Chingy

Originally posted by crap at 2005-4-27 01:20 AM:
  U. b5 r3 B7 {- O+ K* s
0 ?! @; F& C8 N- Q6 k' g1 U7 z5 v. D5 u! L% Y
我都覺得錯不在他們, 是他們的父母 ...

3 \; q1 c* E; l3 z4 D5 ~

1 o& g3 h9 W( c' i5 E9 RIn Spider-Man 2.Spider man did stop a train

crap

Originally posted by Chingy at 2005-4-27 07:12 AM:
" p& J7 @+ t; b6 \
7 M1 A) q4 V3 ]1 X7 U4 q; i* ~: ~; V6 R8 R: W2 A! s7 e
In Spider-Man 2.Spider man did stop a train

6 C# }! a3 @; X! K
+ }+ D7 K8 s7 Coh really...$ K# y- a9 O9 P* O1 T: }3 c9 R. B
hahhaa, thx a lot^^"0 u2 C- `% z# W% o& L% w
i didn't watch ch.2

springspring

挺出名，在偶理學的問題" w1 _3 o. W, x: b$ O. Q

# i# {! _' r1 j. r6 [0 Q當然這是個假設性問題
: ]% g+ o- G+ u4 J但將人數倍大5 e/ j' ]7 U4 e* \* p
例如是十個一個，到一百個一個，到一千個一個0 V4 k& N8 `* N' |& c! U
(情況可以換作其他)) R7 a. D  n% R% P- w
始終有條界線

easonwing

絕情谷既問題...
* Y! H* Z" Z& e' L5 P1 t0 X) q. u: @如果一個人個邊係我親人,我會好自私咁求佢...
1 s0 E6 S2 L1 P# b' L* U' Q4 `如果唔係親人,我會殺人警百...

easonwing

Originally posted by easonwing at 2005-4-27 12:12 PM:
8 b+ h! \) h6 y  K" v( Y絕情谷既問題...
, e- z. P- c& w6 E+ f如果一個人個邊係我親人,我會好自私咁求佢...
! S$ O6 F3 {, t; I, e9 W  d3 x如果唔係親人,我會殺人警百...

, o* Y) O# S/ \2 u
殺一警百...

srfqt1

其實我最初係即刻諗要救多d人,救得愈多愈好' g- V; t5 C2 e* p# h: ?) G
於是好像好順理成章要讓火車轉往停用的鐵軌,等多d小朋友逃生
- Z7 K( T. f! G: v. s" ], I" ~& U但是諗深一層,咁樣真係好像唔係好o岩% e+ p- q0 [' F$ A+ K3 |
好像crap兄講一樣,停用軌玩的小孩, 因他始終才是守規則的人, 他可沒有預料過會有危險,點解要犧牲一個守規矩的小朋友,去換取其他唔守規矩的小朋友的性命呢- B3 F1 a* d4 I2 _7 u
其實到底人數的多與少值唔值得去考慮呢( P6 C; X) z/ N
( i( e# h5 _& A" q0 v% M- d  y# L
我估如果我有時間去想清楚的話,我都係會救係停用路軌玩的小孩,我都認為冇理由要犧牲守規矩的小朋友,去換取其他唔守規矩的小朋友的性命3 |" @! M; M% ]- X( F
不過,係千鈞一髮的時間要我去做抉擇的話,可能我應該會被表面上的人數的多與少去蒙蔽咗,而且眼前真係有一班小朋友,不過的確又好像maxfigo講話明係停用...咁條鐵軌一定有d問題ga la...如果轉左去好易累死果班乘客 !!,可能我係會其實為咗少數唔守規矩的小朋友,犧牲咗更多無辜的火車乘客

crap

Originally posted by srfqt1 at 2005-4-27 05:44 PM:# n+ c# @6 X% B" ~( T
其實我最初係即刻諗要救多d人,救得愈多 ...

& R0 {$ M/ a0 U
2 S, @/ V' B9 r) r; ^
haha, srfqt1兄, 我們終能於球場外達成一致的睇法, 哈, 相當有趣5 G  b6 w  ]+ |; m5 U; x4 x
你所說的也對, 下意識的確會選擇救人多的一方, 當時根本沒辦法分清誰對誰錯, 只好靠本能做決定..其他的要看天意了....9 ]! V. B. U3 s! M# ]' o5 q
; W$ I5 E4 V% g6 s( g. T
p.s. 小弟昨天在你於好文區發表的文章下留了言, srfqt1兄你有看到嗎

jason williams

i think i will help those children instead of that child) k' M- j7 p% s) ]- D
yes, my reason is helping more$ t5 @/ l4 ~1 @0 ]
for this sudden and short period, i dun think i can have so much time to think the background!5 P4 a: ]: K! d$ f# [4 G
if saying that child obey the rule but others are not, i think this is not a very good reason to help that child1 v' [5 z. Y2 y
because no matter the rail is using or not, i think also no gd to play in that place, right?) [# o" b; l2 d1 T3 X0 J. X5 J
also i think the question hasn't tell us the background, none  know that child is obeyin the rule so that he play at the rail which is not using!!!$ G; s- l6 E, Q$ B7 f- \% D  Q
may be other reasons so that he play himself at there, such as, he is a bad guy that none like to play with him, or all children also dunno which is using and which is not using!2 ^8 q1 ?' }  E6 [7 R( w
under so much confusing on the background, i would choose help more than less, just a normal think during this short urgetn period!!!

sfxc0000

作為一個人類~~% f6 u0 H3 c- b1 B. g( n
當我見到呢D咁危急o既事情~~
) N! U9 ^; t, n  i0 `我冇可能可以好理性去諗個後果~~1 k) |' c3 N+ ~' H+ r" B
正常黎講一定係以人數為先~~4 O# \; D# K/ H, e& A; H) I
即係我會救個一班唔守規矩o既細路而犧牲o個位守規矩o既細路~~  s3 V+ R1 q, U8 t4 `1 N
我只有o係事件過後先可以好似Crap同srfqt1好理性咁去分析輕重, 對錯~~4 g+ e* {# k! Y  F
但如果o係當時o既情況中~~9 \3 B( L* c7 R: a8 y: m
我只有犧牲一位細路的性命稷換取一班細路的性命

中華卡樂ｂ

我諗我不會搞到火車轉往停用的鐵軌，因為咁樣會搞到火車乘客犧牲，而且果個守規矩既細路冇理由要佢犧牲的！而且我睇到火車黎中，我會用我既本能去救果一班唔守規矩既壞細路，雖然我明白到一定會有人死，可能我自己都會死，但我咁做一定唔會後悔，減少犧牲的人數，而且可以令一班唔守規矩而且死唔去既壞細路知道錯誤！（個人意見）