！（個人意見）