奪命老妖

Originally posted by seafireson2 at 2007-5-15 02:29 PM:
' t  Q- j- F: |9 _" B! d1 ^6 ~5 \! `# R/ G2 M  d% N
agree,$ g- K# J& c' e7 [
我都未睇過,根本唔知係點,可能真係討論成份為主,9 |1 M" Z5 N; F0 B# n, i* d
但我估同方向生果比,係小兒科,; g: S4 J( O8 |7 P
期盼方向生果比人被定性二級不雅!

. Q1 t0 n1 w3 y# W1 S. J6 ~9 n
http://www.xanga.com/cusp_07/590 ... 76362152636620.html
( d# ?: O9 `0 f已經睇左幾期,性質傾向於性教育,同某報既果d嫖妓指南,差天共地
' |: F; c2 O& t. Y# O搞成咁,都係兩個原因,第一係香港人係性方面真係好保守,探討下都唔得,第二係欺善怕惡,見係學生就恰你

chicken

Read the student post and find that it's not as evil as described by the media.; ~9 ?& w/ O& q$ _+ ]4 u
Just some extreme-conservative people too nervous about it.

sakura310

Originally posted by d228216 at 2007-5-15 01:58 PM:
! j' o1 P2 g, \有罪就要罸, 冇罪就要平反, 法庭應申張正義！ 8 z8 |+ {$ B# F( A
  X: R" _8 _* a( i  x
係咪大學生根本冇關係....大學生巴閉d?? 有免死金牌???
0 O2 `0 n: A! M4 b- s
& B, Y, C6 c0 V4 x1 q4 y為自己既行為負責, 係今日既年青人最需要學習既野!

/ X  x- y9 |( U3 N9 i
/ f4 m# e' r5 n3 K7 y絕對支持啦
2 X" ]4 W0 G2 L, K8 i( i+ U$ \$ t9 ^' r
有錯就認,打就企定
3 a9 h8 S9 K; Z/ l6 J8 ]0 Z8 d9 l4 f, U8 Z/ {
無錯當然要撐到底% W# Q. M$ |0 g9 F9 Z
  ?$ ?8 R: G: k* |- o% ?3 V" U" A
但今次我覺得係班大學生唔0岩. y& `* S% ]2 M
3 l1 ~/ k8 j2 z4 \# J) K4 e
在發佈一份公眾讀物時,內容應該注意下,唔同私人交談,你講咩都得/ e9 h+ p% \' ]0 A- p! e+ o1 O- u; Z

% }& i, M3 n; \: y4 @一份公眾讀物係好有影響力
8 r: a' i6 C% [& j$ {8 D6 i
& m! r. G! P, ?2 k+ w我唔認為學校方今次要幫班學生5 ]. d) ?2 c4 p& A  r$ h0 X5 T$ J

8 d; O! I9 R/ D- E9 u6 |0 b唔通第時出到去做野做錯事就有亞head幫你頂?
; j/ B* J0 x7 H( [9 \: W! {9 H# q( V5 e& T  e3 ~! x
我唔認為lor6 ~7 [* X5 X1 b6 ?& a
) g+ N/ e' H+ B4 y. Q/ Z3 j
唔係話要整死佢地; a& P7 M# W$ z, d
1 ~, w7 ?; Q4 h6 S1 w- X
而係今次件事,如果判得成的話,自然起到警惕作用) f, Z/ l: T7 h* M1 y( i# }

4 I3 F3 `' I# ^1 r" b我覺得係d人將言論自由ge範圍放得太大# L8 l3 f( N$ }7 o, |
5 r6 f. h: \8 f
有d野係應該講,有d野係唔應該係公眾場合講的5 i8 `8 i8 ^: _, w' g( x  \- [

7 e/ Y/ G0 F# A6 z/ q$ |$ x) N唔係話唔應該講就係防礙言論自由
  A8 q; x0 l7 s% c7 q1 S2 P$ v' H* A: ~
大家都知偷錢搶錢係唔唔法,唔通咁又話政府防礙你搵錢?

浪子

睇完, 真係冇野好講, 咁所有中小學性教育書籍都可以列做不雅

hackenli

一日一金句
' u4 v* V( d3 o"佢地有比一般市民較高o既學歷,就更應該能夠明辨是非"
# B  p2 M3 |. \0 j) M' A& e  e5 b4 v* }. {! j
我們的大學生
6 N9 w2 I7 m8 w2 p  P
* k( o! }6 X% ^! R5 r- Z6 n+ }" C
  a2 T0 J! X# y* D
# X& R3 d& B7 f; U9 ^0 m' p4 ~
, O/ X- \( C8 z& d8 c

Originally posted by easy_man at 2007-5-15 02:13 PM:
- X# |, U# r3 t# r7 B% b( O
" `9 b% R& L3 g
4 Q+ c/ v- Y8 h9 N9 ~" F: S有見地 !!!- r" N* j5 p# g2 X+ H
現今大學生部份以為...

vv1668vv

反映大學生對法律認知不足。自以為是

支持者

http://www.xanga.com/cusp_07/590 ... 76362152636620.html
/ W3 I( I9 J- Z( }' n5 E4 t
: O1 H# A2 i% r. }* n3 eI think the content is rather premature, i.e. not a porn stuff compare with some HK newspapers. : z5 _% e( \/ R$ g+ j6 v
I never think of any porn or sexual stuff after the reading, but just have some moment to retreat the social life in mind. ( R, `/ ~6 Y1 o/ j& D* L
I pretty sad that about the University official.
4 p9 |$ u  L$ n4 ]6 `It's them making the stuff worse.

bigfish

我覺得份報刊以市井中文刊出就顯得不雅, 如果轉用華麗英文刊登就乜事都冇 la
5 T, V' P: v' _; E$ m' H2 p* V, }3 @! [- a6 G, r
[ Last edited by bigfish on 2007-5-15 at 05:26 PM ]

mailcool7

有錯就認,打就企定

155220

Originally posted by bigfish at 2007-5-15 17:24:* ]* \% v+ n7 g" u9 u: e4 s
我覺得份報刊以市井中文刊出就顯得不雅, 如果轉用華麗英文刊登就乜事都冇 la7 `3 M5 e7 @+ s) V# w$ X0 h: `
0 a$ e, `& e5 s" |+ x
[ Last edited by bigfish on 2007-5-15 at 05:26 PM ]

3 I1 F9 \5 O, j; f" J% E$ S6 W7 g% Q/ t9 r3 l1 S( ?+ Q9 v, g
兩者有何分別?% a; ~7 o6 V) F, f
中文就市井,英文就華麗,有咩根據?