hermit

[quotefrom="科"]

奧尼爾獨唔獨食呢個問題我真係無諗過,
可能因為奧尼爾既"獨食得分"效率高d掛~

haha..good pt...

Shaq FG% are better than Kobe lor...becoz nobody can defense him efficiency.......he nearly made every score when he had a good position in lowpost.

how abt Kobe.....
Kobe's scoring decision is not good at all.....
he still shoot the ball when there is a double team or triple team on him.......nobody will blame him if he made it....but....

there are lots of kobe stopper....
but is there any shaq stopper?
never heard that......there is only1 can guard Shaq better...he is D.Rodman.

everytime Shaq get the ball.....he will pass if he cant get a deep position in the lowpost.........but kobe......
there is no passing in his mind..........

don misunderstanding he is a good shooter although he made many winning shot
if he made it, he is game winner.
otherwise it just a miss shot.

甘國武

咁你有無唸過O'neal係對Pistons果時,入咁多球又咁準,點解仲係輸？

咪因為O'neal下下自己上唔交波,令Lakers成隊好唔流動,Pistons咪好易守死其他球員o羅!~Pistons對O'neal都比較上放任,所以O'neal o拿到好多分,但事實證明單靠O'neal一個,係贏唔到o既.決賽果時,我成日強調平衡進攻,就因為咁.

比賽最重要係贏,贏唔到o拿幾多分都無用.輸波係因為孖實獨食,kobe都有責任,但唔可以話準就叫唔獨or只要入波就獨都無所謂o既!!!~

hermit

咁你有無唸過O'neal係對Pistons果時,入咁多球又咁準,點解仲係輸？

As u also said Shaq can make the shot la...
becoz kobe always took the shoot but didnt in lor.......
so simple
u can compare their FGA...Kobe is more than shaq a lot

咪因為O'neal下下自己上唔交波,令Lakers成隊好唔流動,Pistons咪好易守死其他球員o羅!~Pistons對O'neal都比較上放任

becoz of 2reasons..
1 - nobody can defense Shaq
2 - stop the others 4players are easier. u miss sth too...the piston players ar stopping the passing to shaq too....

我覺得對 pistons
下下唔交波係 kobe
俾 3 條友圍住都係照剷照射
Oneal 係內線唔交波正常...
命中率咁高 唔通又掉返去出面俾 KOBE 又扭
咁樣唔係唔獨食
不過獨食入到波有乜所謂?隊隊最終目的都係贏波
有冇見過 Carter 淨係對住個籃個時唔入樽
帶出外圍射 3 分~
梗係會做命中率高 d 個個動作~即係入樽先啦
你唔通見 carter 單刀入樽就話佢獨食唔交波咩
oneal 都一樣
俾人圍住命中率一樣奇高
好過俾 kobe 拎住個波 3 條友圍住走去射波好 d 掛

甘國武

就o'neal獨食帶來問題,我己為各位代問了朱主編
以下是朱主編的回答:

簡單的說,球是必須打開來,讓其他隊友都
可以發揮,戰術才可以耍得開.如果他可以
獨48分鐘都維持一樣水準,當然沒問題,但
是如果他不行的話,就必須要依賴隊友.

我認為O'Neal在的球隊都很難免面臨一個
問題,就是攻勢太過專一.而這一點在熱火隊
上馬上就能看到.打例行賽還好,到了季後賽
時,你就會知道球老送到裡面是不行的


還有別的網友的見解:

今年湖人會輸的這麼慘
O'neal只有自己表現好
卻忘記將影響力擴大到全隊
他一拿到球時常就投籃了
但命中率了不起就過五,六成
但活塞就是因此將他的破壞力降到最低
別忘了籃球是只有你好
還是會輸球的運動
簡易個人資料PM
Top

alexinzaghi

MJ 以前平均起手次數不會比O'NEAL , KOBE少...佢個D SHOOTING CHOICE好多都係FADE AWAY, 強行LAY-UP...BUT 佢可以令成為6次終冠軍,所以無人X佢.
我覺得ONEAL AND KOBE 都係聯盟裡既一線球星,起手次數多是必然, 你DUNCAN咪又係咁係12-3尺到儸板屈機....你要睇TEAMPLAY,唔該你捧KINGS/PISTON
FAIR D.....IF U R PHIL JACK...WOULD U CHOOSE LET KOBE/SHAQ SHOOT OR LET UNFIT PAYTON / INJURIED MALONE/ GEORGE SHOOT AH? SO THIS IS TACTICS PROBLEM...NOT THE PLAYER PROBLEM

alexinzaghi

MOREOVER, THE REAL PROBLEM FOR LAKER TO FAIL IN TAKING CHAMPION IS PISTON DEFENSE TOO STRONG, BUT NOT LAKER ATTACK NOT GOOD

kakueeken

朱主編的答案似乎混淆了領軍能力及獨食。
作為球隊領袖, o'neal 0既領軍能力尚要改善； 作為一名入分球員, 我不認同 o'neal 屬於獨食一類。再說,"球老送到裡面" 大概不是 o'neal 的問題。

大家不要太集中討論對pistons一役, 就 o'neal 的整個球員生涯中, o'neal 不但不算獨食, 我甚至覺得他有不錯的傳球意識及能力。 即使在跟一些90年代的天皇中鋒比較, 我覺得他的傳球明顯比ewing & mourning 好,比起 robinson 甚至olajuwon 也不會遜色太多。而即使跟現時的低位球員比較, o'neal 在低位策應的能力, 甚至勝過2位21號大前鋒duncan & KG。

事實上, 不論是magic年代的 anderson & scott, lakers 三冠王年代的fox, horry, fisher, o'neal 的隊友均受惠於巨無霸, 獲得大量的3分機會, 可見o'neal 並非只會自幹。反而大家比較一下 magic 年代的penny 跟 kobe(雖然2人的位置不同), 就會明白別人批評kobe獨食, 不是沒有原因的。

kakueeken

或許對kobe的球迷來說, o'neal 已是過去式,
新來的 divac & odom一定不是獨食, divac 更肯定是現時傳球最好的中鋒。kobe 將會有很多機會來證明自己的能力。

hermit

[quotefrom="alexinzaghi"]MOREOVER, THE REAL PROBLEM FOR LAKER TO FAIL IN TAKING CHAMPION IS PISTON DEFENSE TOO STRONG, BUT NOT LAKER ATTACK NOT GOOD

ei...
only defense good?
there were no teamwork for Lakers in the finals lor........