Chingy

Originally posted by crap at 2005-4-27 01:20 AM:; g7 Y% _5 y( Q9 M

2 {4 ~8 {8 ?5 m% ^( Y5 n, F4 O/ W' n% ]5 y
我都覺得錯不在他們, 是他們的父母 ...

3 a8 x  d0 r4 ~( [

$ @4 S' R; r' P( V7 W$ i4 tIn Spider-Man 2.Spider man did stop a train

crap

Originally posted by Chingy at 2005-4-27 07:12 AM:
5 G6 v, T# i4 Q+ h+ y
5 Z: @+ ~. k. W. j% h' l
& E4 p: `  F2 M: t1 K) Y) ?5 YIn Spider-Man 2.Spider man did stop a train

( Z& I. v9 p6 K1 e9 V; r  K* D4 b5 S; p# W! @
oh really...
, |' }$ F+ v* j3 mhahhaa, thx a lot^^"
# Y7 x/ r; d% O  l1 }. Wi didn't watch ch.2

springspring

挺出名，在偶理學的問題
: f4 ?6 H/ Q5 A1 Z3 S# m7 U5 ~" L! {0 H; T
當然這是個假設性問題! a5 ]! d7 \, U8 w) j9 h
但將人數倍大7 U0 d6 E# v) c" @& t. Y
例如是十個一個，到一百個一個，到一千個一個' [" Z# n$ M8 o( k  Q, g! O; z" v
(情況可以換作其他)  X4 U6 \, m+ u0 F9 u3 U
始終有條界線

easonwing

絕情谷既問題...
* D  K' N; o/ Y# |  m如果一個人個邊係我親人,我會好自私咁求佢.... Z, h  W$ e9 ~! \8 T& b0 y. Q
如果唔係親人,我會殺人警百...

easonwing

Originally posted by easonwing at 2005-4-27 12:12 PM:
5 C( Z& t( M  u9 {! m, a7 T0 J2 t絕情谷既問題...
7 L8 j9 D1 t1 L3 C如果一個人個邊係我親人,我會好自私咁求佢..., S+ [: q7 ]2 q$ Y- Y0 g
如果唔係親人,我會殺人警百...

+ z. t% t' I' H$ c3 q) o6 |; f
殺一警百...

srfqt1

其實我最初係即刻諗要救多d人,救得愈多愈好
  o( l0 A* I# e3 ]9 h於是好像好順理成章要讓火車轉往停用的鐵軌,等多d小朋友逃生
7 q5 n' t( O7 E$ d但是諗深一層,咁樣真係好像唔係好o岩
4 r2 A8 t& e* L; d; C好像crap兄講一樣,停用軌玩的小孩, 因他始終才是守規則的人, 他可沒有預料過會有危險,點解要犧牲一個守規矩的小朋友,去換取其他唔守規矩的小朋友的性命呢
0 ?7 M$ V* h2 x+ _( b其實到底人數的多與少值唔值得去考慮呢% u: Z  o+ D0 k7 ^# m  K

- u8 a& z) [! M8 C我估如果我有時間去想清楚的話,我都係會救係停用路軌玩的小孩,我都認為冇理由要犧牲守規矩的小朋友,去換取其他唔守規矩的小朋友的性命
1 x1 O" j+ @  {& l1 H4 v不過,係千鈞一髮的時間要我去做抉擇的話,可能我應該會被表面上的人數的多與少去蒙蔽咗,而且眼前真係有一班小朋友,不過的確又好像maxfigo講話明係停用...咁條鐵軌一定有d問題ga la...如果轉左去好易累死果班乘客 !!,可能我係會其實為咗少數唔守規矩的小朋友,犧牲咗更多無辜的火車乘客

crap

Originally posted by srfqt1 at 2005-4-27 05:44 PM:
, ^; E+ p7 j4 G其實我最初係即刻諗要救多d人,救得愈多 ...

  a$ H* Z% G2 G9 c& J& r3 ?& u% c" @
/ g. p% I: k5 f3 o' e$ X2 E
haha, srfqt1兄, 我們終能於球場外達成一致的睇法, 哈, 相當有趣
' }) @1 y) r& s- ^- n( F  D你所說的也對, 下意識的確會選擇救人多的一方, 當時根本沒辦法分清誰對誰錯, 只好靠本能做決定..其他的要看天意了....
/ T' G/ P# }& t9 m8 s  q# z* G! r
# l5 z8 V% i0 e, X, xp.s. 小弟昨天在你於好文區發表的文章下留了言, srfqt1兄你有看到嗎

jason williams

i think i will help those children instead of that child
" J3 S" y  V  X9 Gyes, my reason is helping more
2 r, H5 h; j; |% f& V5 t2 Jfor this sudden and short period, i dun think i can have so much time to think the background!
4 k  T- r  I' a: B3 B! F0 i% ~if saying that child obey the rule but others are not, i think this is not a very good reason to help that child
/ y; R( i5 ^9 T, Ibecause no matter the rail is using or not, i think also no gd to play in that place, right?2 Q2 U3 p4 b- N# [. ~9 E
also i think the question hasn't tell us the background, none  know that child is obeyin the rule so that he play at the rail which is not using!!!% Q  e9 W0 q0 E  ?6 H$ k! l' E' Q0 I
may be other reasons so that he play himself at there, such as, he is a bad guy that none like to play with him, or all children also dunno which is using and which is not using!) g4 n. v0 W' G6 g* k
under so much confusing on the background, i would choose help more than less, just a normal think during this short urgetn period!!!

sfxc0000

作為一個人類~~0 P& R; U" l& b: ?/ V. d
當我見到呢D咁危急o既事情~~7 t1 t" Q) J  b5 i. r8 h
我冇可能可以好理性去諗個後果~~9 a; C9 [: f: A3 I) V* x" L; ]
正常黎講一定係以人數為先~~- z  t) |) y) O. C; q  v
即係我會救個一班唔守規矩o既細路而犧牲o個位守規矩o既細路~~
5 X- w, v" S! T% p我只有o係事件過後先可以好似Crap同srfqt1好理性咁去分析輕重, 對錯~~0 T* k/ A! d$ G6 L  R' r
但如果o係當時o既情況中~~
  J5 c- O0 U) z- t; e% J: u我只有犧牲一位細路的性命稷換取一班細路的性命

中華卡樂ｂ

我諗我不會搞到火車轉往停用的鐵軌，因為咁樣會搞到火車乘客犧牲，而且果個守規矩既細路冇理由要佢犧牲的！而且我睇到火車黎中，我會用我既本能去救果一班唔守規矩既壞細路，雖然我明白到一定會有人死，可能我自己都會死，但我咁做一定唔會後悔，減少犧牲的人數，而且可以令一班唔守規矩而且死唔去既壞細路知道錯誤！（個人意見）