奪命老妖

Originally posted by seafireson2 at 2007-5-15 02:29 PM:
, _! e- ?, Y6 k/ u( c% P4 x
8 @% N" r) f9 Z$ Q) B) _2 M& Pagree,8 Y1 I2 z- g1 L& \
我都未睇過,根本唔知係點,可能真係討論成份為主,
" q; |: c+ O5 K! j9 R+ Y) b但我估同方向生果比,係小兒科,
' b# C4 \8 W' P7 O3 w& |9 j期盼方向生果比人被定性二級不雅!

3 q. ~2 h3 P/ X! _' [  R: M1 ^
http://www.xanga.com/cusp_07/590 ... 76362152636620.html% f8 L- V( o$ W% ~7 M
已經睇左幾期,性質傾向於性教育,同某報既果d嫖妓指南,差天共地
. Y7 V* A  z3 I2 U搞成咁,都係兩個原因,第一係香港人係性方面真係好保守,探討下都唔得,第二係欺善怕惡,見係學生就恰你

chicken

Read the student post and find that it's not as evil as described by the media.0 g7 A' _9 z: j: Q
Just some extreme-conservative people too nervous about it.

sakura310

Originally posted by d228216 at 2007-5-15 01:58 PM:6 [7 v+ d7 t9 r6 N( p/ c
有罪就要罸, 冇罪就要平反, 法庭應申張正義！ + V6 ?& p1 }' Q& T

0 |5 @- |8 B0 S5 Y3 J- Q係咪大學生根本冇關係....大學生巴閉d?? 有免死金牌???
3 S1 a1 e! E! }4 e0 o
8 _4 F4 S' E# m  g+ a為自己既行為負責, 係今日既年青人最需要學習既野!

' }" n7 N4 i# E8 w- I
5 Y2 t+ d" @* N; v3 j& b2 S4 f絕對支持啦$ y  D) _4 k+ @. }9 U6 O

( D  q% F9 U7 y2 Y6 R有錯就認,打就企定+ x9 y% v: ^" a& O
! l( r7 u2 c' e/ G5 n9 X6 E2 v
無錯當然要撐到底
1 q# w) C3 y5 k  `0 w. g2 a! ~' q8 {5 x7 q! W
但今次我覺得係班大學生唔0岩
, H4 e! `9 @7 m# ^( h
4 \* D( u" p$ m$ {( g7 J- e* w在發佈一份公眾讀物時,內容應該注意下,唔同私人交談,你講咩都得
; o. r, N# G( Z6 J; y7 n
0 h' K) \- T! f  n一份公眾讀物係好有影響力& R" i: B2 o( _- G
) t; N+ p0 T. h  B( N/ \
我唔認為學校方今次要幫班學生* d5 h- E+ _" n5 k$ _7 t
' o7 [6 x. t; w$ v: ^% v' ]4 q
唔通第時出到去做野做錯事就有亞head幫你頂?- q9 u4 d2 M& }$ |9 d# q& p
- b1 C: D  R$ P6 Q! v/ Z* d
我唔認為lor# d  m: g9 _. e
3 ^2 J1 @7 W2 F) m8 w
唔係話要整死佢地
" f2 o) u- w% z3 [: Z8 `6 y  f! ~9 p+ G% n
而係今次件事,如果判得成的話,自然起到警惕作用
1 E: b9 G" W( w6 K. O
2 ?% Y3 Y" z  `2 n. \8 v8 i% j5 z我覺得係d人將言論自由ge範圍放得太大
+ L- r  S: D8 ]9 b$ F9 l* x6 C9 [$ @6 [# U% G0 ?+ E4 V8 q1 b6 g
有d野係應該講,有d野係唔應該係公眾場合講的
0 D/ E' V4 v' s$ |5 Y
. w; m0 ^" U' x+ L/ N% r唔係話唔應該講就係防礙言論自由* D( B! }: h% l) T: f9 ?. R2 P

  M- D0 i+ m8 k" [. ^1 u大家都知偷錢搶錢係唔唔法,唔通咁又話政府防礙你搵錢?

浪子

睇完, 真係冇野好講, 咁所有中小學性教育書籍都可以列做不雅

hackenli

一日一金句( N* E  ]! z7 n: \, Y
"佢地有比一般市民較高o既學歷,就更應該能夠明辨是非", {1 s6 F5 l, u9 x$ R' ]

7 a' \1 H5 i/ P/ h0 s: x6 l我們的大學生  ^+ D. _% y& m

" K% z% T5 o* `% S/ d+ ]6 b7 r4 s( U2 t" V

* p: u5 n0 r2 H* o
6 u2 y& u1 r% R; `

Originally posted by easy_man at 2007-5-15 02:13 PM:6 ^9 C1 c7 G+ X" W* y; ]
( G  Y0 {, K3 P& ~, N

) t. J  K5 m' l. K有見地 !!!
5 I* ]0 w+ D1 v1 N; c  a現今大學生部份以為...

vv1668vv

反映大學生對法律認知不足。自以為是

支持者

http://www.xanga.com/cusp_07/590 ... 76362152636620.html% c% k, U( L7 _: r  \- u" c
, {7 k( \6 Q7 Y9 Q6 r6 F
I think the content is rather premature, i.e. not a porn stuff compare with some HK newspapers.
$ s. \' l9 S" g) ~7 K! `I never think of any porn or sexual stuff after the reading, but just have some moment to retreat the social life in mind. $ ~7 C, C" W- b0 K( l1 N/ `+ Q
I pretty sad that about the University official.9 X* z! D8 G$ [  p; b
It's them making the stuff worse.

bigfish

我覺得份報刊以市井中文刊出就顯得不雅, 如果轉用華麗英文刊登就乜事都冇 la+ e3 _7 T$ _0 g6 f
/ S$ M  K0 q. u" `
[ Last edited by bigfish on 2007-5-15 at 05:26 PM ]

mailcool7

有錯就認,打就企定

155220

Originally posted by bigfish at 2007-5-15 17:24:
2 M9 ~2 F# T! s) L) T  w我覺得份報刊以市井中文刊出就顯得不雅, 如果轉用華麗英文刊登就乜事都冇 la
0 m: b( |, j- P7 i: k* E' F* S* B9 b5 Y# m( V4 r
[ Last edited by bigfish on 2007-5-15 at 05:26 PM ]

  o- q, s- E4 m9 p" f3 H7 t
4 O  Z2 A4 J5 p. x1 W2 k' |' B兩者有何分別?
- N7 b8 V. W6 r5 |# ?, B1 T中文就市井,英文就華麗,有咩根據?