|
- 帖子
- 118
- 精華
- 0
- 威望
- 69
- 魅力
- 0
- 讚好
- 0
- 性別
- 男
|
1#
發表於 2005-4-4 11:12 PM
| 顯示全部帖子
yes, it's correct.
" w4 u- O4 m" v$ ~$ N0 E9 k/ C9 K9 O/ R, P
according to the law, if anyone get anykind of hurt in the bank, the bank is liable of this.5 j9 R; r4 `7 a; L, N
; f" X4 M/ s6 d U" i$ Q! p0 M
In the same case, if someone get pk or hurt in ur home and u hvn't warned that guy before,
$ D0 B* a' M+ D# |$ j( Fand that guy sue u, u hv to pay a huge sum of money to him.+ s# f; ^$ ^. d( K$ s& @0 ~. T
8 r4 ] e l% J/ d0 }9 V" @so, at this case, a kind of insurance arouse. That's liable insurance, 責任保險
7 l) Z2 U: Z* K, Z
: V6 |, y: L/ [! H- ein 90s, a man got pk in a government department, since that was no sign of 小心地滑,
) V% _/ @+ w, q2 c, T% \+ z# \at least, the government had to pay 10M to that guy |
|
