Rika

由最好排到最壞' d# T1 |+ m& \" t2 i' ?$ Z
F, He/She told a friend the turth. Nothing wrong; I5 P" E: v& _4 Y3 d3 ?/ K
B, He is just a business man, he works for money. He doesn't have the responsibility to help L or give her discount% K! W/ v, v- J8 I" T1 }8 o
S, He just pay for what he wants, he just gives offer. He doesn't force her
" B2 A2 B5 M4 b) g* Z6 FM, He cannot accept L had sex with other men. This is alright. he hurts too. But he should think about why L had sex. The purpose was pure
1 l& r2 \* b  rL, I think there must other way she can find to earn $20 for the transportation fee. She is pure but a bit stupid

左輪仔

最高就代表我最唔LIKE既人物:
/ [& z' N9 F; w, @8 ~: h, O
% g) q0 t: ?/ G8 L8 AM - 點解佢唔搵條女先,要條女陪人一夜再過河搵佢,自己唔要錢過去,枉係男人
6 o, |7 s' e1 Y+ r4 m# ~$ e* ^/ V% n3 k! `! `% s: c5 ]& e$ t  s. H
S - 我最唔鍾意呢D男人,呃女人一夜,仲要0趙完唱喎,(唔係F點會知呢件事)
- }" q. h' \+ M     比我一定唔會做,正禽獸!!!% S# G6 B' T2 ^9 @
& o' A% A0 Z+ l' {! L
B - 呢D冇良船主,知道左件事就坐地起價,為左錢咩都咁做! O8 x( k$ ^& l( c' O+ C2 C7 t% J6 q

9 Y/ k1 d6 q4 O0 E% UL - 雖然佢咁做係為左同個男既一齊,但係為左咁而出賣色相,唔理志7 U' _* J5 b3 ~- w& n
* Q7 `) |( h- q; s: {; d( q* x2 x
F - 佢忠於朋友係一件好事,但有時D野,都要睇下環境可唔可以講嫁,
: u9 H; A/ @) N     正所謂"寧教人打仔,莫教人比妻"嘛,績下口得好
+ u6 K6 O' t4 ]7 \" `- s$ C9 y/ t( z* r7 c% Q7 V
[ Last edited by 左輪仔 on 2005-4-25 at 01:17 AM ]

代仔

我以前都好似睇過.但唔記得個答案
  q: U' B' j2 x9 v9 C3 |7 y% ^而家答多次$ S9 o' B! E. }. P* d4 s8 x( y9 F
f: 因為佢只係張佢所知既事講比朋友聽( [1 t  A. L: ~* b
l: 為左見佢既既愛人, 肯跟一個唔識既人一齊過夜, 不過我唔讚成咁做架
6 T1 R6 {9 a+ U% E! P) pb: 坐地起價.明知人地無錢4 ^8 m: d4 U" w, \2 H( Y) W
s: 衰人一個, 明知人地等錢洗. 雖然係你情我願.! [7 H9 _8 K# q
m: 最衰既人, 條女以經唔好過架啦, 知道之後.重走人同人分手添

hk853

L>F>M>B>S! k) c$ j7 d4 R

2 I1 T+ L3 o8 P  C# z' X* mL為左同心愛既人一齊,甘願犧出賣自己肉體,好偉大/ |/ \8 [  ~. @: p7 E& g' p2 o
F排第二因為佢同M講都係純粹為朋友,唔係有心拆散M同L,因為決定權係M度
3 g# J9 b9 E; X+ l+ t, P, d1 tM冇原諒L為左佢而犧牲色相,但都尚可以原諒
3 S) W0 |) f# M& n; WS乘人之危,最壞,明知L有心上人,都要用佢肉體換金錢
: C7 O8 ]/ b- b! BB都係乘人之危,但商業社會係咁,所以算比S好

JCer

最壞  F>S>M>L>B 唔壞
. b# z2 v; ?' ]# ZF: 如果佢唔講,物事都無, 佢應該學下"善良的沉默"
$ Z  P5 T" x: Z7 f$ ]S: 如果係鍾意一個人, 唔應該承人之危, 學下明正言順地去爭取3 H" h8 l% w# |: v
M: 不明白L的負出, 自私的想法
  t% e9 J2 Q$ ^9 }' R  D0 }L: 太愛一個人, 愛得太傻, 無理後果  `+ w! B3 C) a$ `6 s6 d1 K/ v
B: 有危險的工作, 收多D $ ,人之常情
, a3 k1 S4 A9 Y% x- ^/ r7 x
' |* l( M7 S  M, J& R9 |3 o世上無絕對的正確, 也沒有絕對的錯誤

angellyz

最唔可以接受 S, then B, then M, L and last F.

tai1980

Originally posted by Asurada129 at 2005-4-24 11:24 PM:% Y  n$ c6 h" U# j5 j* c1 V
L = 為左自己鍾意既人寧願犠牲自己+ {/ `9 U6 j5 U! [6 l. F2 ~0 H: o: x
B = 一個為金錢暴利既船夫, 正常生意人都係甘) ]5 I0 z- `9 w  |" g$ D
S = 知道有人需要錢度河, 開出不道德條件
' W9 Y$ a" r0 f& SF = 不理後果告知當事人, (估算係情敵)....拆散對方
* B7 `- b; t4 T' H' w0 HM = 不知愛人為佢犠牲, 反而知道真相不理女方委屈...仲拋棄佢

- P' [  [9 I% }% l  \
. [) [& ^" F! a0 ]# Q/ Y8 I) l
same choices with u , but want to add some comments 8 t& \. j$ H7 W6 r& S$ e
- f+ j( k: q6 M
B : not agree with u on this comment , cos he is at the shore of the woman (有一天, 在女人的這一岸, 有個船夫), so he has no way to know that the woman is in-love with the man across the river  & {" D! q! u( Y% l$ p+ |) g
( v7 Y7 K! o6 x
S : there is ""no-free-lunch"" in this world , if u want something then u have to give-up something so this is a legal transaction ( the woman has the right to refuse ) ,and he is not that bad cos he fulfill their agreement in the end (  女人答應了, 她拿到錢後就由船夫載她過河 )
1 q; E. s. R; J# M& q
/ v' g3 ]! b! LF : if this guy has a brain , then he should know the outcome : T) w% s- w" p8 I/ [! X( d

4 J" P- i3 o" b- |# o( MM : in the present-day this guy is call an asshole ( no need to explain further more ), but this story took place in the past time ( 從前有個男人和女人 ) so they should not be that open minded but it also said that they love each othe ( 非常相愛 ) , so......
) F4 Y0 r/ v$ d: H+ Z8 q! U  F* ^; v; g
[ Last edited by tai1980 on 2005-4-25 at 01:58 AM ]

waterfire

大概可以講....錯ge
# B1 G+ m2 V  X4 l2 ~) I( A+ m4 ^M, L 都係為左想見佢, 而犧牲左自己ge 肉體, M點解唔可以體諒下佢7 Z& |$ `4 X8 b) @6 N! A  k: t
L, 為左想見M, 而唔考慮下件事如果穿左會點5 f3 e6 L0 c* v. }8 L1 [
F, 有時唔係樣樣野都講到咁明ga ma
6 E7 t+ A$ N% ]8 l+ N5 i7 b) `/ o* {( s# y
最錯就係, 點解F 唔叫L 同佢過一晚, 就唔會講俾M 聽....
4 [) D$ Q0 F5 O有女唔食, 最大惡極!!

hiroraymond

好似好有趣咁，. i% r! y9 \; a1 S6 h/ r
由最好開始排起既話，
$ O% {8 q) q( V( O3 x0 f, RL B M F S 啦，) D4 j( C6 T+ K/ T- }

8 Q/ t' c+ O, B6 o7 |其實不少人都會話肯為自己鐘意既人就算要埋自己條命都得，4 q; j9 L6 |2 u; M& [
但當真係需要既時候，又有幾多個會呢？" U! m/ Y( q7 S7 V8 m" M0 f
如果覺得自己真係做得到既，又點會唔明 L 有幾鐘意 M 呢？7 w& p& i7 z, ~. a  ?
又點會唔諒解 L 會咁樣做呢。* H/ c* @* ?9 _, b$ m2 @
% B$ Q# p6 S6 t
而 B 都只不過係做生意，同 L 做個交易，) I& [) L4 A0 `1 H% Z% i2 e& S
所謂現實世界中既商人 ( 傷人 )，' R) ]0 x7 H  Q+ F6 Z( A% a# i8 R
明知你咁想過去緊係開高價啦。
* h; z' V- e4 W1 [& z" i6 X/ N$ O) Y5 w% C2 L+ F* V, @
而由第三個開始我就覺得係壞，. ]1 M6 E5 y0 V5 T: {
M 唔能夠體諒到 L 背叛佢既原因，
$ I" }3 R4 z5 H7 Y亦從未為令雙方可以重逢呢件事上作出任何貢獻，
* F$ C) ?/ Z7 X: i知道一切後更即刻放棄一個甘為自己犠牲一切既人，
7 z$ I, e$ j6 T$ @4 b. X3 R M 都可算壞了。
% t5 B# r6 T' E* `' u
5 n, n% ~3 M8 J" T( e. f F 呢個人仲掂，8 r# e. ^6 K7 f2 D0 }
知道既唔等於要講，
: o3 S4 ~2 |, W6 ^" u! E如果呢件事發生係自己身上，9 y7 k4 w1 [1 i
我諗會即刻毒啞 F 呢條友。3 k" T) c5 v* }0 E  u& A
& o" x& [) r- n: [6 U
最衰個個緊係 S 啦，& k# ^( t( Z6 b, W, g5 U
始終都係討厭提出不道德交易的人。
  Z0 @, L4 T$ O$ _
$ s* p" v0 L7 i) T6 N2 b5 q& {' v6 _+ q

% U9 s! R2 g9 e$ f& u1 w* A  J1 X/ p題外話：
: u" F0 t9 f' w% U; |唔知點解睇呢個故事個陣，
8 O8 l7 G! w$ b3 v3 [  Q9 A8 O4 Y睇到 S 呢條友，& k* A5 i$ m; W6 r9 V
我就即刻諗起英皇老細。

newman2005

由壞至好: S<F<M<B<L/ ]0 d  _1 B6 s8 t) L1 D' h( `
. b/ ~2 @" t, a% f
S: 看中別人的弱點而作出不道德的交易去滿足自己私慾, 最賤格!
# [/ z) W0 j$ k% [2 }$ ^F: 不顧後果爆響口, 影響L和M的關係" q3 r8 X9 G, x) l
M: 沒有理解L所作的事背後真正原因而拋棄她
% e* {5 o8 u. uB: 坐地起價想得到金錢上的利益 .... 但不是對別人造成傷害) A$ O2 T6 b# w! u
L: 寧願犧牲卻換來分手收場...