|
- 帖子
- 118
- 精華
- 0
- 威望
- 69
- 魅力
- 0
- 讚好
- 0
- 性別
- 男
|
1#
發表於 2005-4-4 11:12 PM
| 顯示全部帖子
yes, it's correct.4 d _/ c$ N8 E; l( K! [9 ?* R* ^
3 D# d; S( e( _" naccording to the law, if anyone get anykind of hurt in the bank, the bank is liable of this.8 K5 h. G6 J1 x
: I+ l4 F \. c3 A; e9 MIn the same case, if someone get pk or hurt in ur home and u hvn't warned that guy before,& b5 v7 C$ T+ J& e K
and that guy sue u, u hv to pay a huge sum of money to him.$ J5 N: ]2 J, L( K
' m* X) q2 b( C) E' g. qso, at this case, a kind of insurance arouse. That's liable insurance, 責任保險 N3 l2 p3 T* T5 \$ T0 |
/ W! H/ g' O# x6 u9 @in 90s, a man got pk in a government department, since that was no sign of 小心地滑,
0 T3 V( @% \: ]+ [at least, the government had to pay 10M to that guy |
|
