Chingy

Originally posted by crap at 2005-4-27 01:20 AM:) i6 W2 ]+ |# p! C# a

3 g' x2 ?( r: y* w8 Q0 w9 v
: r$ D3 I9 R, }& l2 f9 ~我都覺得錯不在他們, 是他們的父母 ...

; a2 x+ J5 k8 q' K4 D) v& ?* ]& X3 U5 K1 O- U! z
In Spider-Man 2.Spider man did stop a train

crap

Originally posted by Chingy at 2005-4-27 07:12 AM:% k) v% \: n% Y; F4 F
# W! ~; u" G+ E& u- A1 l+ X3 T
. C! M6 P3 G0 a* ~9 z# W3 x; b
In Spider-Man 2.Spider man did stop a train

8 S8 c* Q% [  u& H
, ?9 D5 [  K0 h9 X0 r
oh really...) M5 E& ]5 Z0 ?! `
hahhaa, thx a lot^^"
& ^' `  P  _5 y7 g) ^5 w' N8 y: Ki didn't watch ch.2

springspring

挺出名，在偶理學的問題
: ]" W( L& y( O
5 A6 s" ]* C! O* q5 X1 t當然這是個假設性問題! N; \0 i' H& b2 a" E9 v
但將人數倍大' |$ ^8 P* i5 C  f: c1 y/ ~9 d; a
例如是十個一個，到一百個一個，到一千個一個3 s# R6 U0 z# j' H2 |
(情況可以換作其他)0 X6 a' i- v" `5 Q; ?9 C- m: Z$ ~0 \
始終有條界線

easonwing

絕情谷既問題...
" y0 l$ {) F) b+ @# o5 i, y如果一個人個邊係我親人,我會好自私咁求佢...  |& q. W# G$ `
如果唔係親人,我會殺人警百...

easonwing

Originally posted by easonwing at 2005-4-27 12:12 PM:7 B  S# N3 v. N0 y; \7 c
絕情谷既問題...
8 c. Q, H1 g: J0 ]: ?' V$ `! T" i如果一個人個邊係我親人,我會好自私咁求佢...3 X2 m) @" O) u' t
如果唔係親人,我會殺人警百...

: D+ v: ?( Z- t  U0 Q/ M5 d
殺一警百...

srfqt1

其實我最初係即刻諗要救多d人,救得愈多愈好% w' s( M2 n, T( F: P
於是好像好順理成章要讓火車轉往停用的鐵軌,等多d小朋友逃生0 h- ?) }! o6 c& D
但是諗深一層,咁樣真係好像唔係好o岩
0 Z* I6 {2 _! l6 t' o7 o6 {3 B# H好像crap兄講一樣,停用軌玩的小孩, 因他始終才是守規則的人, 他可沒有預料過會有危險,點解要犧牲一個守規矩的小朋友,去換取其他唔守規矩的小朋友的性命呢
  E. [6 ^" x% u* k+ |% G( @其實到底人數的多與少值唔值得去考慮呢! A, p$ y+ A. B0 b8 N$ d2 o5 W% D# J
' x9 v8 w* i" {' |! u4 u% B
我估如果我有時間去想清楚的話,我都係會救係停用路軌玩的小孩,我都認為冇理由要犧牲守規矩的小朋友,去換取其他唔守規矩的小朋友的性命2 Y/ f9 m8 ^/ X# T, X; u
不過,係千鈞一髮的時間要我去做抉擇的話,可能我應該會被表面上的人數的多與少去蒙蔽咗,而且眼前真係有一班小朋友,不過的確又好像maxfigo講話明係停用...咁條鐵軌一定有d問題ga la...如果轉左去好易累死果班乘客 !!,可能我係會其實為咗少數唔守規矩的小朋友,犧牲咗更多無辜的火車乘客

crap

Originally posted by srfqt1 at 2005-4-27 05:44 PM:
7 {2 m9 B- c$ M其實我最初係即刻諗要救多d人,救得愈多 ...

1 g# `) r% G: O
" u& m! u% F& J; Z: ihaha, srfqt1兄, 我們終能於球場外達成一致的睇法, 哈, 相當有趣( ~) w7 j/ C  D, V, C# A, ?0 L, T
你所說的也對, 下意識的確會選擇救人多的一方, 當時根本沒辦法分清誰對誰錯, 只好靠本能做決定..其他的要看天意了....
: R- D) M. j' i# l/ o" k. a+ P& n. h$ t; r8 E
p.s. 小弟昨天在你於好文區發表的文章下留了言, srfqt1兄你有看到嗎

jason williams

i think i will help those children instead of that child
5 C, ^" x6 z1 Q3 Nyes, my reason is helping more
" G$ f6 N1 C6 c; c8 {+ Xfor this sudden and short period, i dun think i can have so much time to think the background!6 X4 s, a4 y4 U
if saying that child obey the rule but others are not, i think this is not a very good reason to help that child
& U# _7 }' E3 V. t! Wbecause no matter the rail is using or not, i think also no gd to play in that place, right?% D* K# H% O) A9 K" f$ D: o
also i think the question hasn't tell us the background, none  know that child is obeyin the rule so that he play at the rail which is not using!!!; K8 T0 w6 h, ^' p3 U& D* O
may be other reasons so that he play himself at there, such as, he is a bad guy that none like to play with him, or all children also dunno which is using and which is not using!
  u- {/ N( z! uunder so much confusing on the background, i would choose help more than less, just a normal think during this short urgetn period!!!

sfxc0000

作為一個人類~~4 ?0 Y( _1 f/ J; ^: d
當我見到呢D咁危急o既事情~~6 C. `/ ^3 J3 Y$ ^* _' X- z
我冇可能可以好理性去諗個後果~~3 }" O0 q) A4 h0 A
正常黎講一定係以人數為先~~' T2 E+ }& T2 M' F% c$ X6 K
即係我會救個一班唔守規矩o既細路而犧牲o個位守規矩o既細路~~/ H# L% A: R& Z, Y
我只有o係事件過後先可以好似Crap同srfqt1好理性咁去分析輕重, 對錯~~+ n$ v" M$ k" Z' D3 }. ?
但如果o係當時o既情況中~~
, i$ ^) |) j, q% j我只有犧牲一位細路的性命稷換取一班細路的性命

中華卡樂ｂ

我諗我不會搞到火車轉往停用的鐵軌，因為咁樣會搞到火車乘客犧牲，而且果個守規矩既細路冇理由要佢犧牲的！而且我睇到火車黎中，我會用我既本能去救果一班唔守規矩既壞細路，雖然我明白到一定會有人死，可能我自己都會死，但我咁做一定唔會後悔，減少犧牲的人數，而且可以令一班唔守規矩而且死唔去既壞細路知道錯誤！（個人意見）