奪命老妖

Originally posted by seafireson2 at 2007-5-15 02:29 PM:
1 ^- A3 u( C% g: {0 ~# Z" i
8 k7 `$ S! F1 a4 k' l: Hagree,, u% F6 u% P9 q0 z7 B, Q
我都未睇過,根本唔知係點,可能真係討論成份為主,
% S: A9 ^: |/ p# e1 w% |$ i8 `但我估同方向生果比,係小兒科,
4 {! Q8 v+ L$ w$ ^( Q$ s期盼方向生果比人被定性二級不雅!

8 G" {% ]- t9 j+ v' D  }
http://www.xanga.com/cusp_07/590 ... 76362152636620.html2 Q* [0 [# [/ i8 S1 C5 l
已經睇左幾期,性質傾向於性教育,同某報既果d嫖妓指南,差天共地
; x) _: z% H. v( j6 s! D搞成咁,都係兩個原因,第一係香港人係性方面真係好保守,探討下都唔得,第二係欺善怕惡,見係學生就恰你

chicken

Read the student post and find that it's not as evil as described by the media.' L9 l7 c# q) n% w' a3 _1 ?. T" h
Just some extreme-conservative people too nervous about it.

sakura310

Originally posted by d228216 at 2007-5-15 01:58 PM:
$ |* a4 ^8 a: H4 R3 c6 U9 h有罪就要罸, 冇罪就要平反, 法庭應申張正義！ % t) c4 z, y4 t# d% x! O: r7 ~. \

" W2 E& e: ^2 [3 P7 j) H係咪大學生根本冇關係....大學生巴閉d?? 有免死金牌???' S( G  j2 L" B# ?1 c$ S
) H& V- c7 P9 F7 g$ t) s
為自己既行為負責, 係今日既年青人最需要學習既野!

+ ]$ x4 [6 n, y# {+ R. x5 R: S1 c' j+ t6 B8 L; l
絕對支持啦
! w; o( B7 j  A( {- O; ?: C5 n/ \9 ]. g$ ]9 }7 G
有錯就認,打就企定4 q4 Z  f9 S. f0 {0 H6 v3 t1 ?

5 Q+ \' S, ?  j0 a1 N無錯當然要撐到底
, z. I7 o: s7 k* @; g' e. v% x! f$ V9 a" I" u( S
但今次我覺得係班大學生唔0岩
9 \2 s$ }& h: I6 F5 t& s/ r+ V3 {& S* B# _. I8 J
在發佈一份公眾讀物時,內容應該注意下,唔同私人交談,你講咩都得
# D4 P5 ]( M" v0 e( e# v: A. S' G
一份公眾讀物係好有影響力, {4 J3 f3 F/ Z6 q3 o; [% q8 [
. M7 s$ E2 H, H. v' x
我唔認為學校方今次要幫班學生
! o1 }) ~- \) b% q- ~# }2 S3 u' n' R; E$ `3 {5 ^  K9 k
唔通第時出到去做野做錯事就有亞head幫你頂?$ p: m+ T% _* l. S, L- i. }
2 e8 ?# H# w6 O' }8 ]5 P9 c/ P
我唔認為lor# Y* I& @8 e3 R' O' E7 |
/ y: ~6 G7 ^& ?) T5 B8 x$ }
唔係話要整死佢地" g4 a  T  S9 W" F- j

2 W! f! _$ v* {0 a" p) X而係今次件事,如果判得成的話,自然起到警惕作用
6 B  n3 C; y! t- A' g  P+ R4 h8 o/ x  P: H' q1 H( r
我覺得係d人將言論自由ge範圍放得太大
) g" k$ L' E* {% d* B- h4 Y8 n
7 U. O3 H# W5 X  R& v4 @有d野係應該講,有d野係唔應該係公眾場合講的
: V) `3 C) j9 K0 C% g5 G1 s/ G; A8 [2 {5 K" x& t" j; v; f) V
唔係話唔應該講就係防礙言論自由( A8 {- h9 p  r" y7 D* H* O, J

3 ~2 t" p+ i3 R; [$ W大家都知偷錢搶錢係唔唔法,唔通咁又話政府防礙你搵錢?

浪子

睇完, 真係冇野好講, 咁所有中小學性教育書籍都可以列做不雅

hackenli

一日一金句
) I2 D: U0 q( n0 Y2 p; c, M" x. y: }"佢地有比一般市民較高o既學歷,就更應該能夠明辨是非"
- X( a: k# @, _" w6 b! \; Z2 J; t# v
我們的大學生
8 i. a8 L  M6 A- i
; n7 o1 t9 h' {$ |7 F) |: e( }! b/ I; e: r8 i8 ^! b8 i

0 C& _6 _/ r) t- y" N6 Z! O% t% I
& }1 U; F0 K* `! j8 g

Originally posted by easy_man at 2007-5-15 02:13 PM:2 D4 m/ X/ ^4 e# Z0 R8 X6 D

$ d! v. M  m/ k. \4 P1 j. t' P# J3 M. N& _
有見地 !!!* {! c' d2 i, i. l+ Z/ p" A
現今大學生部份以為...

vv1668vv

反映大學生對法律認知不足。自以為是

支持者

http://www.xanga.com/cusp_07/590 ... 76362152636620.html/ t+ _! O1 z# L) G5 ~% k
* I! G1 z( X- S: Q3 J9 n# O
I think the content is rather premature, i.e. not a porn stuff compare with some HK newspapers. 6 D& Q+ P& x, ?1 b8 ^" }
I never think of any porn or sexual stuff after the reading, but just have some moment to retreat the social life in mind.
5 W* l3 T8 Y9 A3 X1 gI pretty sad that about the University official.
& E. X2 ?& [7 C* lIt's them making the stuff worse.

bigfish

我覺得份報刊以市井中文刊出就顯得不雅, 如果轉用華麗英文刊登就乜事都冇 la
: c/ s& A$ i9 S; ^. b0 q- Y8 `. x  E' S# w# e
[ Last edited by bigfish on 2007-5-15 at 05:26 PM ]

mailcool7

有錯就認,打就企定

155220

Originally posted by bigfish at 2007-5-15 17:24:
! h. v5 S& V2 R我覺得份報刊以市井中文刊出就顯得不雅, 如果轉用華麗英文刊登就乜事都冇 la/ h$ K: `1 o/ n* x) N, D' K
; O9 J$ D! `. D
[ Last edited by bigfish on 2007-5-15 at 05:26 PM ]

9 u  H* V" Y1 v( n8 L( e
* D# P/ K. G% O, g. v6 t' B& Z兩者有何分別?
4 s4 Z( g2 ~' @' J# D$ E/ P中文就市井,英文就華麗,有咩根據?