|
- 帖子
- 118
- 精華
- 0
- 威望
- 69
- 魅力
- 0
- 讚好
- 0
- 性別
- 男
|
1#
發表於 2005-4-4 11:12 PM
| 顯示全部帖子
yes, it's correct.
2 v7 v! ~1 J+ W3 e5 W7 Y8 `2 z) K8 S
$ `3 @$ O) t7 ^& @+ E. o9 Yaccording to the law, if anyone get anykind of hurt in the bank, the bank is liable of this.
! b+ h9 w; O, u( |' X0 E1 }
/ D0 u$ c) Y2 eIn the same case, if someone get pk or hurt in ur home and u hvn't warned that guy before,5 Z& z6 v9 t4 I9 O, G+ B( n
and that guy sue u, u hv to pay a huge sum of money to him. q4 ]/ F# W: `( a0 V; S0 b
( Y, j# {+ `9 yso, at this case, a kind of insurance arouse. That's liable insurance, 責任保險
- @ c8 ^5 w0 b' T# Q$ n; ^* @" o$ c# K2 I: G
in 90s, a man got pk in a government department, since that was no sign of 小心地滑,
" K8 M) T+ i4 n3 k8 w/ |4 Kat least, the government had to pay 10M to that guy |
|
