coolala2005

Originally posted by msv at 18/5/2007 04:02:1 n8 B2 m) d7 M# }8 p
我未睇過...不過我應為e次應該會書(投訴方)

' ]# r6 g- u# C& P( W

Originally posted by evilevilboy at 18/5/2007 20:41:+ h: E: ?$ L% x% X- V' o
我未睇過...不過我應為e次應該會書(投訴方)

; k/ u/ V( `6 r; ^/ @2 h參與討論有機會被加分以示鼓勵、支持~7 K+ {6 i: `1 Y9 {. G% L9 V

/ ^1 L- k  @) s: X0 O* N% e2 R無意義回覆有機會被扣分、禁止發言、禁止訪問~& b5 J# q# M& O: f$ z9 R
) p9 s6 ?, ?9 @$ a8 Z
請珍惜會員戶口!~) |' u) ?* F: N6 m% F6 P

" i6 @$ c; `5 X7 {& b
3 o: j& w3 m, V+ R! D7 s  O5 j& m) a# ]% n2 \0 n7 o2 ?( G
7 ^$ e4 Z5 m. L% [" R
講完!~ 大家繼續~~~~

coolala2005

Originally posted by msv at 18/5/2007 04:02:
0 Y) e" ~( e; t3 D0 G$ T我未睇過...不過我應為e次應該會書(投訴方)

1 `5 t( T. b0 `

Originally posted by evilevilboy at 18/5/2007 20:41:
" `% I& v; B; G6 \) S2 a, I我未睇過...不過我應為e次應該會書(投訴方)

0 V, H, [% e, q/ u3 e' m) }

Originally posted by YingTung at 20/5/2007 02:30:, D2 p) X+ v9 W/ p8 N
5 H+ d0 ~1 o# K0 j* G& ?' h
立場鮮明,而且開宗明義講明自己未睇過,唔係咩專家,但有自己既睇法。
/ t, o  r' O3 Z4 y% n# Q" c咁樣都俾人插係無意義留言,而家o的版主真係...

$ h/ d7 \$ s( h* |呀版友你有冇真係睇清楚呀!~ 2 Q' x0 A9 x5 e% o( L% A) s% a& }! R
成句說話都係複製自版友msv嘅回帖~: `' |' x/ I  p. l) ^
有幾立場鮮明,而且開宗明義呀~~~