Chingy

Originally posted by crap at 2005-4-27 01:20 AM:
; K" V  `. Q3 a; ~7 _6 p" e; l1 q8 Y# F  L: _' j  w! R. O- z1 R2 ~
0 L- C3 ^' ?5 Y: B; r
我都覺得錯不在他們, 是他們的父母 ...

2 `, M* J" y* w
' B% D0 V  h. U7 G$ g/ @
In Spider-Man 2.Spider man did stop a train

crap

Originally posted by Chingy at 2005-4-27 07:12 AM:- m8 [8 o4 O  L- `( S
! @7 z3 s9 s) o0 G! ]( ^' r

; J2 h; a8 |6 [1 ?* e* nIn Spider-Man 2.Spider man did stop a train

: U. V. N0 z+ k; R" X% [5 ^  m/ y) c  ?# B) c+ o) K& |
oh really...3 a- _7 e, p1 s& [
hahhaa, thx a lot^^", L& {5 H/ f9 g. P# ~3 J4 x
i didn't watch ch.2

springspring

挺出名，在偶理學的問題( J6 Z5 `& R& x, d$ W

2 T/ K0 r2 ^/ w! w+ m& |2 M當然這是個假設性問題/ G3 o- n6 N0 k; m- m
但將人數倍大
3 c5 T* z' l9 C9 C) J3 Y例如是十個一個，到一百個一個，到一千個一個; M: F9 L. C8 T* }( v
(情況可以換作其他)
; e7 o: K7 p# t1 t+ p' Z) g! w; |始終有條界線

easonwing

絕情谷既問題...
, z' \' b: C+ f% Z' \2 G如果一個人個邊係我親人,我會好自私咁求佢...: F/ S/ V9 y- G" x0 }  t* C7 l
如果唔係親人,我會殺人警百...

easonwing

Originally posted by easonwing at 2005-4-27 12:12 PM:
; \' r5 ]5 t2 z2 ^# Z  D絕情谷既問題...) u; y0 R8 F! T6 g2 t
如果一個人個邊係我親人,我會好自私咁求佢...
2 J  w" b8 @- o, m& I. q* F如果唔係親人,我會殺人警百...

1 J3 a9 m" Z% V
殺一警百...

srfqt1

其實我最初係即刻諗要救多d人,救得愈多愈好
& D% W4 o& b# c3 Z1 a  w於是好像好順理成章要讓火車轉往停用的鐵軌,等多d小朋友逃生$ K0 V0 F9 `& }6 u; Z# z, m/ Q! w
但是諗深一層,咁樣真係好像唔係好o岩
$ N) o2 z8 |5 E/ |好像crap兄講一樣,停用軌玩的小孩, 因他始終才是守規則的人, 他可沒有預料過會有危險,點解要犧牲一個守規矩的小朋友,去換取其他唔守規矩的小朋友的性命呢4 X8 }3 A; A5 `1 |% \- M
其實到底人數的多與少值唔值得去考慮呢$ c0 p2 a+ z: l) E! P

4 Y( g/ E$ f% j2 x+ A我估如果我有時間去想清楚的話,我都係會救係停用路軌玩的小孩,我都認為冇理由要犧牲守規矩的小朋友,去換取其他唔守規矩的小朋友的性命
/ d# ?; A) }- o, @不過,係千鈞一髮的時間要我去做抉擇的話,可能我應該會被表面上的人數的多與少去蒙蔽咗,而且眼前真係有一班小朋友,不過的確又好像maxfigo講話明係停用...咁條鐵軌一定有d問題ga la...如果轉左去好易累死果班乘客 !!,可能我係會其實為咗少數唔守規矩的小朋友,犧牲咗更多無辜的火車乘客

crap

Originally posted by srfqt1 at 2005-4-27 05:44 PM:
3 }0 _6 i4 y4 n其實我最初係即刻諗要救多d人,救得愈多 ...

9 @4 B! G/ k* z6 t: C
/ D# ^( e& E& x3 K: c
haha, srfqt1兄, 我們終能於球場外達成一致的睇法, 哈, 相當有趣
, a9 ~8 Y' [# p; A1 w% d9 D你所說的也對, 下意識的確會選擇救人多的一方, 當時根本沒辦法分清誰對誰錯, 只好靠本能做決定..其他的要看天意了....) j  o  \% p& w1 n& V# `
* }: ]5 u7 E5 K$ d) r* j
p.s. 小弟昨天在你於好文區發表的文章下留了言, srfqt1兄你有看到嗎

jason williams

i think i will help those children instead of that child/ p. D( L% N) M$ a5 M
yes, my reason is helping more
; }( {, h" Q( m; {for this sudden and short period, i dun think i can have so much time to think the background!
( |/ h( {+ a3 D2 Z# c1 U5 Oif saying that child obey the rule but others are not, i think this is not a very good reason to help that child
0 m$ d1 m9 D4 }; W, f3 ybecause no matter the rail is using or not, i think also no gd to play in that place, right?
9 L; T& D( e6 t' }7 @9 S8 l: Falso i think the question hasn't tell us the background, none  know that child is obeyin the rule so that he play at the rail which is not using!!!9 a7 h' S* c. {; c4 p: [) q9 ?
may be other reasons so that he play himself at there, such as, he is a bad guy that none like to play with him, or all children also dunno which is using and which is not using!9 U2 E" h9 b) x- Q2 Y) S7 K( X
under so much confusing on the background, i would choose help more than less, just a normal think during this short urgetn period!!!

sfxc0000

作為一個人類~~
& x( S9 P$ d* d* ?) [( ~% g) `0 M當我見到呢D咁危急o既事情~~
: }$ O' i7 B: n$ B) [# G我冇可能可以好理性去諗個後果~~3 K0 E" W' }9 w' k
正常黎講一定係以人數為先~~
4 O; k+ H) z5 F1 z即係我會救個一班唔守規矩o既細路而犧牲o個位守規矩o既細路~~
& |8 N4 s' c9 O$ d  a9 b/ ?我只有o係事件過後先可以好似Crap同srfqt1好理性咁去分析輕重, 對錯~~
( |% h: c% R  e& W6 W但如果o係當時o既情況中~~& |+ t" b) ?; K0 `4 \+ O: V4 W  v
我只有犧牲一位細路的性命稷換取一班細路的性命

中華卡樂ｂ

我諗我不會搞到火車轉往停用的鐵軌，因為咁樣會搞到火車乘客犧牲，而且果個守規矩既細路冇理由要佢犧牲的！而且我睇到火車黎中，我會用我既本能去救果一班唔守規矩既壞細路，雖然我明白到一定會有人死，可能我自己都會死，但我咁做一定唔會後悔，減少犧牲的人數，而且可以令一班唔守規矩而且死唔去既壞細路知道錯誤！（個人意見）