Chingy

Originally posted by crap at 2005-4-27 01:20 AM:
( J( @7 }9 R9 F. {& ~( t6 t$ G* W' @2 L) z/ ^8 Y

7 L: W5 ~! u! E& c2 o# W3 U我都覺得錯不在他們, 是他們的父母 ...

2 N. p& L8 i. \' s% S1 @! ~4 f8 F  q7 A6 q
In Spider-Man 2.Spider man did stop a train

crap

Originally posted by Chingy at 2005-4-27 07:12 AM:
! U1 c3 M0 U' ~- G4 `/ ^
% X, H: Y/ f' ~- `; n9 \
+ h: u* y3 I8 d) H, D/ w0 U( {In Spider-Man 2.Spider man did stop a train

8 w7 e/ }" _  v1 l; m

( W6 W+ }3 O$ E( ^" T' ?# w9 I0 voh really...
; _5 \. ^, C3 G/ g! O0 M5 y) V, Lhahhaa, thx a lot^^"5 Z& W: t# E, K* V% Y, U5 v) h- `0 c
i didn't watch ch.2

springspring

挺出名，在偶理學的問題
2 Z; S( g  x/ j, a' p: {. K5 k( B; v$ {- {8 O2 O: r9 D& V
當然這是個假設性問題
  R+ f0 _. h8 C; i; J2 c5 b6 y但將人數倍大; @2 |! d8 [2 O" a; e, d
例如是十個一個，到一百個一個，到一千個一個! M# z" _, y: s$ E0 e
(情況可以換作其他)6 y5 S1 K! ~: X2 z- v
始終有條界線

easonwing

絕情谷既問題...
1 g9 F- l" |' s* Z% G1 {如果一個人個邊係我親人,我會好自私咁求佢...
9 C2 u* @  I; R; x7 u如果唔係親人,我會殺人警百...

easonwing

Originally posted by easonwing at 2005-4-27 12:12 PM:
% t' A/ a/ W$ _+ |" m/ n絕情谷既問題...
& f; z4 q9 k7 ~! w: Q  R3 R; M% v如果一個人個邊係我親人,我會好自私咁求佢...
+ o) A% Q3 L. ^) {如果唔係親人,我會殺人警百...

; `4 m4 w" E8 s$ H' Z; Z" B8 r
殺一警百...

srfqt1

其實我最初係即刻諗要救多d人,救得愈多愈好' D  G: }7 B: t9 p! I
於是好像好順理成章要讓火車轉往停用的鐵軌,等多d小朋友逃生+ i0 w; {' Q; O' I$ u, A1 N7 F
但是諗深一層,咁樣真係好像唔係好o岩7 \4 p) c# X0 A0 z! Z5 P; b
好像crap兄講一樣,停用軌玩的小孩, 因他始終才是守規則的人, 他可沒有預料過會有危險,點解要犧牲一個守規矩的小朋友,去換取其他唔守規矩的小朋友的性命呢9 @( d- g: z; Y; X
其實到底人數的多與少值唔值得去考慮呢3 m9 T% b/ [3 S
- F# Y1 Z: Y5 z% R( a; p) S
我估如果我有時間去想清楚的話,我都係會救係停用路軌玩的小孩,我都認為冇理由要犧牲守規矩的小朋友,去換取其他唔守規矩的小朋友的性命
! u) _6 [& T. j# S: g' i不過,係千鈞一髮的時間要我去做抉擇的話,可能我應該會被表面上的人數的多與少去蒙蔽咗,而且眼前真係有一班小朋友,不過的確又好像maxfigo講話明係停用...咁條鐵軌一定有d問題ga la...如果轉左去好易累死果班乘客 !!,可能我係會其實為咗少數唔守規矩的小朋友,犧牲咗更多無辜的火車乘客

crap

Originally posted by srfqt1 at 2005-4-27 05:44 PM:
$ o9 d3 I: m0 J* E9 f1 \其實我最初係即刻諗要救多d人,救得愈多 ...

1 e" ?: l" @  g* K8 @  t7 m* V

$ r+ h) @# s3 q) a" Lhaha, srfqt1兄, 我們終能於球場外達成一致的睇法, 哈, 相當有趣
% P* r% D  c1 @2 a! J  `你所說的也對, 下意識的確會選擇救人多的一方, 當時根本沒辦法分清誰對誰錯, 只好靠本能做決定..其他的要看天意了....  q1 a- H: y8 T( k0 l/ X
! x/ n2 H) ^# ~  W  M9 q
p.s. 小弟昨天在你於好文區發表的文章下留了言, srfqt1兄你有看到嗎

jason williams

i think i will help those children instead of that child
8 H2 r, d/ N3 Y/ A% Eyes, my reason is helping more
6 B! }! p- }2 B8 }2 @6 \for this sudden and short period, i dun think i can have so much time to think the background!  G* \& o2 _4 v0 c3 E+ Z8 R* t, ^
if saying that child obey the rule but others are not, i think this is not a very good reason to help that child
9 C2 e, d4 L' ?0 x+ g6 r2 n% Ebecause no matter the rail is using or not, i think also no gd to play in that place, right?
5 h) r0 z% k; }, k) ~" v1 h2 G$ U2 {also i think the question hasn't tell us the background, none  know that child is obeyin the rule so that he play at the rail which is not using!!!, q9 q/ N; L3 U
may be other reasons so that he play himself at there, such as, he is a bad guy that none like to play with him, or all children also dunno which is using and which is not using!
0 f& ?- P! X/ H$ ?under so much confusing on the background, i would choose help more than less, just a normal think during this short urgetn period!!!

sfxc0000

作為一個人類~~' k' v3 S5 R2 N7 q" L8 x
當我見到呢D咁危急o既事情~~* P" G3 A" K( U3 ?- i2 ~) Q. i& B. M
我冇可能可以好理性去諗個後果~~
) p% b: C; P. I& P+ Z* e. C& ?正常黎講一定係以人數為先~~9 F/ w; f6 f1 U9 s$ G' V: m
即係我會救個一班唔守規矩o既細路而犧牲o個位守規矩o既細路~~* U0 A4 `7 r' z* M) X
我只有o係事件過後先可以好似Crap同srfqt1好理性咁去分析輕重, 對錯~~. h$ a# G+ j, @- [# @. V& i3 j  U
但如果o係當時o既情況中~~
& V; V+ _6 a% X6 c8 J. S; O( E& J我只有犧牲一位細路的性命稷換取一班細路的性命

中華卡樂ｂ

我諗我不會搞到火車轉往停用的鐵軌，因為咁樣會搞到火車乘客犧牲，而且果個守規矩既細路冇理由要佢犧牲的！而且我睇到火車黎中，我會用我既本能去救果一班唔守規矩既壞細路，雖然我明白到一定會有人死，可能我自己都會死，但我咁做一定唔會後悔，減少犧牲的人數，而且可以令一班唔守規矩而且死唔去既壞細路知道錯誤！（個人意見）