Rika

由最好排到最壞: a/ T8 a9 @' |! {
F, He/She told a friend the turth. Nothing wrong
1 H) H3 Q: O% N/ W5 L5 EB, He is just a business man, he works for money. He doesn't have the responsibility to help L or give her discount
/ E' g3 p5 c7 X8 BS, He just pay for what he wants, he just gives offer. He doesn't force her/ W+ p/ N7 Q. }. ^
M, He cannot accept L had sex with other men. This is alright. he hurts too. But he should think about why L had sex. The purpose was pure
) j: [% Y! X, sL, I think there must other way she can find to earn $20 for the transportation fee. She is pure but a bit stupid

左輪仔

最高就代表我最唔LIKE既人物:
  E% c5 d0 ]5 G3 J8 @
7 X0 G: e  v, Z: N  ~M - 點解佢唔搵條女先,要條女陪人一夜再過河搵佢,自己唔要錢過去,枉係男人0 d  |6 b  v3 M, o" V
. g1 t  E; y3 k% w! j9 P
S - 我最唔鍾意呢D男人,呃女人一夜,仲要0趙完唱喎,(唔係F點會知呢件事)9 s" v* s# g3 z" n4 b, Y' n6 C
     比我一定唔會做,正禽獸!!!! p1 r9 R% H8 j' I
7 ], w, D: M6 y
B - 呢D冇良船主,知道左件事就坐地起價,為左錢咩都咁做
9 t9 _: Q4 C) r: ?0 I; x- h3 J
: L+ Q& p7 M  N- _8 M8 HL - 雖然佢咁做係為左同個男既一齊,但係為左咁而出賣色相,唔理志# D! Z! L; V+ l) f
+ t; \$ J2 N# r- o
F - 佢忠於朋友係一件好事,但有時D野,都要睇下環境可唔可以講嫁,
1 v* K1 Q  \$ T     正所謂"寧教人打仔,莫教人比妻"嘛,績下口得好) J: i+ N  J  d8 G* o- h
# U/ t' }* L. X) A9 d# s. Q4 [+ S' O& }
[ Last edited by 左輪仔 on 2005-4-25 at 01:17 AM ]

代仔

我以前都好似睇過.但唔記得個答案
2 H. o6 p" Z) d! ]4 V4 j而家答多次" R: y( @! w' S6 x7 q, q$ H5 e$ m+ P
f: 因為佢只係張佢所知既事講比朋友聽! j+ W3 P' O5 P
l: 為左見佢既既愛人, 肯跟一個唔識既人一齊過夜, 不過我唔讚成咁做架0 b( e; [! ]; Z6 |7 L5 F$ T
b: 坐地起價.明知人地無錢
5 K$ K, U# u  c/ \: k# {s: 衰人一個, 明知人地等錢洗. 雖然係你情我願.( x6 l% N) L1 t
m: 最衰既人, 條女以經唔好過架啦, 知道之後.重走人同人分手添

hk853

L>F>M>B>S
5 ]8 Q; G" q. `* `3 k2 p( R4 t4 x! Q! H
L為左同心愛既人一齊,甘願犧出賣自己肉體,好偉大) q/ d0 n6 i. U) Z" e5 ^: }% H, K
F排第二因為佢同M講都係純粹為朋友,唔係有心拆散M同L,因為決定權係M度- n# p5 k- {( H2 t8 a+ _+ @' v
M冇原諒L為左佢而犧牲色相,但都尚可以原諒, y# e0 u/ n- z& d* P
S乘人之危,最壞,明知L有心上人,都要用佢肉體換金錢
( ?* M% M; i" V- J" QB都係乘人之危,但商業社會係咁,所以算比S好

JCer

最壞  F>S>M>L>B 唔壞
; U* J- e! D5 M; F. D' MF: 如果佢唔講,物事都無, 佢應該學下"善良的沉默"
2 L2 G$ N, ~1 \3 [% i# mS: 如果係鍾意一個人, 唔應該承人之危, 學下明正言順地去爭取* q2 I! {8 r+ ~5 d+ Q* `7 S0 @; j
M: 不明白L的負出, 自私的想法6 {( r/ {( i$ z* K/ t/ [# }
L: 太愛一個人, 愛得太傻, 無理後果
0 n9 \# o/ I5 [4 |) C1 bB: 有危險的工作, 收多D $ ,人之常情; @) A$ _% e' I& X& d% w' h. B

3 P- j) w: X' R' |4 S世上無絕對的正確, 也沒有絕對的錯誤

angellyz

最唔可以接受 S, then B, then M, L and last F.

tai1980

Originally posted by Asurada129 at 2005-4-24 11:24 PM:: J' `& l; x- V& t" A
L = 為左自己鍾意既人寧願犠牲自己
0 a) @5 @1 [, ~B = 一個為金錢暴利既船夫, 正常生意人都係甘
! h+ Z. f' r" ZS = 知道有人需要錢度河, 開出不道德條件' g; y, V) ]6 H. u) W1 E" d
F = 不理後果告知當事人, (估算係情敵)....拆散對方/ [$ ]. e$ T/ x& j- B
M = 不知愛人為佢犠牲, 反而知道真相不理女方委屈...仲拋棄佢

# \$ o6 y$ n4 S

4 G: P5 ]. e3 i' l+ L/ `8 g same choices with u , but want to add some comments
( ], T- y, N1 T& B
+ Q/ {. z6 F0 W7 R3 A* nB : not agree with u on this comment , cos he is at the shore of the woman (有一天, 在女人的這一岸, 有個船夫), so he has no way to know that the woman is in-love with the man across the river  . A1 K! g  C+ X' p' g" ^2 |5 X

, k: k5 b7 g3 {( CS : there is ""no-free-lunch"" in this world , if u want something then u have to give-up something so this is a legal transaction ( the woman has the right to refuse ) ,and he is not that bad cos he fulfill their agreement in the end (  女人答應了, 她拿到錢後就由船夫載她過河 )8 h: @3 }7 L6 w
* Z/ z+ ^- Q# t, P2 G8 N4 U) `( W
F : if this guy has a brain , then he should know the outcome # `5 D! Z% O( P1 B5 U

% j+ {& G, t8 ?' b) ^7 GM : in the present-day this guy is call an asshole ( no need to explain further more ), but this story took place in the past time ( 從前有個男人和女人 ) so they should not be that open minded but it also said that they love each othe ( 非常相愛 ) , so......
  }2 q5 q/ S6 k; @' k0 t
% q, ]8 S( \$ \* d1 t[ Last edited by tai1980 on 2005-4-25 at 01:58 AM ]

waterfire

大概可以講....錯ge/ i5 q+ w9 d2 r2 @4 x& i4 Z
M, L 都係為左想見佢, 而犧牲左自己ge 肉體, M點解唔可以體諒下佢. y# j- H7 L. Z9 \3 Y, p
L, 為左想見M, 而唔考慮下件事如果穿左會點
, T: Q) a1 X( I3 c- M, z$ oF, 有時唔係樣樣野都講到咁明ga ma1 m( \$ W0 \& G* Y  [' S

$ y! X$ i- O( K2 h, {最錯就係, 點解F 唔叫L 同佢過一晚, 就唔會講俾M 聽....
: ?' k$ h6 f2 o" x" g+ g有女唔食, 最大惡極!!

hiroraymond

好似好有趣咁，, }2 K% S3 X! J* x1 c' j, z
由最好開始排起既話，
" o1 ~- B" V6 g4 aL B M F S 啦，, f2 l/ Q3 q# A' r3 t
  h1 r# c, e5 k$ r7 t( V
其實不少人都會話肯為自己鐘意既人就算要埋自己條命都得，0 h7 F: n0 k0 [. C
但當真係需要既時候，又有幾多個會呢？
3 U2 E/ Y: v* z: F" C# r: m如果覺得自己真係做得到既，又點會唔明 L 有幾鐘意 M 呢？
* @) R0 k3 B# F7 I4 q, [- k9 T又點會唔諒解 L 會咁樣做呢。: f* E" T- A0 f6 V3 a- r
; F9 H. J! w3 M
而 B 都只不過係做生意，同 L 做個交易，6 P$ w1 H3 o$ L
所謂現實世界中既商人 ( 傷人 )，( V: q& X  ?3 E! G! o
明知你咁想過去緊係開高價啦。
9 `+ v2 f( w0 n" C  L7 s' z( a6 \1 Q: J: U* Z
而由第三個開始我就覺得係壞，  l5 ]! [/ ]! U4 x' D/ S4 u) ^
M 唔能夠體諒到 L 背叛佢既原因，
5 \$ _/ \5 z8 V: J8 R. M亦從未為令雙方可以重逢呢件事上作出任何貢獻，
% h# v- _6 x+ u# m知道一切後更即刻放棄一個甘為自己犠牲一切既人，- Z9 u! G# M4 e5 K- g
M 都可算壞了。
0 i5 O- ?) l* O1 ]: N1 m1 ~
) `3 Q8 x2 v$ k$ ] F 呢個人仲掂，
& D2 |5 W. d- ]1 I知道既唔等於要講，
3 a: X+ }. I' T/ d) ?/ Z如果呢件事發生係自己身上，' t; B: f! K+ {
我諗會即刻毒啞 F 呢條友。
6 n* P- t: O9 Z! h% V' q
$ H/ y) g- ~' q0 j# c% g6 ?最衰個個緊係 S 啦，
# z/ i1 U1 K) G/ M8 Q2 }始終都係討厭提出不道德交易的人。3 [; ?) W) V, ?1 e9 R/ z. |
  }  V6 I% O" r, u1 p3 ?% F
1 d6 C( Z, t8 I  C8 T+ A
# K  e( t# ~' C  K3 S* @9 [/ P
題外話：+ `0 e1 h- I' l- M
唔知點解睇呢個故事個陣，& m( S: l  f7 P' l
睇到 S 呢條友，- y) v4 s; E; S( n- z+ l1 w
我就即刻諗起英皇老細。

newman2005

由壞至好: S<F<M<B<L
7 Y9 Q' T  P* w- W# `3 G
' B7 Q) ?% B( b- MS: 看中別人的弱點而作出不道德的交易去滿足自己私慾, 最賤格!
0 Z8 Q% v' l# m1 @F: 不顧後果爆響口, 影響L和M的關係7 X# z  w- h) C) _2 j4 D
M: 沒有理解L所作的事背後真正原因而拋棄她" [3 Q7 [" X4 e% \0 V9 Q2 K. |5 ^
B: 坐地起價想得到金錢上的利益 .... 但不是對別人造成傷害. X1 L8 z3 X" M# Q$ H$ {
L: 寧願犧牲卻換來分手收場...