奪命老妖

Originally posted by seafireson2 at 2007-5-15 02:29 PM:0 m. t3 r3 R  s# H- g( Y+ {

- I6 R7 l- N: y8 l9 H" m$ G! Fagree,
$ w& x7 _; C. L* N5 J; }( A我都未睇過,根本唔知係點,可能真係討論成份為主,
, d" Y4 m2 ]" o9 J但我估同方向生果比,係小兒科,3 q; z# |% H0 d5 d: u
期盼方向生果比人被定性二級不雅!

: t" `, \' r% F# Z0 Yhttp://www.xanga.com/cusp_07/590 ... 76362152636620.html4 D% P) q* Q5 Z+ B& w- a# w& B
已經睇左幾期,性質傾向於性教育,同某報既果d嫖妓指南,差天共地/ }4 i1 L1 L. B4 j& M* l7 P
搞成咁,都係兩個原因,第一係香港人係性方面真係好保守,探討下都唔得,第二係欺善怕惡,見係學生就恰你

chicken

Read the student post and find that it's not as evil as described by the media.
9 Q+ M6 d  y, A* m4 M; b( s. R) oJust some extreme-conservative people too nervous about it.

sakura310

Originally posted by d228216 at 2007-5-15 01:58 PM:# N! l" h5 C" V6 J) I
有罪就要罸, 冇罪就要平反, 法庭應申張正義！
4 d: z! }, n& F  P9 Y: }+ e
1 X1 X# h1 T: V& H) ~' }係咪大學生根本冇關係....大學生巴閉d?? 有免死金牌???
+ k& w% W  J  q- _) r
2 b8 }: ^' k5 R2 ~0 D為自己既行為負責, 係今日既年青人最需要學習既野!

7 o1 h2 n" f8 x
' p/ \, y, J* A8 G絕對支持啦
8 a4 E7 a! L6 N, G- h
) h# D0 c; y& k& {" Z  J% C有錯就認,打就企定
  I4 ~, v+ v/ x+ D% ?" i2 O( C5 l: G6 j0 y  o4 X8 i1 L' B
無錯當然要撐到底
3 ^  q' y- o* t$ T2 F$ p' j4 a% D1 Y2 A! }% Z) X
但今次我覺得係班大學生唔0岩" O, Y0 {9 X" b

0 G: N+ [* n5 Z- c0 i5 r在發佈一份公眾讀物時,內容應該注意下,唔同私人交談,你講咩都得
6 u6 r4 W% e8 X  d
. q( p7 x; ]9 \一份公眾讀物係好有影響力
; G7 p& P& @. x3 ^3 E# o
' J8 C  f2 c  C我唔認為學校方今次要幫班學生
2 v, _# F& N- y
& ?3 K9 H+ `! n/ ^2 Y* Y唔通第時出到去做野做錯事就有亞head幫你頂?
8 x+ t5 f( J7 ~- Z4 g2 Q# B; G1 L* E% D0 ~' F! ]! F; Y
我唔認為lor8 q- J9 p+ v* {
! i! f, i2 f+ N  m" {+ a+ {
唔係話要整死佢地
' a$ `- Z- W! H& n& C9 E" N% ]& _
1 J  x+ i4 U( Q7 f. J% c5 @8 ^' N' m而係今次件事,如果判得成的話,自然起到警惕作用$ i- Y5 S9 z. |% {0 H' N: A3 a5 H& E

! B! _% g" g( c4 C我覺得係d人將言論自由ge範圍放得太大2 a- \& z, O9 d* R4 e

1 r7 m4 e, ^" n  g8 `有d野係應該講,有d野係唔應該係公眾場合講的
+ ?2 V( Q: R( Q) `3 x( i+ r, L
& S6 B! ~' N4 F: _唔係話唔應該講就係防礙言論自由
/ a7 F. V( {2 C# k$ [8 F" [+ q3 ]# w! C" w: h: q; }
大家都知偷錢搶錢係唔唔法,唔通咁又話政府防礙你搵錢?

浪子

睇完, 真係冇野好講, 咁所有中小學性教育書籍都可以列做不雅

hackenli

一日一金句
% r, ?1 r* u, _( K8 r"佢地有比一般市民較高o既學歷,就更應該能夠明辨是非"
/ C( K4 w( S' [+ a6 l
. @( N" R3 n$ k2 K" E我們的大學生
6 c3 g4 K/ u  _/ V
6 [& q; Q( H3 E6 c7 B; {- o; U
1 @; R; q- s0 y; }6 T; J- `
2 O0 j- M! |6 G
, {: q1 {: |2 k% U

Originally posted by easy_man at 2007-5-15 02:13 PM:) j; C' b4 R1 |; w$ o7 i1 @

" {* \/ t* @2 L
. E, {- o" L% P4 ]) D6 P! P. t; c% y有見地 !!!7 U2 b; Y& O' u( ?9 V4 h
現今大學生部份以為...

vv1668vv

反映大學生對法律認知不足。自以為是

支持者

http://www.xanga.com/cusp_07/590 ... 76362152636620.html' H. x7 g$ B5 I: |

3 k9 {3 ^6 W# \! n: T. y( \  _I think the content is rather premature, i.e. not a porn stuff compare with some HK newspapers. , U; y+ j" U0 N8 s: r9 y& k: ]
I never think of any porn or sexual stuff after the reading, but just have some moment to retreat the social life in mind. 5 T; R7 I* x% `& s% k& ~
I pretty sad that about the University official.
, a# q$ Q6 Z6 }It's them making the stuff worse.

bigfish

我覺得份報刊以市井中文刊出就顯得不雅, 如果轉用華麗英文刊登就乜事都冇 la
8 A+ w0 g: A: T9 m! k* a
' R1 X! _& ?$ V. ^[ Last edited by bigfish on 2007-5-15 at 05:26 PM ]

mailcool7

有錯就認,打就企定

155220

Originally posted by bigfish at 2007-5-15 17:24:5 s9 p2 N  J) z5 D3 {. X
我覺得份報刊以市井中文刊出就顯得不雅, 如果轉用華麗英文刊登就乜事都冇 la/ @$ g$ a, z7 h0 x- G
7 a6 p2 K, D  T, }5 D
[ Last edited by bigfish on 2007-5-15 at 05:26 PM ]

7 ]% `$ x+ z. F) o

& m- G4 g$ P$ ~. O) j* G兩者有何分別?
% M1 i6 Q! g6 |% \9 O中文就市井,英文就華麗,有咩根據?