奪命老妖

Originally posted by seafireson2 at 2007-5-15 02:29 PM:& G  e4 O* z: S3 ]& q. d* p

) I0 i; Z. s7 Z* j* Dagree,, S, _; Y0 Y" ~; P6 k
我都未睇過,根本唔知係點,可能真係討論成份為主,
; w( Y: f3 M- f7 i4 I但我估同方向生果比,係小兒科,
; p4 g8 r9 D( f期盼方向生果比人被定性二級不雅!

8 O# K+ A# p; |6 yhttp://www.xanga.com/cusp_07/590 ... 76362152636620.html
; s6 K" J6 g/ Q' M8 }已經睇左幾期,性質傾向於性教育,同某報既果d嫖妓指南,差天共地4 D' A' R8 T8 P, Q% h. Q% b+ }
搞成咁,都係兩個原因,第一係香港人係性方面真係好保守,探討下都唔得,第二係欺善怕惡,見係學生就恰你

chicken

Read the student post and find that it's not as evil as described by the media.
" `" U( ^7 B, b" M* }, ~5 jJust some extreme-conservative people too nervous about it.

sakura310

Originally posted by d228216 at 2007-5-15 01:58 PM:; F) z9 H# m- ]8 n. m5 \9 N
有罪就要罸, 冇罪就要平反, 法庭應申張正義！
8 ~  q, t$ L- H; i8 y2 G6 y) f5 ?, }9 H
係咪大學生根本冇關係....大學生巴閉d?? 有免死金牌???7 F$ x6 @( t5 ?2 ?7 b( N; @; M9 K6 ]
) E- Z( u$ e; N
為自己既行為負責, 係今日既年青人最需要學習既野!

) D( |7 M* a: R' x* v& ?

- E+ N; o9 c/ B6 O絕對支持啦1 I+ {( [  _$ i0 s" p

2 C8 H/ ]. {- e. {9 l有錯就認,打就企定
9 ]' x- T, Z& |/ x
* o6 g% F6 {# i7 n3 f無錯當然要撐到底
- f- c% H, u, \- H. U) \' C  H! x0 Q
但今次我覺得係班大學生唔0岩
. i: x6 E+ y" e6 G( D; ?
% X! q& i% k( \2 x9 C$ e在發佈一份公眾讀物時,內容應該注意下,唔同私人交談,你講咩都得
( A, L4 `8 L0 g, N0 y: U5 [$ p) }6 `3 W8 K# Y1 D4 F
一份公眾讀物係好有影響力7 P, @( o) Y6 T' d6 H: U& `6 e! G

0 {7 [# f& f! j- a6 _2 H4 a. C" y  v我唔認為學校方今次要幫班學生
7 f- d& I! T1 ?9 ?$ K4 {: Z* S8 ]2 o4 }
6 t( M5 i6 Y5 t! U! U) Z' b& s  a唔通第時出到去做野做錯事就有亞head幫你頂?+ r! y* W" ^- J4 Z% T9 J& ]* K

( m: O7 N( g- T9 f/ ^我唔認為lor+ G. V6 I+ B4 M
( @! m% B  k) y2 d) y! v, c4 `" y5 r
唔係話要整死佢地$ l. r. l3 I7 k

8 |3 r1 `+ S3 H( L而係今次件事,如果判得成的話,自然起到警惕作用* ~( y+ ^) }0 x# `8 ^' p
4 |, m5 c% P3 ~& D  J$ {* X) J! S
我覺得係d人將言論自由ge範圍放得太大
# P. N5 u: g) N7 E. c
& I& @8 _, h8 _有d野係應該講,有d野係唔應該係公眾場合講的- A' p- ]' N, l% F4 Y, z  h

# P, D6 l$ g, h2 V唔係話唔應該講就係防礙言論自由
5 i/ H# L# t! W1 {" N  P& U6 S/ @
9 m# F% p4 }: x. f) q大家都知偷錢搶錢係唔唔法,唔通咁又話政府防礙你搵錢?

浪子

睇完, 真係冇野好講, 咁所有中小學性教育書籍都可以列做不雅

hackenli

一日一金句
2 h$ y9 y" M5 O( H! A# |5 c"佢地有比一般市民較高o既學歷,就更應該能夠明辨是非"! b8 B0 t! Q& c9 y

% b' y; q! }/ Q! ]2 r  H$ ~5 f我們的大學生/ [1 [+ e9 {* p2 s# v

2 K  I) o8 M" ^% X7 h7 {) |; l. {" e1 s4 K% o& Z
& s4 \" j( |/ n
1 O" }1 z" y! U

Originally posted by easy_man at 2007-5-15 02:13 PM:
2 |1 L) [8 B8 M2 P+ T! t4 f2 F! d) F( o  J
' |; E5 D! [# r0 Y* `% V
有見地 !!!" E$ ~4 Q8 |1 h8 u/ Y
現今大學生部份以為...

vv1668vv

反映大學生對法律認知不足。自以為是

支持者

http://www.xanga.com/cusp_07/590 ... 76362152636620.html
5 J3 Y, [# q& {6 r; R; @7 a! x
1 q  L2 q) v1 E1 e- |  W7 JI think the content is rather premature, i.e. not a porn stuff compare with some HK newspapers.
, l" d: t/ H; ~2 ^1 z8 {1 m3 e% RI never think of any porn or sexual stuff after the reading, but just have some moment to retreat the social life in mind.
* }  V0 j, l$ r7 dI pretty sad that about the University official.
  }9 m- S# E  d. ^: g' F, CIt's them making the stuff worse.

bigfish

我覺得份報刊以市井中文刊出就顯得不雅, 如果轉用華麗英文刊登就乜事都冇 la
. ]: E# F5 ^8 t
" w: _( T/ V& E* y# N# x, p, p: n[ Last edited by bigfish on 2007-5-15 at 05:26 PM ]

mailcool7

有錯就認,打就企定

155220

Originally posted by bigfish at 2007-5-15 17:24:
9 b9 K/ ~) a- X, Y# m- @我覺得份報刊以市井中文刊出就顯得不雅, 如果轉用華麗英文刊登就乜事都冇 la
! ~; E% I8 Y' g- s0 c3 X' T! G; t/ J) N7 h% W, l
[ Last edited by bigfish on 2007-5-15 at 05:26 PM ]

2 }5 |, W" V$ y$ O3 Z3 O

/ K, k. Z% O  d/ s1 i  {兩者有何分別?4 z, y, N! ~6 w6 }
中文就市井,英文就華麗,有咩根據?