if u havent seen it ure missin out on a part of history man作者: lizard 時間: 2008-2-2 12:51 AM
抗議！ $ l& y" r$ e) O3 E4 B3 a/ T) G. i5 x( t( r1 [
只許 谷德超 商場 買 翻版鹹碟5 h F4 X8 a1 V3 M
不准 香港人 網絡 睇 自拍淫照 # e) j- p4 _" x, z& Z 8 Z3 U' u/ r: k! I4 \/ G' B0 d強列 要求 香港警察 不要 選擇性 執法！& `3 d+ R9 l2 B; ~5 w
- p. O* o3 i; N' q
[ Last edited by lizard on 2008-2-2 at 12:57 AM ]作者: Edgar_Davids 時間: 2008-2-2 08:37 AM
What is the definition of "原圖" ? # u8 i3 f/ k4 f6 x1 ]8 t8 Z
3 K3 p# m: C) U5 {+ W
6 R D9 u4 `# O' ~* wI have watched only several "疑似" 相片, 5 y. a( i+ E$ C) l3 t N: @" }and "I AM NOT SURE WHETHER THEY ARE REAL OR FRAUD".... 6 ] O$ G: r3 z6 T8 Y" j8 [6 O3 n/ Y \- e- ]1 |
I can only say that "I believe they have been widely spreaded".....作者: garlicguy79 時間: 2008-2-2 09:09 AM
I did saw some but it seems quite true, anyway, if they really done something, they hv to bare the responsibility. / N( Z7 ]0 Y& |( `6 QOn the other hand, in fact the media have to play a important rules, before anything finalise, especially the truely of the photo, have to be verify by the specialst and after that, they wrote whatever they want. 0 ^, H* L5 n! oWell, just my personal comments.: V- V' U$ `# a! W
, ]7 ]$ _' g0 D2 _
Hv a nice day.作者: alanfcw 時間: 2008-2-6 03:42 PM
完全沒看過~~~作者: 迪達拉姑 時間: 2008-2-9 01:45 AM
未呀..未看到入洞..咁算唔算看過原圖= =作者: loklok117 時間: 2008-2-9 03:31 AM
# u8 i3 f/ k4 f6 x1 ]8 t8 Z
