奪命老妖

Originally posted by seafireson2 at 2007-5-15 02:29 PM:
& i% u$ O% x4 I/ I9 q8 ~7 S- _8 D( M  j0 x7 U1 F
agree,
/ C( v  K! [( ?. w# ]" d# D6 b. [我都未睇過,根本唔知係點,可能真係討論成份為主,
( a% B+ X. S  A5 V$ |但我估同方向生果比,係小兒科,
) ]0 F8 e  ~- e, I+ g9 n8 K期盼方向生果比人被定性二級不雅!

' {3 t& Q. y8 `7 Vhttp://www.xanga.com/cusp_07/590 ... 76362152636620.html
3 y1 S% t8 f3 A5 Z已經睇左幾期,性質傾向於性教育,同某報既果d嫖妓指南,差天共地% P; l7 }: y1 u: `' _
搞成咁,都係兩個原因,第一係香港人係性方面真係好保守,探討下都唔得,第二係欺善怕惡,見係學生就恰你

chicken

Read the student post and find that it's not as evil as described by the media.
: H1 C6 R- G- K. y8 q1 ?, K2 QJust some extreme-conservative people too nervous about it.

sakura310

Originally posted by d228216 at 2007-5-15 01:58 PM:& y# ?2 p* {% A1 h3 D' W7 V. t# g
有罪就要罸, 冇罪就要平反, 法庭應申張正義！
& `  T3 L6 J* r" `( R5 m. J
: t5 K# c( V% O$ j# m) h6 E; }9 v) d係咪大學生根本冇關係....大學生巴閉d?? 有免死金牌???4 j5 V) X, s3 D$ j( o2 r# [, W

+ C$ ]* O4 J* w為自己既行為負責, 係今日既年青人最需要學習既野!

+ o7 ~1 ^8 j/ k# V
. B1 {1 J2 ^9 c6 Z
絕對支持啦
" K) i& C) e- [
7 J6 ~7 @% ?' m有錯就認,打就企定
! |1 V0 M3 I9 b3 }9 S4 d8 i8 T! C
# q; n- S* N# W+ _, H無錯當然要撐到底+ Z& v. |8 J5 e/ u$ r) W( U7 y
" c& C9 v* O7 U' Q2 h
但今次我覺得係班大學生唔0岩- P4 g! z. k! v- o1 c: Q
% ?# N  g4 W5 ^" N' C6 t
在發佈一份公眾讀物時,內容應該注意下,唔同私人交談,你講咩都得
  j  b5 M% K$ u7 a7 X5 p  x8 w: m7 O7 d
一份公眾讀物係好有影響力
4 i) z/ p! g8 z5 D% r$ j8 s) O3 `1 s1 _* v& x
我唔認為學校方今次要幫班學生4 q9 Z' n' X: a( D# }: ?& R

+ d! S7 L( V2 D9 u  f; k唔通第時出到去做野做錯事就有亞head幫你頂?3 M5 W9 h% s. b% e0 B4 b# C
. [9 `7 w5 ]! R& U
我唔認為lor
0 C' S$ D. R- i0 J8 J8 e3 l- k5 x, w& L( ], S
唔係話要整死佢地+ ]) H; t( F: K/ P0 I

  `; B7 g% G& c* D" i而係今次件事,如果判得成的話,自然起到警惕作用
) u1 O% ]( ]1 Q6 D, Q+ R8 C6 n
0 ^! R2 U3 K3 Z9 ?+ F7 z, x0 ^我覺得係d人將言論自由ge範圍放得太大! l! a2 L3 ~  f) h

9 l( \3 B0 y  W# [4 b6 k  T有d野係應該講,有d野係唔應該係公眾場合講的1 f/ k  Z, s) Z5 Q3 C- L+ D: z
2 l5 \0 j7 d, ^
唔係話唔應該講就係防礙言論自由
" q* O* J+ l5 y8 r. \$ \3 k
5 Y" M: o6 l8 m7 E, u# `$ e大家都知偷錢搶錢係唔唔法,唔通咁又話政府防礙你搵錢?

浪子

睇完, 真係冇野好講, 咁所有中小學性教育書籍都可以列做不雅

hackenli

一日一金句8 A. v4 R2 B  w" B
"佢地有比一般市民較高o既學歷,就更應該能夠明辨是非"
) A2 a0 N7 `. e6 z, `: h- l8 p7 B9 P! A, N; D( T/ q  [% k# y' R$ P4 Q
我們的大學生
, C, Y6 G  g# g% q0 ]; [+ F
) _( Q' @# h6 m- ^
) p4 \3 [; D* {% T9 i
+ t% U& ]% L9 |) Y: Q* U
" N8 l9 u- X' u0 \

Originally posted by easy_man at 2007-5-15 02:13 PM:
/ J2 K7 v( p- v9 l% T- ?) h9 ~) X; g- N6 y8 b
- M, P( G" Z+ t- @+ D
有見地 !!!
3 L/ Z% n4 y- f' ]/ d現今大學生部份以為...

vv1668vv

反映大學生對法律認知不足。自以為是

支持者

http://www.xanga.com/cusp_07/590 ... 76362152636620.html
3 \& w4 w- H! r% F2 V3 F0 w
2 A) E2 k% ?8 ]; t8 K+ HI think the content is rather premature, i.e. not a porn stuff compare with some HK newspapers.
) u1 W9 `; _3 M3 R! a# U4 QI never think of any porn or sexual stuff after the reading, but just have some moment to retreat the social life in mind. ' X  `8 |' K+ h4 ]! M& r$ P/ i
I pretty sad that about the University official.7 l! V! {/ A& E: P
It's them making the stuff worse.

bigfish

我覺得份報刊以市井中文刊出就顯得不雅, 如果轉用華麗英文刊登就乜事都冇 la
8 h3 S+ X0 V1 J
1 @. N1 T5 |/ H+ o# ~2 N* ?+ Y[ Last edited by bigfish on 2007-5-15 at 05:26 PM ]

mailcool7

有錯就認,打就企定

155220

Originally posted by bigfish at 2007-5-15 17:24:
9 ~$ I0 `6 C8 H我覺得份報刊以市井中文刊出就顯得不雅, 如果轉用華麗英文刊登就乜事都冇 la
( `/ Z4 s! N9 p6 l, \8 a* V& `8 e/ \& q/ L! e+ R8 M- P+ @
[ Last edited by bigfish on 2007-5-15 at 05:26 PM ]

. q: [2 O( }; {# g" {5 K( l0 w$ q- |6 g' H% i/ A7 N1 [
兩者有何分別?4 |+ G' O3 _8 z, {  L
中文就市井,英文就華麗,有咩根據?