- 帖子
- 2839
- 精華
- 4
- 威望
- 119
- 魅力
- 0
- 讚好
- 0
- 性別
- 女
|
26#
發表於 2005-7-7 06:50 AM
| 只看該作者
Originally posted by fatfatdragon at 2005-7-7 09:40 AM:
十仔, 下面一段說話可能好唔啱聽, 希... Fat Fat, the following is my response to Sohozhk 前輩.
I have also given it some thoughts. This is why I added the following message in the 加分守則 of 【飲食天地】 - "可以嘅話, 請提供資料嘅來源, 以增加資料嘅可信性", and I also suggested members to post the following statement along with their postings - "以上資料只供參考, 詳情請咨詢醫生, 註冊營養師, 或其他相關嘅專業人仕".
I have actually thought of removing 健康飲食資訊 as one of the 加分題 of 【飲食天地】. But this won't solve the problem as members have been posting the so-called "健康資訊" long before the establishment of 【飲食天地】.
Here are my suggestions:
1) We can suggest the moderators not to give points to (or even deduct points from) members who are posting 健康飲食資訊 without giving the source of the information.
2) We can also suggest members to consult their doctors or registered nutritionist before they practice anything that is being posted here.
In 【飲食天地】, I have previously posted the following comments:
講開又講, 早排响度睇到一 d 健康資訊轉貼, 有d 我真係不敢苟同, 大家要明白, 好多記者對科学一知半解, 憑一兩個研究報告就响報紙度斷章取義, 嘩眾取寵, 信與唔信就要用吓閣下嘅智慧喇
再者睇研究報告唔係淨係睇 result, 仲要睇埋個 experimental design, 個 design 有問題, d result 點可靠?? 好多時個設計係会 biased, 或者 sample size 太細, 總之呢 d 問題係存在, 我都見唔少.
你会問, 有問題嘅話, 點公佈呀? 呢個就係 how the science community work. 公佈出嚟俾其他科学家參考, 自然就会有另一 group 科学家寫另一份報告去支持或反對, 然後再去研究.
有一篇叫 “癌細胞最愛吃用微波爐煮熱的食物” 嘅文章裡面提到用微波爐嘅害處, 有 d 真係幾離譜.
舉個例, Nitrosamine 係致癌, 但係放塊肉入微波爐会產生幾多 nitrosamine 呢? 第一, 有冇都成問題, 第二, 就算有, 份量比起一塊煙肉或香腸嚟講就一定会少得多, 如果你敢食煙肉香腸, 咁就唔好丟咗屋企部微波爐喇. |
最可靠嘅終生伴侶係.... 面油紙, 鼻貼<-- 答案 ^_^ ' |
|