Rika

由最好排到最壞1 M7 U% c$ x4 {. A/ Y4 ~) ^
F, He/She told a friend the turth. Nothing wrong6 Y3 r& I3 \1 n; R* H
B, He is just a business man, he works for money. He doesn't have the responsibility to help L or give her discount
# X3 t& E8 A. c8 U( E2 n: j3 WS, He just pay for what he wants, he just gives offer. He doesn't force her; D5 ^3 u! k: U4 t  p' _
M, He cannot accept L had sex with other men. This is alright. he hurts too. But he should think about why L had sex. The purpose was pure2 \$ [' E$ V- I& o
L, I think there must other way she can find to earn $20 for the transportation fee. She is pure but a bit stupid

左輪仔

最高就代表我最唔LIKE既人物:
- o7 I1 c* w( B$ j! ]" f6 _& T6 Y2 J4 ^- B0 B/ R  q
M - 點解佢唔搵條女先,要條女陪人一夜再過河搵佢,自己唔要錢過去,枉係男人
: }' |) e9 m) M% S5 c# |5 F6 n0 L- d4 _
S - 我最唔鍾意呢D男人,呃女人一夜,仲要0趙完唱喎,(唔係F點會知呢件事)/ \: a6 l# B6 h5 n
     比我一定唔會做,正禽獸!!!+ ]1 o% B) R0 V  n+ W

, p+ O2 Z* g  e* D! R( c* S! hB - 呢D冇良船主,知道左件事就坐地起價,為左錢咩都咁做3 N! s5 F+ I" V* K, j( u! R) w

) M9 U3 Y7 k' W7 G* @L - 雖然佢咁做係為左同個男既一齊,但係為左咁而出賣色相,唔理志
" `9 D. v( Y' D: i+ ^
* {" I9 A, Y7 b0 l6 @* d+ l$ r( }F - 佢忠於朋友係一件好事,但有時D野,都要睇下環境可唔可以講嫁,
, [6 G: G7 M) k9 }     正所謂"寧教人打仔,莫教人比妻"嘛,績下口得好: p' A% D9 i& d: q- l. N

  Z! {) D& _; R4 t0 Y[ Last edited by 左輪仔 on 2005-4-25 at 01:17 AM ]

代仔

我以前都好似睇過.但唔記得個答案7 k6 f3 D& U" I/ ]# u$ V
而家答多次
8 o4 d8 A) R* e8 A# cf: 因為佢只係張佢所知既事講比朋友聽
0 C$ G& S7 a, ?; L' V! ?$ ]0 cl: 為左見佢既既愛人, 肯跟一個唔識既人一齊過夜, 不過我唔讚成咁做架
# d* L" J6 Y, N7 c' ~4 F$ Sb: 坐地起價.明知人地無錢
, c/ [+ T! C* X# x% Ds: 衰人一個, 明知人地等錢洗. 雖然係你情我願.
( {% C- ~' Y4 f) _! {8 Y. f" [& f! im: 最衰既人, 條女以經唔好過架啦, 知道之後.重走人同人分手添

hk853

L>F>M>B>S
: l7 l& V& z' E% S$ C3 S
' l3 u8 T: D# A: M6 i" d. ]L為左同心愛既人一齊,甘願犧出賣自己肉體,好偉大$ V0 R) x8 @# V/ v; c' ]
F排第二因為佢同M講都係純粹為朋友,唔係有心拆散M同L,因為決定權係M度
& s$ P$ C6 ]4 U7 s# w' wM冇原諒L為左佢而犧牲色相,但都尚可以原諒
7 i% l1 N( j9 g% K" X7 x' L  j0 FS乘人之危,最壞,明知L有心上人,都要用佢肉體換金錢
/ W: C" Q+ W) D1 NB都係乘人之危,但商業社會係咁,所以算比S好

JCer

最壞  F>S>M>L>B 唔壞& W5 H* Z. c2 h6 ~
F: 如果佢唔講,物事都無, 佢應該學下"善良的沉默"
+ Q* [" p* l+ F9 j+ s! R) P2 `S: 如果係鍾意一個人, 唔應該承人之危, 學下明正言順地去爭取- h9 x# J! o- t; l4 _! [
M: 不明白L的負出, 自私的想法6 h  _1 e0 A, t! o+ N* l& n$ W) \
L: 太愛一個人, 愛得太傻, 無理後果
% F& ^1 x4 o- ~& a$ a9 @9 d& mB: 有危險的工作, 收多D $ ,人之常情
$ [# R, X( W) |- {
8 x$ [( T6 s6 R+ P7 @6 \世上無絕對的正確, 也沒有絕對的錯誤

angellyz

最唔可以接受 S, then B, then M, L and last F.

tai1980

Originally posted by Asurada129 at 2005-4-24 11:24 PM:
$ m# i# U" M$ r3 l6 `% D/ QL = 為左自己鍾意既人寧願犠牲自己1 _. P/ f1 k9 s/ Y( U
B = 一個為金錢暴利既船夫, 正常生意人都係甘
! _& X# t' T! ~% T. e5 w. {S = 知道有人需要錢度河, 開出不道德條件1 a0 W* l! A* O" G5 N9 m  h! {' C- U
F = 不理後果告知當事人, (估算係情敵)....拆散對方
5 G1 z9 q8 X6 I2 z3 b  ?M = 不知愛人為佢犠牲, 反而知道真相不理女方委屈...仲拋棄佢

. Z* A" x0 C- N  z3 a4 K; a4 Y0 H8 ?- L. ^, ?9 l4 Q, X
same choices with u , but want to add some comments / N2 D- c( w; U0 g- Y

/ |' c" x3 m. [; D$ F9 `9 CB : not agree with u on this comment , cos he is at the shore of the woman (有一天, 在女人的這一岸, 有個船夫), so he has no way to know that the woman is in-love with the man across the river  # e. Y1 @% B& y& G, ~7 j8 ?
# T& W& ]+ P- r
S : there is ""no-free-lunch"" in this world , if u want something then u have to give-up something so this is a legal transaction ( the woman has the right to refuse ) ,and he is not that bad cos he fulfill their agreement in the end (  女人答應了, 她拿到錢後就由船夫載她過河 )
+ O$ I) Y5 u8 n# ?+ D/ p6 B0 \3 J. t" ^
F : if this guy has a brain , then he should know the outcome
- ^8 W' `) }5 Z
& h( P# H3 s" L- E3 n3 t/ _M : in the present-day this guy is call an asshole ( no need to explain further more ), but this story took place in the past time ( 從前有個男人和女人 ) so they should not be that open minded but it also said that they love each othe ( 非常相愛 ) , so......
9 g' R8 H( ~; b* A$ N: g0 p
, W) j, n6 D* M0 s[ Last edited by tai1980 on 2005-4-25 at 01:58 AM ]

waterfire

大概可以講....錯ge( q1 {3 n" s% [/ X
M, L 都係為左想見佢, 而犧牲左自己ge 肉體, M點解唔可以體諒下佢
# |% z3 o- ]- l; e% j0 u* w: EL, 為左想見M, 而唔考慮下件事如果穿左會點9 U2 S6 |( n( S: y+ B4 @6 _
F, 有時唔係樣樣野都講到咁明ga ma- i; {1 Z3 ^0 x# I. ]5 L6 `% F

: y6 j& R6 f8 u; g最錯就係, 點解F 唔叫L 同佢過一晚, 就唔會講俾M 聽....
1 Y6 N! C, U% w. l& u5 \, I0 z有女唔食, 最大惡極!!

hiroraymond

好似好有趣咁，& n! V# H7 t/ b) B. k
由最好開始排起既話，
2 k6 x8 Q5 v. ], kL B M F S 啦，
. B0 x# E& }  r6 f0 f/ E2 S, v
1 q" G+ p) `/ ^4 |3 o5 s其實不少人都會話肯為自己鐘意既人就算要埋自己條命都得，
3 Q0 z1 N) `2 }: d6 b& W但當真係需要既時候，又有幾多個會呢？) P3 i6 [! w+ }+ g& \3 g
如果覺得自己真係做得到既，又點會唔明 L 有幾鐘意 M 呢？. J4 q& c0 u: T: C
又點會唔諒解 L 會咁樣做呢。
! H" ~5 s: y. i% U! e  T
$ n; R8 K% f* c" X而 B 都只不過係做生意，同 L 做個交易，
7 ^* {" F# [/ N4 c9 L所謂現實世界中既商人 ( 傷人 )，
7 l5 }5 E2 E6 G3 E7 p8 \6 V- w明知你咁想過去緊係開高價啦。, F! F! S6 i' o+ a" m
9 Y8 ?4 O6 k' R4 K( t& {
而由第三個開始我就覺得係壞，9 P& B6 n' V8 O8 r" @
M 唔能夠體諒到 L 背叛佢既原因，7 k: s- j8 x4 \+ l
亦從未為令雙方可以重逢呢件事上作出任何貢獻，) I2 n: `2 N: B& l- N. l8 B
知道一切後更即刻放棄一個甘為自己犠牲一切既人，
& b4 S6 Q6 p. }5 A; L M 都可算壞了。
9 Z; H. R! _2 [1 p* t  j, l" T0 Q$ n" W
F 呢個人仲掂，! M- L# h/ n/ b
知道既唔等於要講，
* t4 \- a, z0 t' i如果呢件事發生係自己身上，
( x! Y5 b! u+ ]我諗會即刻毒啞 F 呢條友。: S1 N& O: Z  }$ b

( s8 @! K( {7 U2 f最衰個個緊係 S 啦，6 a. i2 z, Q# s& E8 Q
始終都係討厭提出不道德交易的人。! Z: X6 e" }' {0 W

0 ]4 M3 c/ s' z4 E& d# K/ I/ s( c: ~1 y+ a7 U

( P5 [2 m* j) _/ A3 {8 r1 t題外話：
8 u" b: U4 H# ~# ~7 D1 x6 z+ I' Y7 }唔知點解睇呢個故事個陣，% A4 Q! d" ]1 L; L
睇到 S 呢條友，& R& X2 N- g' l2 T- D/ m
我就即刻諗起英皇老細。

newman2005

由壞至好: S<F<M<B<L5 n; U$ l; _/ g( j( b- L

" X1 q7 B3 J' }+ ^: K5 bS: 看中別人的弱點而作出不道德的交易去滿足自己私慾, 最賤格!. t: A* A+ y! d9 u
F: 不顧後果爆響口, 影響L和M的關係$ Y4 v( Y( V% M  b" S: w
M: 沒有理解L所作的事背後真正原因而拋棄她& r' y; R5 y5 S% g, q( o" \1 \
B: 坐地起價想得到金錢上的利益 .... 但不是對別人造成傷害
- `. ]- ^+ G7 d3 `L: 寧願犧牲卻換來分手收場...