Rika

由最好排到最壞* E9 k0 C( F* I* d
F, He/She told a friend the turth. Nothing wrong0 s1 N6 A5 m/ r2 @3 [
B, He is just a business man, he works for money. He doesn't have the responsibility to help L or give her discount
$ z7 Y% J( u* g& k; nS, He just pay for what he wants, he just gives offer. He doesn't force her
7 s/ U2 M5 `# L# L3 BM, He cannot accept L had sex with other men. This is alright. he hurts too. But he should think about why L had sex. The purpose was pure  C- G3 q1 o1 d7 Q9 @
L, I think there must other way she can find to earn $20 for the transportation fee. She is pure but a bit stupid

左輪仔

最高就代表我最唔LIKE既人物:
( X$ X: A( P7 ?1 q- O4 B. z* q: ^1 u7 t
M - 點解佢唔搵條女先,要條女陪人一夜再過河搵佢,自己唔要錢過去,枉係男人) `0 ?& [' N# a6 |

; U# `6 z  o6 Q7 |. x; }S - 我最唔鍾意呢D男人,呃女人一夜,仲要0趙完唱喎,(唔係F點會知呢件事)( R  T: r" }( W* B
     比我一定唔會做,正禽獸!!!
  u( M3 ^( x$ a  N6 q
+ }: {; x7 z3 K- @B - 呢D冇良船主,知道左件事就坐地起價,為左錢咩都咁做
; o8 Q  y4 M9 t. L8 q) G. k/ U2 z% l( o9 T$ X
L - 雖然佢咁做係為左同個男既一齊,但係為左咁而出賣色相,唔理志: D7 F5 Q& L2 ~% [, `0 k4 `
& @0 I; m1 R: R
F - 佢忠於朋友係一件好事,但有時D野,都要睇下環境可唔可以講嫁,
8 T, Y. G4 R6 T1 w) q     正所謂"寧教人打仔,莫教人比妻"嘛,績下口得好
6 H- P2 Z- P9 _, h1 C, c5 [% q7 e$ V$ a  |7 B3 c
[ Last edited by 左輪仔 on 2005-4-25 at 01:17 AM ]

代仔

我以前都好似睇過.但唔記得個答案
1 E0 {& Z+ q/ Z4 y而家答多次: J. l7 @1 z+ X+ _( }3 g
f: 因為佢只係張佢所知既事講比朋友聽9 ^- x, s: \, t6 j! g7 G9 N
l: 為左見佢既既愛人, 肯跟一個唔識既人一齊過夜, 不過我唔讚成咁做架
5 Z0 ]8 D2 d' C8 B' C/ j; yb: 坐地起價.明知人地無錢5 @! X0 h0 }2 K6 V
s: 衰人一個, 明知人地等錢洗. 雖然係你情我願.! t5 |' l# G) D9 `
m: 最衰既人, 條女以經唔好過架啦, 知道之後.重走人同人分手添

hk853

L>F>M>B>S
3 O! i1 P. M0 z: F0 B2 D% v; z, g% K4 `  [9 K8 k
L為左同心愛既人一齊,甘願犧出賣自己肉體,好偉大
* }  s7 R! ^' ?$ rF排第二因為佢同M講都係純粹為朋友,唔係有心拆散M同L,因為決定權係M度0 r3 A+ V( }6 n
M冇原諒L為左佢而犧牲色相,但都尚可以原諒7 b2 f! {( S7 X, n; n. n  @
S乘人之危,最壞,明知L有心上人,都要用佢肉體換金錢
% b7 u' y2 {. xB都係乘人之危,但商業社會係咁,所以算比S好

JCer

最壞  F>S>M>L>B 唔壞
: e/ E2 X; \! x4 B6 e& ?F: 如果佢唔講,物事都無, 佢應該學下"善良的沉默": G7 r; l2 [& A! h0 P
S: 如果係鍾意一個人, 唔應該承人之危, 學下明正言順地去爭取
8 e! U; v$ H) z% d; l5 XM: 不明白L的負出, 自私的想法
/ v# g0 g( |- B' I/ \' _( m% c* nL: 太愛一個人, 愛得太傻, 無理後果
& h; S, e6 x: L. g, D7 K  q( ZB: 有危險的工作, 收多D $ ,人之常情
8 ?, b2 e  X/ Y% F! x
1 @6 h1 h" w: S$ n( f3 E世上無絕對的正確, 也沒有絕對的錯誤

angellyz

最唔可以接受 S, then B, then M, L and last F.

tai1980

Originally posted by Asurada129 at 2005-4-24 11:24 PM:" W8 E# m2 F" o0 r* H0 q4 @
L = 為左自己鍾意既人寧願犠牲自己# r! N1 p0 Q' ~
B = 一個為金錢暴利既船夫, 正常生意人都係甘
: q% m5 S, [# h" ?- M. D( G6 Q; M) US = 知道有人需要錢度河, 開出不道德條件
3 a1 ^& p! r) |6 c% DF = 不理後果告知當事人, (估算係情敵)....拆散對方$ q2 Z- f# |' G* y0 \5 r
M = 不知愛人為佢犠牲, 反而知道真相不理女方委屈...仲拋棄佢

; L  ^& Z7 F9 j) O7 O
" k7 D. O7 Q% A+ B' p, C# P. z
same choices with u , but want to add some comments
& g* l* T! A  V  t6 ^: d0 t0 b' D
B : not agree with u on this comment , cos he is at the shore of the woman (有一天, 在女人的這一岸, 有個船夫), so he has no way to know that the woman is in-love with the man across the river  
; N$ `( ?' b# |* U2 ]+ x6 Y% m! a
9 R) p4 t6 A; u/ o  C5 ?S : there is ""no-free-lunch"" in this world , if u want something then u have to give-up something so this is a legal transaction ( the woman has the right to refuse ) ,and he is not that bad cos he fulfill their agreement in the end (  女人答應了, 她拿到錢後就由船夫載她過河 )
, ]9 f, b6 D6 h+ a' n: \
  c6 s0 W- a& G$ A& k% AF : if this guy has a brain , then he should know the outcome
8 k# Z* k0 |* t( |9 V) ^- `! j5 z( l3 [  b
M : in the present-day this guy is call an asshole ( no need to explain further more ), but this story took place in the past time ( 從前有個男人和女人 ) so they should not be that open minded but it also said that they love each othe ( 非常相愛 ) , so......" h- M3 l+ L) [7 k9 P( j8 h

, j6 s& R$ ^* N[ Last edited by tai1980 on 2005-4-25 at 01:58 AM ]

waterfire

大概可以講....錯ge8 h: R# b! R9 s# A1 m  g
M, L 都係為左想見佢, 而犧牲左自己ge 肉體, M點解唔可以體諒下佢
! r$ K" O" N) X/ c% a* P: vL, 為左想見M, 而唔考慮下件事如果穿左會點( K4 J0 f. l4 r9 T: p" K
F, 有時唔係樣樣野都講到咁明ga ma
" l" t& s1 g. f
; k5 z# G1 p, p- e( Y最錯就係, 點解F 唔叫L 同佢過一晚, 就唔會講俾M 聽....$ G/ i, V! @( ~
有女唔食, 最大惡極!!

hiroraymond

好似好有趣咁，+ B" V. [( u  @9 Y" w+ ?7 G6 A
由最好開始排起既話，
7 V& s% B% K2 z* f% s/ `; S! K/ ZL B M F S 啦，% m) d- ~  c) N0 @

8 T$ q1 ?7 Y6 J, V! [7 z# o9 K其實不少人都會話肯為自己鐘意既人就算要埋自己條命都得，) q4 V4 [  @% A1 e' |8 I8 a% y
但當真係需要既時候，又有幾多個會呢？$ v( p3 ~/ K  y# `. z' G! E
如果覺得自己真係做得到既，又點會唔明 L 有幾鐘意 M 呢？/ O: r: y) N) p( [* n
又點會唔諒解 L 會咁樣做呢。0 K' N& i2 k6 ^9 f$ m

1 x5 i! z6 d5 K7 i1 k! @0 m; j8 c而 B 都只不過係做生意，同 L 做個交易，
# _, V+ _; s4 r1 A) {8 Q+ o所謂現實世界中既商人 ( 傷人 )，
0 J( y6 X& L) ^1 ~9 t% q- [明知你咁想過去緊係開高價啦。5 O3 I" v* T; y, d2 e0 D

0 ]- g: y( y* H- H而由第三個開始我就覺得係壞，
2 v* y8 A5 u+ [" C; b; I8 E& {; C# J* Z M 唔能夠體諒到 L 背叛佢既原因，
4 z, q' |/ F% L! ~0 J亦從未為令雙方可以重逢呢件事上作出任何貢獻，
. U4 t$ U9 u' y知道一切後更即刻放棄一個甘為自己犠牲一切既人，
, {* S- s8 X- l% u9 |8 Z% q M 都可算壞了。, O1 G' F7 t' b! }; }' b8 u& h
$ R2 u# w3 }  e8 N% K
F 呢個人仲掂，$ r. R1 E0 x  H. p& \- V$ o
知道既唔等於要講，# K5 A2 I$ F- E, g
如果呢件事發生係自己身上，8 W' D4 a- ^" c  A. c: Z
我諗會即刻毒啞 F 呢條友。
9 }- t4 ^+ |* y! J; `# N
! X8 h9 o: r3 A, P; l最衰個個緊係 S 啦，! c# w( x. t0 _' j
始終都係討厭提出不道德交易的人。' C% O/ p7 I6 L( Q9 K' b+ m* R
" {; ?( q+ l' n0 `4 t

. J, n1 N' L9 X8 }% L# ]  C2 I5 O# U' h* B* R3 l6 Q; K
題外話：5 G/ W- O: _/ t2 f; ~& [% ?$ U% d
唔知點解睇呢個故事個陣，
- o9 l/ o) B3 {8 n6 [* g8 P! c睇到 S 呢條友，# _- z' M8 A" T) w# X& K
我就即刻諗起英皇老細。

newman2005

由壞至好: S<F<M<B<L
' P$ J( h; O7 X: z5 q6 q9 f5 h- @2 D/ w& a) `; T- |: L7 s
S: 看中別人的弱點而作出不道德的交易去滿足自己私慾, 最賤格!( c- _, z3 T* K8 T
F: 不顧後果爆響口, 影響L和M的關係5 J, Y. z. W$ t, n4 u, h
M: 沒有理解L所作的事背後真正原因而拋棄她$ R# [6 e, |% x/ h. A" H
B: 坐地起價想得到金錢上的利益 .... 但不是對別人造成傷害: p, _: L+ T$ X6 F; I2 P, b/ @
L: 寧願犧牲卻換來分手收場...