Rika

由最好排到最壞
. z% J* I. t4 R& h' BF, He/She told a friend the turth. Nothing wrong: e9 k+ b; a* x( h& A* B) z3 s
B, He is just a business man, he works for money. He doesn't have the responsibility to help L or give her discount) q, ?% T4 E+ |1 N" a
S, He just pay for what he wants, he just gives offer. He doesn't force her' H$ m0 I( \) |; p
M, He cannot accept L had sex with other men. This is alright. he hurts too. But he should think about why L had sex. The purpose was pure/ v8 a3 C: |' p
L, I think there must other way she can find to earn $20 for the transportation fee. She is pure but a bit stupid

左輪仔

最高就代表我最唔LIKE既人物:. g  v/ O" n* E

6 P& C+ _) x; p/ t6 p' EM - 點解佢唔搵條女先,要條女陪人一夜再過河搵佢,自己唔要錢過去,枉係男人
8 d; L  X' q. Y, ~
8 b, ]8 w  l- \& x9 y' \S - 我最唔鍾意呢D男人,呃女人一夜,仲要0趙完唱喎,(唔係F點會知呢件事)) l  R# q/ ~9 S3 p+ g) @
     比我一定唔會做,正禽獸!!!4 e2 o, w/ q- W1 ?2 M( a& F9 @+ g" Y, I

4 b- `7 o, D7 I! Q2 VB - 呢D冇良船主,知道左件事就坐地起價,為左錢咩都咁做
- m# t7 Y2 p. E- z- n7 `* ~" S, w: l& g6 R
L - 雖然佢咁做係為左同個男既一齊,但係為左咁而出賣色相,唔理志
: j. @$ m$ U* i$ o# Z+ K- d8 ~2 L% N/ W6 N2 z
F - 佢忠於朋友係一件好事,但有時D野,都要睇下環境可唔可以講嫁,5 o: d1 Z/ @9 O7 X  G  t5 b, F2 n2 }
     正所謂"寧教人打仔,莫教人比妻"嘛,績下口得好
  h$ o1 r' Z$ p" b+ ^# w& v
; }) w5 l/ q: Y- }[ Last edited by 左輪仔 on 2005-4-25 at 01:17 AM ]

代仔

我以前都好似睇過.但唔記得個答案! z" f+ ]/ b' M: B# h' P
而家答多次
, a! D7 `7 O& l9 t. c0 ^4 Bf: 因為佢只係張佢所知既事講比朋友聽2 V  z" a3 B# _! o" H
l: 為左見佢既既愛人, 肯跟一個唔識既人一齊過夜, 不過我唔讚成咁做架
3 B, l* _" L9 G6 Ub: 坐地起價.明知人地無錢4 y7 V9 V8 n( l9 j# o& Y/ e
s: 衰人一個, 明知人地等錢洗. 雖然係你情我願.
6 O. ^' Z: |9 K0 m; a8 n9 [( ?* Gm: 最衰既人, 條女以經唔好過架啦, 知道之後.重走人同人分手添

hk853

L>F>M>B>S
& R+ t# [! @$ P% z) e5 a- \0 B/ P; [# i" X9 X
L為左同心愛既人一齊,甘願犧出賣自己肉體,好偉大) m$ y3 v5 x: k. g; z1 v; O
F排第二因為佢同M講都係純粹為朋友,唔係有心拆散M同L,因為決定權係M度
- U* I- b2 Y- YM冇原諒L為左佢而犧牲色相,但都尚可以原諒
+ A4 X, n0 D9 |+ B# I+ v6 gS乘人之危,最壞,明知L有心上人,都要用佢肉體換金錢! r& L  I9 v$ g
B都係乘人之危,但商業社會係咁,所以算比S好

JCer

最壞  F>S>M>L>B 唔壞# u5 {6 h5 f/ w1 }+ i, a
F: 如果佢唔講,物事都無, 佢應該學下"善良的沉默"6 [( C& d7 u" e! \0 p
S: 如果係鍾意一個人, 唔應該承人之危, 學下明正言順地去爭取
6 C- _: W; t  G6 T7 J/ JM: 不明白L的負出, 自私的想法
' X% Z, s1 h2 F* O8 E8 ^  M% lL: 太愛一個人, 愛得太傻, 無理後果; g+ m: K0 v6 [4 @7 Z; |" S
B: 有危險的工作, 收多D $ ,人之常情- p# B+ e- A, E6 B$ `! U

. a% Q4 _$ B8 w7 y+ E. r7 n世上無絕對的正確, 也沒有絕對的錯誤

angellyz

最唔可以接受 S, then B, then M, L and last F.

tai1980

Originally posted by Asurada129 at 2005-4-24 11:24 PM:$ A/ x: V& Y) G" ^/ p* p0 g! U. x
L = 為左自己鍾意既人寧願犠牲自己5 o2 o8 Q" j4 U# W
B = 一個為金錢暴利既船夫, 正常生意人都係甘7 n& [& f, i% o9 O. @
S = 知道有人需要錢度河, 開出不道德條件
9 D7 r8 \2 o! TF = 不理後果告知當事人, (估算係情敵)....拆散對方/ i9 y/ Z0 U  e& N7 p
M = 不知愛人為佢犠牲, 反而知道真相不理女方委屈...仲拋棄佢

7 I3 I% Q0 F" q) ^5 P6 u3 a7 L; n& @! u# N3 G- c# v" a/ r+ w3 l3 x
same choices with u , but want to add some comments + E- T" b: U" `9 g, o5 v* A7 A& W

$ E2 @4 R) P; p5 |9 s" zB : not agree with u on this comment , cos he is at the shore of the woman (有一天, 在女人的這一岸, 有個船夫), so he has no way to know that the woman is in-love with the man across the river  5 h+ h( A! {/ t& E

4 ?  m) K7 T  j2 q8 K+ u, F+ k) T; NS : there is ""no-free-lunch"" in this world , if u want something then u have to give-up something so this is a legal transaction ( the woman has the right to refuse ) ,and he is not that bad cos he fulfill their agreement in the end (  女人答應了, 她拿到錢後就由船夫載她過河 )8 Q6 L% v. A! P4 H- f. ?" m
7 F; p; K+ S# V* z
F : if this guy has a brain , then he should know the outcome . M) }, b& N% M' D; m. i

6 X  d* Q: [$ F- W% p# EM : in the present-day this guy is call an asshole ( no need to explain further more ), but this story took place in the past time ( 從前有個男人和女人 ) so they should not be that open minded but it also said that they love each othe ( 非常相愛 ) , so......
/ }+ n9 p/ d) c
9 P! P) R5 ?. q5 }5 v# M[ Last edited by tai1980 on 2005-4-25 at 01:58 AM ]

waterfire

大概可以講....錯ge" \  e* i/ j' J* Y0 V
M, L 都係為左想見佢, 而犧牲左自己ge 肉體, M點解唔可以體諒下佢
: |. [. S- P) R* PL, 為左想見M, 而唔考慮下件事如果穿左會點  W, \' Z/ B. f. t; J5 Z& `: o
F, 有時唔係樣樣野都講到咁明ga ma
+ O8 [( `. j0 L; J7 T. y
$ a5 y% x5 {1 ^- N; @3 J最錯就係, 點解F 唔叫L 同佢過一晚, 就唔會講俾M 聽....
& R. @" l  p  q; ]* @. u有女唔食, 最大惡極!!

hiroraymond

好似好有趣咁，
8 v$ Q/ o  T2 R8 \5 j由最好開始排起既話，
/ {5 N2 _4 [2 hL B M F S 啦，
$ _; g6 U5 N. x9 M4 h- y; d6 ~) F$ g: M2 f
其實不少人都會話肯為自己鐘意既人就算要埋自己條命都得，$ \: J( n; V$ M1 ^1 q, b; K1 X& A
但當真係需要既時候，又有幾多個會呢？# m$ O; p9 p$ M3 W5 d0 W5 [
如果覺得自己真係做得到既，又點會唔明 L 有幾鐘意 M 呢？
7 x! T: n  H/ _5 |! y1 u" ?" a又點會唔諒解 L 會咁樣做呢。7 z# f8 ~, l+ B* x$ h

$ j3 q. Y$ ]6 ~) L而 B 都只不過係做生意，同 L 做個交易，
) C/ s: H3 ?* C9 b6 d6 j' T4 e) T/ ^) u所謂現實世界中既商人 ( 傷人 )，4 q# Y, R. t+ y1 K9 F
明知你咁想過去緊係開高價啦。
( H( i- f( N! [; w5 s% u1 f8 B6 c* ^; g; s3 e" s
而由第三個開始我就覺得係壞，
; ]4 `+ b; S6 t& y9 C( Z# e M 唔能夠體諒到 L 背叛佢既原因，
3 p/ U* n& k2 J5 J亦從未為令雙方可以重逢呢件事上作出任何貢獻，
2 F- M" I8 n0 u9 S  u) v- d知道一切後更即刻放棄一個甘為自己犠牲一切既人，
; a6 P$ W- u' }5 S M 都可算壞了。
$ W0 D7 q5 o% z3 e7 k! j( j) }  F$ B; m# @8 E
F 呢個人仲掂，+ p9 @1 q" h. G; j9 s
知道既唔等於要講，1 \6 q1 j2 S+ M0 w3 W
如果呢件事發生係自己身上，
- g* G  N5 _( N$ }* T$ d' ]# k我諗會即刻毒啞 F 呢條友。4 {- S: ]2 d+ c; h& V- S; H

2 k7 n, B: |, U5 b6 e4 D4 H最衰個個緊係 S 啦，7 C8 N$ l1 Y% z
始終都係討厭提出不道德交易的人。
! Y+ F" b/ k8 X- t# ?! J
9 |" @/ x! T' Q: [7 u$ T4 g1 t& {6 z. y

0 J* E) `6 E; D題外話：; o2 S, k' Z8 v0 t6 B1 C6 R4 @! e
唔知點解睇呢個故事個陣，
: q4 W0 y9 ^+ g! [. `$ r7 G* q- S睇到 S 呢條友，$ T- k7 j5 C3 H( J0 A% _
我就即刻諗起英皇老細。

newman2005

由壞至好: S<F<M<B<L. G- t) F; e; I- X5 B% J

- I1 W' O6 k7 `* c# XS: 看中別人的弱點而作出不道德的交易去滿足自己私慾, 最賤格!% d4 X. _  j+ \( j  M$ G
F: 不顧後果爆響口, 影響L和M的關係
; s8 d# i" n/ o4 IM: 沒有理解L所作的事背後真正原因而拋棄她
8 u, o, v; W0 g7 y$ y& ~) LB: 坐地起價想得到金錢上的利益 .... 但不是對別人造成傷害
: b" A/ R$ ~% w$ FL: 寧願犧牲卻換來分手收場...