|
- 帖子
- 118
- 精華
- 0
- 威望
- 69
- 魅力
- 0
- 讚好
- 0
- 性別
- 男
|
1#
發表於 2005-4-4 11:12 PM
| 顯示全部帖子
yes, it's correct.: \5 J2 T7 P6 P1 y
/ I5 } Z @9 m2 P% }
according to the law, if anyone get anykind of hurt in the bank, the bank is liable of this.
) I+ ^; {. y/ o. a8 f4 O+ |3 r: v" U4 _9 J
In the same case, if someone get pk or hurt in ur home and u hvn't warned that guy before,
2 E6 M+ P0 h; i8 @and that guy sue u, u hv to pay a huge sum of money to him.' l s+ w* K8 z0 X* l
; [+ I* Z' J" }/ G
so, at this case, a kind of insurance arouse. That's liable insurance, 責任保險
0 Y* _5 \. ^ M+ Y
2 s- A% `: w4 M* c- A1 j* Uin 90s, a man got pk in a government department, since that was no sign of 小心地滑,
3 v; |2 {( `; [5 V kat least, the government had to pay 10M to that guy |
|
