Chingy

Originally posted by crap at 2005-4-27 01:20 AM:
! n& O0 [( ?3 Y7 p# L# y) u8 @. ]$ q5 Z9 |

1 N* i% ^5 f9 X- l. Q我都覺得錯不在他們, 是他們的父母 ...

- I0 }3 d  O7 ~1 e9 j* I  F
0 K7 C' d' [" `& R
In Spider-Man 2.Spider man did stop a train

crap

Originally posted by Chingy at 2005-4-27 07:12 AM:, Z; d0 _( i- _/ Q% ?3 E

/ Z2 H: B' V! |( }& X# d: {; y( f$ S! M+ c( Q4 P; A, [+ Z; n% y" n2 G
In Spider-Man 2.Spider man did stop a train

5 O' |4 S& _2 [* P/ A7 c9 N4 v2 R( }9 V2 p- V: @( T5 W3 C1 t5 X
oh really...
/ W/ @4 d( r+ w, R4 Ehahhaa, thx a lot^^"
8 p1 S4 K9 {9 ]& p/ Gi didn't watch ch.2

springspring

挺出名，在偶理學的問題
, R6 A6 G/ z: V! O' |) y! Y. C- w7 d! [5 p5 b$ w  |& A5 k+ I
當然這是個假設性問題& u( k8 A6 Q) S% b, M
但將人數倍大  ]6 z+ K; J2 P0 U! ?
例如是十個一個，到一百個一個，到一千個一個
9 l9 z3 k1 g. `/ a) e+ H. Z7 N(情況可以換作其他)
9 Y: Y( B. h2 Y2 D始終有條界線

easonwing

絕情谷既問題...& E1 U8 l+ n/ M. |3 n' d" f# O) x
如果一個人個邊係我親人,我會好自私咁求佢...
; [7 ?# n. }/ `( l! r  G: a如果唔係親人,我會殺人警百...

easonwing

Originally posted by easonwing at 2005-4-27 12:12 PM:" M5 A4 S. q9 a3 R
絕情谷既問題...
% H) K$ I% J% ?, x8 f8 N) _$ }  z如果一個人個邊係我親人,我會好自私咁求佢...1 \& _+ I! f6 m% Y
如果唔係親人,我會殺人警百...

0 @& e+ T: y1 e殺一警百...

srfqt1

其實我最初係即刻諗要救多d人,救得愈多愈好* L: ^4 k: i/ T) l/ k& S
於是好像好順理成章要讓火車轉往停用的鐵軌,等多d小朋友逃生) |* T! p6 v; I  X
但是諗深一層,咁樣真係好像唔係好o岩# g$ {/ W9 j: B& @, e9 n
好像crap兄講一樣,停用軌玩的小孩, 因他始終才是守規則的人, 他可沒有預料過會有危險,點解要犧牲一個守規矩的小朋友,去換取其他唔守規矩的小朋友的性命呢
" \# l5 |& S# n其實到底人數的多與少值唔值得去考慮呢( Q% w5 d- c, v9 k

9 p  E1 L) S. B7 B, N8 i9 `4 F6 e我估如果我有時間去想清楚的話,我都係會救係停用路軌玩的小孩,我都認為冇理由要犧牲守規矩的小朋友,去換取其他唔守規矩的小朋友的性命
: Z1 L8 k6 d; h- s" @8 Q不過,係千鈞一髮的時間要我去做抉擇的話,可能我應該會被表面上的人數的多與少去蒙蔽咗,而且眼前真係有一班小朋友,不過的確又好像maxfigo講話明係停用...咁條鐵軌一定有d問題ga la...如果轉左去好易累死果班乘客 !!,可能我係會其實為咗少數唔守規矩的小朋友,犧牲咗更多無辜的火車乘客

crap

Originally posted by srfqt1 at 2005-4-27 05:44 PM:
0 Y& R' Z. }) W# _+ J. G  S其實我最初係即刻諗要救多d人,救得愈多 ...

% `4 q% H' H$ `  H5 S; L

# E! s0 R% o! j  Z+ \- ~haha, srfqt1兄, 我們終能於球場外達成一致的睇法, 哈, 相當有趣4 k- m4 T6 G/ h
你所說的也對, 下意識的確會選擇救人多的一方, 當時根本沒辦法分清誰對誰錯, 只好靠本能做決定..其他的要看天意了....* ~- c# n# o# l4 S% Q% O, P

$ I5 w1 m6 J# M3 h  {- Kp.s. 小弟昨天在你於好文區發表的文章下留了言, srfqt1兄你有看到嗎

jason williams

i think i will help those children instead of that child
: R3 ?9 b. Z$ _# c% K! d1 ayes, my reason is helping more
- C; ~1 E; O) g  x8 Rfor this sudden and short period, i dun think i can have so much time to think the background!
2 f5 c. _* [3 @) Gif saying that child obey the rule but others are not, i think this is not a very good reason to help that child. g, J. \- I# p) k
because no matter the rail is using or not, i think also no gd to play in that place, right?
$ c1 D0 Z$ Q3 Walso i think the question hasn't tell us the background, none  know that child is obeyin the rule so that he play at the rail which is not using!!!
8 Q5 B0 K, j0 {' n6 E1 Fmay be other reasons so that he play himself at there, such as, he is a bad guy that none like to play with him, or all children also dunno which is using and which is not using!
5 B1 ^( I0 a$ o( M: s* T/ wunder so much confusing on the background, i would choose help more than less, just a normal think during this short urgetn period!!!

sfxc0000

作為一個人類~~, T7 G- S5 B+ W; ]4 N+ y2 C' {  T6 ?
當我見到呢D咁危急o既事情~~6 J* L7 _7 w) u7 r5 X6 ~0 b1 a# h
我冇可能可以好理性去諗個後果~~- e- ^  z5 x* w4 _
正常黎講一定係以人數為先~~
) s2 [6 J  [3 ?4 p  V即係我會救個一班唔守規矩o既細路而犧牲o個位守規矩o既細路~~
4 R% a( @. J* {$ I: e. y0 y' `我只有o係事件過後先可以好似Crap同srfqt1好理性咁去分析輕重, 對錯~~
* T; H, t  `1 X2 l: k- }9 P0 k但如果o係當時o既情況中~~
; ]# u  E/ r5 s# g5 J" Y2 Z. B5 V我只有犧牲一位細路的性命稷換取一班細路的性命

中華卡樂ｂ

我諗我不會搞到火車轉往停用的鐵軌，因為咁樣會搞到火車乘客犧牲，而且果個守規矩既細路冇理由要佢犧牲的！而且我睇到火車黎中，我會用我既本能去救果一班唔守規矩既壞細路，雖然我明白到一定會有人死，可能我自己都會死，但我咁做一定唔會後悔，減少犧牲的人數，而且可以令一班唔守規矩而且死唔去既壞細路知道錯誤！（個人意見）