|
- 帖子
- 118
- 精華
- 0
- 威望
- 69
- 魅力
- 0
- 讚好
- 0
- 性別
- 男
|
1#
發表於 2005-4-4 11:12 PM
| 顯示全部帖子
yes, it's correct.. x& h% P1 `6 ], _& o# {- e
3 q' v: k" O9 ]/ Iaccording to the law, if anyone get anykind of hurt in the bank, the bank is liable of this.; q8 r! h' B2 k- V) B
. e, e& V6 ~9 g3 o/ b
In the same case, if someone get pk or hurt in ur home and u hvn't warned that guy before,
- F5 t: e y& d9 U+ V' gand that guy sue u, u hv to pay a huge sum of money to him.
$ T2 _* k; o c& @ n- _ F7 O/ q/ F- ?$ X- e- `
so, at this case, a kind of insurance arouse. That's liable insurance, 責任保險3 D& O% P9 o# u
3 I& q0 H O0 Iin 90s, a man got pk in a government department, since that was no sign of 小心地滑, " a5 W0 K( U8 C3 V
at least, the government had to pay 10M to that guy |
|
