ronald001120

D大學生好多都低低BB8 A- b7 y$ x0 U
好似今次事件
- L- G' D8 r1 M/ `識用個腦諗下/ A) B( o  Y5 K  u8 E
唔好死讀書: |# w$ I) T* j$ W8 Y  K
都知登左出來會發生咩事
  Q6 X4 [9 c0 m+ j  X; d錯左重要唔認錯1 A1 A& t3 X+ C
畀人見到香港D大學生有甘既質素
- l: d. W8 @/ |真係.........

shehboy

Originally posted by PG-13 at 2007-5-18 09:12 PM:
# q2 \: f, a6 K7 |' Y
9 \2 p3 {6 p. l9 x; Z. ]
& c, \' w* ?; T9 G7 dI do respect CU students' good ...

* E3 l' G$ N8 b4 V9 K4 L+ T8 Y
% l3 k  }9 Y; Q見你都好有heart寫個long ass boring reply,又不妨再boring一下. 如果係真係有所為而為,唔係搞噱頭,但做出黎既野人地完全get唔到你個message,咁個問題仲大,因為連最基本既判斷力同表達力都無.' p% V, l! y7 |! h0 U
係認真定胡鬧,細心d睇多d就呃唔到人,講亂倫人獸交,可以話係挑戰社會禁忌,fine,但問人最想係校園邊度做愛,就明顯係玩,仲學坊間報刊整埋d乜乜信箱自己黎答,仲有語文粗劣市井...
' L1 U. \7 Z  I只從編輯同語文角度睇,都係好低水平好唔認真的產品,而你話其實佢地係好用心好認真咁做.你可以話我既judgement係subjective,我一樣可以話佢地既arguement係狡辯./ \4 s+ ]: ~: f# u' V0 v, L9 V
: E. p1 G& _' S4 r
講多樣野你知,我見過一d睇黎畫得好馬虎既圖畫,後來發覺原來係d智障小朋友畫既,咁我會相信佢地真係用心畫既,係我怪錯左佢地.

PG-13

Originally posted by shehboy at 2007-5-19 04:37 AM:1 }9 |0 q/ g" z* D  V! P
/ I. Z9 G3 c6 p: d/ z
! Y1 S  h! h, S3 [! m. Z% u
見你都好有heart寫個long ass bor...

+ z! `' p/ r1 z) o( P  f7 f1 B, K# i# d) b; N
Your last point is right into my heart." h+ T, t2 n/ |9 v( O2 o. a
Not that I think they are retards Heehee
3 s5 k' a$ T1 w2 X) a& k  f* E: ?4 P% S! Q8 k
Maybe you have overestimated the ability of universities students. Don't put too much expectation, then you can appreciate their work.
: j' E( z9 o) j
/ Y# v0 Q: F* C) R6 _5 J' lThis time they has made a big and stupid mistake but I still bow for them. Its hard to see one who can stand out to make something different, something radical. 1 P. w# F: r- K
5 d' z3 F+ k$ k. {; w( o5 {
They are still in school, the whole idea of conducting a student newspaper is only a leaning process. I still don't think they deserve too much of a blame, people make mistake and after this incident, they will become a better person.
- c: k2 K# b5 ?/ U
) t; t# Q5 `+ Q
" z4 `* |. g; ~8 I" G" c5 G( C" W# ]
Last, I do think they need some pressure from public.