奪命老妖

Originally posted by seafireson2 at 2007-5-15 02:29 PM:
' J, ^$ C1 G; E' z+ T7 q" p' Y7 O2 L0 N: ~
agree,2 [5 N( v; q# y+ N/ z: D
我都未睇過,根本唔知係點,可能真係討論成份為主,
* S% y, r$ w0 j7 ^6 G但我估同方向生果比,係小兒科,
' [1 _! q! n1 l1 \期盼方向生果比人被定性二級不雅!

) s$ d7 ^' Q, W5 S- @% |$ Bhttp://www.xanga.com/cusp_07/590 ... 76362152636620.html
! i1 H8 _- o' |! {( ^  l已經睇左幾期,性質傾向於性教育,同某報既果d嫖妓指南,差天共地, U; _: o! D9 a' s
搞成咁,都係兩個原因,第一係香港人係性方面真係好保守,探討下都唔得,第二係欺善怕惡,見係學生就恰你

chicken

Read the student post and find that it's not as evil as described by the media.
! g& m' d. u. y! G$ G! KJust some extreme-conservative people too nervous about it.

sakura310

Originally posted by d228216 at 2007-5-15 01:58 PM:2 x7 B  R8 `: q3 x2 Z. `  f' B
有罪就要罸, 冇罪就要平反, 法庭應申張正義！
! _: \* P" j& |( ?5 F+ G! ~5 d4 d$ d5 [2 O& t3 ?* F) O0 m
係咪大學生根本冇關係....大學生巴閉d?? 有免死金牌???$ @, T0 ]: t6 v. ^  O  C

9 X- ~1 J, t; [$ W6 Z為自己既行為負責, 係今日既年青人最需要學習既野!

5 d2 ?$ I! J7 Y  L" F/ D* K
- ]# A" T/ q4 S, N
絕對支持啦, o: q9 e8 \0 T# `5 ~
( }; e, A+ j8 [- Q. d0 E' T
有錯就認,打就企定' ^, A; U" G9 m: M

# |; |. _8 _$ q) t1 V9 b* G無錯當然要撐到底
. G; c3 W! ~5 G1 j* E0 U
' m# G- I2 Q6 p/ d/ }  ]5 @' x但今次我覺得係班大學生唔0岩/ d& ^7 j1 r( ?+ h: R: z

  D$ W! c2 J: L' B# R' t在發佈一份公眾讀物時,內容應該注意下,唔同私人交談,你講咩都得
8 d0 d2 l: |" i! ^9 i0 d5 O0 v
6 l1 O8 |! c. \# ~' y" f一份公眾讀物係好有影響力
* w3 X% x! |/ s, i3 g* J- F; B; s- X5 j6 ?
我唔認為學校方今次要幫班學生
5 t) [: c* L% [& m: b
9 n3 O' X! J: W+ m  {0 B唔通第時出到去做野做錯事就有亞head幫你頂?: P" n, s, z. x) }8 e

) K. ?# ~7 }# P我唔認為lor8 t) J2 C0 n7 V# z- q

/ P, _3 d6 w; |# C7 I: r7 B$ z唔係話要整死佢地
7 X- x5 W8 Z* i9 a( }! m
2 C+ q6 L# {; Z9 z5 S而係今次件事,如果判得成的話,自然起到警惕作用
; N6 m; j. L7 E- i
; t7 \4 J1 J& y我覺得係d人將言論自由ge範圍放得太大0 ^& Z8 \- T# X3 ~2 p' c8 ~7 f( d" \

8 N. {( ^6 r; X! D8 w. |8 p有d野係應該講,有d野係唔應該係公眾場合講的
' v, f' ~3 x9 _, j) ], b& \' B- S
5 N- C# K7 J* b5 B, @唔係話唔應該講就係防礙言論自由3 G$ s. T/ P2 P

& L% I& C5 l/ Z+ K6 @+ \大家都知偷錢搶錢係唔唔法,唔通咁又話政府防礙你搵錢?

浪子

睇完, 真係冇野好講, 咁所有中小學性教育書籍都可以列做不雅

hackenli

一日一金句2 E; O  w& w) a' ~$ G  V
"佢地有比一般市民較高o既學歷,就更應該能夠明辨是非"( O4 F: U9 z* u+ Z2 L1 h
  w' i) j" w8 S# m; u
我們的大學生9 u. g3 C5 t: r) t, o8 }
! _9 q2 C$ I0 \' {3 \
5 O) Q: c) T( H* m

2 a* m( s# O* M( V/ ?% S
7 S/ H" |: [9 V5 P' _4 ?% N6 e  d

Originally posted by easy_man at 2007-5-15 02:13 PM:
2 v) b9 n& m) r- V4 ^$ J/ b- N. h  F, V% Y1 ^8 j& D
+ X% W6 ~* X& L9 ]! j) k
有見地 !!!
" x( @1 y( B: x) O" ~  H現今大學生部份以為...

vv1668vv

反映大學生對法律認知不足。自以為是

支持者

http://www.xanga.com/cusp_07/590 ... 76362152636620.html
3 G: x: H  b$ e% R1 F" K
- w$ p! c5 S7 R9 r2 V% y8 H: `& xI think the content is rather premature, i.e. not a porn stuff compare with some HK newspapers. $ c& g5 t# H/ d$ Z
I never think of any porn or sexual stuff after the reading, but just have some moment to retreat the social life in mind.
7 g& ~6 A2 S& A; f- hI pretty sad that about the University official.4 S7 Q/ b% n3 d9 l9 h
It's them making the stuff worse.

bigfish

我覺得份報刊以市井中文刊出就顯得不雅, 如果轉用華麗英文刊登就乜事都冇 la+ C% v, H: K; y0 f

5 Y: \! q% e2 |8 g7 U( S. {[ Last edited by bigfish on 2007-5-15 at 05:26 PM ]

mailcool7

有錯就認,打就企定

155220

Originally posted by bigfish at 2007-5-15 17:24:1 Z, a( i  N  u" f
我覺得份報刊以市井中文刊出就顯得不雅, 如果轉用華麗英文刊登就乜事都冇 la
! y9 W( ?1 ?* Q. n% @! G7 L4 s
0 @: F2 R0 N, T  r[ Last edited by bigfish on 2007-5-15 at 05:26 PM ]

1 |! h( N4 h3 n/ r: D7 U) x% g! g9 r" w) W- F
兩者有何分別?5 F. m8 ?6 \  {! c+ W
中文就市井,英文就華麗,有咩根據?