Chingy

Originally posted by crap at 2005-4-27 01:20 AM:) S. j5 S. G3 b( V
1 @( Q# H  y; K6 e# w
% s' M: U; T# K* n, T0 q
我都覺得錯不在他們, 是他們的父母 ...

. h9 B' b) d/ ~! K+ s

9 V( [$ |) C& H3 U! w% }# S4 t, h/ IIn Spider-Man 2.Spider man did stop a train

crap

Originally posted by Chingy at 2005-4-27 07:12 AM:( z+ F8 H# U! q, W
5 n) T) |0 p) x3 {# U1 o
8 w6 n* \- U2 O
In Spider-Man 2.Spider man did stop a train

# j- N4 u4 g. F3 `2 F( n$ k: }
$ {) g- O4 I0 z4 M+ L$ roh really...- B! |3 L& [% j: \9 g  A; K' j
hahhaa, thx a lot^^"# r( L/ M8 |- G
i didn't watch ch.2

springspring

挺出名，在偶理學的問題4 c# M* i3 ?; B# D- h8 p. y
2 D. e- V9 a/ ~+ I
當然這是個假設性問題8 v  C- k  r8 L- ]$ m0 n; h
但將人數倍大- [, K' _- E$ K, p
例如是十個一個，到一百個一個，到一千個一個9 ]/ o& N. s. u' X8 y9 x" a$ T; ?
(情況可以換作其他), \' O. w: W: K( o4 i
始終有條界線

easonwing

絕情谷既問題...' [9 ]( W- X, O
如果一個人個邊係我親人,我會好自私咁求佢...% D% v( j$ |. f! s- U) R
如果唔係親人,我會殺人警百...

easonwing

Originally posted by easonwing at 2005-4-27 12:12 PM:
0 K$ g) ^$ i; \/ n2 k$ S: ^絕情谷既問題...
* U. m+ {9 I6 j' l6 ]& c3 l如果一個人個邊係我親人,我會好自私咁求佢...
/ n: O+ o6 E  n) i  M9 b如果唔係親人,我會殺人警百...

0 [% u, R) w: m1 R0 p9 j, D
殺一警百...

srfqt1

其實我最初係即刻諗要救多d人,救得愈多愈好
+ h/ B! P1 U2 \3 Y於是好像好順理成章要讓火車轉往停用的鐵軌,等多d小朋友逃生. {+ v& ]) |" v. ]6 s2 ^# N
但是諗深一層,咁樣真係好像唔係好o岩
6 A! n* W; {2 C* w好像crap兄講一樣,停用軌玩的小孩, 因他始終才是守規則的人, 他可沒有預料過會有危險,點解要犧牲一個守規矩的小朋友,去換取其他唔守規矩的小朋友的性命呢) j! a3 ?* \7 ~" Q- f
其實到底人數的多與少值唔值得去考慮呢
6 L" X( ~* |6 [" |/ p
* p- j/ @' \1 T4 R' Q/ x我估如果我有時間去想清楚的話,我都係會救係停用路軌玩的小孩,我都認為冇理由要犧牲守規矩的小朋友,去換取其他唔守規矩的小朋友的性命" D, e7 ^: J( O. n3 u* t  M1 T9 r
不過,係千鈞一髮的時間要我去做抉擇的話,可能我應該會被表面上的人數的多與少去蒙蔽咗,而且眼前真係有一班小朋友,不過的確又好像maxfigo講話明係停用...咁條鐵軌一定有d問題ga la...如果轉左去好易累死果班乘客 !!,可能我係會其實為咗少數唔守規矩的小朋友,犧牲咗更多無辜的火車乘客

crap

Originally posted by srfqt1 at 2005-4-27 05:44 PM:2 S) I0 C4 W  s. m$ Z
其實我最初係即刻諗要救多d人,救得愈多 ...

# ~- i. b, Q4 B( {- f5 n: _
5 t# y* |1 J! s. `: E; }haha, srfqt1兄, 我們終能於球場外達成一致的睇法, 哈, 相當有趣% K1 t! Y0 }3 m( Z  K" B
你所說的也對, 下意識的確會選擇救人多的一方, 當時根本沒辦法分清誰對誰錯, 只好靠本能做決定..其他的要看天意了....8 H) R* k5 K: L+ `
- v9 _, Y! L0 H/ Y/ O
p.s. 小弟昨天在你於好文區發表的文章下留了言, srfqt1兄你有看到嗎

jason williams

i think i will help those children instead of that child
# j" R6 n1 N& |" e( `! _yes, my reason is helping more! ~: H7 ]. B- E: g  Q- m" w
for this sudden and short period, i dun think i can have so much time to think the background!) i1 p& A/ s# H
if saying that child obey the rule but others are not, i think this is not a very good reason to help that child
% e( T! Y5 a/ S+ K$ G7 Rbecause no matter the rail is using or not, i think also no gd to play in that place, right?7 L3 w: H, o) s
also i think the question hasn't tell us the background, none  know that child is obeyin the rule so that he play at the rail which is not using!!!: \, P7 u7 p% A' `. J5 }5 S6 O
may be other reasons so that he play himself at there, such as, he is a bad guy that none like to play with him, or all children also dunno which is using and which is not using!
, W9 E$ c5 s8 T( b6 J% @1 yunder so much confusing on the background, i would choose help more than less, just a normal think during this short urgetn period!!!

sfxc0000

作為一個人類~~
- R6 ?$ M% f7 Z7 z當我見到呢D咁危急o既事情~~: L' |0 G, R* x  l: }2 K2 C
我冇可能可以好理性去諗個後果~~
. u3 D5 p6 y) M# c+ p6 u( j( E正常黎講一定係以人數為先~~
) f9 ]% z' r; J0 w$ W0 \6 E; ~即係我會救個一班唔守規矩o既細路而犧牲o個位守規矩o既細路~~( Z; T. t$ F  s, b5 J, g3 h" T
我只有o係事件過後先可以好似Crap同srfqt1好理性咁去分析輕重, 對錯~~7 v/ n0 b: O1 k$ e' Q/ Q% I
但如果o係當時o既情況中~~, R& Z) O" a' z0 q7 Y
我只有犧牲一位細路的性命稷換取一班細路的性命

中華卡樂ｂ

我諗我不會搞到火車轉往停用的鐵軌，因為咁樣會搞到火車乘客犧牲，而且果個守規矩既細路冇理由要佢犧牲的！而且我睇到火車黎中，我會用我既本能去救果一班唔守規矩既壞細路，雖然我明白到一定會有人死，可能我自己都會死，但我咁做一定唔會後悔，減少犧牲的人數，而且可以令一班唔守規矩而且死唔去既壞細路知道錯誤！（個人意見）