<<新主題 | 舊主題>>
娛樂滿紛 26FUN » 吹水版 » 大家認為古惑天皇既下場?[積極回應者+5]
返回列表 回復 發帖
雖然我唔用BT,因我中意租碟用電視睇(畫面大); h) R  S3 r# q# T& Y
但我都希望佢無事,因太多垃圾戲,D濕9電影人係到瀨地硬!
能忍不計心胸闊,悅盡人情眼界寬
Originally posted by 短毛 at 2005-4-29 11:48 PM:
4 F3 U: w8 O% S5 N! N3 Y大家可以睇o下有關法律條文. 裏面*好 ...
. n$ P2 q5 _  B/ A) b' YI agree you points that it could be illegal
& b6 W: k0 _& Sbut that is still a "gray area"4 @0 M1 A/ }  S( v# j1 y: l
whoever win, it still makes us to feel that the result is unfair
' O: e, }, d# O9 \# q6 o$ F
$ n% F- j5 j# I& G! W- Xanyway, I want to say that is& `3 |) s7 F/ M! R7 ]5 V6 e  e+ P
who is supposed to be protected by laws
4 T: I& U5 z, t" `' n: jcreators?
' _& n: Q& w  rbut I think now they just only protect big companies but not the movies market0 l; V' z4 F: x
let's them copy others ideas and produce lots of boring movies (not all) to earn our money.3 e+ `; b- Y& g
when we are cheated by some shops, we can sue those! E* p+ K3 k: V% i, B3 o2 M" z
Why nothing protects consumers to choose a movies???
Originally posted by dogson009 at 2005-4-29 10:03 PM:
6 [1 n8 q; B8 {7 L+ u其實我都唔肯定係咪真有其人=.=
1 `0 H, U* q' S
我都咁話,可能其實係班差佬為左想"空"我地,作個人出黎,做戲!!
Originally posted by junob04 at 2005-4-30 08:41 AM:' }% E" J1 I% m$ B; b2 N+ h

% \; ^. N4 ^* i; D我都咁話,可能其實係班差佬為左想"空"我地,作個人出黎,做戲!!
9 k/ L' L4 b) K5 C, E  ]唔係喎!& ^% _" S" c! r$ Y% a
古惑天皇響--- 嗰度好出名係大佬黎喎!
+ \3 `+ l( R: }& f( L我以前都成日去download佢放出黎啲戲!
, P2 ~0 {$ A' q0 O9 k8 Y佢真係好有熱誠嗰隻, 由舊到你諗唔起既戲到新到岩岩上畫既戲佢都有!) X2 c& `- |. L
就係因為佢出名所以班pk先捕佢!
希望佢無事) _% ]0 L# V3 e& Z
一有先例以後就死嚕
honestly, i also use bt, but i know my action is totally incorrect!!!
  p& G5 o. L, }8 h/ u* s6 jdun say nowadays movie is bad or not, downloan it is giving its face.......
5 O& t- R" h% B, _+ i6 v" }if so bad, dun download la, right?1 Z3 G+ y/ O4 d' s- U1 x. _4 t
i am dun shouting on all using bt guys, because i am also this guy^^
" z3 B! }; z  Rbut for the fact and 對事 to say, dl by bt really harm the company a lot, there is no excuse for using bt is a legal way and correct+ v' G8 |4 ]1 z* D
no need $$$ and need $, how to consider also no need $ is much more benfit la1 N) A. I1 l% H. A. j
so what i always think is that, in this modern and high tech society
2 M% d" h$ N" |2 ^using bt or winmx this kind of high tech should be graduately to take over buying CD or going to cinema.........5 Y# h) a/ o1 m- p: s" J" D
why not develop this to takeover now condition? even need $$$ to dl, i think ppl would also accept (but sure the price should be lower as much more ppl would dl to overcome the production cost) BT really a very great invention !!!
! u& V, u8 W3 Q+ G* ?: h& x5 x, oso, even they catch him or us, i only can say he or us are unlucky, but not incorrect way for them to do and custom also doing what they should do, so dun fxxking them la^^
jason
罰款,冇留案底!
' A7 w6 C( `  A# B# n佢又唔係殺人放火~~~
# S( W; _# m' o: i6 A5 \% x政府想比下馬威0的人~~  Y% {( }3 ^& y1 |
錢就一定罰- h+ J8 t% Z8 j- {
未必要坐牢~~
如果真係判佢有罪,# \  \6 V: h/ R' W! F& v
唔知佢會唔會上訴呢?
2 e$ s5 W4 r4 ?8 u佢又失業既, 會唔會冇錢上訴呢?
% [# x( Z, W9 k/ [4 l9 G到時有冇人幫佢呢?!
最後同佢針掂,叫佢認左網上盜竊及行為不檢算數,網上盜竊就口頭警告(因知前有案例參考,條友網上盜竊人十幾萬地武器都係比口頭警告),而行為不檢就因初犯罰款HK$1000不留案底,咁大家都孝好落台d...
冇事!!!!!:cool:
返回列表 回復 發帖
<<新主題 | 舊主題>>
娛樂滿紛 26FUN » 吹水版 » 大家認為古惑天皇既下場?[積極回應者+5]

重要聲明:26fun.com為一個討論區服務網站。本網站是以即時上載留言的方式運作,26fun.com對所有留言的真實性、完整性及立場等,不負任何法律責任。而一切留言之言論只代表留言者個人意見,並非本網站之立場,用戶不應信賴內容,並應自行判斷內容之真實性。於有關情形下,用戶應尋求專業意見(如涉及醫療、法律或投資等問題)。 由於本討論區受到「即時上載留言」運作方式所規限,故不能完全監察所有留言,若讀者發現有留言出現問題,請聯絡我們。26fun.com有權刪除任何留言及拒絕任何人士上載留言,同時亦有不刪除留言的權利。切勿撰寫粗言穢語、誹謗、渲染色情暴力或人身攻擊的言論,敬請自律。本網站保留一切法律權利。