 
- 帖子
- 118
- 精華
- 0
- 威望
- 69
- 魅力
- 0
- 讚好
- 0
- 性別
- 男
|
1#
發表於 2005-4-4 11:12 PM
| 顯示全部帖子
yes, it's correct.! K1 t/ m# R. q; F
% j- v! _. E O8 W
according to the law, if anyone get anykind of hurt in the bank, the bank is liable of this.8 a A, \& T! k( e7 y8 S; H
8 `, n" o0 @1 C6 H4 Y8 C( z
In the same case, if someone get pk or hurt in ur home and u hvn't warned that guy before,: N9 S* e* z7 J. o. l
and that guy sue u, u hv to pay a huge sum of money to him.* j' W1 s" n" g1 g, L0 h
+ o- `5 {/ a* j" K) r3 ]0 c; R
so, at this case, a kind of insurance arouse. That's liable insurance, 責任保險
5 _) |9 `* u8 w9 q9 H) t9 @
* K" D9 ?. l5 v' d/ }- Z" {in 90s, a man got pk in a government department, since that was no sign of 小心地滑,
3 ^& o) x) o7 vat least, the government had to pay 10M to that guy |
|