Chingy

Originally posted by crap at 2005-4-27 01:20 AM:
2 E& C6 b( ~% }& ^- }
! H( B$ J; C% M: ?3 c3 C) @- J; P- d- ^. \
我都覺得錯不在他們, 是他們的父母 ...

/ {6 m* x) P  V3 j  r# b& X# w& R; n; a5 c5 I% }
In Spider-Man 2.Spider man did stop a train

crap

Originally posted by Chingy at 2005-4-27 07:12 AM:
$ A4 _9 [  u$ `- P
/ d1 a8 v% I: b$ Y3 e* g( W( v2 [9 F: ?  g/ F+ ^9 |
In Spider-Man 2.Spider man did stop a train

1 u; x3 _0 I( o) S: c* }' N! G

2 n$ S* L: z+ `7 P0 `+ G6 y( [oh really...1 F, t( q. c, e0 e& v
hahhaa, thx a lot^^"' D, X7 k3 b: }; E. J$ U3 B8 |
i didn't watch ch.2

springspring

挺出名，在偶理學的問題9 c: x' ~2 q: o# @9 Z

2 T7 Q- d3 A) R% n( W& t! w當然這是個假設性問題
$ |* b1 ~: d8 G) x  a9 n但將人數倍大
' d+ w* @% S' ~+ M7 h例如是十個一個，到一百個一個，到一千個一個
8 H& n( o: l* }5 y$ j: y' K. \$ u/ l(情況可以換作其他)
" F+ L  J+ |8 c始終有條界線

easonwing

絕情谷既問題...# d4 w+ q- f: @0 Z
如果一個人個邊係我親人,我會好自私咁求佢...
8 D& h6 z2 n) J2 D如果唔係親人,我會殺人警百...

easonwing

Originally posted by easonwing at 2005-4-27 12:12 PM:
7 u  W% e2 `- W3 P+ i6 Y! v4 U- `絕情谷既問題...; I4 M' K# B# d. J3 m
如果一個人個邊係我親人,我會好自私咁求佢...: u- ]9 p* S9 A
如果唔係親人,我會殺人警百...

4 O0 v6 e' o% _! B  }
殺一警百...

srfqt1

其實我最初係即刻諗要救多d人,救得愈多愈好- w3 \; i! Y2 _$ L$ r
於是好像好順理成章要讓火車轉往停用的鐵軌,等多d小朋友逃生7 c0 M0 p1 P* U' h" p
但是諗深一層,咁樣真係好像唔係好o岩
( R0 v+ w  \# _- H- Q好像crap兄講一樣,停用軌玩的小孩, 因他始終才是守規則的人, 他可沒有預料過會有危險,點解要犧牲一個守規矩的小朋友,去換取其他唔守規矩的小朋友的性命呢
! P+ R& r7 ?5 T  ^& f/ b5 D其實到底人數的多與少值唔值得去考慮呢! s7 O6 V( ~* o2 x' o. v
8 `. i1 y: V" Q, j2 ?) C
我估如果我有時間去想清楚的話,我都係會救係停用路軌玩的小孩,我都認為冇理由要犧牲守規矩的小朋友,去換取其他唔守規矩的小朋友的性命$ Z9 @7 ^, @2 d( G* I5 a& k
不過,係千鈞一髮的時間要我去做抉擇的話,可能我應該會被表面上的人數的多與少去蒙蔽咗,而且眼前真係有一班小朋友,不過的確又好像maxfigo講話明係停用...咁條鐵軌一定有d問題ga la...如果轉左去好易累死果班乘客 !!,可能我係會其實為咗少數唔守規矩的小朋友,犧牲咗更多無辜的火車乘客

crap

Originally posted by srfqt1 at 2005-4-27 05:44 PM:
$ Z; I) b1 O/ ]' b% O9 J" _其實我最初係即刻諗要救多d人,救得愈多 ...

% K/ e/ B, B0 O4 w" S5 O& g

8 Q# T% o- C* S4 s$ [" Ihaha, srfqt1兄, 我們終能於球場外達成一致的睇法, 哈, 相當有趣
* @0 ~4 G* t: b4 `# z+ v% A+ r你所說的也對, 下意識的確會選擇救人多的一方, 當時根本沒辦法分清誰對誰錯, 只好靠本能做決定..其他的要看天意了....
$ p: }# Z1 ]+ Q! _6 o7 A. r! A$ Q8 |
p.s. 小弟昨天在你於好文區發表的文章下留了言, srfqt1兄你有看到嗎

jason williams

i think i will help those children instead of that child1 S& r. {9 Z) n2 s7 f& c: G; S
yes, my reason is helping more
3 @5 o7 U( F* afor this sudden and short period, i dun think i can have so much time to think the background!
# k! m; E. A5 Sif saying that child obey the rule but others are not, i think this is not a very good reason to help that child
' X$ k9 L  M& A( @8 Pbecause no matter the rail is using or not, i think also no gd to play in that place, right?5 A3 \) _% L% K( c$ f/ r2 l1 }
also i think the question hasn't tell us the background, none  know that child is obeyin the rule so that he play at the rail which is not using!!!; p5 l1 E' z9 o% p6 _
may be other reasons so that he play himself at there, such as, he is a bad guy that none like to play with him, or all children also dunno which is using and which is not using!, U, \! M2 L4 |; t7 M
under so much confusing on the background, i would choose help more than less, just a normal think during this short urgetn period!!!

sfxc0000

作為一個人類~~6 K% Z% @- X5 _2 f
當我見到呢D咁危急o既事情~~
( F2 W& J8 p, H3 A, o$ O9 A我冇可能可以好理性去諗個後果~~
: b/ S, M8 [, C! Q# {2 x8 g9 g6 A+ w正常黎講一定係以人數為先~~
* G8 ]& p' v* N  z- Q即係我會救個一班唔守規矩o既細路而犧牲o個位守規矩o既細路~~; g/ m7 c9 p. [$ |5 Y
我只有o係事件過後先可以好似Crap同srfqt1好理性咁去分析輕重, 對錯~~: o1 d: y' U  w  L- ]
但如果o係當時o既情況中~~
5 U: Z6 K( ^- ]% C: U, J+ c9 G我只有犧牲一位細路的性命稷換取一班細路的性命

中華卡樂ｂ

我諗我不會搞到火車轉往停用的鐵軌，因為咁樣會搞到火車乘客犧牲，而且果個守規矩既細路冇理由要佢犧牲的！而且我睇到火車黎中，我會用我既本能去救果一班唔守規矩既壞細路，雖然我明白到一定會有人死，可能我自己都會死，但我咁做一定唔會後悔，減少犧牲的人數，而且可以令一班唔守規矩而且死唔去既壞細路知道錯誤！（個人意見）