coolala2005

Originally posted by msv at 18/5/2007 04:02:
; u! d! E: P& o" @3 I我未睇過...不過我應為e次應該會書(投訴方)

" E  i  l4 d- O- ]8 w6 h. `% I* v5 @

Originally posted by evilevilboy at 18/5/2007 20:41:% K6 a& w( r/ J! v0 N7 T
我未睇過...不過我應為e次應該會書(投訴方)

& q( ^. y7 d: Y+ a$ N0 z/ o參與討論有機會被加分以示鼓勵、支持~
; O# z2 h1 `, u: P/ L" a0 a* q; r, n/ i/ e
無意義回覆有機會被扣分、禁止發言、禁止訪問~" Z7 x& G9 w; r/ @* E: `" I: N

. e, S: t# a, i請珍惜會員戶口!~/ l3 T! r6 V! E# M, k

# v6 T% y. p' S7 a6 K( O1 z" _8 C- K% b3 ?9 P0 A

% d& A  V: _7 J( [6 s  o4 I. n0 x) S( o0 ~# |% M
講完!~ 大家繼續~~~~

coolala2005

Originally posted by msv at 18/5/2007 04:02:
: k9 O% _, R7 B( v& |4 \我未睇過...不過我應為e次應該會書(投訴方)

, K/ T" o. O1 X; H( k

Originally posted by evilevilboy at 18/5/2007 20:41:; j3 t. ~: |' b8 C) t
我未睇過...不過我應為e次應該會書(投訴方)

8 h/ g  `7 \3 X1 n+ B# U

Originally posted by YingTung at 20/5/2007 02:30:
$ a/ b$ C& b) p, e& n* [2 j4 w9 U9 D+ _) X
立場鮮明,而且開宗明義講明自己未睇過,唔係咩專家,但有自己既睇法。0 N3 ?9 }. U  p  Z
咁樣都俾人插係無意義留言,而家o的版主真係...

7 L" A0 R$ x, v% |3 e呀版友你有冇真係睇清楚呀!~ : |3 K+ x9 ~$ V; f. P% A1 r
成句說話都係複製自版友msv嘅回帖~
3 a! U! I& I. A( j* F  \4 X; @- k有幾立場鮮明,而且開宗明義呀~~~