coolala2005

Originally posted by msv at 18/5/2007 04:02:
# e5 u1 i5 B& _; Y" V我未睇過...不過我應為e次應該會書(投訴方)

! {& M9 q% a: A

Originally posted by evilevilboy at 18/5/2007 20:41:
8 \& u3 j, P+ }) A  e/ q8 U我未睇過...不過我應為e次應該會書(投訴方)

/ j0 _8 z, q6 ^; s/ T" l* Q參與討論有機會被加分以示鼓勵、支持~* j: u  Y) I8 V# d, }; j" {

& A1 t$ k1 W2 C# H8 ?: b7 M無意義回覆有機會被扣分、禁止發言、禁止訪問~, b  k6 y3 P* x1 }2 B; p  |$ p
0 k% h0 y/ \7 v6 R/ L
請珍惜會員戶口!~% V* O, J* q% z

" V. o' y# R8 ?) y4 Y/ [% R+ b. G! }: T  ^" T* }& @. {6 ^

# w2 B' B. r+ l! T
: j3 J8 c7 ]- C* K- d講完!~ 大家繼續~~~~

coolala2005

Originally posted by msv at 18/5/2007 04:02:/ K8 j% k! }3 O
我未睇過...不過我應為e次應該會書(投訴方)

' |3 x- J3 d0 x, r8 [: k, |

Originally posted by evilevilboy at 18/5/2007 20:41:
- d, r" W6 Q6 E0 L我未睇過...不過我應為e次應該會書(投訴方)

3 h: @1 E" S8 {( Q; k8 u

Originally posted by YingTung at 20/5/2007 02:30:& Y4 o7 T$ ~. G; H( S
6 v' L4 }5 Y# a- Z$ B5 R( x
立場鮮明,而且開宗明義講明自己未睇過,唔係咩專家,但有自己既睇法。
0 ^9 g" L  q% [0 B2 E咁樣都俾人插係無意義留言,而家o的版主真係...

+ P& S2 `% Q3 b+ z& h, C! x呀版友你有冇真係睇清楚呀!~
& u' J0 T8 n" P1 W$ Z成句說話都係複製自版友msv嘅回帖~+ u. z& Q8 c; |$ \( G2 G1 N2 o
有幾立場鮮明,而且開宗明義呀~~~