ronald001120

D大學生好多都低低BB
- F' a  j5 \: F9 p$ n好似今次事件
, Y) T6 b- U) V識用個腦諗下
! K  S4 }4 s7 ^唔好死讀書
1 W8 s; B. ]1 r都知登左出來會發生咩事$ W7 d$ w4 V# N$ S( W8 t
錯左重要唔認錯
, p# M5 r2 m/ ?+ H- ?; A畀人見到香港D大學生有甘既質素
& x4 l% r3 P! e- V* o/ Y真係.........

shehboy

Originally posted by PG-13 at 2007-5-18 09:12 PM:
% q: L6 F4 j+ C0 c4 {+ O8 F" R& M( S  O. t3 F+ E% ?( N
: O: N9 ~8 @% w. @# _
I do respect CU students' good ...

* y/ B- ~' S- V/ C
- \* n; v9 ?# F' b
見你都好有heart寫個long ass boring reply,又不妨再boring一下. 如果係真係有所為而為,唔係搞噱頭,但做出黎既野人地完全get唔到你個message,咁個問題仲大,因為連最基本既判斷力同表達力都無.  J% ]) i; r6 |- ?- w
係認真定胡鬧,細心d睇多d就呃唔到人,講亂倫人獸交,可以話係挑戰社會禁忌,fine,但問人最想係校園邊度做愛,就明顯係玩,仲學坊間報刊整埋d乜乜信箱自己黎答,仲有語文粗劣市井...
! N6 }3 \1 H5 A0 a只從編輯同語文角度睇,都係好低水平好唔認真的產品,而你話其實佢地係好用心好認真咁做.你可以話我既judgement係subjective,我一樣可以話佢地既arguement係狡辯.
2 v- ~- ~6 V% i# @1 d. t
' p0 |! w" b2 T* Q講多樣野你知,我見過一d睇黎畫得好馬虎既圖畫,後來發覺原來係d智障小朋友畫既,咁我會相信佢地真係用心畫既,係我怪錯左佢地.

PG-13

Originally posted by shehboy at 2007-5-19 04:37 AM:& S! B- Y5 V& r9 A

7 }! h  Y1 O% u! _' `
) H, M3 {2 u  H見你都好有heart寫個long ass bor...

8 U* ?- u5 z0 o* I
2 T( Y6 a7 K1 \- J, H
Your last point is right into my heart." [0 s& _) l+ k- _: X) ]
Not that I think they are retards Heehee9 H# \4 ~1 R% j  f

% a7 m& @# i3 kMaybe you have overestimated the ability of universities students. Don't put too much expectation, then you can appreciate their work. 3 T/ j0 `8 D$ }
2 q: `0 Y; @- Q; @$ }0 j8 j
This time they has made a big and stupid mistake but I still bow for them. Its hard to see one who can stand out to make something different, something radical. : c1 h1 k# A9 I- e  r5 I' k5 Q
* a  W/ Y/ q: f8 q# J* f
They are still in school, the whole idea of conducting a student newspaper is only a leaning process. I still don't think they deserve too much of a blame, people make mistake and after this incident, they will become a better person.3 H. _" n9 e# H* r

% T# {+ V' d0 h8 A
  S/ f1 T2 @0 W
: ?1 @2 }+ `9 Y. O- B8 ?, p2 pLast, I do think they need some pressure from public.