Chingy

Originally posted by crap at 2005-4-27 01:20 AM:5 R4 M) R% g" I4 c! S9 Q
( \% _& G- W3 o$ X  z

8 n% ^4 t) T& b8 f我都覺得錯不在他們, 是他們的父母 ...

! f4 T3 h( ^& [1 e' s* L  d
! q% c) j7 _: G3 K3 l; b+ e! a
In Spider-Man 2.Spider man did stop a train

crap

Originally posted by Chingy at 2005-4-27 07:12 AM:
4 @3 j9 z% V% T4 u5 n& A
4 a, Z5 l6 e4 Z" i) Y. W
4 p* Y/ `- z" }3 `# L- _& xIn Spider-Man 2.Spider man did stop a train

8 Q! L  ~& |. n" D. m5 f4 F7 b

- G  j2 g0 y: t8 _& z& moh really...
4 \) a/ l: k1 L" T+ Ahahhaa, thx a lot^^"
- o* i6 i% W6 _i didn't watch ch.2

springspring

挺出名，在偶理學的問題
3 H) U5 }6 x9 ?9 v
) B1 M  W# c; K/ }3 N當然這是個假設性問題
+ m2 D3 q# K2 L1 {但將人數倍大9 {" N: k* s3 b" I
例如是十個一個，到一百個一個，到一千個一個
2 C1 F2 E, C: G(情況可以換作其他), q$ f5 q) I1 g: _* A! C1 S
始終有條界線

easonwing

絕情谷既問題...9 b9 N5 ?: U$ f' S
如果一個人個邊係我親人,我會好自私咁求佢...
" u7 d* l& l! B" M/ l" e, ]/ G4 f) x如果唔係親人,我會殺人警百...

easonwing

Originally posted by easonwing at 2005-4-27 12:12 PM:
* L! @& x4 l. V  g絕情谷既問題...
9 z( c. \* ?- a; i8 C; a7 D如果一個人個邊係我親人,我會好自私咁求佢...
1 b' P  I" p$ Q! Q如果唔係親人,我會殺人警百...

( M! K2 |3 P& u4 }& T" G( g* m
殺一警百...

srfqt1

其實我最初係即刻諗要救多d人,救得愈多愈好
$ h. M7 w& D1 T( ]; V於是好像好順理成章要讓火車轉往停用的鐵軌,等多d小朋友逃生
4 `/ l: \+ c# ^3 j. X$ t" Z. A) D但是諗深一層,咁樣真係好像唔係好o岩
9 L* m; a: ^) [+ v; \- j好像crap兄講一樣,停用軌玩的小孩, 因他始終才是守規則的人, 他可沒有預料過會有危險,點解要犧牲一個守規矩的小朋友,去換取其他唔守規矩的小朋友的性命呢3 Z. ~6 \/ ~8 N6 ]( X( @) U: U$ J9 V
其實到底人數的多與少值唔值得去考慮呢
" A8 W( a" x% a6 b
& z2 w, V; J8 p! [$ ~  j4 \我估如果我有時間去想清楚的話,我都係會救係停用路軌玩的小孩,我都認為冇理由要犧牲守規矩的小朋友,去換取其他唔守規矩的小朋友的性命
7 s# h; `8 n, }; g不過,係千鈞一髮的時間要我去做抉擇的話,可能我應該會被表面上的人數的多與少去蒙蔽咗,而且眼前真係有一班小朋友,不過的確又好像maxfigo講話明係停用...咁條鐵軌一定有d問題ga la...如果轉左去好易累死果班乘客 !!,可能我係會其實為咗少數唔守規矩的小朋友,犧牲咗更多無辜的火車乘客

crap

Originally posted by srfqt1 at 2005-4-27 05:44 PM:+ }8 z# G9 Z. ^
其實我最初係即刻諗要救多d人,救得愈多 ...

' K' Y& |/ j  o# h/ v; @+ E4 M
. y, h6 L& Q; X/ a
haha, srfqt1兄, 我們終能於球場外達成一致的睇法, 哈, 相當有趣; T6 j  V- i4 g% {0 y1 A
你所說的也對, 下意識的確會選擇救人多的一方, 當時根本沒辦法分清誰對誰錯, 只好靠本能做決定..其他的要看天意了....* V) L+ _4 K0 L) ]. I+ d3 ^& c% G
, B: @. L( j, t# y# A
p.s. 小弟昨天在你於好文區發表的文章下留了言, srfqt1兄你有看到嗎

jason williams

i think i will help those children instead of that child9 N- q# Q4 |  W! H1 S
yes, my reason is helping more# ~# [9 P+ E$ R
for this sudden and short period, i dun think i can have so much time to think the background!8 Z. M, F% A7 d6 M
if saying that child obey the rule but others are not, i think this is not a very good reason to help that child
' G9 R" H5 W& h; dbecause no matter the rail is using or not, i think also no gd to play in that place, right?$ C7 D; m' W% n1 i2 D! M: P
also i think the question hasn't tell us the background, none  know that child is obeyin the rule so that he play at the rail which is not using!!!5 t, O+ c* t- T( \: p: i4 w: |
may be other reasons so that he play himself at there, such as, he is a bad guy that none like to play with him, or all children also dunno which is using and which is not using!) P+ I  N7 t$ }6 i* j+ C
under so much confusing on the background, i would choose help more than less, just a normal think during this short urgetn period!!!

sfxc0000

作為一個人類~~5 z* z+ N* `7 N) S) d
當我見到呢D咁危急o既事情~~
* l1 u5 F' T. \: o6 y& K$ t我冇可能可以好理性去諗個後果~~/ j# `' ]+ ]! e) a+ d& B
正常黎講一定係以人數為先~~
1 W- ^, @. U. _- m, E. T即係我會救個一班唔守規矩o既細路而犧牲o個位守規矩o既細路~~& Z' j! l, X" t! A: o* q
我只有o係事件過後先可以好似Crap同srfqt1好理性咁去分析輕重, 對錯~~
! i) u6 G( H/ }  [但如果o係當時o既情況中~~8 Y1 S1 V8 H  X1 J
我只有犧牲一位細路的性命稷換取一班細路的性命

中華卡樂ｂ

我諗我不會搞到火車轉往停用的鐵軌，因為咁樣會搞到火車乘客犧牲，而且果個守規矩既細路冇理由要佢犧牲的！而且我睇到火車黎中，我會用我既本能去救果一班唔守規矩既壞細路，雖然我明白到一定會有人死，可能我自己都會死，但我咁做一定唔會後悔，減少犧牲的人數，而且可以令一班唔守規矩而且死唔去既壞細路知道錯誤！（個人意見）