coolala2005

Originally posted by msv at 18/5/2007 04:02:
( g/ x" K( T( G% \/ S! H我未睇過...不過我應為e次應該會書(投訴方)

) r! X) }  O# o% d1 a8 t5 y* A

Originally posted by evilevilboy at 18/5/2007 20:41:- s6 J1 [: A# ]- B
我未睇過...不過我應為e次應該會書(投訴方)

1 U& g4 @+ K% I# P  k  ?- t. ^參與討論有機會被加分以示鼓勵、支持~  b# ?8 L' R: c8 X

& y( O8 J' |0 g6 Q6 k6 C無意義回覆有機會被扣分、禁止發言、禁止訪問~6 G3 N7 R$ l9 b

9 [& J+ ]% E& R% j- D. X3 Q請珍惜會員戶口!~
* I* v' p) V0 i4 I" ~" `3 s* g/ ^5 {9 _' |4 ?! F( _7 x8 P4 ~
3 g& n# N8 e: V$ c8 J5 e1 ^) F

. V( I8 ~: {) J/ \  F, p9 W" ~7 x
講完!~ 大家繼續~~~~

coolala2005

Originally posted by msv at 18/5/2007 04:02:4 _* ?+ p5 P2 g7 A  y$ h
我未睇過...不過我應為e次應該會書(投訴方)

% w/ x7 m$ r; p

Originally posted by evilevilboy at 18/5/2007 20:41:2 n. B! n- Q& R. v. G
我未睇過...不過我應為e次應該會書(投訴方)

- x4 H2 |' L+ i8 u5 k

Originally posted by YingTung at 20/5/2007 02:30:
; }( E8 [* _9 P5 [' q3 I1 o' @: t( N5 r4 T( Z# }" P
立場鮮明,而且開宗明義講明自己未睇過,唔係咩專家,但有自己既睇法。
/ {3 g/ P! O7 S: |" K' H. L咁樣都俾人插係無意義留言,而家o的版主真係...

5 e. _" T# g3 S. Z$ K! N
呀版友你有冇真係睇清楚呀!~
6 V) e) E( C* u成句說話都係複製自版友msv嘅回帖~
3 X' Y9 I5 ], p: S# [- K有幾立場鮮明,而且開宗明義呀~~~