Chingy

Originally posted by crap at 2005-4-27 01:20 AM:
6 d; {, P! K% L- ]/ c5 \) p* w
9 O. g5 }$ F$ l* q/ o
- B1 K8 h$ F1 M  _我都覺得錯不在他們, 是他們的父母 ...

; n7 o5 {6 h8 L% `" @/ W/ h0 w

3 g& x0 w% o/ a# o5 H' r2 ]In Spider-Man 2.Spider man did stop a train

crap

Originally posted by Chingy at 2005-4-27 07:12 AM:
5 g" J1 x  k8 K6 ~$ E) y. Y& l  o/ B
* t2 y: b4 B+ f& j
; z' H% k4 E$ @7 {" LIn Spider-Man 2.Spider man did stop a train

) T6 W$ @5 N  q( i" q- S2 p; j& V" I

3 F) K, K% i8 j' }& V$ n$ c9 X4 Ooh really...
& V' {3 b) W3 Z" ]- \+ [0 lhahhaa, thx a lot^^", T: r; Q7 O) E9 ]( v# [2 C9 n$ {
i didn't watch ch.2

springspring

挺出名，在偶理學的問題
' v! E: x1 u; d( M" ?; q7 B) J7 ]3 Y$ E! j9 V6 w
當然這是個假設性問題
# z' `9 c/ I0 N& q7 o6 z但將人數倍大; y" n7 o& i' q& R) E: K+ ]1 U
例如是十個一個，到一百個一個，到一千個一個5 n. d8 c/ d9 [9 U
(情況可以換作其他)% u2 X5 ?0 j) H, A  T' B
始終有條界線

easonwing

絕情谷既問題...* w2 Y$ {1 f& \; o$ K
如果一個人個邊係我親人,我會好自私咁求佢...; E1 H0 I$ y  w( F
如果唔係親人,我會殺人警百...

easonwing

Originally posted by easonwing at 2005-4-27 12:12 PM:1 x+ Q0 S3 q  ^. q. g9 D
絕情谷既問題...5 J5 P2 X' L: C$ E. L  F9 ]
如果一個人個邊係我親人,我會好自私咁求佢...
$ [# M6 z3 I3 ~  d如果唔係親人,我會殺人警百...

& }; f- I% x- h9 W殺一警百...

srfqt1

其實我最初係即刻諗要救多d人,救得愈多愈好
$ X6 s# Q6 \; Q4 w6 @於是好像好順理成章要讓火車轉往停用的鐵軌,等多d小朋友逃生
8 ~" X8 _, A$ c0 n; v但是諗深一層,咁樣真係好像唔係好o岩
8 R6 C4 c# h0 l7 j2 M& `: ~好像crap兄講一樣,停用軌玩的小孩, 因他始終才是守規則的人, 他可沒有預料過會有危險,點解要犧牲一個守規矩的小朋友,去換取其他唔守規矩的小朋友的性命呢
: x7 b; M% G1 ^其實到底人數的多與少值唔值得去考慮呢+ A6 I4 @* b. v* E* z

7 p6 X) E. o- ~3 k1 G* R/ u我估如果我有時間去想清楚的話,我都係會救係停用路軌玩的小孩,我都認為冇理由要犧牲守規矩的小朋友,去換取其他唔守規矩的小朋友的性命
, }% y) ]2 g; U- v- W! I  s不過,係千鈞一髮的時間要我去做抉擇的話,可能我應該會被表面上的人數的多與少去蒙蔽咗,而且眼前真係有一班小朋友,不過的確又好像maxfigo講話明係停用...咁條鐵軌一定有d問題ga la...如果轉左去好易累死果班乘客 !!,可能我係會其實為咗少數唔守規矩的小朋友,犧牲咗更多無辜的火車乘客

crap

Originally posted by srfqt1 at 2005-4-27 05:44 PM:4 Q: _8 }8 w6 ~) W- Q' O
其實我最初係即刻諗要救多d人,救得愈多 ...

- l3 }# u: B& c' g

4 O  g" e! {/ b& ?haha, srfqt1兄, 我們終能於球場外達成一致的睇法, 哈, 相當有趣6 l2 Q3 y8 Q$ A
你所說的也對, 下意識的確會選擇救人多的一方, 當時根本沒辦法分清誰對誰錯, 只好靠本能做決定..其他的要看天意了..... n1 P0 r$ H/ g% k2 M

8 ~2 \4 W& `! _0 ]' |  Vp.s. 小弟昨天在你於好文區發表的文章下留了言, srfqt1兄你有看到嗎

jason williams

i think i will help those children instead of that child* c" `, Y$ j: O+ H' z4 D
yes, my reason is helping more/ A, p5 a1 R7 T0 f+ N
for this sudden and short period, i dun think i can have so much time to think the background!
8 t9 Y* Y: t' d+ J, l6 B& C2 W9 _if saying that child obey the rule but others are not, i think this is not a very good reason to help that child
9 E. d: S9 W4 o6 Xbecause no matter the rail is using or not, i think also no gd to play in that place, right?
8 }5 R( E2 C# b2 h7 Lalso i think the question hasn't tell us the background, none  know that child is obeyin the rule so that he play at the rail which is not using!!!" j1 _* M4 d6 ~, A' C! ?' R
may be other reasons so that he play himself at there, such as, he is a bad guy that none like to play with him, or all children also dunno which is using and which is not using!
2 @$ A3 L. i% Uunder so much confusing on the background, i would choose help more than less, just a normal think during this short urgetn period!!!

sfxc0000

作為一個人類~~9 d+ ^* }& r8 u4 ^3 E
當我見到呢D咁危急o既事情~~8 W3 {# ?( f( s7 k  m/ i
我冇可能可以好理性去諗個後果~~
  Z( `9 p( {6 j正常黎講一定係以人數為先~~
) B, P  D$ P# H9 x- L即係我會救個一班唔守規矩o既細路而犧牲o個位守規矩o既細路~~
* `8 V. ]2 ]; t; e6 j我只有o係事件過後先可以好似Crap同srfqt1好理性咁去分析輕重, 對錯~~8 J6 x- q4 z7 B) b: r
但如果o係當時o既情況中~~
5 g( [! {4 @" e我只有犧牲一位細路的性命稷換取一班細路的性命

中華卡樂ｂ

我諗我不會搞到火車轉往停用的鐵軌，因為咁樣會搞到火車乘客犧牲，而且果個守規矩既細路冇理由要佢犧牲的！而且我睇到火車黎中，我會用我既本能去救果一班唔守規矩既壞細路，雖然我明白到一定會有人死，可能我自己都會死，但我咁做一定唔會後悔，減少犧牲的人數，而且可以令一班唔守規矩而且死唔去既壞細路知道錯誤！（個人意見）