Rika

由最好排到最壞* _' {$ z. N& g  i. L' D4 H7 _0 L
F, He/She told a friend the turth. Nothing wrong2 N+ e$ X7 Z, z6 O6 H% T. A
B, He is just a business man, he works for money. He doesn't have the responsibility to help L or give her discount
3 g4 |7 g' s) v) O# ^S, He just pay for what he wants, he just gives offer. He doesn't force her: V( G8 f+ L7 `& I. `# N
M, He cannot accept L had sex with other men. This is alright. he hurts too. But he should think about why L had sex. The purpose was pure4 a! b' V5 K, |* v4 `; g6 v
L, I think there must other way she can find to earn $20 for the transportation fee. She is pure but a bit stupid

左輪仔

最高就代表我最唔LIKE既人物:$ k0 k* B0 b8 s! B

% k* `( o! R3 SM - 點解佢唔搵條女先,要條女陪人一夜再過河搵佢,自己唔要錢過去,枉係男人
% C- `0 q$ f. z1 r, I
5 \8 z: Y  i& @2 u) XS - 我最唔鍾意呢D男人,呃女人一夜,仲要0趙完唱喎,(唔係F點會知呢件事)) n+ k5 A( B4 R' e# u6 ?# {
     比我一定唔會做,正禽獸!!!
: R6 w, R9 P/ y8 V5 h5 B% K* D7 w1 H
B - 呢D冇良船主,知道左件事就坐地起價,為左錢咩都咁做3 R( k2 G6 Z' D) j; S
: I- z1 N2 I! ^+ |+ B5 X; j
L - 雖然佢咁做係為左同個男既一齊,但係為左咁而出賣色相,唔理志# b" S. x+ F2 N5 t- |! [( K. I
2 H( l$ l6 n9 ?1 X! Y1 g# ]
F - 佢忠於朋友係一件好事,但有時D野,都要睇下環境可唔可以講嫁,
7 R) c. L' F/ h     正所謂"寧教人打仔,莫教人比妻"嘛,績下口得好2 i1 }) M/ Q7 G  X" o- B8 ~& ?

$ h# n, G, I1 \! w3 K( v[ Last edited by 左輪仔 on 2005-4-25 at 01:17 AM ]

代仔

我以前都好似睇過.但唔記得個答案
# D/ L+ l# g0 T$ Y8 Q7 p而家答多次7 p2 h) d. f3 ]  j8 L- t
f: 因為佢只係張佢所知既事講比朋友聽
: M; h* w- ^* }8 hl: 為左見佢既既愛人, 肯跟一個唔識既人一齊過夜, 不過我唔讚成咁做架
9 c- F/ g" }8 s% b" A. Ib: 坐地起價.明知人地無錢9 U) Q* h) t# t
s: 衰人一個, 明知人地等錢洗. 雖然係你情我願.5 B1 B5 g* _4 y1 t% E
m: 最衰既人, 條女以經唔好過架啦, 知道之後.重走人同人分手添

hk853

L>F>M>B>S
$ c( p; U% M1 k6 {: D
+ M. j1 @5 l* `2 {7 VL為左同心愛既人一齊,甘願犧出賣自己肉體,好偉大8 _$ K. u& ^9 i, ^/ K: \6 k+ T
F排第二因為佢同M講都係純粹為朋友,唔係有心拆散M同L,因為決定權係M度8 A% u2 n" ^( L, {0 }" r# D0 }
M冇原諒L為左佢而犧牲色相,但都尚可以原諒; e7 \0 H3 U( b3 X/ W0 k2 U6 F, M1 Q
S乘人之危,最壞,明知L有心上人,都要用佢肉體換金錢
: {; [) Q; b" y' h0 P, x$ ?! b+ QB都係乘人之危,但商業社會係咁,所以算比S好

JCer

最壞  F>S>M>L>B 唔壞
# [7 S6 a. y3 r: x; N7 t" K! @F: 如果佢唔講,物事都無, 佢應該學下"善良的沉默"
2 Q5 D( Q* k4 U- RS: 如果係鍾意一個人, 唔應該承人之危, 學下明正言順地去爭取
2 `; L. }8 ^* aM: 不明白L的負出, 自私的想法0 H% `4 ~2 ]7 [) Y: Z
L: 太愛一個人, 愛得太傻, 無理後果
$ i; ?+ ^- w: vB: 有危險的工作, 收多D $ ,人之常情' T3 x4 T6 M9 p' p+ f' m3 y2 w

, b$ |$ i& N" t4 a) ~2 M世上無絕對的正確, 也沒有絕對的錯誤

angellyz

最唔可以接受 S, then B, then M, L and last F.

tai1980

Originally posted by Asurada129 at 2005-4-24 11:24 PM:# Z- R, N) N" v" o& [$ D4 H" V; R5 E
L = 為左自己鍾意既人寧願犠牲自己1 J: ~. E; m/ b3 H' Z4 T  e) S
B = 一個為金錢暴利既船夫, 正常生意人都係甘6 i0 {; \  Q  v5 j
S = 知道有人需要錢度河, 開出不道德條件
: _% E3 `3 o+ n) I* iF = 不理後果告知當事人, (估算係情敵)....拆散對方  F" s& [0 K, c& K4 m
M = 不知愛人為佢犠牲, 反而知道真相不理女方委屈...仲拋棄佢

+ ?5 f( ^0 M0 n# x1 t

1 d0 b! D9 I; E, ] same choices with u , but want to add some comments 3 z& N8 z. H. X) ]

8 ~) r  C' g! p+ Q  A( V9 k" cB : not agree with u on this comment , cos he is at the shore of the woman (有一天, 在女人的這一岸, 有個船夫), so he has no way to know that the woman is in-love with the man across the river  9 m$ k! t1 u$ ~. ^
/ I  H; V. J9 b  z( Z. c* i; {: [
S : there is ""no-free-lunch"" in this world , if u want something then u have to give-up something so this is a legal transaction ( the woman has the right to refuse ) ,and he is not that bad cos he fulfill their agreement in the end (  女人答應了, 她拿到錢後就由船夫載她過河 )
; Y& Q- F1 J' o" r9 U! X6 {- m6 P2 y' }/ h+ B3 D8 |1 r$ J' I: i
F : if this guy has a brain , then he should know the outcome 1 X/ g( o: {# R8 C9 d% B- u2 r

4 ]4 s' Q) p% k) AM : in the present-day this guy is call an asshole ( no need to explain further more ), but this story took place in the past time ( 從前有個男人和女人 ) so they should not be that open minded but it also said that they love each othe ( 非常相愛 ) , so......" T* ]2 N$ A% r7 C; ^" Z+ Z& @8 s
5 ]  \$ D7 q$ b6 M9 O* G
[ Last edited by tai1980 on 2005-4-25 at 01:58 AM ]

waterfire

大概可以講....錯ge
% f; O9 o" G1 @! B! f0 @2 Y  NM, L 都係為左想見佢, 而犧牲左自己ge 肉體, M點解唔可以體諒下佢
" n& o: O) f4 [. N  p1 x0 n6 K" |L, 為左想見M, 而唔考慮下件事如果穿左會點& j% {7 n- ?4 z2 e' z
F, 有時唔係樣樣野都講到咁明ga ma+ `' s& `) X, \6 A" \" W

8 T$ h( T# G) Q# G  S5 @( G最錯就係, 點解F 唔叫L 同佢過一晚, 就唔會講俾M 聽....0 [! |5 |! Z; {& Y" `: ?  I
有女唔食, 最大惡極!!

hiroraymond

好似好有趣咁，
7 @. z$ f) ]9 L  H由最好開始排起既話，. g6 d: F2 c! {+ C, a9 V) N
L B M F S 啦，
  w0 T! A/ D0 ~9 s- m) l3 w
7 h2 v) o8 G, Z5 N其實不少人都會話肯為自己鐘意既人就算要埋自己條命都得，
- n: ]! z6 c. {' ]8 d8 _( [. u# E/ A但當真係需要既時候，又有幾多個會呢？
0 }6 v8 w. [7 a; t% c: w如果覺得自己真係做得到既，又點會唔明 L 有幾鐘意 M 呢？5 `) b/ _* h5 K+ M. {
又點會唔諒解 L 會咁樣做呢。
. d- u9 S$ o2 n8 u; w& Z
% @# B6 I9 B* e/ X/ F: e+ V8 ^* K而 B 都只不過係做生意，同 L 做個交易，7 f9 Q& z) M2 w2 W2 Y  d
所謂現實世界中既商人 ( 傷人 )，' G0 P4 C7 |- Y% H; {$ l+ T
明知你咁想過去緊係開高價啦。
* h0 [+ m$ v+ d' A
2 F5 r" t+ d9 g8 \# a& `) D+ l而由第三個開始我就覺得係壞，. T  q! X" g- N& r+ R
M 唔能夠體諒到 L 背叛佢既原因，) A3 f: Y$ z  {4 h0 T; P
亦從未為令雙方可以重逢呢件事上作出任何貢獻，  b5 ^; Y& N; w6 e" K
知道一切後更即刻放棄一個甘為自己犠牲一切既人，2 M; L+ e) y8 n6 \
M 都可算壞了。
/ b8 {6 H" t: N' ~0 R
2 I" ], I+ [2 Q- I- t8 ?$ ]% [, Q F 呢個人仲掂，5 d1 n6 j3 `" C5 B. {
知道既唔等於要講，8 T$ Q& n% a1 c
如果呢件事發生係自己身上，
# t) R7 t; i( m$ B, j$ t$ h我諗會即刻毒啞 F 呢條友。" u: B! a* ]7 N4 ]3 t4 [/ O

. w+ X6 ]  ?: i( i" f3 D最衰個個緊係 S 啦，2 N( n' ]5 B3 m$ r
始終都係討厭提出不道德交易的人。7 {7 s; Z7 k# H6 C9 L, A2 L

9 J! a; d' I# R. l8 O3 u; t2 k. s0 v+ `9 B, ]0 D4 @+ Z

6 e6 N* H7 ]' R% K: r. O4 b題外話：
8 T! c. ~( k; N' h- v! _唔知點解睇呢個故事個陣，9 {4 h- y! @  S3 Y' F9 l* N0 n4 d
睇到 S 呢條友，( ~" U; K$ I; @6 s5 F" R6 }1 s
我就即刻諗起英皇老細。

newman2005

由壞至好: S<F<M<B<L
5 \# b- x$ E! M; x7 d1 h8 |  J1 A
$ Y% E" m0 I/ vS: 看中別人的弱點而作出不道德的交易去滿足自己私慾, 最賤格!- _# y# G: l$ [0 j5 V
F: 不顧後果爆響口, 影響L和M的關係
8 A( ]: F* u% i/ d' V' YM: 沒有理解L所作的事背後真正原因而拋棄她
$ n$ w) a1 R# n( LB: 坐地起價想得到金錢上的利益 .... 但不是對別人造成傷害
( C2 v; `5 F# L  aL: 寧願犧牲卻換來分手收場...