<<新主題 | 舊主題>>
娛樂滿紛 26FUN » 吹水版 » 您地會唔會考慮「同居」? [積極回應者+]
返回列表 回復 發帖
for a couple:
- c3 |7 b$ S, n) \8 q5 `
4 g7 C8 c4 s; I9 rfor my view, i agree concubinage b4 getting married
9 l, Q# S2 i/ V7 K: D7 d' z9 lbecause u can know much more about her/his daily life and comportment(also for them to know these about u), living together, nothing can be suppressed so easily: I+ C  `: A8 i2 M) ]; f- |* V+ j' y
so that u can know much more about she/he is suitable for u or not5 c6 @  j4 K3 B5 ?. q
avoiding divorse which will come out much more serious and trouble problems!!!
6 j! R3 S# C8 E- ^* Q. l: }8 K  y/ Z; M* A
after comparing with the moral and rational analysis, i think actuality is much more important!!!
! B8 d  ^& g3 {1 X. T
5 M7 v( [. ?& }3 S7 Y6 K* Whowever for fds, i think no, i have tried to live with a guy at hall
) G5 L! k1 ~% m) K( B) Q7 mliving together with fds really a trouble, because must need to stand for other bad point
$ p9 _: w8 h% b# ~easily getting worse for yr relationship
* Y6 x) Q- I, ^4 V0 Y* s" U4 A& h4 q9 e( I
[ Last edited by jason williams on 2005-5-27 at 11:14 PM ]
jason
返回列表 回復 發帖
<<新主題 | 舊主題>>
娛樂滿紛 26FUN » 吹水版 » 您地會唔會考慮「同居」? [積極回應者+]

重要聲明:26fun.com為一個討論區服務網站。本網站是以即時上載留言的方式運作,26fun.com對所有留言的真實性、完整性及立場等,不負任何法律責任。而一切留言之言論只代表留言者個人意見,並非本網站之立場,用戶不應信賴內容,並應自行判斷內容之真實性。於有關情形下,用戶應尋求專業意見(如涉及醫療、法律或投資等問題)。 由於本討論區受到「即時上載留言」運作方式所規限,故不能完全監察所有留言,若讀者發現有留言出現問題,請聯絡我們。26fun.com有權刪除任何留言及拒絕任何人士上載留言,同時亦有不刪除留言的權利。切勿撰寫粗言穢語、誹謗、渲染色情暴力或人身攻擊的言論,敬請自律。本網站保留一切法律權利。