奪命老妖

Originally posted by seafireson2 at 2007-5-15 02:29 PM:' r" S1 _6 @6 {; F0 l/ o, s

$ t; F0 ^" N! g: oagree,8 k& H) C8 A1 s3 {
我都未睇過,根本唔知係點,可能真係討論成份為主,
  U5 T# j' u/ M1 h! N" `' n但我估同方向生果比,係小兒科,
- b6 X  {7 Y3 f0 h期盼方向生果比人被定性二級不雅!

* X" p9 V: s. o
http://www.xanga.com/cusp_07/590 ... 76362152636620.html
+ {' e2 g; e# P9 s& a0 \" S! a& p" a已經睇左幾期,性質傾向於性教育,同某報既果d嫖妓指南,差天共地
6 Y: _4 z6 J' [& j4 q搞成咁,都係兩個原因,第一係香港人係性方面真係好保守,探討下都唔得,第二係欺善怕惡,見係學生就恰你

chicken

Read the student post and find that it's not as evil as described by the media.; I; |0 q7 m6 S' N8 n4 n
Just some extreme-conservative people too nervous about it.

sakura310

Originally posted by d228216 at 2007-5-15 01:58 PM:
& k& b( @, M' H8 ]# s' ]# |有罪就要罸, 冇罪就要平反, 法庭應申張正義！
/ v1 z# K+ n" p% l- b; t7 F+ T% [! Y9 R! q: T. ?% |
係咪大學生根本冇關係....大學生巴閉d?? 有免死金牌???2 Y# Y% }/ D2 }8 H: k% `9 K

. D; W  ~8 s7 O1 n4 U為自己既行為負責, 係今日既年青人最需要學習既野!

! l; S/ u7 o* M  f- K6 o% o3 T) z1 ~7 v7 t: G' M' i2 b3 U
絕對支持啦
6 N6 @) q! }5 \% j6 T& b" m! r2 ^5 L8 d& j) _$ i2 w
有錯就認,打就企定, Q9 O/ ?" Z2 O8 i

( Q9 ]6 [! d$ A$ J2 u無錯當然要撐到底
; U8 L' y* R' n6 m% l, _  d' o# k+ Q
7 ^1 X* D/ T& q1 N" m3 \$ l! W但今次我覺得係班大學生唔0岩, M+ Z, G( W5 |) b$ L- a* J

& z  d% c$ H$ u, \9 l! _$ G在發佈一份公眾讀物時,內容應該注意下,唔同私人交談,你講咩都得+ e1 ?% T& E. j

' ^# r. p5 {  @  ]4 t9 p6 L一份公眾讀物係好有影響力
; e9 A9 H7 y# R( \* N: x- k+ v
! P& M! a' @5 c7 H我唔認為學校方今次要幫班學生
( F0 I! H- X0 M/ @4 }
9 K/ X- i8 ~( `5 {$ z唔通第時出到去做野做錯事就有亞head幫你頂?& N* t) X  }% \) v4 d6 g

) u8 p9 `/ S: Q1 D/ {我唔認為lor
2 e2 D' @' X( v/ z; m7 V+ `' h/ Z* d5 a! `! Q
唔係話要整死佢地1 z/ u3 @1 ]! p! }" h; K. x
% e6 M6 D0 o& O# {" O  L; W1 }5 S. J
而係今次件事,如果判得成的話,自然起到警惕作用
0 @0 q: A9 k9 o
8 X; y% R* V' ^' z我覺得係d人將言論自由ge範圍放得太大& T9 ], H: V; `
* X0 v2 F+ i6 J8 D: ]
有d野係應該講,有d野係唔應該係公眾場合講的4 W# ?/ T" K" w* v  o0 C

* H9 ?' Z9 h; N& T唔係話唔應該講就係防礙言論自由
" p1 R4 \+ ]# x4 O, i
- |7 ?. `0 n/ s4 j  A$ d7 V: a- H0 c大家都知偷錢搶錢係唔唔法,唔通咁又話政府防礙你搵錢?

浪子

睇完, 真係冇野好講, 咁所有中小學性教育書籍都可以列做不雅

hackenli

一日一金句; n) s. D. k& }
"佢地有比一般市民較高o既學歷,就更應該能夠明辨是非"7 `( n8 A4 o8 W0 ^' s
$ z8 X) y4 e& C8 l3 a) n0 @# ^- Y
我們的大學生
$ O$ p: K! c8 r0 d8 V# q- l- p" h5 h* \

$ ^8 R; z9 \' O0 V* V: e  x% b7 X7 G: n/ y* }8 j

: P5 f- x) t0 U1 u1 {

Originally posted by easy_man at 2007-5-15 02:13 PM:
5 F$ u: w: Q" m( h- Z/ W* g# Y' b2 O* |/ ?4 D: y" J# ]
& x6 h0 i# [0 Y$ E+ @% T
有見地 !!!' l  E: H) f- i4 H
現今大學生部份以為...

vv1668vv

反映大學生對法律認知不足。自以為是

支持者

http://www.xanga.com/cusp_07/590 ... 76362152636620.html
& c1 G; u3 S/ [% R7 t" C0 q2 j  _0 l  p1 D% ]$ u" ^
I think the content is rather premature, i.e. not a porn stuff compare with some HK newspapers. ( c1 _" U, b, i( f5 c. o: }
I never think of any porn or sexual stuff after the reading, but just have some moment to retreat the social life in mind.
; a+ Z6 G& y6 }I pretty sad that about the University official.
. f4 x0 W9 c) r& `8 _It's them making the stuff worse.

bigfish

我覺得份報刊以市井中文刊出就顯得不雅, 如果轉用華麗英文刊登就乜事都冇 la6 b+ X5 R+ p  A
: e1 e) t0 K* D3 E7 n' x9 F( U
[ Last edited by bigfish on 2007-5-15 at 05:26 PM ]

mailcool7

有錯就認,打就企定

155220

Originally posted by bigfish at 2007-5-15 17:24:8 o0 \0 u2 H: l* l' M
我覺得份報刊以市井中文刊出就顯得不雅, 如果轉用華麗英文刊登就乜事都冇 la
* Y+ ]2 o, V, u' l
/ K. J2 D; t3 [7 Y* s[ Last edited by bigfish on 2007-5-15 at 05:26 PM ]

* H/ Z3 }8 C# k: L

/ N7 E0 i) p* c: V! R+ w8 L兩者有何分別?) ~8 v3 r/ F/ W) C  `$ o# k
中文就市井,英文就華麗,有咩根據?