娛樂滿紛 26FUN - Powered by Discuz! Board

標題: 大家認為古惑天皇既下場?[積極回應者+5] [打印本頁]

作者: HansChan 時間: 2005-4-29 09:52 PM 標題: 大家認為古惑天皇既下場?[積極回應者+5]

我希望佢冇事!
佢都係方便各網友啫!
之前我都有好多套戲響佢度download.3 E8 u& v" J9 z
告得入就俾班仆街開到先例!
我覺得bt係一個灰色地帶, 唔可能好definite話係侵權或犯法!
班友甘大回嚮甘狼都係感情因素居多!
純個人意見! 冇意開戰!亦不打算回應!- Z3 \1 P: N7 j' B- E
" G Q& {9 Q! F% N8 B" D7 m) F
[ Last edited by 樂壇渣Fit人 on 2005-4-30 at 11:32 AM ]

作者: tony 時間: 2005-4-29 09:58 PM

冇事!

作者: Ricky00893 時間: 2005-4-29 10:02 PM

罰款 $ 5000

作者: dogson009 時間: 2005-4-29 10:03 PM

其實我都唔肯定係咪真有其人=.=

作者: goonejp 時間: 2005-4-29 10:47 PM

法律已死,班友强姦法律 4 ~0 W$ J: Y) o& D
http://jm.g.free.fr/smileys/Xsmileys/iconsex----dog.gif ?: [, {/ x+ P) x6 \6 B

[ Last edited by goonejp on 2005-4-29 at 10:48 PM ]

作者: chickenboy 時間: 2005-4-29 11:03 PM

kill chicken scare monkey.....佢起碼都要守行為

作者: 692004 時間: 2005-4-29 11:09 PM

冇罪釋放

作者: bob64 時間: 2005-4-29 11:10 PM

打靶!!

作者: king_king 時間: 2005-4-29 11:14 PM

小弟覺得會冇事,但會好似m$,要公開道歉.

作者: abc123aa 時間: 2005-4-29 11:15 PM

最好就冇事,否則班所謂的"電影人"就有本地案例

作者: HansChan 時間: 2005-4-29 11:16 PM

我覺得班友成日嘈話侵版權, 但我覺得佢哋自己做就冇問題!
根本bt係灰色地域!我覺得即係未係犯法!甘邊有理由入佢罪?4 u8 _7 t4 T5 ^7 \+ T
"老鼠愛大米"甘, 人人爭黎唱, 講真, 佢哋甘正義, 自動自覺交返版權費俾個原創者囉! 咪又係食個灰色地帶話國語版冇版權邊個鍾意就攞黎唱!
講開又講!首歌根本唔好聽(我唔識欣賞啦!)啲詞直接係好, 但太老土了!啲人而家老土當冧歌!9 r" v" ]3 w d, ]
香港人有啲真係好似中咗毒甘!!!

作者: EV4886 時間: 2005-4-29 11:18 PM

美國咁講版權法都吾敢告BT,香港海關想扮勁想做世界法治一哥,輸.....輸硬.(除非又請人大釋法)

作者: HansChan 時間: 2005-4-29 11:26 PM

重有就係, 佢而家唔係只係針對"公開"既人, 連攞黎睇既人都想造佢哋!
根本就荒天下之大謬!
不知所謂!

作者: HansChan 時間: 2005-4-29 11:27 PM

重有就係, 佢而家唔係只係針對"公開"既人, 連攞黎睇既人都想造佢哋! x3 N; G. n2 k3 n
根本就荒天下之大謬!
不知所謂!

作者: nkt1000 時間: 2005-4-29 11:36 PM

希望古惑天皇兄會冇事吧!!!

作者: HansChan 時間: 2005-4-29 11:47 PM

我希望佢冇事之餘,仲可以挫一挫班契弟既銳氣!

作者: 短毛 時間: 2005-4-29 11:48 PM

大家可以睇o下有關法律條文. 裏面*好似*講明*非牟利性*的侵犯版權也算是犯法.2 B. _$ p8 T4 |1 a# w) b& n
, Z' s. |, K6 W0 q& l& x
佢放種子俾人下載, 明顯地有動機讓其他人下載.
+ L7 ] k% k7 ~9 }6 j; J) Y
現在好似有人做錯事(非法盜版)但好多人都覺得沒有大不了." v4 X- L6 |1 t' a3 K1 {1 ?

沒有意思偏幫那一方, 只希望大家可以討論一下.7 x/ ?- I* g& v6 D

還有報紙中提到一百萬人下載某一部戲, 損失幾億元, 那個記者一定沒有讀經濟的, 沒有成本下需求當然大. 叫人$60買張飛都無咁多人睇啦~

作者: lijinwei 時間: 2005-4-29 11:51 PM

想罰錢, 但因他失業, 身家不多
要坐牢, 但政府財赤, 還要出錢養一個失業的人
罰少少錢, 守行為並留案底算了吧

作者: HansChan 時間: 2005-4-29 11:58 PM

Originally posted by 短毛 at 2005-4-29 11:48 PM:6 _$ O- C; ^0 P7 C8 X
大家可以睇o下有關法律條文. 裏面*好 ...

( v# O; `+ R6 Q/ S% {3 L" H
vcd鋪通常一有新返既碟就對住大街大行黎播! $ U% ?4 `8 M7 x% _8 a/ e' f# j. x
然後啲人睇睇下入去買咗!" B/ [* M* s. d, c) |
既牟利又侵權!
但亦大行其道.....5 h) N- g& ~' R6 X$ E* t
唉! 唔係話甘就唔代表bt係唔犯法定係點......
只係香港政府係多重標準!
同埋bt冇先例, 始終係灰色地帶!
難聽到嘔既老鼠愛大米國語版俾啲人大搖大擺攞黎唱到臭晒又冇事.....
所以話, 香港政府都係仆街黎! 鍾意點就點!正仆街!

作者: EV4886 時間: 2005-4-30 12:08 AM

無得告 la~~~全世界都冇先例又冇法証參考,香港e班2打6法官點識判,陳嘉上點都惡吾過哥倫比亞或Dream Work掛,e家個個都想睇香港點死.

作者: 史艷文2 時間: 2005-4-30 01:00 AM

雖然我唔用BT,因我中意租碟用電視睇(畫面大)
但我都希望佢無事,因太多垃圾戲,D濕9電影人係到瀨地硬!

作者: F.king 時間: 2005-4-30 07:08 AM

Originally posted by 短毛 at 2005-4-29 11:48 PM:) Q7 g1 J8 c' V' U* ?1 s6 z
大家可以睇o下有關法律條文. 裏面*好 ...

I agree you points that it could be illegal
but that is still a "gray area"
whoever win, it still makes us to feel that the result is unfair

anyway, I want to say that is* H6 X4 n! v9 s
who is supposed to be protected by laws! R5 U Z- L0 M0 |3 y
creators?
but I think now they just only protect big companies but not the movies market: Z7 K7 F* m; v
let's them copy others ideas and produce lots of boring movies (not all) to earn our money.1 w7 Y% O( K+ {6 g5 M
when we are cheated by some shops, we can sue those7 W Z0 @: s, d( C+ T7 N/ w
Why nothing protects consumers to choose a movies???

作者: junob04 時間: 2005-4-30 08:41 AM

Originally posted by dogson009 at 2005-4-29 10:03 PM:' w# N' [. _, L" L) v% X) `1 z' ~8 m
其實我都唔肯定係咪真有其人=.=

我都咁話,可能其實係班差佬為左想"空"我地,作個人出黎,做戲!!

作者: HansChan 時間: 2005-4-30 09:58 AM

Originally posted by junob04 at 2005-4-30 08:41 AM:1 {- h; P8 ^. G, f& k! V: C
0 ?$ j$ [: ~# t# d* v
我都咁話,可能其實係班差佬為左想"空"我地,作個人出黎,做戲!!

唔係喎!/ P8 b' T* c! T9 s; d0 V: w [
古惑天皇響--- 嗰度好出名係大佬黎喎!
我以前都成日去download佢放出黎啲戲!7 g, `* h) t/ z {. @1 e2 s/ e
佢真係好有熱誠嗰隻, 由舊到你諗唔起既戲到新到岩岩上畫既戲佢都有!
就係因為佢出名所以班pk先捕佢!

作者: 大家樂1234 時間: 2005-4-30 12:27 PM

希望佢無事
一有先例以後就死嚕

作者: jason williams 時間: 2005-4-30 12:36 PM

honestly, i also use bt, but i know my action is totally incorrect!!!3 [+ y$ n  p8 B+ Q
dun say nowadays movie is bad or not, downloan it is giving its face.......
if so bad, dun download la, right?
i am dun shouting on all using bt guys, because i am also this guy^^. _# M9 j3 ~2 R! b9 j* s( [) ]
but for the fact and 對事 to say, dl by bt really harm the company a lot, there is no excuse for using bt is a legal way and correct- E& L9 R3 Z& i4 C; J, e
no need $$$ and need $, how to consider also no need $ is much more benfit la* I. b# z: p  D6 a  k4 N: h
so what i always think is that, in this modern and high tech society* D& ^4 i" j) D- d* N) H
using bt or winmx this kind of high tech should be graduately to take over buying CD or going to cinema.........3 ^5 B0 y  ?9 }4 ^$ X, ^. y
why not develop this to takeover now condition? even need $$$ to dl, i think ppl would also accept (but sure the price should be lower as much more ppl would dl to overcome the production cost) BT really a very great invention !!!4 ?6 i7 P9 X: ?( T% I& m
so, even they catch him or us, i only can say he or us are unlucky, but not incorrect way for them to do and custom also doing what they should do, so dun fxxking them la^^

作者: coolyiceman 時間: 2005-4-30 12:45 PM

罰款,冇留案底!% O6 |$ Z6 z" \/ C4 D0 R
佢又唔係殺人放火~~~
政府想比下馬威0的人~~
錢就一定罰
未必要坐牢~~

作者: HansChan 時間: 2005-4-30 01:31 PM

如果真係判佢有罪,
唔知佢會唔會上訴呢?
佢又失業既, 會唔會冇錢上訴呢?2 g+ p. \! s. m3 {
到時有冇人幫佢呢?!

作者: EV4886 時間: 2005-4-30 04:17 PM

最後同佢針掂,叫佢認左網上盜竊及行為不檢算數,網上盜竊就口頭警告(因知前有案例參考,條友網上盜竊人十幾萬地武器都係比口頭警告),而行為不檢就因初犯罰款HK$1000不留案底,咁大家都孝好落台d...

作者: @bcc@ 時間: 2005-4-30 05:39 PM

冇事!!!!!:cool:

作者: 小虫 時間: 2005-4-30 06:05 PM

法官班報法令要幾個保鑣護送佢返屋企^_^

作者: 老鬼X 時間: 2005-5-1 01:54 PM

無奈！一定搞死佢　

作者: markmk 時間: 2005-5-3 04:29 AM

一定坐牢......殺雞警猴...仲要大字標題咁話俾bt友聽..

作者: 人人人人人 時間: 2005-5-3 06:09 PM

唉...試問有幾多人未用過BT??政府係都要搞呢D咁o既野, 多少都感到無奈

作者: ilovefuckingyou 時間: 2005-5-4 01:47 AM

告得入我切!!!

作者: bonzi1983 時間: 2005-5-4 05:40 AM

I think 古惑天皇 is immoral, but not illegal....so he is not guilty according to the law

作者: karenmoe 時間: 2005-5-5 01:14 AM

Originally posted by ilove---you at 2005-5-4 01:47 AM:
1 ^$ T v1 a4 a$ d2 c8 |2 L告得入我切!!!

$ U" J* W# V/ L1 n& q
我當初都估告唔入,
不過我老豆提醒我,政府咁多大狀,# W9 p$ S7 |: z5 V2 V% x$ z
真係告唔入就唔會告啦.....

作者: timho1027 時間: 2005-5-5 03:34 AM

海關做戲給美國電影業睇
我希望佢冇事

作者: wolfevil 時間: 2005-5-5 10:08 PM

會有罪, 不過冇圖利and第一次, 最大可能會守行為

作者: 阿細 時間: 2005-5-5 10:54 PM

Originally posted by EV4886 at 2005-4-29 11:18 PM:9 C4 y. C+ _9 `% w, V, a
美國咁講版權法都吾敢告BT,香港海關想扮勁想做世界法治一哥,輸.....輸硬.(除非又請人大釋法)

& S4 E+ k4 V d' e/ H2 t9 N- L
因為美國人權大過天...所以唔敢告用bt d人ja...香港海關想扮勁...就唔見得係la..大家都用緊份內事...

作者: kwajc 時間: 2005-5-6 08:58 AM

香港海關想做一場大龍鳳俾電影業d人睇......講真香港有成幾廿萬人用bt download野....拉晒番去邊到有咁多錢養呢班人呀!!!

歡迎光臨娛樂滿紛 26FUN (http://www.26fun.com/bbs7/)