|
- 帖子
- 118
- 精華
- 0
- 威望
- 69
- 魅力
- 0
- 讚好
- 0
- 性別
- 男
|
1#
發表於 2005-4-4 11:12 PM
| 顯示全部帖子
yes, it's correct.
% K9 X0 |% E& d* Q4 r x
8 y2 C& i$ o% V) baccording to the law, if anyone get anykind of hurt in the bank, the bank is liable of this.( \% v5 M( s6 U' {( k
& x8 w% `, @, U9 J' g- X8 TIn the same case, if someone get pk or hurt in ur home and u hvn't warned that guy before," H; V: R2 _. E% ~3 i
and that guy sue u, u hv to pay a huge sum of money to him.
v; W- k: p1 r3 z) _' ~# t( t' x# Y0 T2 ]% Z; v, U H
so, at this case, a kind of insurance arouse. That's liable insurance, 責任保險9 }: n. y6 X! P! S! I
8 G* D7 Y Z. `* e, t% i1 cin 90s, a man got pk in a government department, since that was no sign of 小心地滑, 5 E8 K4 `3 k& a) L0 z$ L
at least, the government had to pay 10M to that guy |
|
