Rika

由最好排到最壞% J, M9 [, R2 C6 m# g9 q
F, He/She told a friend the turth. Nothing wrong# A7 n" S8 G5 r4 _: h! g* n
B, He is just a business man, he works for money. He doesn't have the responsibility to help L or give her discount
7 s, M3 {3 `+ P4 jS, He just pay for what he wants, he just gives offer. He doesn't force her
( N9 ?, W4 B$ l' b/ ]* QM, He cannot accept L had sex with other men. This is alright. he hurts too. But he should think about why L had sex. The purpose was pure
( ?2 i2 {2 n# k5 _0 y) VL, I think there must other way she can find to earn $20 for the transportation fee. She is pure but a bit stupid

左輪仔

最高就代表我最唔LIKE既人物:! Z2 s" ]; \, [: L" J+ o
$ l' C' r, r' r. n& p
M - 點解佢唔搵條女先,要條女陪人一夜再過河搵佢,自己唔要錢過去,枉係男人
0 Y) F( N: J$ h; U! g2 j$ m# U7 U
5 |- P% n$ \. b' q& V$ lS - 我最唔鍾意呢D男人,呃女人一夜,仲要0趙完唱喎,(唔係F點會知呢件事)
4 F5 ~9 f! }0 X' k# A; i0 M     比我一定唔會做,正禽獸!!!. g6 S! s6 k4 I. U2 @

; C& N) U9 ?" s. {& [1 KB - 呢D冇良船主,知道左件事就坐地起價,為左錢咩都咁做
2 E6 l$ K' X" M: d: s, J7 [3 w' B, W  i( [1 y4 z- o. u
L - 雖然佢咁做係為左同個男既一齊,但係為左咁而出賣色相,唔理志
5 S1 G- x) U! L* `; @0 u" m( i; n  `1 L3 }4 m$ q/ y8 G: F; q( S
F - 佢忠於朋友係一件好事,但有時D野,都要睇下環境可唔可以講嫁,/ f) O! X& r. v6 k" e
     正所謂"寧教人打仔,莫教人比妻"嘛,績下口得好
! }3 c. F) d# G4 \2 ^+ U$ @- j2 r* Y
[ Last edited by 左輪仔 on 2005-4-25 at 01:17 AM ]

代仔

我以前都好似睇過.但唔記得個答案
, R: D: ^  Q7 B而家答多次+ S( i6 R/ C8 c9 o
f: 因為佢只係張佢所知既事講比朋友聽6 [$ B4 Y  U4 Z  H- A. i2 y
l: 為左見佢既既愛人, 肯跟一個唔識既人一齊過夜, 不過我唔讚成咁做架
2 L' ^. v5 v* V: R2 Lb: 坐地起價.明知人地無錢9 R& u; @- ~$ \5 |4 g
s: 衰人一個, 明知人地等錢洗. 雖然係你情我願.
( r5 J% y2 e5 e1 W% Km: 最衰既人, 條女以經唔好過架啦, 知道之後.重走人同人分手添

hk853

L>F>M>B>S
. b1 G8 V! q, a" k9 l5 B% |- a9 O4 z2 [
L為左同心愛既人一齊,甘願犧出賣自己肉體,好偉大
# N5 |5 r6 J! o$ }2 iF排第二因為佢同M講都係純粹為朋友,唔係有心拆散M同L,因為決定權係M度2 L* f. R1 K( R; q8 l& r+ ?. ?
M冇原諒L為左佢而犧牲色相,但都尚可以原諒
4 l: y1 r; B6 O& d$ ^S乘人之危,最壞,明知L有心上人,都要用佢肉體換金錢! d* {3 {3 n  \- G- j" D
B都係乘人之危,但商業社會係咁,所以算比S好

JCer

最壞  F>S>M>L>B 唔壞
  P: g' b3 m5 s) mF: 如果佢唔講,物事都無, 佢應該學下"善良的沉默"
  o3 x) t$ X2 ^* Y; s+ |& VS: 如果係鍾意一個人, 唔應該承人之危, 學下明正言順地去爭取
/ X8 [4 N! q) A$ qM: 不明白L的負出, 自私的想法) U% N# w2 v  n$ v: ^0 k
L: 太愛一個人, 愛得太傻, 無理後果4 b+ J2 s* P4 P& s
B: 有危險的工作, 收多D $ ,人之常情
# O1 p- j) x" U( P7 q1 {8 E( K& i: p' I, I  p
世上無絕對的正確, 也沒有絕對的錯誤

angellyz

最唔可以接受 S, then B, then M, L and last F.

tai1980

Originally posted by Asurada129 at 2005-4-24 11:24 PM:
! |' c' W; f$ g3 g3 YL = 為左自己鍾意既人寧願犠牲自己
: C( H* w) @+ W- yB = 一個為金錢暴利既船夫, 正常生意人都係甘2 P$ U5 \9 i- q. N2 g; K
S = 知道有人需要錢度河, 開出不道德條件
' A0 t$ v6 v2 J6 v& G9 aF = 不理後果告知當事人, (估算係情敵)....拆散對方+ n) z1 G* v  N7 u+ t
M = 不知愛人為佢犠牲, 反而知道真相不理女方委屈...仲拋棄佢

+ M7 D0 u6 f( U: b
& j5 I) E, ]  {1 b. Y% i' m same choices with u , but want to add some comments ' ^6 f) ?1 u; U# O' Z, l* R) z8 y

! s  G' w, D2 W9 r9 u1 w% KB : not agree with u on this comment , cos he is at the shore of the woman (有一天, 在女人的這一岸, 有個船夫), so he has no way to know that the woman is in-love with the man across the river  
% B7 L! L+ _5 \- P2 i3 G5 E
( U* q* {  q+ jS : there is ""no-free-lunch"" in this world , if u want something then u have to give-up something so this is a legal transaction ( the woman has the right to refuse ) ,and he is not that bad cos he fulfill their agreement in the end (  女人答應了, 她拿到錢後就由船夫載她過河 )- c. W+ x  I8 l4 ~" |
0 b# U7 ^& I9 P( v! _4 A7 n
F : if this guy has a brain , then he should know the outcome
* Z1 H. w& B  k2 c' _* H& T" j" h: e% ?
M : in the present-day this guy is call an asshole ( no need to explain further more ), but this story took place in the past time ( 從前有個男人和女人 ) so they should not be that open minded but it also said that they love each othe ( 非常相愛 ) , so......
4 |$ v5 d% K1 [# R  n1 V( R! M! S: p7 u, P/ v( R) U) Z; P4 J
[ Last edited by tai1980 on 2005-4-25 at 01:58 AM ]

waterfire

大概可以講....錯ge
# N8 q, Z, j! r' M- I, |M, L 都係為左想見佢, 而犧牲左自己ge 肉體, M點解唔可以體諒下佢
/ I! s' [) w2 r4 y' hL, 為左想見M, 而唔考慮下件事如果穿左會點
0 H/ j4 X3 z3 T. LF, 有時唔係樣樣野都講到咁明ga ma
! O3 B: G$ ]4 P. e$ T4 C. D+ e  v' Y, k
最錯就係, 點解F 唔叫L 同佢過一晚, 就唔會講俾M 聽....
# X: K* q& S; f& y) W! n& f' |. @) X有女唔食, 最大惡極!!

hiroraymond

好似好有趣咁，4 U6 Q% w+ w1 ]" b1 ]9 ~
由最好開始排起既話，2 d4 G9 v: N  K. }
L B M F S 啦，  ?5 J9 r0 n! l+ [: X# z! ?6 _+ Y% Z
1 M: _) g- I( b1 b# e+ Z
其實不少人都會話肯為自己鐘意既人就算要埋自己條命都得，, h# {6 V, `* u: t
但當真係需要既時候，又有幾多個會呢？
+ f/ b% k& u8 \3 A; {1 C1 G) A如果覺得自己真係做得到既，又點會唔明 L 有幾鐘意 M 呢？; V* h0 G0 p( i9 ~
又點會唔諒解 L 會咁樣做呢。
5 x: X; `3 f8 m8 `( n
* B7 s$ C. E' O& t而 B 都只不過係做生意，同 L 做個交易，
+ h) h" v- W; {9 E6 r所謂現實世界中既商人 ( 傷人 )，
) \; P" Q) r; L1 m5 S' s: O明知你咁想過去緊係開高價啦。! Z! d2 ~" o) l
, W1 Q. p* y2 I! p! p- i% K+ X
而由第三個開始我就覺得係壞，1 A% f+ S: O: ^$ C/ X: q
M 唔能夠體諒到 L 背叛佢既原因，
. N% e& p9 T, v- m9 J亦從未為令雙方可以重逢呢件事上作出任何貢獻，5 I; z6 A0 I. f. ~% T
知道一切後更即刻放棄一個甘為自己犠牲一切既人，4 h& x( N) b( \4 Z4 c
M 都可算壞了。9 C2 |  n- [, o
5 F1 ~5 L. T2 X4 `- J+ E+ _5 ^
F 呢個人仲掂，% @1 r, F+ T, v- F
知道既唔等於要講，
( o" }/ ~# f8 y如果呢件事發生係自己身上，
  ^! R+ j" t: B* R7 [+ O我諗會即刻毒啞 F 呢條友。) Z, H* w  ?+ D- L4 V( z- d
/ i# D% D; z: E" l' N
最衰個個緊係 S 啦，
/ p, Z+ y  k- r1 e始終都係討厭提出不道德交易的人。
4 c1 ?( ~2 f* f& X+ o$ b. Q' n4 s( V+ ?# R5 g, @; V
, A' {$ T) Q& B/ R: D
, x7 H, x, V5 k) _- p
題外話：4 h" H% g) ~0 E0 w& ]0 F
唔知點解睇呢個故事個陣，
7 u6 B6 G& O0 g* z, s4 ~, ~睇到 S 呢條友，
, T  N" e1 T9 X, o) y我就即刻諗起英皇老細。

newman2005

由壞至好: S<F<M<B<L$ L" N- u% i5 {$ ?5 }6 a
' F- ?8 @. x' J* c# d' A$ _
S: 看中別人的弱點而作出不道德的交易去滿足自己私慾, 最賤格!
' R) _1 j1 }$ H% X8 rF: 不顧後果爆響口, 影響L和M的關係
( G! L4 T! t7 ^* X( WM: 沒有理解L所作的事背後真正原因而拋棄她5 F: t" W* P3 c# M' s  a, m
B: 坐地起價想得到金錢上的利益 .... 但不是對別人造成傷害
" v; g  U! x% S. W) ?) h0 xL: 寧願犧牲卻換來分手收場...