Rika

由最好排到最壞
# t# r% }+ y' j3 C- c0 S3 cF, He/She told a friend the turth. Nothing wrong5 [& d% \! c& T- ]( b8 c0 [7 S
B, He is just a business man, he works for money. He doesn't have the responsibility to help L or give her discount- v: z! g: G* c, G, f. G4 I0 B
S, He just pay for what he wants, he just gives offer. He doesn't force her
  u3 t9 |/ ]$ YM, He cannot accept L had sex with other men. This is alright. he hurts too. But he should think about why L had sex. The purpose was pure5 J: @3 \& U! \- T
L, I think there must other way she can find to earn $20 for the transportation fee. She is pure but a bit stupid

左輪仔

最高就代表我最唔LIKE既人物:
5 m1 N3 i# M5 ]$ L" w6 M# g3 M$ f2 W, [( N
M - 點解佢唔搵條女先,要條女陪人一夜再過河搵佢,自己唔要錢過去,枉係男人
- i4 _1 |: ?% E: Y
1 L" w1 U( K- U9 D" _S - 我最唔鍾意呢D男人,呃女人一夜,仲要0趙完唱喎,(唔係F點會知呢件事)6 c' f$ B! Y( L
     比我一定唔會做,正禽獸!!!7 R2 I: H% B6 k& {/ V. N' a" b

& n6 P' v( B& @1 uB - 呢D冇良船主,知道左件事就坐地起價,為左錢咩都咁做  U  m/ H$ g; C3 P8 D# B

0 E5 j& |5 d5 [+ |L - 雖然佢咁做係為左同個男既一齊,但係為左咁而出賣色相,唔理志0 ~. j* w4 B0 Y/ O( c

% N/ r& K! V* sF - 佢忠於朋友係一件好事,但有時D野,都要睇下環境可唔可以講嫁,1 ~  e. [: I# V" |
     正所謂"寧教人打仔,莫教人比妻"嘛,績下口得好# B5 j4 r+ `& Y* C0 v2 `

6 Y4 c& a0 I3 t' e. d[ Last edited by 左輪仔 on 2005-4-25 at 01:17 AM ]

代仔

我以前都好似睇過.但唔記得個答案0 C# P" ?2 M8 d9 I) P
而家答多次
1 b: J* \4 ~8 w4 W! \" hf: 因為佢只係張佢所知既事講比朋友聽# _6 Y. B6 Z. R, W& E
l: 為左見佢既既愛人, 肯跟一個唔識既人一齊過夜, 不過我唔讚成咁做架& j; o) u# q6 l5 M* b) I" H0 L
b: 坐地起價.明知人地無錢6 [9 d' [5 L& M1 g
s: 衰人一個, 明知人地等錢洗. 雖然係你情我願.% |8 v+ S/ Y5 ?7 P, ?4 X
m: 最衰既人, 條女以經唔好過架啦, 知道之後.重走人同人分手添

hk853

L>F>M>B>S) u5 d# ^1 h/ E5 x5 p* M
; d* v+ |* t% f3 J
L為左同心愛既人一齊,甘願犧出賣自己肉體,好偉大" O, m) q" C1 b, d! b1 D* u! w
F排第二因為佢同M講都係純粹為朋友,唔係有心拆散M同L,因為決定權係M度$ y4 ^% W, C, J+ E
M冇原諒L為左佢而犧牲色相,但都尚可以原諒1 l0 A3 T& W5 F" V+ a- T
S乘人之危,最壞,明知L有心上人,都要用佢肉體換金錢
$ [/ ]& Q( |, Q( |B都係乘人之危,但商業社會係咁,所以算比S好

JCer

最壞  F>S>M>L>B 唔壞
! ]; t4 J4 ^7 b$ F! I$ f1 g# B, H9 XF: 如果佢唔講,物事都無, 佢應該學下"善良的沉默"1 [6 [& L: b9 M6 L: |
S: 如果係鍾意一個人, 唔應該承人之危, 學下明正言順地去爭取# D  S: W* n- Y
M: 不明白L的負出, 自私的想法! o" L! h- A& x4 P( f
L: 太愛一個人, 愛得太傻, 無理後果
$ u- J2 Y) D& MB: 有危險的工作, 收多D $ ,人之常情
" I- n/ _7 x& l
2 T9 w% G* w& ?' @  t- I0 Y5 V世上無絕對的正確, 也沒有絕對的錯誤

angellyz

最唔可以接受 S, then B, then M, L and last F.

tai1980

Originally posted by Asurada129 at 2005-4-24 11:24 PM:
7 n- C( z6 {) ^& X: kL = 為左自己鍾意既人寧願犠牲自己
3 Y. W3 ?! L! E7 w$ ^6 HB = 一個為金錢暴利既船夫, 正常生意人都係甘! \! l' A* g& \; T3 u# G8 ?, G
S = 知道有人需要錢度河, 開出不道德條件
% p: D0 N$ w' g; d( mF = 不理後果告知當事人, (估算係情敵)....拆散對方
9 p: c# u: m( [8 W* ?, L+ ?4 pM = 不知愛人為佢犠牲, 反而知道真相不理女方委屈...仲拋棄佢

2 I1 ?# ?* I/ J% S, i$ i  E
" O" e1 R  O3 Y$ S, r" @) H
same choices with u , but want to add some comments & l* S$ G4 G7 s2 g7 Z: T4 P' X

% j" g0 l  R# S. VB : not agree with u on this comment , cos he is at the shore of the woman (有一天, 在女人的這一岸, 有個船夫), so he has no way to know that the woman is in-love with the man across the river  
+ V7 F# l4 \: H) E
7 Y/ W3 _; D4 t/ _) ]) N( mS : there is ""no-free-lunch"" in this world , if u want something then u have to give-up something so this is a legal transaction ( the woman has the right to refuse ) ,and he is not that bad cos he fulfill their agreement in the end (  女人答應了, 她拿到錢後就由船夫載她過河 )) M5 \# n# T' C! {& l
% ?9 U( w  V' p' Q' p
F : if this guy has a brain , then he should know the outcome
+ E! Y; ]8 x  v6 S0 f- l* n/ ]2 e* s
M : in the present-day this guy is call an asshole ( no need to explain further more ), but this story took place in the past time ( 從前有個男人和女人 ) so they should not be that open minded but it also said that they love each othe ( 非常相愛 ) , so......% y8 B5 P: [1 ]; N
# l/ x, Z1 v! w' @/ z: j
[ Last edited by tai1980 on 2005-4-25 at 01:58 AM ]

waterfire

大概可以講....錯ge- a. z% f8 _3 r: \; Y
M, L 都係為左想見佢, 而犧牲左自己ge 肉體, M點解唔可以體諒下佢
- l. ^8 O6 M4 e" I6 k3 VL, 為左想見M, 而唔考慮下件事如果穿左會點; K+ @% \. v( x0 o. p* z5 P$ z
F, 有時唔係樣樣野都講到咁明ga ma
# g# ]- U* v/ `7 X( c  h8 k6 e8 z" i" n8 }  O
最錯就係, 點解F 唔叫L 同佢過一晚, 就唔會講俾M 聽....
1 A' ?4 _2 r  |- C- O4 l8 Q有女唔食, 最大惡極!!

hiroraymond

好似好有趣咁，
9 K# H# A0 z( q, G# s由最好開始排起既話，/ r1 w- f# H3 [4 [, E
L B M F S 啦，" O+ B: b" W0 F
* [" H# k$ i2 _1 L6 v- b( x2 f
其實不少人都會話肯為自己鐘意既人就算要埋自己條命都得，
  Y7 j, j: x4 `9 s. @& ^但當真係需要既時候，又有幾多個會呢？5 K$ ]; p% ?) _( h5 t' ]) f- }
如果覺得自己真係做得到既，又點會唔明 L 有幾鐘意 M 呢？; V1 T( `8 G0 y: Z' L' }! U
又點會唔諒解 L 會咁樣做呢。( K, t) z0 G& \1 ]1 [4 M5 y1 K% s0 C: v5 c' X

5 o% X# o6 m& m8 @+ T而 B 都只不過係做生意，同 L 做個交易，  M! l  [  ^4 ~+ ?
所謂現實世界中既商人 ( 傷人 )，
; m7 l3 _3 }$ [$ `2 F( U明知你咁想過去緊係開高價啦。# j- S+ o" b7 J* g

+ R$ G1 L) T' \而由第三個開始我就覺得係壞，
. r0 d# F* m  D9 t M 唔能夠體諒到 L 背叛佢既原因，
+ ?) S: ?* q) ~/ n& h0 i" ~* i! Z亦從未為令雙方可以重逢呢件事上作出任何貢獻，
) O  A: c  Z/ e4 A% Z- T" B7 X( |' @知道一切後更即刻放棄一個甘為自己犠牲一切既人，) A( x' E* Z! H7 ^) Y
M 都可算壞了。1 b" N; k( R1 x# I
$ [$ Y4 \7 g8 D2 {4 W- n0 r
F 呢個人仲掂，
2 `8 c) f$ G2 B$ H" e" l知道既唔等於要講，  A; R- F% m& t7 [& A
如果呢件事發生係自己身上，, m! z+ j3 M  v- t/ ?( t- j; ?
我諗會即刻毒啞 F 呢條友。  ]  f0 n8 f0 F& ]3 H/ n( O* p' }
$ U' `: n8 a: Q4 T6 x0 }* s5 }1 @
最衰個個緊係 S 啦，
* N* Z0 l* G; r3 [( X; U/ O, }始終都係討厭提出不道德交易的人。
3 t. T, P- e9 K0 g9 v, B
; y9 d+ |  }7 q5 b* P2 o, K, B/ B
- n* Y) a6 p* x& q  q! B* E1 L% E: }4 q, n0 `
題外話：! j8 I8 V  U# V2 K5 B
唔知點解睇呢個故事個陣，# b" N+ f2 C+ y; r% F
睇到 S 呢條友，
- Z4 N& ]) a$ \: d& e+ O我就即刻諗起英皇老細。

newman2005

由壞至好: S<F<M<B<L8 F' }* \& ]  e7 x, J3 x

0 B  `& L. a7 V* `2 P* T) v: vS: 看中別人的弱點而作出不道德的交易去滿足自己私慾, 最賤格!
7 Q2 m% x# j, O, KF: 不顧後果爆響口, 影響L和M的關係3 F  ^: _2 i7 H  ~/ J$ E" J2 w2 [7 x
M: 沒有理解L所作的事背後真正原因而拋棄她
/ ]# Y4 T9 T% a' XB: 坐地起價想得到金錢上的利益 .... 但不是對別人造成傷害
. n& }( ~2 K6 S, WL: 寧願犧牲卻換來分手收場...