Chingy

Originally posted by crap at 2005-4-27 01:20 AM:
1 j8 u5 `0 u6 N% I% v& g) U1 f
, q+ R& h" q9 w0 r$ b/ Q% n9 k) Q  c
我都覺得錯不在他們, 是他們的父母 ...

$ w+ t. ~+ W9 E

, k/ u! I2 j7 W. P7 Z' FIn Spider-Man 2.Spider man did stop a train

crap

Originally posted by Chingy at 2005-4-27 07:12 AM:) D# ^- z2 y+ d* o& }
1 H  w7 f3 @6 X% @

5 \1 `  Z0 J6 W# `) ?6 }In Spider-Man 2.Spider man did stop a train

9 y" G' }2 K1 U" T, r! q$ k
1 }9 d* Y$ P; y: I
oh really...
! T* E# u2 D' F- X. K/ v, F4 ~hahhaa, thx a lot^^": G9 P' {/ e+ ]' i# o6 p
i didn't watch ch.2

springspring

挺出名，在偶理學的問題, j9 f( o- U( M) n

2 H* B* p2 t- c2 a/ L當然這是個假設性問題
+ u/ ^5 `5 H7 @* r但將人數倍大4 L6 c! `& J' U
例如是十個一個，到一百個一個，到一千個一個
, N' u3 u" o% X' a(情況可以換作其他)
8 E3 }$ J8 I# `5 W& A, W2 W始終有條界線

easonwing

絕情谷既問題...6 g3 ^- \; n4 q) ~% Y
如果一個人個邊係我親人,我會好自私咁求佢...
4 \2 `9 H! }4 A/ b9 K* j如果唔係親人,我會殺人警百...

easonwing

Originally posted by easonwing at 2005-4-27 12:12 PM:
2 J5 L' q7 G7 c' R8 ~8 o& l絕情谷既問題...
( ~* @  j3 s1 M: u9 R如果一個人個邊係我親人,我會好自私咁求佢...
# x' S) F/ T& m( C  F8 m如果唔係親人,我會殺人警百...

( x9 I/ ^' S- @' B5 O
殺一警百...

srfqt1

其實我最初係即刻諗要救多d人,救得愈多愈好
- n/ B8 X/ k' Y+ a3 B於是好像好順理成章要讓火車轉往停用的鐵軌,等多d小朋友逃生
. d# O6 i6 L3 }但是諗深一層,咁樣真係好像唔係好o岩
: j0 @. k$ T) W! ~2 B好像crap兄講一樣,停用軌玩的小孩, 因他始終才是守規則的人, 他可沒有預料過會有危險,點解要犧牲一個守規矩的小朋友,去換取其他唔守規矩的小朋友的性命呢
8 ^" E3 _6 w/ E& J3 I: ]! x/ K' @其實到底人數的多與少值唔值得去考慮呢
" _& z! t7 V5 @0 {
* U$ h: n/ D4 }1 x! x' Y' X我估如果我有時間去想清楚的話,我都係會救係停用路軌玩的小孩,我都認為冇理由要犧牲守規矩的小朋友,去換取其他唔守規矩的小朋友的性命2 S+ z: F* |/ L. w
不過,係千鈞一髮的時間要我去做抉擇的話,可能我應該會被表面上的人數的多與少去蒙蔽咗,而且眼前真係有一班小朋友,不過的確又好像maxfigo講話明係停用...咁條鐵軌一定有d問題ga la...如果轉左去好易累死果班乘客 !!,可能我係會其實為咗少數唔守規矩的小朋友,犧牲咗更多無辜的火車乘客

crap

Originally posted by srfqt1 at 2005-4-27 05:44 PM:/ [: ^) ~% ^( f7 r- p. J
其實我最初係即刻諗要救多d人,救得愈多 ...

- Z+ k4 E/ w# S- c  m9 A* `3 y; R+ N
, a0 v0 K, a. F7 `haha, srfqt1兄, 我們終能於球場外達成一致的睇法, 哈, 相當有趣
/ Q  k8 q6 H! d9 \你所說的也對, 下意識的確會選擇救人多的一方, 當時根本沒辦法分清誰對誰錯, 只好靠本能做決定..其他的要看天意了....
: A$ g0 w1 c6 s' u; d; ^
6 `- {: f" z$ t' ~7 c9 y, Qp.s. 小弟昨天在你於好文區發表的文章下留了言, srfqt1兄你有看到嗎

jason williams

i think i will help those children instead of that child2 A! Q' J0 @+ N$ }, P, Q
yes, my reason is helping more5 f5 f. a5 N8 t5 w
for this sudden and short period, i dun think i can have so much time to think the background!
8 m' ?5 b  d1 K& Uif saying that child obey the rule but others are not, i think this is not a very good reason to help that child
4 R3 Q, J+ p. Rbecause no matter the rail is using or not, i think also no gd to play in that place, right?
) ~% u# p+ v: u3 I% G: jalso i think the question hasn't tell us the background, none  know that child is obeyin the rule so that he play at the rail which is not using!!!' |1 H- O; v: n* `
may be other reasons so that he play himself at there, such as, he is a bad guy that none like to play with him, or all children also dunno which is using and which is not using!
  f# [( X8 }8 ]( a, H- Y! j3 Junder so much confusing on the background, i would choose help more than less, just a normal think during this short urgetn period!!!

sfxc0000

作為一個人類~~
  I' J" K" w' m當我見到呢D咁危急o既事情~~
0 ]' T+ N* E0 ?4 [4 Y我冇可能可以好理性去諗個後果~~
8 Q3 h! |$ j2 i* g, k& Z0 [正常黎講一定係以人數為先~~2 E! v7 |5 z) H, V) o# j3 I
即係我會救個一班唔守規矩o既細路而犧牲o個位守規矩o既細路~~" W. c- O8 `$ ]! d0 _
我只有o係事件過後先可以好似Crap同srfqt1好理性咁去分析輕重, 對錯~~& g9 I! v3 R+ ^0 b! H
但如果o係當時o既情況中~~
0 a: b3 c% o# j2 R我只有犧牲一位細路的性命稷換取一班細路的性命

中華卡樂ｂ

我諗我不會搞到火車轉往停用的鐵軌，因為咁樣會搞到火車乘客犧牲，而且果個守規矩既細路冇理由要佢犧牲的！而且我睇到火車黎中，我會用我既本能去救果一班唔守規矩既壞細路，雖然我明白到一定會有人死，可能我自己都會死，但我咁做一定唔會後悔，減少犧牲的人數，而且可以令一班唔守規矩而且死唔去既壞細路知道錯誤！（個人意見）