奪命老妖

Originally posted by seafireson2 at 2007-5-15 02:29 PM:
+ m" B7 A8 t/ k5 W" Q+ ?( {( T  t, b4 l; |7 f2 ?+ x- |
agree,
9 A) u5 I% a$ }5 p3 [我都未睇過,根本唔知係點,可能真係討論成份為主,
2 C  N1 o' f7 \$ Z7 J  k3 F但我估同方向生果比,係小兒科,7 G& N" M5 s9 W' Y
期盼方向生果比人被定性二級不雅!

- i: ]: I+ n7 J9 Mhttp://www.xanga.com/cusp_07/590 ... 76362152636620.html; k0 x: x; f0 _9 ?$ k
已經睇左幾期,性質傾向於性教育,同某報既果d嫖妓指南,差天共地
% {2 I" F' N/ w" O, Z1 u! r搞成咁,都係兩個原因,第一係香港人係性方面真係好保守,探討下都唔得,第二係欺善怕惡,見係學生就恰你

chicken

Read the student post and find that it's not as evil as described by the media.
8 |# V$ [# U0 l1 vJust some extreme-conservative people too nervous about it.

sakura310

Originally posted by d228216 at 2007-5-15 01:58 PM:
& K* j3 N! \- X0 I2 r. N有罪就要罸, 冇罪就要平反, 法庭應申張正義！
! ^/ i. J8 D5 n9 c, e+ Z
( q2 |7 M8 l( u/ f5 V# q0 [係咪大學生根本冇關係....大學生巴閉d?? 有免死金牌???& M9 A' a# Y3 ?8 p$ q6 D6 V

  }0 _, V8 e& R" l為自己既行為負責, 係今日既年青人最需要學習既野!

* o0 z" u1 v, E+ b3 i
8 Z! q9 }/ [* [4 U  ]
絕對支持啦5 @2 S6 c1 w7 O2 G
+ |# H- T, o4 a* U- n: h0 u
有錯就認,打就企定
1 }" }& R5 m7 b, D; M2 j" j5 d% k5 r
無錯當然要撐到底. m5 p3 p1 t. ^# N, u

2 \) e2 Y( {& d/ @9 R* {但今次我覺得係班大學生唔0岩$ v/ H9 \: O* h
3 v% U+ A" T/ i
在發佈一份公眾讀物時,內容應該注意下,唔同私人交談,你講咩都得
6 B2 u5 R" a/ B2 `
3 l7 w' V! f! K$ V- K5 E一份公眾讀物係好有影響力. K0 t6 y% P  ^( m1 F
$ C1 ]: y2 c% e1 O; e* ?4 B4 w7 _
我唔認為學校方今次要幫班學生
2 d0 o7 h" c$ T- t
+ |* y/ y0 v& o/ x3 o唔通第時出到去做野做錯事就有亞head幫你頂?
4 w! I, c' y: U! e/ ~* H, t" I, a: t, J& }+ [
我唔認為lor
) D4 N1 ^$ \3 l, C# q8 W  |2 |9 O# i  d. b0 S' @
唔係話要整死佢地! W" a9 F) S+ Q

0 Y& X) v! M2 K* a  h' ^而係今次件事,如果判得成的話,自然起到警惕作用
! @: r4 a! o% a. s% _' ?* x/ m/ F, a% J9 E4 Q: G
我覺得係d人將言論自由ge範圍放得太大" `7 E1 `5 E0 l0 C

: L+ s- t# J3 J' `" y$ q" P  O0 M有d野係應該講,有d野係唔應該係公眾場合講的% |' }9 n$ E; d  _3 h! z& K! B

4 ~! g7 h6 F! H. L6 O& J8 y/ ?唔係話唔應該講就係防礙言論自由$ |$ W# S, m! q* b- l9 @, n/ i

* w& W( b3 M9 }% E. Y& c7 P大家都知偷錢搶錢係唔唔法,唔通咁又話政府防礙你搵錢?

浪子

睇完, 真係冇野好講, 咁所有中小學性教育書籍都可以列做不雅

hackenli

一日一金句0 A0 z- h1 h8 X! {. y) ~
"佢地有比一般市民較高o既學歷,就更應該能夠明辨是非") D  ]) [$ _* T/ E. X0 H. u3 M

8 z$ l" k3 |- U# @& P" y& p+ T7 }我們的大學生
- e$ S6 m1 i6 ^: P; ]& T7 x+ V) q
* O7 g5 u- O/ O6 d
, O1 n$ @- \& ^. V
9 B& i: B; a# V' [2 D. R3 c8 r# N

Originally posted by easy_man at 2007-5-15 02:13 PM:
4 ^5 t; [- f9 |+ Z
3 a% \* n( }9 R
  C  k+ ?) `0 h# |% w3 c) Q0 C有見地 !!!
, Y+ [3 A0 T5 x# x5 |現今大學生部份以為...

vv1668vv

反映大學生對法律認知不足。自以為是

支持者

http://www.xanga.com/cusp_07/590 ... 76362152636620.html
& z9 N# r, T7 l4 ]5 W
1 F0 {4 n. x% h$ ~" S4 [  ^I think the content is rather premature, i.e. not a porn stuff compare with some HK newspapers.
$ s* ?8 q7 q; B5 N$ b( h' O, w* zI never think of any porn or sexual stuff after the reading, but just have some moment to retreat the social life in mind.
4 B' f" g! {0 C3 L* `1 Q1 A& i; ~0 RI pretty sad that about the University official.) ~" r- u- ]3 T0 _4 n9 U  T. b; F
It's them making the stuff worse.

bigfish

我覺得份報刊以市井中文刊出就顯得不雅, 如果轉用華麗英文刊登就乜事都冇 la
) c. N+ L4 Q+ u4 E/ K  s; \! j1 c+ L8 C% q$ Z
[ Last edited by bigfish on 2007-5-15 at 05:26 PM ]

mailcool7

有錯就認,打就企定

155220

Originally posted by bigfish at 2007-5-15 17:24:( I2 m9 z3 g  M$ a- t3 G  z
我覺得份報刊以市井中文刊出就顯得不雅, 如果轉用華麗英文刊登就乜事都冇 la
9 M) A4 F+ F$ B* i( v; p# x9 i, S' E) K
[ Last edited by bigfish on 2007-5-15 at 05:26 PM ]

( O6 w  X/ q% q& X; [, l
. A; [2 _8 s' q) X( i2 i
兩者有何分別?5 Q3 f$ G  A. [: r3 f' d( F9 g
中文就市井,英文就華麗,有咩根據?