Rika

由最好排到最壞
: @8 R5 c0 a6 X+ `( ?8 B' l- r: eF, He/She told a friend the turth. Nothing wrong7 t( I1 L" h5 z% y3 A
B, He is just a business man, he works for money. He doesn't have the responsibility to help L or give her discount7 Q, P- |& w4 f
S, He just pay for what he wants, he just gives offer. He doesn't force her; d! b# E; S; ^3 s8 v) m. z
M, He cannot accept L had sex with other men. This is alright. he hurts too. But he should think about why L had sex. The purpose was pure( h1 E4 U4 ]1 j: ^) d/ r& P  S
L, I think there must other way she can find to earn $20 for the transportation fee. She is pure but a bit stupid

左輪仔

最高就代表我最唔LIKE既人物:* B9 D1 y, C( m* C+ I
5 Y, I# ^- g4 A8 b, E
M - 點解佢唔搵條女先,要條女陪人一夜再過河搵佢,自己唔要錢過去,枉係男人% O' @: ^/ N+ K# C% g! a0 U$ q

% U* ~) z3 \" r6 j" _7 I* `S - 我最唔鍾意呢D男人,呃女人一夜,仲要0趙完唱喎,(唔係F點會知呢件事)
( m& H9 Q! a' h1 v" B9 V$ c     比我一定唔會做,正禽獸!!!# D" y1 m6 Z1 B, Q. y: }

' Q* ~0 n) v- y2 [B - 呢D冇良船主,知道左件事就坐地起價,為左錢咩都咁做- `" \2 G" c8 r' P! N. _

( B' L2 t' m1 k2 C, {" q# [) O5 W0 \( @1 J. bL - 雖然佢咁做係為左同個男既一齊,但係為左咁而出賣色相,唔理志
: N* ^7 s. t/ K0 C. n# a: j! B! _: ]" Z; I$ p% q& t- v8 P
F - 佢忠於朋友係一件好事,但有時D野,都要睇下環境可唔可以講嫁,6 @& y4 X5 I" w0 j1 ]  z4 _
     正所謂"寧教人打仔,莫教人比妻"嘛,績下口得好
7 q, z9 _+ ]1 x" H$ Y9 n, O9 C  H! t% O4 |
[ Last edited by 左輪仔 on 2005-4-25 at 01:17 AM ]

代仔

我以前都好似睇過.但唔記得個答案
3 Q' I8 V2 |% T. J  f: T而家答多次7 \$ ]8 s6 D: S! O. I' T9 p5 C
f: 因為佢只係張佢所知既事講比朋友聽  h9 b# Z: S3 L
l: 為左見佢既既愛人, 肯跟一個唔識既人一齊過夜, 不過我唔讚成咁做架
4 q+ q# Y  y0 l; Y/ ^; O# Q5 Cb: 坐地起價.明知人地無錢5 V1 f& r% _# z" B, B+ m& [) t7 h# C
s: 衰人一個, 明知人地等錢洗. 雖然係你情我願.9 o9 j" q0 {2 G6 O
m: 最衰既人, 條女以經唔好過架啦, 知道之後.重走人同人分手添

hk853

L>F>M>B>S
# o* Y* n6 U* }: f% l2 ?8 S
5 {8 ?1 `: N. ?& |L為左同心愛既人一齊,甘願犧出賣自己肉體,好偉大
% h: ]( c' |% {7 L1 G* u, b5 m8 jF排第二因為佢同M講都係純粹為朋友,唔係有心拆散M同L,因為決定權係M度( L) u* b; t( V6 R' Y9 m7 H
M冇原諒L為左佢而犧牲色相,但都尚可以原諒1 s, z5 x5 r, U2 X5 i2 B0 f7 b
S乘人之危,最壞,明知L有心上人,都要用佢肉體換金錢
0 H9 _: g% ^, X* d! FB都係乘人之危,但商業社會係咁,所以算比S好

JCer

最壞  F>S>M>L>B 唔壞
% @2 P2 O1 l/ A3 OF: 如果佢唔講,物事都無, 佢應該學下"善良的沉默"3 u7 g- W. e9 F! e! I
S: 如果係鍾意一個人, 唔應該承人之危, 學下明正言順地去爭取
) t! S0 S( D' o8 I3 }4 L: ?% ?1 tM: 不明白L的負出, 自私的想法
; V6 v3 y* X8 u9 ]L: 太愛一個人, 愛得太傻, 無理後果! t" n! A' h% y: W
B: 有危險的工作, 收多D $ ,人之常情) C% O/ |3 [6 }$ B5 d! c

7 U  L1 T! i, U* A世上無絕對的正確, 也沒有絕對的錯誤

angellyz

最唔可以接受 S, then B, then M, L and last F.

tai1980

Originally posted by Asurada129 at 2005-4-24 11:24 PM:4 }( d6 x2 S; u( e" J0 f/ S
L = 為左自己鍾意既人寧願犠牲自己$ x; K$ `0 k4 V
B = 一個為金錢暴利既船夫, 正常生意人都係甘
4 F& p0 g( L  XS = 知道有人需要錢度河, 開出不道德條件
8 A" b" o0 @( O- h3 }- H" G  \1 OF = 不理後果告知當事人, (估算係情敵)....拆散對方  d% R2 `4 f  a7 @& Z! O
M = 不知愛人為佢犠牲, 反而知道真相不理女方委屈...仲拋棄佢

9 c' ^; Z# y5 v: ?5 \2 K+ ^+ [* I) J

* K# q" p0 W; _, n4 v1 m' W( w same choices with u , but want to add some comments
( _- |' a) O$ X$ }  s& ?3 J* _
7 i; H" e$ p' F% t5 d3 gB : not agree with u on this comment , cos he is at the shore of the woman (有一天, 在女人的這一岸, 有個船夫), so he has no way to know that the woman is in-love with the man across the river  : i- o/ j* c0 G! _
$ z! G$ i% j! q: J  ^# h6 k1 a
S : there is ""no-free-lunch"" in this world , if u want something then u have to give-up something so this is a legal transaction ( the woman has the right to refuse ) ,and he is not that bad cos he fulfill their agreement in the end (  女人答應了, 她拿到錢後就由船夫載她過河 )
  I) I; [8 d! A) E" ^- [9 [& X% Q$ q+ g8 y9 Y
F : if this guy has a brain , then he should know the outcome
0 X+ c4 [5 B# _" J) t1 d% h( _$ f! T' }5 m% I' Y+ j' G
M : in the present-day this guy is call an asshole ( no need to explain further more ), but this story took place in the past time ( 從前有個男人和女人 ) so they should not be that open minded but it also said that they love each othe ( 非常相愛 ) , so......
! ?5 Z. Q: o) r( W3 `% G( x9 e# @: ^
[ Last edited by tai1980 on 2005-4-25 at 01:58 AM ]

waterfire

大概可以講....錯ge, ?: u+ l3 U  @( U8 |
M, L 都係為左想見佢, 而犧牲左自己ge 肉體, M點解唔可以體諒下佢0 Y% S$ G+ i+ N
L, 為左想見M, 而唔考慮下件事如果穿左會點
8 R5 \# m: I8 h, j+ n6 pF, 有時唔係樣樣野都講到咁明ga ma
1 V% a: B/ ]; J% s! P- K3 u6 h- d) ^; `, i8 B# ~" t3 S0 G1 [
最錯就係, 點解F 唔叫L 同佢過一晚, 就唔會講俾M 聽....
5 g0 z8 K& B: \$ w5 P5 ]3 K* x+ t有女唔食, 最大惡極!!

hiroraymond

好似好有趣咁，
; P: i; A; Q! z3 x8 k  i由最好開始排起既話，
0 Q# @9 G  R' U1 L/ D0 tL B M F S 啦，
3 e& c2 ]; E* }* e& d  s
) X; |. p* e" g' G其實不少人都會話肯為自己鐘意既人就算要埋自己條命都得，
1 e* R; b: U: y9 P2 S. B! T7 }但當真係需要既時候，又有幾多個會呢？
4 f+ o# C. n6 |' I7 s) F如果覺得自己真係做得到既，又點會唔明 L 有幾鐘意 M 呢？
. C: i2 Q* K! y, s5 `$ b又點會唔諒解 L 會咁樣做呢。
; z* n/ P7 l! {2 M# W# |5 w
9 v, b! z9 i% {而 B 都只不過係做生意，同 L 做個交易，( w1 f) Q9 `0 l. Y; p5 O5 f% D
所謂現實世界中既商人 ( 傷人 )，
, J1 w- s% E! Q7 i明知你咁想過去緊係開高價啦。/ z2 L+ G& a+ S. N

7 P' m& U- j3 b8 u3 v而由第三個開始我就覺得係壞，; ?3 b# f. J# {6 X" I! P
M 唔能夠體諒到 L 背叛佢既原因，0 Q2 s9 I- m7 \+ x0 i, ~6 n4 k# N
亦從未為令雙方可以重逢呢件事上作出任何貢獻，
+ a6 }9 I1 ]4 g# R& Q) H' l知道一切後更即刻放棄一個甘為自己犠牲一切既人，
2 s8 S7 w8 F) V* F M 都可算壞了。
# ~0 C* d0 `+ i- g9 v5 M& m% B' d: g( Q# R# E$ M' ]" y( c
F 呢個人仲掂，
/ J2 C/ Y+ T+ ]2 ?  T" @知道既唔等於要講，
6 t- S5 T% H/ h: I8 N如果呢件事發生係自己身上，  f/ ~# S/ A5 A" Q! s
我諗會即刻毒啞 F 呢條友。1 c# r, \. t/ S+ n8 h. z: i
* q$ q  k4 C1 ]
最衰個個緊係 S 啦，6 b) O  l: ]6 P6 ~
始終都係討厭提出不道德交易的人。
- Q. Z9 ~( `9 ^: P' [/ w, \7 F1 T( B2 F/ R
; r  E/ m0 j8 C! m6 @% i& L: U4 A
6 I! G7 g2 Y0 g! j% I
題外話：- `: g+ W, `& N9 `5 M
唔知點解睇呢個故事個陣，
3 @$ |# F* {3 H: s6 K睇到 S 呢條友，: I/ r* U5 ]- X
我就即刻諗起英皇老細。

newman2005

由壞至好: S<F<M<B<L
* L0 ?+ x( I* `2 |6 \4 R8 i) A' u7 F+ P
S: 看中別人的弱點而作出不道德的交易去滿足自己私慾, 最賤格!; C8 `8 f3 M8 |' f
F: 不顧後果爆響口, 影響L和M的關係
6 E7 L1 q; \4 UM: 沒有理解L所作的事背後真正原因而拋棄她% ~/ @( g, R6 L5 A5 G4 R
B: 坐地起價想得到金錢上的利益 .... 但不是對別人造成傷害
. ?4 y7 R( o6 k+ e: F+ a* K" T9 rL: 寧願犧牲卻換來分手收場...