奪命老妖

Originally posted by seafireson2 at 2007-5-15 02:29 PM:
, }2 S3 v# k* H: d" J
) ^( e9 i& r5 R2 `& ^/ @agree,
7 ^& C$ o3 U8 \我都未睇過,根本唔知係點,可能真係討論成份為主,
+ U( j2 v2 m( A5 ^7 F! N5 Z但我估同方向生果比,係小兒科,
' B0 b1 K' a6 I4 m9 S4 A* G. E. K# O期盼方向生果比人被定性二級不雅!

" W: B1 P) C0 M) _  }; |7 V; c; V
http://www.xanga.com/cusp_07/590 ... 76362152636620.html
7 ^9 ]& w0 e' u$ l7 \已經睇左幾期,性質傾向於性教育,同某報既果d嫖妓指南,差天共地
# F  I0 Y6 q6 M, |4 _1 E' }" |2 X搞成咁,都係兩個原因,第一係香港人係性方面真係好保守,探討下都唔得,第二係欺善怕惡,見係學生就恰你

chicken

Read the student post and find that it's not as evil as described by the media.
& ~, t' A% c* r1 T1 k, B0 _9 s  BJust some extreme-conservative people too nervous about it.

sakura310

Originally posted by d228216 at 2007-5-15 01:58 PM:9 G- W5 v9 V& n! L7 [4 Q. w2 L
有罪就要罸, 冇罪就要平反, 法庭應申張正義！
# e/ X& H0 T7 j% K1 |3 R4 D( u: h5 U0 R+ ]$ \8 r1 B/ U
係咪大學生根本冇關係....大學生巴閉d?? 有免死金牌???1 W1 \" C5 M- c. e% x# k" W5 I
5 y+ c8 @5 |6 O; _1 P
為自己既行為負責, 係今日既年青人最需要學習既野!

8 X( C  G% N1 T7 z

. o' d0 @* u5 R/ @絕對支持啦
& @$ a( m  N* x' H  Z# r9 X% j, m
! N# t/ L# Y* [: V$ L& a有錯就認,打就企定, M; o- [, [- @& z+ E
7 X. A! p$ x2 S; x& t
無錯當然要撐到底( y' ~( T( I2 ^1 y6 B
- `- P; l( a+ P
但今次我覺得係班大學生唔0岩# C  l' L% q7 c  a' h

. m# t6 h! i& ?% P6 P( f: P  H在發佈一份公眾讀物時,內容應該注意下,唔同私人交談,你講咩都得; d1 i# h. `, l% N4 g

' R& v! Q2 f. ^. o) d一份公眾讀物係好有影響力
: m$ `8 r: P. _( l0 L- z' J* H; U# y# y3 O9 Y4 d
我唔認為學校方今次要幫班學生; b0 r; j( `6 J  V
  l, z: T0 H6 j" q( D
唔通第時出到去做野做錯事就有亞head幫你頂?
$ L1 t/ e8 K, N
  }. Y+ r5 Z) f$ v  a我唔認為lor
: J& R( A: C- B; {2 N3 \* M
3 B& G6 W1 ?5 R+ {. J唔係話要整死佢地
. o# x5 Q8 U- b
# \! @8 F3 w5 t0 z0 |+ {  l% ]6 R而係今次件事,如果判得成的話,自然起到警惕作用
& a/ J: \% y5 \" Y
6 r9 q" R( b. y' y我覺得係d人將言論自由ge範圍放得太大
5 f, ?* t/ [3 Z( \/ t0 B
  U9 J6 E; \5 x7 f8 b有d野係應該講,有d野係唔應該係公眾場合講的) d$ y5 S. e9 P6 v4 X" r
. n( S5 y: u! H& E$ A" T9 n% ~
唔係話唔應該講就係防礙言論自由: v5 F8 X2 h+ _; E+ H+ E
& J8 W) i1 M$ m
大家都知偷錢搶錢係唔唔法,唔通咁又話政府防礙你搵錢?

浪子

睇完, 真係冇野好講, 咁所有中小學性教育書籍都可以列做不雅

hackenli

一日一金句8 k3 O) A$ W8 e% E& t, ~7 H
"佢地有比一般市民較高o既學歷,就更應該能夠明辨是非"
: M- t" p" Y) q! t9 R
/ \2 I( @% ]6 C- l; T4 |我們的大學生
$ h- r. S& Q/ d, }7 b5 ?- m9 O1 }9 g& K, `4 t1 S

& }0 J9 @3 p1 `9 F
) e! I1 f3 @) [6 O# K" f! `! B) G& _& i

Originally posted by easy_man at 2007-5-15 02:13 PM:; O  a. U! b9 @2 _/ t
: ^; w+ b, a" e- a+ a' H8 k/ l

. @$ R3 X2 ~, K! K8 z有見地 !!!* W$ ^) N- E# t1 J
現今大學生部份以為...

vv1668vv

反映大學生對法律認知不足。自以為是

支持者

http://www.xanga.com/cusp_07/590 ... 76362152636620.html, p9 D& a/ {! d2 R! i
( }' X, K; b9 ~0 v
I think the content is rather premature, i.e. not a porn stuff compare with some HK newspapers.
) F+ I- l# B, c! U8 D9 V- aI never think of any porn or sexual stuff after the reading, but just have some moment to retreat the social life in mind.
- }% ~8 K9 _/ C/ c7 I5 xI pretty sad that about the University official.
+ o0 O1 Z) k% y) ~+ ?  G/ q5 AIt's them making the stuff worse.

bigfish

我覺得份報刊以市井中文刊出就顯得不雅, 如果轉用華麗英文刊登就乜事都冇 la, N3 w+ [6 ~* {

9 i1 d2 F) n9 Q5 _1 q4 Y3 z[ Last edited by bigfish on 2007-5-15 at 05:26 PM ]

mailcool7

有錯就認,打就企定

155220

Originally posted by bigfish at 2007-5-15 17:24:
9 _4 Z# q+ U" u' w; s我覺得份報刊以市井中文刊出就顯得不雅, 如果轉用華麗英文刊登就乜事都冇 la
* s& \" q- v1 C2 \, Y, ~9 M# x
- P/ @0 h5 n8 T[ Last edited by bigfish on 2007-5-15 at 05:26 PM ]

0 U$ m  h5 z/ n3 i9 ?+ j- }
2 Z/ Z  C6 Z& g: Y兩者有何分別?
, p" n& K1 \3 v; a& \) Z3 Q8 ~中文就市井,英文就華麗,有咩根據?