Rika

由最好排到最壞
/ A! \1 y( V! C7 q: WF, He/She told a friend the turth. Nothing wrong& e) Z& W" k* G" r( K
B, He is just a business man, he works for money. He doesn't have the responsibility to help L or give her discount
4 x7 k* X$ W, x6 z& u& @S, He just pay for what he wants, he just gives offer. He doesn't force her
& D! ?5 N1 @2 V( f) b$ EM, He cannot accept L had sex with other men. This is alright. he hurts too. But he should think about why L had sex. The purpose was pure5 ^# F$ U! P( {% k$ r" Z
L, I think there must other way she can find to earn $20 for the transportation fee. She is pure but a bit stupid

左輪仔

最高就代表我最唔LIKE既人物:
) p9 P# S  M$ K) Z; W$ Q* U+ ~$ B- I0 g
M - 點解佢唔搵條女先,要條女陪人一夜再過河搵佢,自己唔要錢過去,枉係男人0 c2 o% V8 o; ?: e5 w
1 r, @9 n8 C% Q# y* h, R, P
S - 我最唔鍾意呢D男人,呃女人一夜,仲要0趙完唱喎,(唔係F點會知呢件事)' B  G, M& z! H# q0 w) l. k
     比我一定唔會做,正禽獸!!!
2 m/ N. r+ Z& j; l2 e; y6 T6 b& ?/ H* p6 G" ?# E# L* \
B - 呢D冇良船主,知道左件事就坐地起價,為左錢咩都咁做+ t0 U; i3 M7 K' |2 F

! _8 q; L0 w) [7 ^' cL - 雖然佢咁做係為左同個男既一齊,但係為左咁而出賣色相,唔理志
3 Z$ ]% R. D- K* Q, g8 ~" g
/ f& ~. X1 H+ ]" |0 z" V1 @# }F - 佢忠於朋友係一件好事,但有時D野,都要睇下環境可唔可以講嫁,
+ x& g1 P1 b1 G- |; G& t     正所謂"寧教人打仔,莫教人比妻"嘛,績下口得好
, Q' D5 S/ S) ^8 y4 u/ F1 k
, m- F3 I$ v+ @% U. i2 j[ Last edited by 左輪仔 on 2005-4-25 at 01:17 AM ]

代仔

我以前都好似睇過.但唔記得個答案' s% e% [' q8 W
而家答多次+ R- R: V7 H" x& Q8 e7 f0 v
f: 因為佢只係張佢所知既事講比朋友聽
+ r/ x% D: D0 N4 A7 r  Fl: 為左見佢既既愛人, 肯跟一個唔識既人一齊過夜, 不過我唔讚成咁做架- I$ A& m" B" }" i
b: 坐地起價.明知人地無錢5 S4 n0 y4 J4 h: e# T( k9 c
s: 衰人一個, 明知人地等錢洗. 雖然係你情我願.6 ^* [6 n! p+ Q  P8 D
m: 最衰既人, 條女以經唔好過架啦, 知道之後.重走人同人分手添

hk853

L>F>M>B>S
0 Y, P2 f3 J9 T7 R2 `) ]' p5 g9 N- N# \1 ?- E3 @0 }, D
L為左同心愛既人一齊,甘願犧出賣自己肉體,好偉大$ j6 H) A0 E* ^3 H/ B* K& y2 T3 M
F排第二因為佢同M講都係純粹為朋友,唔係有心拆散M同L,因為決定權係M度$ _, H. N0 ?) N" [9 L& N
M冇原諒L為左佢而犧牲色相,但都尚可以原諒
9 R( K' @, I( ^  S; H/ XS乘人之危,最壞,明知L有心上人,都要用佢肉體換金錢
6 m  w; _$ H* Z% Y$ z+ }% y/ O9 kB都係乘人之危,但商業社會係咁,所以算比S好

JCer

最壞  F>S>M>L>B 唔壞9 f+ o9 K' K! X- j: U7 Y
F: 如果佢唔講,物事都無, 佢應該學下"善良的沉默"
$ G9 s. o: h5 f& V( hS: 如果係鍾意一個人, 唔應該承人之危, 學下明正言順地去爭取$ y. S6 |- i7 ^. R1 ^; i% n4 z
M: 不明白L的負出, 自私的想法# p5 [2 u0 `  M/ Y8 t
L: 太愛一個人, 愛得太傻, 無理後果
' q7 d- M7 p/ E3 [# YB: 有危險的工作, 收多D $ ,人之常情6 R8 l; s- c9 X6 {6 d* J, s/ X4 F
7 j" s0 s  v/ ?) i
世上無絕對的正確, 也沒有絕對的錯誤

angellyz

最唔可以接受 S, then B, then M, L and last F.

tai1980

Originally posted by Asurada129 at 2005-4-24 11:24 PM:+ m: d, m% s' v5 ^
L = 為左自己鍾意既人寧願犠牲自己
9 O7 j" F5 N4 AB = 一個為金錢暴利既船夫, 正常生意人都係甘
. V0 f" l" O0 ]+ uS = 知道有人需要錢度河, 開出不道德條件: P) r, J+ y0 y3 C. t
F = 不理後果告知當事人, (估算係情敵)....拆散對方; ~* Q* C9 ~. G4 r  L( x- e& l/ y
M = 不知愛人為佢犠牲, 反而知道真相不理女方委屈...仲拋棄佢

/ X0 ]; ^( Q& S% w1 K7 B/ Z3 P: h# Q. s: Z$ F
same choices with u , but want to add some comments
+ a6 e) [( ~# ^( o, ~: j6 n
' \( b' e& ~, m. gB : not agree with u on this comment , cos he is at the shore of the woman (有一天, 在女人的這一岸, 有個船夫), so he has no way to know that the woman is in-love with the man across the river  1 K% N+ {+ a) ^! B! S8 B$ k

" H5 A! d3 m' u9 z( |S : there is ""no-free-lunch"" in this world , if u want something then u have to give-up something so this is a legal transaction ( the woman has the right to refuse ) ,and he is not that bad cos he fulfill their agreement in the end (  女人答應了, 她拿到錢後就由船夫載她過河 )" q% l! D( Y; f0 E; ?& Z, h7 l4 l
* a2 w2 Y% ?  I. y0 J8 z- j2 j& n
F : if this guy has a brain , then he should know the outcome
; m& M( ~" X0 e$ B0 {! Y
% `( o4 Y! m+ e4 I. ^* tM : in the present-day this guy is call an asshole ( no need to explain further more ), but this story took place in the past time ( 從前有個男人和女人 ) so they should not be that open minded but it also said that they love each othe ( 非常相愛 ) , so......
1 e7 q/ T7 S, C, L6 p  a
+ Y, `6 @" @- f8 ]0 O9 S2 {[ Last edited by tai1980 on 2005-4-25 at 01:58 AM ]

waterfire

大概可以講....錯ge
# i! ~5 r- [) s; H+ a8 |+ }* uM, L 都係為左想見佢, 而犧牲左自己ge 肉體, M點解唔可以體諒下佢
" N$ N/ y' U+ PL, 為左想見M, 而唔考慮下件事如果穿左會點$ R4 {7 g9 ~* }3 i1 L
F, 有時唔係樣樣野都講到咁明ga ma
& F" o2 q& O! _  L% t2 k8 L% f1 y
最錯就係, 點解F 唔叫L 同佢過一晚, 就唔會講俾M 聽....- ^6 ]$ T( a8 N0 T% l
有女唔食, 最大惡極!!

hiroraymond

好似好有趣咁，* ^8 }- o# ]; r" E+ C& u
由最好開始排起既話，! ]# l; F- @4 @. Q3 {6 H5 w
L B M F S 啦，
7 d, l# _/ G' `' n) W  E4 J5 _; s: R* |! _
其實不少人都會話肯為自己鐘意既人就算要埋自己條命都得，
9 i' z. b1 h% D但當真係需要既時候，又有幾多個會呢？; Z3 A: c$ }4 N4 f' E8 f7 l+ Y
如果覺得自己真係做得到既，又點會唔明 L 有幾鐘意 M 呢？
; b- x* r$ |6 K6 z9 t6 K8 O) p0 _5 h( {又點會唔諒解 L 會咁樣做呢。2 G4 z$ |0 u+ @8 N% V  L" W

5 f: Z! _; {4 s2 `6 D0 O: c* P而 B 都只不過係做生意，同 L 做個交易，
( P5 p3 ~6 x) t, u5 p, F" @所謂現實世界中既商人 ( 傷人 )，! a  [: N# L: w- ~- {0 i" S  R6 o
明知你咁想過去緊係開高價啦。
8 M2 f; O8 }' _8 v7 U, ]" U
% r7 x# S3 Z1 G4 }9 ~* h$ `而由第三個開始我就覺得係壞，0 r: {3 J2 ~( V4 \8 B. v; M$ {: v
M 唔能夠體諒到 L 背叛佢既原因，
0 m" f1 h0 c2 @8 l- [& j) T亦從未為令雙方可以重逢呢件事上作出任何貢獻，: ^9 i( F4 u+ l. e" ?/ d1 y
知道一切後更即刻放棄一個甘為自己犠牲一切既人，: B3 p( L: p: g
M 都可算壞了。$ C; U0 \& _3 N- x/ M

/ v# T7 a6 R5 x F 呢個人仲掂，
9 K. v9 w) c) A. \, u4 Z! \知道既唔等於要講，
8 C$ ]+ x# S+ C5 {1 j2 X如果呢件事發生係自己身上，
7 O) @" C( [. G2 b& m- a我諗會即刻毒啞 F 呢條友。
/ m" m" w7 g5 t4 U9 W8 l2 ^4 @( \: L( B
最衰個個緊係 S 啦，  Y9 {$ H4 E& Y6 ~* N0 L) V, @
始終都係討厭提出不道德交易的人。
0 U" a8 ?- Q, N. j: g0 H/ c# H! i( p9 |( K- W: O

1 x) k) s$ n7 u5 q) C' t- p
( q% v9 c) w9 t題外話：
8 n! o; p  H. G+ ^) u( A唔知點解睇呢個故事個陣，
: ]9 q: I3 f; J+ f' p' c2 L5 h睇到 S 呢條友，
" `& ?2 e8 g2 x6 D/ _) V我就即刻諗起英皇老細。

newman2005

由壞至好: S<F<M<B<L
( W. T- p9 v' G
) |% N! ~* f9 D. {0 \3 @S: 看中別人的弱點而作出不道德的交易去滿足自己私慾, 最賤格!  v$ v+ |9 D2 J  |7 |
F: 不顧後果爆響口, 影響L和M的關係5 h- D  e9 P5 T( p- y  t1 f
M: 沒有理解L所作的事背後真正原因而拋棄她3 o1 X9 L0 f0 y; w5 h) ~+ y2 Y0 X
B: 坐地起價想得到金錢上的利益 .... 但不是對別人造成傷害" `  x/ q8 F* v, G
L: 寧願犧牲卻換來分手收場...