|
- 帖子
- 118
- 精華
- 0
- 威望
- 69
- 魅力
- 0
- 讚好
- 0
- 性別
- 男
|
1#
發表於 2005-4-4 11:12 PM
| 顯示全部帖子
yes, it's correct.( I/ H2 X( l8 @) D8 K* d
) }" U8 k# }3 R3 e1 O" @6 i2 laccording to the law, if anyone get anykind of hurt in the bank, the bank is liable of this.
' A" j- L; [5 W6 D; x% G2 F' \
0 U& K8 {# C0 D) f* g4 X2 p; q# W( ^In the same case, if someone get pk or hurt in ur home and u hvn't warned that guy before,
: ?1 R* Y% ?, a* [) y. v0 q9 a9 @and that guy sue u, u hv to pay a huge sum of money to him.
6 e& L: j9 e5 X2 t, n
3 E3 i' q, I% K2 j* |so, at this case, a kind of insurance arouse. That's liable insurance, 責任保險3 _! K" F; f* R2 E3 l1 `
) v9 F/ l, }* A% ?) W C/ A$ Z
in 90s, a man got pk in a government department, since that was no sign of 小心地滑, 6 m, i7 r5 v1 K. i6 M& `
at least, the government had to pay 10M to that guy |
|
