奪命老妖

Originally posted by seafireson2 at 2007-5-15 02:29 PM:9 t# T7 S4 k- o1 r  R

+ Q! F2 o. F+ y- ?agree,
$ r: P# Y6 O- N. ~+ p' w我都未睇過,根本唔知係點,可能真係討論成份為主,& ?% j, n' Y$ m' y5 Z
但我估同方向生果比,係小兒科,
7 @- x# z3 f2 f期盼方向生果比人被定性二級不雅!

8 u1 V; z3 H  c# K1 B
http://www.xanga.com/cusp_07/590 ... 76362152636620.html' L' q* s9 z2 U. R
已經睇左幾期,性質傾向於性教育,同某報既果d嫖妓指南,差天共地7 Z7 X8 {8 ^2 Q, A8 o
搞成咁,都係兩個原因,第一係香港人係性方面真係好保守,探討下都唔得,第二係欺善怕惡,見係學生就恰你

chicken

Read the student post and find that it's not as evil as described by the media.( S! [) i% K* L" z) j) b
Just some extreme-conservative people too nervous about it.

sakura310

Originally posted by d228216 at 2007-5-15 01:58 PM:; ]2 w6 i' ^) d. N# u# c- L& r
有罪就要罸, 冇罪就要平反, 法庭應申張正義！ - C4 U' ]3 e4 S; a, ^
2 U+ y6 R. e5 d$ G& ]- m
係咪大學生根本冇關係....大學生巴閉d?? 有免死金牌???
8 Z0 t3 [& i- D' K0 h  S
' T' U- H  X$ n( E- s為自己既行為負責, 係今日既年青人最需要學習既野!

( ~1 `1 _3 X2 Z2 K4 n! ?. l. w5 ?) ?* z6 w& @
絕對支持啦( k; O1 H1 q" _" M3 Q! {. i' `

( ]" y6 z( L) G- Y) L有錯就認,打就企定
) n7 j$ }3 G' L/ c1 g2 |( @9 x& `7 X9 @7 `: f5 @
無錯當然要撐到底3 Q% j* |; j4 f$ E- ^

( f( f; o$ F) O' E; `# p但今次我覺得係班大學生唔0岩
0 U- X2 N3 O' @) P) y# j! l: W! |1 r
7 b% K  i. v' A0 {9 b在發佈一份公眾讀物時,內容應該注意下,唔同私人交談,你講咩都得: B4 b- [4 h2 E# B- e9 [
  D  d( ?6 P9 Z; H# s
一份公眾讀物係好有影響力" U  p, }" l) ^. D. |! u

- P5 c1 v; J: L' j8 u, e我唔認為學校方今次要幫班學生
  }  G  Z$ e7 T, S+ R
  I) b. ^2 Q5 F唔通第時出到去做野做錯事就有亞head幫你頂?
' X9 N. G( V  N$ {7 `' a/ ~
# q$ M/ ^6 U2 W1 F  W& M我唔認為lor% [  l; _' H+ t8 w
- r+ @1 l' F* W! y; _8 Q+ Q2 i/ T
唔係話要整死佢地0 b: m$ H/ d1 t7 H

0 s3 D0 I/ f+ ?, n而係今次件事,如果判得成的話,自然起到警惕作用$ i, \; P2 g+ q

$ O% ^  r* q* I8 G8 v! S! V我覺得係d人將言論自由ge範圍放得太大
7 m) }8 ~) ?) g7 P7 x1 U' w# H1 f1 d! _" M' x( {
有d野係應該講,有d野係唔應該係公眾場合講的  u; ]) g5 z7 j$ X1 G7 V

0 N& L+ {8 s% s. Y) {唔係話唔應該講就係防礙言論自由  D4 `8 Q, B. k* r- q
9 A, a% X% ]" q- y' b
大家都知偷錢搶錢係唔唔法,唔通咁又話政府防礙你搵錢?

浪子

睇完, 真係冇野好講, 咁所有中小學性教育書籍都可以列做不雅

hackenli

一日一金句
8 J  p$ A, O& ~/ ~, ?# Z"佢地有比一般市民較高o既學歷,就更應該能夠明辨是非"
2 Z: I4 B* s) B' f9 m0 ]2 M
* a$ P) Y7 L! u* K( M我們的大學生
) I2 ^- Z; A+ z/ P9 h8 }+ j( a4 ?1 f) Z$ v- g! m

5 C7 v/ M% O0 v' x$ v5 l: P# Z, W8 p. _0 M7 a: j& K
: \7 Q9 R1 z3 K% ~

Originally posted by easy_man at 2007-5-15 02:13 PM:
% M/ {1 @7 Y: H/ a
' t0 w. y" Z8 x- h0 Z/ M* C$ F: k, G! p0 h
有見地 !!!: }1 x% P, ^. v6 Q$ o$ k/ c
現今大學生部份以為...

vv1668vv

反映大學生對法律認知不足。自以為是

支持者

http://www.xanga.com/cusp_07/590 ... 76362152636620.html8 R$ B  J3 D+ R/ ~) m# @+ M  C
0 m- A  E' R" A- X; M( M
I think the content is rather premature, i.e. not a porn stuff compare with some HK newspapers. / p  Y* a* W. q! L, \# A
I never think of any porn or sexual stuff after the reading, but just have some moment to retreat the social life in mind.
) O6 J9 h0 l/ O" m" k6 |8 S( ^I pretty sad that about the University official.1 n: i# J6 P2 g. R' r5 J2 |8 F. q
It's them making the stuff worse.

bigfish

我覺得份報刊以市井中文刊出就顯得不雅, 如果轉用華麗英文刊登就乜事都冇 la
" L' k4 |; I5 @! U+ v7 {
) e8 v/ {; B& I% b- {: `[ Last edited by bigfish on 2007-5-15 at 05:26 PM ]

mailcool7

有錯就認,打就企定

155220

Originally posted by bigfish at 2007-5-15 17:24:2 W0 Z  I( d/ R% S
我覺得份報刊以市井中文刊出就顯得不雅, 如果轉用華麗英文刊登就乜事都冇 la
% z# i' P9 _( M8 _7 ?. p/ L0 N3 H/ F, ^9 w0 J
[ Last edited by bigfish on 2007-5-15 at 05:26 PM ]

$ y8 e8 \7 |: G' y1 m/ h

' |3 m- f+ t  Q兩者有何分別?% a- V# }1 q* B; u" I% ~+ [$ |
中文就市井,英文就華麗,有咩根據?