奪命老妖

Originally posted by seafireson2 at 2007-5-15 02:29 PM:
: e, ^0 k! o6 U+ Z; C* i1 q
- P6 u# W! ^  M. a9 j! e9 Wagree,6 A% L' z4 \7 N& j
我都未睇過,根本唔知係點,可能真係討論成份為主,5 ^( S9 R) Z3 L% u$ x
但我估同方向生果比,係小兒科,' o7 v; I$ Y% [; w; b3 d' J
期盼方向生果比人被定性二級不雅!

, J& a5 `' b( W* N- Z" H$ k! uhttp://www.xanga.com/cusp_07/590 ... 76362152636620.html, P) ]9 m5 O6 B. e% ^+ Y
已經睇左幾期,性質傾向於性教育,同某報既果d嫖妓指南,差天共地
# J: D3 ?0 |7 C# z  P" E搞成咁,都係兩個原因,第一係香港人係性方面真係好保守,探討下都唔得,第二係欺善怕惡,見係學生就恰你

chicken

Read the student post and find that it's not as evil as described by the media.
+ o+ {; y/ Z6 F4 m# }Just some extreme-conservative people too nervous about it.

sakura310

Originally posted by d228216 at 2007-5-15 01:58 PM:
  x0 M/ g4 x2 {$ y$ ^7 q& R4 f, g, u有罪就要罸, 冇罪就要平反, 法庭應申張正義！ $ G) E! V$ s0 T+ C

  F# H4 [$ Z# O& ~  B/ B% D, ~) S. L係咪大學生根本冇關係....大學生巴閉d?? 有免死金牌???
- d. Q- _4 T( E" c! m$ }* Z0 J4 c, u+ ~& F
為自己既行為負責, 係今日既年青人最需要學習既野!

, J& e; x% e3 K+ y+ }
- [' T, o1 a' w+ _* p! f絕對支持啦5 O, V# z2 y2 s9 X
" m; h: E0 h. X; Q8 c, E* E
有錯就認,打就企定* Q9 H( R. t; u* _: x

5 N1 d1 h- W5 W5 S無錯當然要撐到底* @: u7 c1 h" T: a7 |# N) p* y

4 Y& {2 P( j& |; T" p* }0 [' {9 o但今次我覺得係班大學生唔0岩9 }! a! Q1 y: D9 V" W4 l3 F+ k

; P! o+ J8 j- S- |2 `: U在發佈一份公眾讀物時,內容應該注意下,唔同私人交談,你講咩都得
& v+ d; S& ~4 {6 a* i9 z, B1 ?& U9 m
一份公眾讀物係好有影響力
* i5 o* ^* R1 u$ e; V6 {' Q7 W6 K' c0 G2 T' h- X
我唔認為學校方今次要幫班學生
6 i* p* {% |! C0 c: W
1 n& h/ F' v% j' G唔通第時出到去做野做錯事就有亞head幫你頂?
' W0 \, J" c4 p, q- j
. X. r/ q6 |, W7 f* i我唔認為lor5 x" P! `$ m- e- D& V
/ t, h1 v+ I* Z7 a# u1 l7 D/ B
唔係話要整死佢地
, z: C: a4 c( q2 @4 Y7 `3 B) L! K4 v, x: c2 R6 ?: {. [
而係今次件事,如果判得成的話,自然起到警惕作用& A8 I; o" o& F6 Z  a
( c0 E+ a7 B1 G/ A7 S
我覺得係d人將言論自由ge範圍放得太大
) i8 O$ S7 e' p/ R$ }9 P
. z3 n* R7 U5 L$ H( f; n0 |有d野係應該講,有d野係唔應該係公眾場合講的
1 V, L/ l0 h/ [! ?$ w. j
# S+ n: R+ J2 U1 U' _& k8 `唔係話唔應該講就係防礙言論自由- x; x; G3 D; ^( p& l9 }. Y
1 Y4 n* {% z, @4 Y, _4 f
大家都知偷錢搶錢係唔唔法,唔通咁又話政府防礙你搵錢?

浪子

睇完, 真係冇野好講, 咁所有中小學性教育書籍都可以列做不雅

hackenli

一日一金句
( h" b, i2 A5 A0 v/ c( B$ S+ c7 C"佢地有比一般市民較高o既學歷,就更應該能夠明辨是非"
. _3 |, v+ s8 Q& G
+ q5 v- p6 ]6 K( G: X$ |我們的大學生
( s, O/ W/ {. W+ F/ b% {9 t
* ?, _& `/ X% _! D) ?' u2 c* R# I1 j* n+ [! e* N+ l9 f

  @. L& C8 V" \0 ?7 d" e. f) K% _, k0 d- A0 b5 G' g

Originally posted by easy_man at 2007-5-15 02:13 PM:  Z4 V' j5 ?' F- I4 Y

5 Q& P. m0 c: a! [: ]
$ n/ u# I9 u9 Z有見地 !!!
* O( g) b+ Q+ b; ]! Z- [) z現今大學生部份以為...

vv1668vv

反映大學生對法律認知不足。自以為是

支持者

http://www.xanga.com/cusp_07/590 ... 76362152636620.html7 k0 `& p) E# e, m1 V1 U6 G

, y) A- Y: D- S% ~, VI think the content is rather premature, i.e. not a porn stuff compare with some HK newspapers. 8 s  [0 _; \, `/ ?2 s/ ^
I never think of any porn or sexual stuff after the reading, but just have some moment to retreat the social life in mind.
0 {( h; Y1 w7 e" k/ I# \2 WI pretty sad that about the University official.1 I! _1 E2 f9 \1 ~; f
It's them making the stuff worse.

bigfish

我覺得份報刊以市井中文刊出就顯得不雅, 如果轉用華麗英文刊登就乜事都冇 la' ?5 d: Q. m$ ]  L8 L

( E& q* H$ y& P" l2 c5 s0 k% B# ?[ Last edited by bigfish on 2007-5-15 at 05:26 PM ]

mailcool7

有錯就認,打就企定

155220

Originally posted by bigfish at 2007-5-15 17:24:
# i3 P7 I1 z& b# d, E, Q0 g+ Y我覺得份報刊以市井中文刊出就顯得不雅, 如果轉用華麗英文刊登就乜事都冇 la# H2 q+ K  V& T2 X
5 ?/ x- j5 g7 g4 a. J# ^/ R
[ Last edited by bigfish on 2007-5-15 at 05:26 PM ]

; j3 N5 x9 c2 w7 K3 x; m
! J( L+ d7 P$ |5 s$ |8 X: D兩者有何分別?
  z# Z- p! G/ S- U, z% j. _中文就市井,英文就華麗,有咩根據?