Rika

由最好排到最壞
/ e0 H- ~: o/ A! M! q; p# ZF, He/She told a friend the turth. Nothing wrong
9 Z7 R* x( l) A& ]) V% {' v* @8 mB, He is just a business man, he works for money. He doesn't have the responsibility to help L or give her discount0 A0 R& a3 [1 |8 ^, K& {: i4 H
S, He just pay for what he wants, he just gives offer. He doesn't force her9 G# X% b% ]% w: `- \% g! p3 A
M, He cannot accept L had sex with other men. This is alright. he hurts too. But he should think about why L had sex. The purpose was pure" X0 e5 u5 W, x- F
L, I think there must other way she can find to earn $20 for the transportation fee. She is pure but a bit stupid

左輪仔

最高就代表我最唔LIKE既人物:+ h4 P4 ^8 Z' T' u6 S

' c6 w; I, k+ F$ kM - 點解佢唔搵條女先,要條女陪人一夜再過河搵佢,自己唔要錢過去,枉係男人
+ x7 x# c' t7 U  S2 L5 y
0 u( r  W3 u/ i4 vS - 我最唔鍾意呢D男人,呃女人一夜,仲要0趙完唱喎,(唔係F點會知呢件事)
* Y: P* N) S( X" ]) |     比我一定唔會做,正禽獸!!!+ v) {6 F. l7 j0 ^4 V5 @

! e' b9 b6 q1 X3 T  ?B - 呢D冇良船主,知道左件事就坐地起價,為左錢咩都咁做
3 W2 F, V- k6 L5 v4 v
- P. ?- j7 B1 s9 S* YL - 雖然佢咁做係為左同個男既一齊,但係為左咁而出賣色相,唔理志: X2 Q( e8 y7 L8 z( x

3 o$ j6 |2 T8 Y% Q5 y, lF - 佢忠於朋友係一件好事,但有時D野,都要睇下環境可唔可以講嫁,, W. N/ ]7 o' H" A  b. @5 _" B
     正所謂"寧教人打仔,莫教人比妻"嘛,績下口得好
9 m6 f0 P6 @- K
% r# Z, s* L* h0 |/ S0 G[ Last edited by 左輪仔 on 2005-4-25 at 01:17 AM ]

代仔

我以前都好似睇過.但唔記得個答案
) T( H0 P, ^4 K! y而家答多次  N5 ]" _: g! v4 t/ p
f: 因為佢只係張佢所知既事講比朋友聽, @9 r  K4 r. A
l: 為左見佢既既愛人, 肯跟一個唔識既人一齊過夜, 不過我唔讚成咁做架
6 u# D$ T# A! p( L! ?b: 坐地起價.明知人地無錢7 m8 O4 H. ^+ H' x. d/ v
s: 衰人一個, 明知人地等錢洗. 雖然係你情我願.2 D9 L' x+ x- e; f( E
m: 最衰既人, 條女以經唔好過架啦, 知道之後.重走人同人分手添

hk853

L>F>M>B>S  c7 p( I9 `7 Y

! w# j+ r' \9 w0 _- E/ KL為左同心愛既人一齊,甘願犧出賣自己肉體,好偉大: Q( F/ P& J3 G, [4 j
F排第二因為佢同M講都係純粹為朋友,唔係有心拆散M同L,因為決定權係M度0 l/ L) R8 A6 |% }* M9 [' _
M冇原諒L為左佢而犧牲色相,但都尚可以原諒
+ w! c7 |8 u% u, z+ D6 b0 t' kS乘人之危,最壞,明知L有心上人,都要用佢肉體換金錢( Z' O8 |. p7 X* @+ h! R
B都係乘人之危,但商業社會係咁,所以算比S好

JCer

最壞  F>S>M>L>B 唔壞4 t3 `0 X+ l# K3 R& f  y, s0 {
F: 如果佢唔講,物事都無, 佢應該學下"善良的沉默"
* k$ k$ \+ L$ G( z7 KS: 如果係鍾意一個人, 唔應該承人之危, 學下明正言順地去爭取
+ ^1 ^- g1 ^$ QM: 不明白L的負出, 自私的想法
6 _- }: I2 I2 m6 v4 }: ?) BL: 太愛一個人, 愛得太傻, 無理後果
) i4 z/ F% ~7 @6 R6 nB: 有危險的工作, 收多D $ ,人之常情
: y& S& m& X5 n+ P; F( x( t' ?# L# M
世上無絕對的正確, 也沒有絕對的錯誤

angellyz

最唔可以接受 S, then B, then M, L and last F.

tai1980

Originally posted by Asurada129 at 2005-4-24 11:24 PM:
0 Z7 T' a9 v6 I& W/ `0 I+ f% lL = 為左自己鍾意既人寧願犠牲自己7 F5 m6 X7 R5 X: ~
B = 一個為金錢暴利既船夫, 正常生意人都係甘/ L* c& G9 D, Z$ v% j: r! X
S = 知道有人需要錢度河, 開出不道德條件( l) D& d5 s  w+ w6 C
F = 不理後果告知當事人, (估算係情敵)....拆散對方" q. J2 w0 G; s8 g4 ^' A. Y* }
M = 不知愛人為佢犠牲, 反而知道真相不理女方委屈...仲拋棄佢

8 J, Q5 f$ b( r5 ?2 k$ U5 _/ F1 U! ^0 v! V
same choices with u , but want to add some comments
8 D9 r+ f/ Q( R% J
* S. K2 b5 Z) G5 \B : not agree with u on this comment , cos he is at the shore of the woman (有一天, 在女人的這一岸, 有個船夫), so he has no way to know that the woman is in-love with the man across the river  9 k) A( G1 c/ ]5 ]
6 S* U( I7 N) D' V  a# V
S : there is ""no-free-lunch"" in this world , if u want something then u have to give-up something so this is a legal transaction ( the woman has the right to refuse ) ,and he is not that bad cos he fulfill their agreement in the end (  女人答應了, 她拿到錢後就由船夫載她過河 )
& Y1 G  J, o: `
* @7 \8 ?0 s3 y$ O1 F  T- K% }0 LF : if this guy has a brain , then he should know the outcome " Y* D+ Q6 `' ~

  ?* T7 C% V) m% XM : in the present-day this guy is call an asshole ( no need to explain further more ), but this story took place in the past time ( 從前有個男人和女人 ) so they should not be that open minded but it also said that they love each othe ( 非常相愛 ) , so......
- @, p* d0 n, E5 z
2 b* _9 i5 z' Y; y9 J0 Z[ Last edited by tai1980 on 2005-4-25 at 01:58 AM ]

waterfire

大概可以講....錯ge9 |+ i  N- X! ~% D* }7 f* V
M, L 都係為左想見佢, 而犧牲左自己ge 肉體, M點解唔可以體諒下佢; f6 h& R% q& ^/ n2 e
L, 為左想見M, 而唔考慮下件事如果穿左會點9 Y9 q# a, o4 ]
F, 有時唔係樣樣野都講到咁明ga ma* M2 n3 [. C9 X$ L% e
8 O7 f( m6 b& D) e* ^# j
最錯就係, 點解F 唔叫L 同佢過一晚, 就唔會講俾M 聽....3 Q( ?# {  _2 T' J- U# A: z
有女唔食, 最大惡極!!

hiroraymond

好似好有趣咁，) Y- K) m2 {$ R9 b1 c
由最好開始排起既話，' C5 D8 J& f/ }2 N! `+ ^
L B M F S 啦，$ `; ~; n. V: m) a4 ]

# j* ^& S! s' W! z其實不少人都會話肯為自己鐘意既人就算要埋自己條命都得，& ?$ f3 |' Z/ L. w6 i+ b1 e
但當真係需要既時候，又有幾多個會呢？* N6 z0 q3 l: i9 a8 J8 o( I8 u
如果覺得自己真係做得到既，又點會唔明 L 有幾鐘意 M 呢？5 c6 u  p4 ?+ v4 P8 f* m
又點會唔諒解 L 會咁樣做呢。
! f* j" i& U" C1 o; _* Y: v/ n3 a0 L- ^
而 B 都只不過係做生意，同 L 做個交易，
+ ?9 l+ i1 [  k* B所謂現實世界中既商人 ( 傷人 )，2 j0 D" j. M# c" O* O4 l' f
明知你咁想過去緊係開高價啦。
) @, E" k0 ?2 o6 }* N
" M+ k: r+ R* g" u) v+ O而由第三個開始我就覺得係壞，0 [+ k' {- x! U; l
M 唔能夠體諒到 L 背叛佢既原因，
/ A# d& R. _$ v' l' `; x3 Q亦從未為令雙方可以重逢呢件事上作出任何貢獻，& I5 Y, M( N3 g
知道一切後更即刻放棄一個甘為自己犠牲一切既人，1 s6 v) I. j2 D6 `
M 都可算壞了。
  G& l! a, b0 _
- x+ s/ v$ a  Q5 q" M$ l; ~4 { F 呢個人仲掂，
( p" g# L4 r0 @, W" W3 _知道既唔等於要講，
$ h" k8 v$ S! m& P2 R0 K# y如果呢件事發生係自己身上，
& R& L2 ~% p' e2 n9 C$ m+ N9 g我諗會即刻毒啞 F 呢條友。
4 W# i* i4 m* N
/ H+ D# }( f+ {# ]& M  }$ D- U最衰個個緊係 S 啦，
0 D7 U9 s9 |5 d; q始終都係討厭提出不道德交易的人。
+ Q- X' z0 y3 e9 r1 i2 i) [! Y- S9 t) B5 j% _/ D/ t

* {7 K4 D& @" n8 A+ {
- p2 m8 `- S) k$ r題外話：
) P6 u1 j$ F" g& ^0 W6 O唔知點解睇呢個故事個陣，
2 s, b& u1 A% B2 D6 ]* }# P睇到 S 呢條友，
+ ]- R" @! o- E- b4 T- `  i4 v我就即刻諗起英皇老細。

newman2005

由壞至好: S<F<M<B<L8 `5 a& Q5 f' R
5 W5 ^. m# R5 l* F7 |8 y% {: p
S: 看中別人的弱點而作出不道德的交易去滿足自己私慾, 最賤格!- Q% h3 t1 a' W* `# z2 E
F: 不顧後果爆響口, 影響L和M的關係
4 d8 ^# f9 [0 [2 TM: 沒有理解L所作的事背後真正原因而拋棄她; D0 o  r+ K" ^3 _% l
B: 坐地起價想得到金錢上的利益 .... 但不是對別人造成傷害
) @3 w+ B' A- @' D9 D9 aL: 寧願犧牲卻換來分手收場...