Rika

由最好排到最壞
+ l' B/ f. w$ H) Z1 c) [F, He/She told a friend the turth. Nothing wrong
7 E' ?) X- c, e+ M/ CB, He is just a business man, he works for money. He doesn't have the responsibility to help L or give her discount# m. r$ M+ W2 l
S, He just pay for what he wants, he just gives offer. He doesn't force her
3 {3 `+ `- n+ B0 S# _% }# nM, He cannot accept L had sex with other men. This is alright. he hurts too. But he should think about why L had sex. The purpose was pure
0 A0 J$ Z# C7 [/ t' K2 HL, I think there must other way she can find to earn $20 for the transportation fee. She is pure but a bit stupid

左輪仔

最高就代表我最唔LIKE既人物:. i3 q- _+ B8 K: g1 n% C2 r6 C/ f

+ p) }8 C1 @0 d: r5 j# W" k9 HM - 點解佢唔搵條女先,要條女陪人一夜再過河搵佢,自己唔要錢過去,枉係男人
! ~8 `( Q* R+ [. X5 j: \6 s
) G$ i0 R3 a0 K7 hS - 我最唔鍾意呢D男人,呃女人一夜,仲要0趙完唱喎,(唔係F點會知呢件事)
% S- C/ G, O" F) \& V' R- j9 b     比我一定唔會做,正禽獸!!!4 \1 R2 g2 T2 X7 U+ d' j
! M1 y6 E/ T" U
B - 呢D冇良船主,知道左件事就坐地起價,為左錢咩都咁做
6 l4 j6 K" z9 a) X: B/ }1 `5 @
7 _4 U& Y8 k+ h( KL - 雖然佢咁做係為左同個男既一齊,但係為左咁而出賣色相,唔理志
' f  z1 B2 X( J; o
8 p! N* F% Z. S* f7 qF - 佢忠於朋友係一件好事,但有時D野,都要睇下環境可唔可以講嫁,% K! p+ U0 a7 ~+ Z% N7 }
     正所謂"寧教人打仔,莫教人比妻"嘛,績下口得好
6 _' S( e4 H" H
# J* K; B  b6 a7 X+ q[ Last edited by 左輪仔 on 2005-4-25 at 01:17 AM ]

代仔

我以前都好似睇過.但唔記得個答案4 G9 G& M  G+ R3 g, M
而家答多次+ N! l" Q! c- h8 T% Y( Y; G, c
f: 因為佢只係張佢所知既事講比朋友聽
8 C/ \6 ?; z# ]; Nl: 為左見佢既既愛人, 肯跟一個唔識既人一齊過夜, 不過我唔讚成咁做架
. ]0 c! g6 E- q& p+ vb: 坐地起價.明知人地無錢
4 P, Y7 C% d: k' F4 }/ H3 j4 o" Gs: 衰人一個, 明知人地等錢洗. 雖然係你情我願.( K+ W2 h5 \4 `
m: 最衰既人, 條女以經唔好過架啦, 知道之後.重走人同人分手添

hk853

L>F>M>B>S  e% j5 f% U' a
& t1 M0 g9 T# {9 o( T
L為左同心愛既人一齊,甘願犧出賣自己肉體,好偉大+ T( n7 l5 q2 m5 R4 O6 ?
F排第二因為佢同M講都係純粹為朋友,唔係有心拆散M同L,因為決定權係M度
: g/ E( x0 F5 j! {! _M冇原諒L為左佢而犧牲色相,但都尚可以原諒
. k8 ]' |$ S# @  KS乘人之危,最壞,明知L有心上人,都要用佢肉體換金錢3 z+ E2 b  o# a3 p
B都係乘人之危,但商業社會係咁,所以算比S好

JCer

最壞  F>S>M>L>B 唔壞$ X* \4 o$ N, E7 D% A  W) P0 Z
F: 如果佢唔講,物事都無, 佢應該學下"善良的沉默"
/ o; \/ A7 ]: v+ a0 d) QS: 如果係鍾意一個人, 唔應該承人之危, 學下明正言順地去爭取
5 {5 k: D* t; U* ~7 ?9 d; c" a& uM: 不明白L的負出, 自私的想法
: Q# |; Y: ?4 w$ S9 gL: 太愛一個人, 愛得太傻, 無理後果
. e- ~9 Y& s. f1 L/ ^1 x$ eB: 有危險的工作, 收多D $ ,人之常情, V) J& k2 \. n* E7 q

" c, j. ^- |8 w1 O9 _( K: [世上無絕對的正確, 也沒有絕對的錯誤

angellyz

最唔可以接受 S, then B, then M, L and last F.

tai1980

Originally posted by Asurada129 at 2005-4-24 11:24 PM:6 ^% i, J+ R5 N( q
L = 為左自己鍾意既人寧願犠牲自己
7 L# }/ }3 c5 _+ \B = 一個為金錢暴利既船夫, 正常生意人都係甘0 N$ t8 X+ o1 g( `
S = 知道有人需要錢度河, 開出不道德條件0 _8 [5 [7 K3 ^+ v
F = 不理後果告知當事人, (估算係情敵)....拆散對方; J! d% l9 z5 Z' ^, A7 H# R6 H
M = 不知愛人為佢犠牲, 反而知道真相不理女方委屈...仲拋棄佢

9 C' Y- k* W" u' g! m

' L5 o3 c/ g% N' @) D( r# ?  W same choices with u , but want to add some comments 1 D6 @: u2 O, U# Z

9 @8 R6 ]* `& Z+ V2 v/ EB : not agree with u on this comment , cos he is at the shore of the woman (有一天, 在女人的這一岸, 有個船夫), so he has no way to know that the woman is in-love with the man across the river  
6 x- L" U1 T9 \6 }- i" u: c* j/ O& T5 m  Z8 f6 R3 }3 W' z
S : there is ""no-free-lunch"" in this world , if u want something then u have to give-up something so this is a legal transaction ( the woman has the right to refuse ) ,and he is not that bad cos he fulfill their agreement in the end (  女人答應了, 她拿到錢後就由船夫載她過河 )+ @5 x% [- V5 U
+ k, ~0 Z8 z# M
F : if this guy has a brain , then he should know the outcome
: x* Q, r2 Z9 q( _. p. O5 J  T% K8 ~* @: g6 C- @$ _
M : in the present-day this guy is call an asshole ( no need to explain further more ), but this story took place in the past time ( 從前有個男人和女人 ) so they should not be that open minded but it also said that they love each othe ( 非常相愛 ) , so......# w! V8 F& c+ w+ H8 `5 t/ _+ A0 c2 P
; d+ K- y1 F3 Q2 p) ~
[ Last edited by tai1980 on 2005-4-25 at 01:58 AM ]

waterfire

大概可以講....錯ge2 u* F2 h' D" r5 v
M, L 都係為左想見佢, 而犧牲左自己ge 肉體, M點解唔可以體諒下佢. ~* i1 U/ F& P5 I4 a7 s9 I8 {
L, 為左想見M, 而唔考慮下件事如果穿左會點
3 w3 k$ r( \# M' K) I4 lF, 有時唔係樣樣野都講到咁明ga ma- ^( g5 Q% u; Y6 N; }

6 C' x# [4 n0 N2 ]9 h7 D2 E" L2 I最錯就係, 點解F 唔叫L 同佢過一晚, 就唔會講俾M 聽....; Y6 F: u8 @+ L* l9 m! ^* t
有女唔食, 最大惡極!!

hiroraymond

好似好有趣咁，3 z. h2 L6 R* S5 J3 T- \, p/ j" I
由最好開始排起既話，* O+ D: W. t+ g  k
L B M F S 啦，
; R' |: u4 D( X! B" X" ^2 |, J  ~
其實不少人都會話肯為自己鐘意既人就算要埋自己條命都得，
9 Z; o+ Y4 s; I/ }但當真係需要既時候，又有幾多個會呢？- C& A6 t& `; I( g) h" N9 C
如果覺得自己真係做得到既，又點會唔明 L 有幾鐘意 M 呢？+ ~" e* K* z% z9 p
又點會唔諒解 L 會咁樣做呢。" A4 p- U. B; k, A0 c
0 C3 g- R8 Q7 H/ c) j
而 B 都只不過係做生意，同 L 做個交易，
8 v% a& G5 v/ F所謂現實世界中既商人 ( 傷人 )，8 s! P5 ]$ P9 L( L' ^
明知你咁想過去緊係開高價啦。
. @& V. H, t2 Z' U" t: F' F( I) M' V& U
而由第三個開始我就覺得係壞，) O4 a$ l1 r+ m
M 唔能夠體諒到 L 背叛佢既原因，
" s/ A% v% |+ [3 L亦從未為令雙方可以重逢呢件事上作出任何貢獻，/ a5 A  K$ @6 j9 A6 L
知道一切後更即刻放棄一個甘為自己犠牲一切既人，/ A$ K% U$ Y$ o5 U9 n+ T. Z
M 都可算壞了。
# }  y! L# G" H5 d9 N0 a
1 u0 w, F: O& _, a: ]  ^. u F 呢個人仲掂，  h( H; R+ {; n# n) D  }
知道既唔等於要講，
6 e8 U' P2 \/ ~% w如果呢件事發生係自己身上，
) u" f- }( g" {我諗會即刻毒啞 F 呢條友。* n# H6 c4 w, y. e4 n
& |- n5 m) Z6 y/ B& }8 o! j# d
最衰個個緊係 S 啦，+ ~$ ]6 k8 u* {, l' N
始終都係討厭提出不道德交易的人。" x1 R5 c  ?$ n. U0 v2 ], q% o
* d, u5 O6 T$ k
6 U7 Y3 U) [' z* f1 A+ k* d

5 B: _" j, V& t題外話：
* V/ A7 _8 Q' |1 H2 a5 h! v7 w3 x" Y唔知點解睇呢個故事個陣，: T- h# \; _+ N6 Z- j
睇到 S 呢條友，
) W( w& x6 L8 W8 f' z我就即刻諗起英皇老細。

newman2005

由壞至好: S<F<M<B<L
5 g+ }( S% w) \4 w1 R. \7 H% M  x. `% u6 V
S: 看中別人的弱點而作出不道德的交易去滿足自己私慾, 最賤格!9 ]3 d' e" S/ Y# p( D' d7 O5 \
F: 不顧後果爆響口, 影響L和M的關係
( b7 [1 v: c8 X- {. F; X! rM: 沒有理解L所作的事背後真正原因而拋棄她; @7 b+ p% X2 ]; y( d# ^% ?4 ?/ B
B: 坐地起價想得到金錢上的利益 .... 但不是對別人造成傷害
7 A) w/ W: {6 |9 GL: 寧願犧牲卻換來分手收場...