Board logo

標題: 唔知梁奕侖還可以留在港台工作嗎? [打印本頁]

作者: rayyipas    時間: 2007-11-7 11:13 PM     標題: 唔知梁奕侖還可以留在港台工作嗎?

唔知梁奕侖還可以留在港台工作嗎?
作者: oz2    時間: 2007-11-7 11:17 PM

港台e排發生咩事呀?: o; @, e, x" K4 U$ i0 l. D7 B5 D" C# _( f
之前嗱嗱林貪污,而家又到梁奕侖
/ m, o4 `% }( b4 a- A# G% j; G難怪曾特首話要封港台啦!
作者: foto188    時間: 2007-11-7 11:25 PM

Originally posted by oz2 at 2007-11-7 11:17 PM:
, n% @& f0 p; y7 w2 g- R1 Y5 X! a: ^1 @港台e排發生咩事呀?" c7 I! K3 U( X* e  s( z
之前嗱嗱林貪污,而家又到梁奕侖; W2 ~$ c$ _, Y) L' ~' y7 Z
難怪曾特首話要封港台啦!
0 L; j: y- c! a
. [, b0 m' T; ]3 }5 m8 C特首有講過要封港台嗎?
作者: oz2    時間: 2007-11-7 11:36 PM

Originally posted by foto188 at 2007-11-7 11:25 PM:1 f. v3 [+ l! A, }, i$ [/ o
3 ~5 a6 M  V& w4 |  S9 c: s/ W

( f% l* c# r8 z: R$ Z特首有講過要封港台嗎?
" I- `! U  T# ?' W2 P3 |5 C7 G1 b6 K7 r1 j7 K) A* k
之前特首講過考慮港台續牌問題
作者: foto188    時間: 2007-11-7 11:56 PM

Originally posted by oz2 at 2007-11-7 11:36 PM:
# V1 g+ E+ o1 D! r
$ ?* M+ a: E4 r% e- M
) u% j' ?' E9 a% w( t8 `- g之前特首講過考慮港台續牌問題
0 \% l( G" t& I; t
7 X) a6 i4 ~- y1 v$ ~( r* y=封港台?
作者: oz2    時間: 2007-11-8 12:06 AM

Originally posted by foto188 at 2007-11-7 11:56 PM:
; R# F$ e; S1 r/ Y: R6 Z8 s( r7 J% _; g. p
# c3 E) _/ f: ~1 |2 s
=封港台?
2 `. e) h8 I5 z4 E如他唔續牌給港台,咪變相式封了港台囉(不過唔係直接封姐)
作者: foto188    時間: 2007-11-8 12:08 AM

Originally posted by oz2 at 2007-11-8 12:06 AM:# i$ E' L$ H% |# O* H  Z0 k
! M9 z" x: O) {0 |
如他唔續牌給港台,咪變相式封了港台囉(不過唔係直接封姐)
5 g( X- T! G% n; Q" e1 ^. a9 \: _. d- X1 ]3 I
"如果"/ o2 C- z2 P5 C+ I2 O+ z
3 i/ r4 j6 l% b# E# }  ]
they way you comment is no different from those irresponsible weekly magazines. you cannot make your assumption becomes the fact. that is not a fair statement.
作者: oz2    時間: 2007-11-8 12:44 AM

Originally posted by foto188 at 2007-11-8 12:08 AM:2 u- s# }# a, Z) @9 i
! D  u4 X! Y* G$ p  d1 b
  h/ `8 _& L( g2 y2 I
"如果"( X) O# M) j# d% D$ P3 z
' g# A2 K4 B6 s7 d
they way you comment is no different from those irresponsible weekly magazines. you cannot make your assumption becomes the fact. that is not a fair statement.
; m6 U- x+ i( Z3 s. {( I8 u: Y
想不到一個吹水區變了時事評論區,還要一定100%正確的言論才能發言2 ]/ X$ O* F8 s3 `
本人英文欠佳,只能用中文回覆,請閣下見諒。1 g- s& H$ \3 L

3 V9 g. ?+ z0 _+ Z6 q7 t! Y豈不聞[空穴來風,未必無因],之前[頭條新聞]事件徐四民已點名說此節目不當了,曾特首也評論過[十大中文金曲]是否繼續,而且政府在查核港台時也發現財政賬目有問題,加上近日港台員工貪污醜聞不斷,令人們會想政府會否要再次評審港台牌照問題呢?% q$ _% J' r. z5 o
" \0 ^8 l' {) P
當然,以上只是個人的想法意見,並不代表任何人立場。
; c7 G0 P8 R; p! R' G
& X! G0 ^' j  ^[ Last edited by oz2 on 2007-11-8 at 12:46 AM ]




歡迎光臨 娛樂滿紛 26FUN (http://www.26fun.com/bbs/) Powered by Discuz! 7.0.0