|
- 帖子
- 118
- 精華
- 0
- 威望
- 69
- 魅力
- 0
- 讚好
- 0
- 性別
- 男
|
1#
發表於 2005-4-4 11:12 PM
| 顯示全部帖子
yes, it's correct.
! o# j! A% B) r8 J1 X3 c3 y1 t1 i5 ]3 ?2 n& v$ u
according to the law, if anyone get anykind of hurt in the bank, the bank is liable of this.
* A7 N0 M$ ^5 q9 T0 H5 g) |, f, @# q5 I$ z/ K
In the same case, if someone get pk or hurt in ur home and u hvn't warned that guy before,
0 ]+ ~2 ?2 h A. C/ n9 iand that guy sue u, u hv to pay a huge sum of money to him.
# Y* D; v) P, W0 s0 e' C" Q/ Y J' Z3 ~, D# {/ U4 f' g5 ? `, T
so, at this case, a kind of insurance arouse. That's liable insurance, 責任保險' l- K3 n! N v/ c3 K* [1 S, l" F
* i- B3 L& N( I0 e/ _- Y3 H# ~ m, N
in 90s, a man got pk in a government department, since that was no sign of 小心地滑, ! j* c" Z, ?# H+ l( K% S& s
at least, the government had to pay 10M to that guy |
|
