Chingy

Originally posted by crap at 2005-4-27 01:20 AM:0 h% u9 z% I2 @, O9 n7 n

$ G# Y/ G4 x( g- g6 j9 q4 w6 E5 h/ S4 X* n
我都覺得錯不在他們, 是他們的父母 ...

6 w+ W9 H0 r: O& r% ~

2 ?& T) ?0 i: h0 d7 r5 M6 oIn Spider-Man 2.Spider man did stop a train

crap

Originally posted by Chingy at 2005-4-27 07:12 AM:
* s+ C* \% A+ ]  F5 b/ n
' ~0 c' Q1 r7 X9 e1 i4 s8 ?2 F" c' |1 i8 l4 f3 L+ [
In Spider-Man 2.Spider man did stop a train

% l' X2 O7 q- C/ z# n3 K0 R+ D
' J* ~6 O, n5 H. Goh really...: Q( k0 G! Y. J1 }: T6 P
hahhaa, thx a lot^^"
4 b% |1 Y7 z/ `. f9 n! Di didn't watch ch.2

springspring

挺出名，在偶理學的問題
' p/ n' q' t/ |& d: \4 Z4 k
/ _( P  F2 t" Q0 G7 M  j' |# `6 [當然這是個假設性問題
4 B8 g7 J5 M4 ^; i但將人數倍大, J% N6 l1 F+ u, A! a. c/ J( L
例如是十個一個，到一百個一個，到一千個一個
* s; b  N8 C2 P1 b! m; `1 \" k, a(情況可以換作其他)1 c0 m, n! T, t1 b3 A2 M. s5 j
始終有條界線

easonwing

絕情谷既問題...
3 v! H4 A- }4 T  w如果一個人個邊係我親人,我會好自私咁求佢...
  p  w$ G+ B+ B# B$ ?如果唔係親人,我會殺人警百...

easonwing

Originally posted by easonwing at 2005-4-27 12:12 PM:7 I  t- l+ X% ~$ w- S- M8 I, @" t
絕情谷既問題...9 m& s2 v! \( B, b" U9 n' l
如果一個人個邊係我親人,我會好自私咁求佢...
* e  C4 I- a; W( U, z, F! d如果唔係親人,我會殺人警百...

6 ?; n; p+ L! P9 K殺一警百...

srfqt1

其實我最初係即刻諗要救多d人,救得愈多愈好
" l8 `& l: f! D於是好像好順理成章要讓火車轉往停用的鐵軌,等多d小朋友逃生2 U& Z$ _/ a* ?) s- t1 ?4 g
但是諗深一層,咁樣真係好像唔係好o岩
/ B, q4 S/ Z. [8 g( |6 r好像crap兄講一樣,停用軌玩的小孩, 因他始終才是守規則的人, 他可沒有預料過會有危險,點解要犧牲一個守規矩的小朋友,去換取其他唔守規矩的小朋友的性命呢
. a$ Z) |4 I( M$ h2 M. n其實到底人數的多與少值唔值得去考慮呢& H' {$ C. M" t1 \

# u' A- W! o6 b我估如果我有時間去想清楚的話,我都係會救係停用路軌玩的小孩,我都認為冇理由要犧牲守規矩的小朋友,去換取其他唔守規矩的小朋友的性命. i5 a; }6 {7 Q& Z! U
不過,係千鈞一髮的時間要我去做抉擇的話,可能我應該會被表面上的人數的多與少去蒙蔽咗,而且眼前真係有一班小朋友,不過的確又好像maxfigo講話明係停用...咁條鐵軌一定有d問題ga la...如果轉左去好易累死果班乘客 !!,可能我係會其實為咗少數唔守規矩的小朋友,犧牲咗更多無辜的火車乘客

crap

Originally posted by srfqt1 at 2005-4-27 05:44 PM:0 \6 D0 q+ q" _( f6 h) K
其實我最初係即刻諗要救多d人,救得愈多 ...

% f; u, @( p9 }# h/ s
! r$ N$ T* y- Z( s$ T- @4 r1 d6 E
haha, srfqt1兄, 我們終能於球場外達成一致的睇法, 哈, 相當有趣1 \6 L, Z4 \$ [' S9 V( d# M
你所說的也對, 下意識的確會選擇救人多的一方, 當時根本沒辦法分清誰對誰錯, 只好靠本能做決定..其他的要看天意了....# |1 A' ^+ N0 Y% R$ Z* `: `

0 \. ]3 K$ t- H9 e6 @p.s. 小弟昨天在你於好文區發表的文章下留了言, srfqt1兄你有看到嗎

jason williams

i think i will help those children instead of that child5 e. A' t' l, ?) P3 {0 l
yes, my reason is helping more: G, H! l' r7 m4 e1 j% A
for this sudden and short period, i dun think i can have so much time to think the background!
/ ]! Q5 |/ S! W. ]5 A# W) T6 ^if saying that child obey the rule but others are not, i think this is not a very good reason to help that child
1 l2 X1 S' f4 jbecause no matter the rail is using or not, i think also no gd to play in that place, right?$ M) R) n" |. m" @6 G/ x( p7 {( u' L  {
also i think the question hasn't tell us the background, none  know that child is obeyin the rule so that he play at the rail which is not using!!!
1 j9 l( U6 b; }9 G4 |* ~) Qmay be other reasons so that he play himself at there, such as, he is a bad guy that none like to play with him, or all children also dunno which is using and which is not using!( d1 m- y4 ]3 X+ a( U) A% k; D
under so much confusing on the background, i would choose help more than less, just a normal think during this short urgetn period!!!

sfxc0000

作為一個人類~~9 S: g( S6 e  h; I% Y
當我見到呢D咁危急o既事情~~: x! A) }8 F* }! l
我冇可能可以好理性去諗個後果~~
0 `9 ?; y' F0 Z* C7 e: [正常黎講一定係以人數為先~~
  ?8 m2 m& B: k即係我會救個一班唔守規矩o既細路而犧牲o個位守規矩o既細路~~" A8 r+ f) w/ h+ L
我只有o係事件過後先可以好似Crap同srfqt1好理性咁去分析輕重, 對錯~~
5 f5 h, b- F# Z- a5 R但如果o係當時o既情況中~~
' T1 A6 e1 M) Q0 s' ^, ?我只有犧牲一位細路的性命稷換取一班細路的性命

中華卡樂ｂ

我諗我不會搞到火車轉往停用的鐵軌，因為咁樣會搞到火車乘客犧牲，而且果個守規矩既細路冇理由要佢犧牲的！而且我睇到火車黎中，我會用我既本能去救果一班唔守規矩既壞細路，雖然我明白到一定會有人死，可能我自己都會死，但我咁做一定唔會後悔，減少犧牲的人數，而且可以令一班唔守規矩而且死唔去既壞細路知道錯誤！（個人意見）