Triangel

Originally posted by oz2 at 2008-2-5 01:33 AM:1 O) B& o! Y, d' c: T% S

5 A  `! _6 u. y8 u# M: B- ^' b那麼方案(2),ok?

3 e. G5 i( z; A- B3 Y4 _
7 f. ]( [0 U( H) `5 {! d9 |* s
可以帶出討論氣氛并且有討點的，我都會加分+ J: y2 m( v8 O0 ]+ a; M
Ok?

Triangel

Originally posted by oz2 at 2008-2-5 02:11 AM:5 F3 k6 D" y# Z. I
3 S) B4 }2 C+ b
可能我的例子未必是好好,而且每件事... # ~& k% [3 t2 R/ o+ \. j
% I' o3 F( W7 X* \7 |- P
[棺材]多數人認為是[不好]的東西,但它不是一件[錯]的東西;
' B6 }3 h- P- ?- S9 p6 W8 k7 N即使把[棺材]被放在一些不恰當地方,也是行為上的[錯],不是[棺材]的[錯]。. ?, E8 x+ c# S# P9 f/ N

  b( R1 g0 |' }2 k, n! Q/ |
' P, E: J5 @1 J& z
嘩，敢既例子你都稔到

Triangel

Originally posted by SWK at 2008-2-5 02:20 AM:* q) I7 c% ~8 D' _

5 U! B: h5 A% w你啲舉例好似有啲"格硬理" 咁唔係你既錯 只係你舉例得不好

$ p, |2 Z4 `6 q! _) X. k) E+ L9 L% H7 p' q
應該係：【格硬黎】， 唔係： ［格硬理］

Triangel

Originally posted by oz2 at 2008-2-5 02:42 AM:- K9 s* c4 @( W3 A
* j7 `1 G. H. _* _. e
多謝你見意,也令到我又有另一見解:/ P; L8 L7 L$ ^0 b6 A6 `

# d/ u; j4 }  Q# e- ?# d' A不希望因為此帖而令到會員之間產生罵戰
1 Z0 l# C2 _" x- J...

7 u3 T9 Q7 w/ x& d/ Q/ ]
3 R, q( y4 }6 n2 u" u# l6 o* t放心，我相信 SWK姐姐唔係敢既意義, right?

Triangel

Originally posted by s20021601 at 2008-2-5 09:10 AM:
; `  s! s7 Z" U5 _8 X& J+ z我就覺得「不好」同「錯」呢個關係......
1 ?5 u$ J( V6 d/ C6 P  Y哈哈..講到連我自己都唔係幾明tim...
& G4 u" q# |: P/ p7 m  p還望大家見諒9 V/ P+ x0 M3 v9 ?

. q1 w  v3 O( y' K$ p0 @
6 e" @; z9 U& ?" c  d. t' xs2002, 我真係睇極都吾明

Triangel

Originally posted by yeung hiu he at 2008-2-5 09:47 AM:
) E6 b* _3 }3 h) A9 x- ?2 ^7 f5 `" a其實我覺得(不好) 同 (錯), 每次都連...

1 U6 `5 Z7 r/ L
7 \3 t' n. r( z( ^* B4 Y: wYour point is?

Triangel

Originally posted by alanfcw at 2008-2-5 01:35 PM:, q1 c  d/ c+ w5 o# V
不好同錯 2樣野黎 我覺得
+ |) s8 s! I& ~* j
1 r  e: N& ~$ x7 Q3 X媽媽見我做得唔好既野未必打你,如做功課呀9 L- m" h; r3 a% ~: U  j# r5 D

8 Q$ z+ M- r5 |$ e2 A' J# S. U但係錯既野佢一定會打你,如你同人打架

* }( |- O& A3 B- \2 z+ s+ c9 _$ e- z; z: m0 y. w; Z
你咪幸福咯!
4 k2 y! d% a( ?2 U+ I) ^$ H我老頂見我做得唔好, 未必打我, 不過話以後都吾駛我做啦, 死末!
" G; d- F0 R5 k# p但係做錯野, 佢一定都吾會打我, 不過要揾過份工啫!