vivienna

Originally posted by 28083003 at 2005-6-18 01:07 AM:
: _" m1 W) Z+ l* w反轉黎諗
9 \/ [% y' ^% K, D/ Dps2之所以o係香港咁流行就因為有翻版2 K4 H) P& {- r  y# N
你睇下DC,X-box
+ n( p7 |& G7 k# D3 U9 s( m1 W同ps2 o既機o既銷售量真係無得比  G8 f  b+ U5 z. R, G; X7 A/ D
你估ps2無老翻會唔會有咁多人買呢??

. a3 y" S7 `& |/ t1 H3 c4 U
講中曬!!!
4 {: N2 _2 \# D- r; X2 K
: G; R2 y) N# K0 P( s4 Y仲有GAME貴跟本唔係籍口﹐寫GAME果班人都要食飯。; S3 b- o( r7 z% o* d# z9 x
+ ~; ?' m; j9 A% R' @$ Y4 W
講來講去﹐又係講知識產權尼樣野。

bodycharge

物就係囉. 改車唔犯法, 只有係條路行改車先算犯法.  同樣道理, 改機, 無錯, intension係要玩老番(但係仲未玩喎), 但係就算依家連買老番都算犯法的話, 政府大不了只可捉用改機來玩老番(如果真的立了法). 改機呢個行為, 又點可以算犯法呢?  明唔明呢??

vivienna

Originally posted by bodycharge at 2005-6-18 01:12 AM:
; q2 t- D2 e7 l4 H  R物就係囉. 改車唔犯法, 只有係條路行...

/ S) {* a  z3 I3 So甘政府當初立法嚴禁運毒咪立錯左囉﹖話曬都未販賣﹖又未用﹖
. x$ B; n9 _2 P0 r8 `0 |
  m% ^* d- C7 K2 y) |要斷米路﹐政府就係要甘絕﹐條條路都要封斷曬。

bodycharge

哩個例子, 即係: 毒品=老番.  針筒=PS機.  政府唔可以禁針筒喎.  如果係咁, 全區碼DVD機都唔可以賣啦.

細驚

針筒應該係等同改左機既ps25 H" \- L2 ^8 u7 D: g( C
* ]- X" C! N/ C: k
其實政府今次立法原意係岩: J, I* l4 z' ]) G
但正如bodycharge兄咁講, 改左機, 但未玩翻版, 唔算有損版權& O2 Y' D* V( C
唔可以用販毒唻比喻 而且部機係我既 我想點搞佢邊到人管, n1 o6 l- a+ x) z6 ?8 {

6 c0 Y3 B6 s2 U# n* M& C1 t" {7 N另外, 政府咁搞係好心做壞事# m6 S5 u: @9 e  B: T
一個唔該令sony賺少左硬件既錢
/ i! D5 i; Y: E; G$ X0 ?( t眾所周知
) k; }: V% b# K+ dps2咁好賣, 同之前ps, gb, gba一樣原因 有翻版
  r: e7 p7 j/ E佢假如真係立法成功 相信唔會再有咩人買ps2
5 ^% w$ c: a+ M  y7 J+ O到時希望真係正版軟件可以支持到佢地香港分公司既運作

abc123aa

Originally posted by vivienna at 2005-6-18 01:12 AM:
( c* j# W/ o. A$ |1 N2 K
1 d$ x' X. K! G) J講中曬!!!
, ?3 f1 B: y3 Z% V( f% L4 F! _" p8 ~; n
仲有GAME貴跟本唔係籍口﹐寫GAME果班人都要食飯。% T% _( b5 f2 B: |& i* N$ f

" x1 @6 A. {* e9 z/ M: k講來講去﹐又係講知識產權尼樣野。

% n% H4 ]$ f+ f
對~我得好少 game,因為冇咩錢,但係我唔會買翻版,因為都唔知玩唔玩整既,加上正版game畫面都靚d啦~
! K7 Z4 T0 z; O! I
, _7 w: W. N; i: N3 Qps2要睇vcd果d野買多一條唔知咩線就得

waterfire

唔係翻版, 點會有咁多人買...
( X0 b2 ~( {6 v9 Z) K其實最簡單一樣野+ y% \) D% l8 E4 j
正版好似翻版咁平
" A. \$ z& y% m$ t或者, 香港人個個好有錢, 買正版game 好似食餐飯咁
8 Z9 {0 \8 {- E  D; j& W咁就可以解決問題la

sheraton

I think PS2 piracy should not be an immediate concern to HK Gov't, who cares when we're only stealing, pirating, copying Japanese/American developed products?  Japanese "adapted" many Chinese culture and called it their own, who's going to pay us back for that?" ]) q/ g  ^8 e: ?1 n# d
. c% y! ]; ]% K/ `$ q* ?/ h" X
But I agree, Copyrights should be supported if it's on HK developed products like Movies and Music.  Coz HK, we should care, I could care less about Japan

bigg

我覺得唔可以apply毒品呢個例子" n% J( {5 ?4 i4 T& C; C
因為你本身藏有大量毒品已經犯法, 咁你運毒就一定犯法啦,2 y9 k% @6 h& C1 Z5 w
但ps2本身係合法既, 咁我買左番黎點改係我既事, 唔通我將部ps2放落屎坑都話我犯法2 [# g" b; o0 Z
我覺得政府應該係立例加重賣老翻既刑罰, 等佢地覺得冇錢賺就唔會賣
2 r" f! ]! e3 O7 M% F再講而家d人都用bt download game落ps2玩, 立呢條例都冇咩用

Miz

我就覺得係關..3 J! g' V7 E4 G  Q
改機既用途
7 v; y* H- v3 Q+ [5 k, O+ N- ?6 q) D如果改機既用途一定係用黎玩老番 so先要改既咁就可能會犯法囉! T/ ?2 s( D: p1 v! k
政府咁做都係想阻止d人玩老番啫(其實邊阻到架)...冇做錯架~
7 k  W$ }" T8 H3 V我亦同意樓上話..『部機係我既 我想點搞佢邊到人管』