|
- 帖子
- 118
- 精華
- 0
- 威望
- 69
- 魅力
- 0
- 讚好
- 0
- 性別
- 男
|
1#
發表於 2005-4-4 11:12 PM
| 顯示全部帖子
yes, it's correct.
4 c6 m' U' q) Y5 E, z
4 r2 {+ Z5 }/ x% a# ^according to the law, if anyone get anykind of hurt in the bank, the bank is liable of this.
/ J, `; b+ B8 W0 U% k
- x7 \5 [9 d; QIn the same case, if someone get pk or hurt in ur home and u hvn't warned that guy before,
& ~! ^; H0 }& sand that guy sue u, u hv to pay a huge sum of money to him.6 c2 K$ k6 C3 i8 }5 ~9 `$ T, ?
) B( Z& a1 m5 D, [1 P/ aso, at this case, a kind of insurance arouse. That's liable insurance, 責任保險# H6 P+ T, G5 V. e
: y/ ?, y' W+ K) J* tin 90s, a man got pk in a government department, since that was no sign of 小心地滑, ; z8 C( K9 V: A5 I9 e4 m
at least, the government had to pay 10M to that guy |
|
