|
- 帖子
- 118
- 精華
- 0
- 威望
- 69
- 魅力
- 0
- 讚好
- 0
- 性別
- 男
|
1#
發表於 2005-4-4 11:12 PM
| 顯示全部帖子
yes, it's correct.9 l) l# L& J* d" r
: s; z/ C) H9 ]1 K/ x" |9 [according to the law, if anyone get anykind of hurt in the bank, the bank is liable of this.; X3 ^, z+ \8 p+ d+ W5 F
% Y% Q" B5 K: L& c
In the same case, if someone get pk or hurt in ur home and u hvn't warned that guy before,9 q! E. @- {4 n6 n! {
and that guy sue u, u hv to pay a huge sum of money to him.9 X7 O5 ~$ v, k0 a2 Y! A
! j1 p2 x" Z/ _so, at this case, a kind of insurance arouse. That's liable insurance, 責任保險. Q9 B. w9 |; {$ y1 V, C2 }& Q/ U5 u
" z9 o+ G4 w+ s
in 90s, a man got pk in a government department, since that was no sign of 小心地滑, $ v0 h% H; U8 O* L0 _9 t
at least, the government had to pay 10M to that guy |
|
