Chingy

Originally posted by crap at 2005-4-27 01:20 AM:! _: z  u2 J9 ]4 p3 Q
- D) s$ E, u$ c
, U! n" J6 U. r
我都覺得錯不在他們, 是他們的父母 ...

! c! U9 B. A3 G0 M: C3 E$ ]1 Q' @( J  F/ w' h
In Spider-Man 2.Spider man did stop a train

crap

Originally posted by Chingy at 2005-4-27 07:12 AM:4 s! ?( X7 Q" R+ o; M6 g5 F
/ q- ?7 l+ _; T7 w6 g+ c

8 _- U; |/ e* v! {9 t6 rIn Spider-Man 2.Spider man did stop a train

, E4 C4 y" g0 h& }$ i% Q
- t  A3 D1 c; Y: v) k# i) y1 ~
oh really...
: q  @" I+ C6 ?% p9 A/ Y% ^+ mhahhaa, thx a lot^^"; w0 k) v* ^) L( W
i didn't watch ch.2

springspring

挺出名，在偶理學的問題
8 T+ I$ r1 ?' a+ w- o( X
, p+ I3 a. B6 \# P0 v& U" W當然這是個假設性問題$ L3 v7 {+ c1 e# v# N4 C
但將人數倍大+ y  u$ g4 j0 X1 w# O" P- K
例如是十個一個，到一百個一個，到一千個一個
) f0 }9 j) t1 T(情況可以換作其他): I6 c; F( i5 v! S, K0 l
始終有條界線

easonwing

絕情谷既問題...) x- T7 P2 x: t; ?8 r8 |
如果一個人個邊係我親人,我會好自私咁求佢...* }5 w( ~" h; i' f* i
如果唔係親人,我會殺人警百...

easonwing

Originally posted by easonwing at 2005-4-27 12:12 PM:7 r! u- n* t9 }6 r
絕情谷既問題...
, I! ?6 l. X- M( B0 w如果一個人個邊係我親人,我會好自私咁求佢...$ l& `/ K0 N. @7 B* s2 x, p
如果唔係親人,我會殺人警百...

* b  ^% l* t: z) s- \3 p* `殺一警百...

srfqt1

其實我最初係即刻諗要救多d人,救得愈多愈好0 g" Q7 f6 |2 u0 d
於是好像好順理成章要讓火車轉往停用的鐵軌,等多d小朋友逃生9 A. P0 u% M% D: k. X
但是諗深一層,咁樣真係好像唔係好o岩* P0 G) R4 J" Z* O) h6 t1 u$ r6 x! H
好像crap兄講一樣,停用軌玩的小孩, 因他始終才是守規則的人, 他可沒有預料過會有危險,點解要犧牲一個守規矩的小朋友,去換取其他唔守規矩的小朋友的性命呢0 ~! u- n% X$ q) U0 j
其實到底人數的多與少值唔值得去考慮呢
8 [' l5 A% L7 ~2 ?/ S8 R# g
1 j9 e5 A3 `3 ~1 u2 A' K; \6 g我估如果我有時間去想清楚的話,我都係會救係停用路軌玩的小孩,我都認為冇理由要犧牲守規矩的小朋友,去換取其他唔守規矩的小朋友的性命
# X8 N& O$ Z8 H3 q不過,係千鈞一髮的時間要我去做抉擇的話,可能我應該會被表面上的人數的多與少去蒙蔽咗,而且眼前真係有一班小朋友,不過的確又好像maxfigo講話明係停用...咁條鐵軌一定有d問題ga la...如果轉左去好易累死果班乘客 !!,可能我係會其實為咗少數唔守規矩的小朋友,犧牲咗更多無辜的火車乘客

crap

Originally posted by srfqt1 at 2005-4-27 05:44 PM:3 b/ K9 \  W4 B1 a" S  \0 ]$ ^
其實我最初係即刻諗要救多d人,救得愈多 ...

$ e, W* e( W6 U9 s. `; S0 |

( n6 f- U3 x5 p+ W  V: M8 i+ u* Phaha, srfqt1兄, 我們終能於球場外達成一致的睇法, 哈, 相當有趣+ G9 P% c4 d% M6 e
你所說的也對, 下意識的確會選擇救人多的一方, 當時根本沒辦法分清誰對誰錯, 只好靠本能做決定..其他的要看天意了....% z3 t7 B( v0 H! \
+ N8 [6 K1 h3 \: W; y
p.s. 小弟昨天在你於好文區發表的文章下留了言, srfqt1兄你有看到嗎

jason williams

i think i will help those children instead of that child8 B3 J) D) @7 w8 {0 A
yes, my reason is helping more
9 K; k5 n* Q+ |( Ofor this sudden and short period, i dun think i can have so much time to think the background!- q& n8 @* B  M% E
if saying that child obey the rule but others are not, i think this is not a very good reason to help that child
6 s, d9 Y# S, h% ubecause no matter the rail is using or not, i think also no gd to play in that place, right?) b0 v2 }2 s; `+ B
also i think the question hasn't tell us the background, none  know that child is obeyin the rule so that he play at the rail which is not using!!!2 g0 g" K1 t# _1 u
may be other reasons so that he play himself at there, such as, he is a bad guy that none like to play with him, or all children also dunno which is using and which is not using!( r: \) |# A+ {. F! t8 L- i
under so much confusing on the background, i would choose help more than less, just a normal think during this short urgetn period!!!

sfxc0000

作為一個人類~~
- H9 K9 m0 ^  y; q, U8 j當我見到呢D咁危急o既事情~~/ u8 f# W- f8 h3 @5 F
我冇可能可以好理性去諗個後果~~" |, c- w  w& c: S  V) P& Y3 x
正常黎講一定係以人數為先~~6 J6 y! H& V1 a' Y  p: w, s, x
即係我會救個一班唔守規矩o既細路而犧牲o個位守規矩o既細路~~! w8 n$ m$ m7 `: V% r3 C: w  d* R
我只有o係事件過後先可以好似Crap同srfqt1好理性咁去分析輕重, 對錯~~7 }) g& }7 D5 s% ]' r% N5 W
但如果o係當時o既情況中~~" s5 B7 e9 f( v7 r/ q$ R
我只有犧牲一位細路的性命稷換取一班細路的性命

中華卡樂ｂ

我諗我不會搞到火車轉往停用的鐵軌，因為咁樣會搞到火車乘客犧牲，而且果個守規矩既細路冇理由要佢犧牲的！而且我睇到火車黎中，我會用我既本能去救果一班唔守規矩既壞細路，雖然我明白到一定會有人死，可能我自己都會死，但我咁做一定唔會後悔，減少犧牲的人數，而且可以令一班唔守規矩而且死唔去既壞細路知道錯誤！（個人意見）