奪命老妖

Originally posted by seafireson2 at 2007-5-15 02:29 PM:
) @# r/ o. g/ {( _* _  z3 g  ]0 q  Z  `1 _
agree,! p6 I0 C/ B) I/ T3 r' I; F
我都未睇過,根本唔知係點,可能真係討論成份為主,! L5 h" F+ Y- n# O) q
但我估同方向生果比,係小兒科,
8 w; A. N; j$ A0 E/ E9 ~期盼方向生果比人被定性二級不雅!

! c9 K( W2 _9 u- }# R
http://www.xanga.com/cusp_07/590 ... 76362152636620.html' w2 t/ y$ @. c  \6 Y5 @' h( w
已經睇左幾期,性質傾向於性教育,同某報既果d嫖妓指南,差天共地9 P3 G+ |; ]- k2 j. b+ ^3 ^8 Q
搞成咁,都係兩個原因,第一係香港人係性方面真係好保守,探討下都唔得,第二係欺善怕惡,見係學生就恰你

chicken

Read the student post and find that it's not as evil as described by the media.* b) w2 ~% i% m0 f% s" |0 r6 S- D
Just some extreme-conservative people too nervous about it.

sakura310

Originally posted by d228216 at 2007-5-15 01:58 PM:0 h( J& W, d; R, [
有罪就要罸, 冇罪就要平反, 法庭應申張正義！
# D! V' Y7 D$ T& c. f9 p6 o  x0 S0 n! V( V
係咪大學生根本冇關係....大學生巴閉d?? 有免死金牌???. B. a2 K. {1 j2 S" I0 I. t
, b0 S& q+ p3 j0 A; ^
為自己既行為負責, 係今日既年青人最需要學習既野!

; B$ b, ~% h1 d, Z& `

+ @: Q7 r. B& ~+ _絕對支持啦
$ O; z5 J1 m7 n/ N6 P* M  S* E- T: B: s! H$ O/ \
有錯就認,打就企定
0 n# j* O0 R4 P5 C+ O1 R9 H) L
無錯當然要撐到底, s* a$ {- p, C' t; W
. C) g* O5 }1 I( N" E4 ~) r
但今次我覺得係班大學生唔0岩8 q. g2 z7 ~6 L7 j" q3 O( q

3 Z4 Q3 ^4 ~; Z; v在發佈一份公眾讀物時,內容應該注意下,唔同私人交談,你講咩都得* u* ?0 T. P9 x  h" Y

# W* z" i+ _8 [一份公眾讀物係好有影響力
# `0 ~9 }; J: {6 M  `5 ?: H% T, ~1 c) _" {
我唔認為學校方今次要幫班學生$ }; w2 `( {6 e2 Y; H
. v& q. q( R* Y
唔通第時出到去做野做錯事就有亞head幫你頂?
6 H9 ]- z) S# W% f  @! x
" ^1 P- p- ]7 I* d. g, w我唔認為lor4 J3 j; W2 W/ O  R  p
4 ]- I5 I8 q  n, a0 z3 q# F
唔係話要整死佢地  s8 M2 H  K6 B0 q4 _

) q: \, k1 S' s( A  s$ f. L而係今次件事,如果判得成的話,自然起到警惕作用
. E* {' }8 j; C& r8 {: H3 i9 Z, L9 A1 E! ~) u+ w  w# ?* X
我覺得係d人將言論自由ge範圍放得太大% ]) R! o1 Y; x1 l

$ e; i+ {/ b' U# t; l* x有d野係應該講,有d野係唔應該係公眾場合講的2 e6 t6 r# j/ O) s! X; F
  [, Y) h6 E/ z. j2 a
唔係話唔應該講就係防礙言論自由
' s/ K% u; e& f+ ^" T4 |+ u% z  W/ i' `
大家都知偷錢搶錢係唔唔法,唔通咁又話政府防礙你搵錢?

浪子

睇完, 真係冇野好講, 咁所有中小學性教育書籍都可以列做不雅

hackenli

一日一金句& f4 Z0 T1 _6 [( y
"佢地有比一般市民較高o既學歷,就更應該能夠明辨是非"
. l* X7 V' v2 K0 d5 Y3 c. E+ Y% R  V( y4 ^, A# p; ^* F
我們的大學生1 l0 f) p. Y. r$ M. C

* H) H5 [1 o; O- f
" s( i9 ?% y$ m& s
6 z- g) v; ^0 ^! U8 j, y+ R2 g% \7 J, G  d! C, f: E5 J- P4 f2 a

Originally posted by easy_man at 2007-5-15 02:13 PM:! Y3 q6 S8 ~6 r# D; O/ X1 t/ Q8 _

) Y% ?& d: N% U6 `3 a' d' l5 q" f$ b) U
有見地 !!!% D: O2 ~3 j4 T$ t% {' {
現今大學生部份以為...

vv1668vv

反映大學生對法律認知不足。自以為是

支持者

http://www.xanga.com/cusp_07/590 ... 76362152636620.html
; d  l, E- `, \) }% ?4 f+ |1 n$ Q8 H0 F( U& h5 X! F" L0 ?$ Z- {
I think the content is rather premature, i.e. not a porn stuff compare with some HK newspapers. 6 o" C& f% G: w8 m$ T
I never think of any porn or sexual stuff after the reading, but just have some moment to retreat the social life in mind. 6 V6 ]) ?; P9 g
I pretty sad that about the University official.
5 a4 g* D$ N0 }; [" u& g5 hIt's them making the stuff worse.

bigfish

我覺得份報刊以市井中文刊出就顯得不雅, 如果轉用華麗英文刊登就乜事都冇 la
' w- x& \3 Q5 g8 [
1 v- b1 T: Z! R, y9 K+ O[ Last edited by bigfish on 2007-5-15 at 05:26 PM ]

mailcool7

有錯就認,打就企定

155220

Originally posted by bigfish at 2007-5-15 17:24:
1 [- [4 a! h2 d" S* g; b1 P( g- s4 x我覺得份報刊以市井中文刊出就顯得不雅, 如果轉用華麗英文刊登就乜事都冇 la. j# a$ I* O" {1 \. f8 @- L  y( p

! {* O5 c1 K1 t5 z. B/ u[ Last edited by bigfish on 2007-5-15 at 05:26 PM ]

; {- Q/ @6 V3 g4 Y- ^" B4 t0 N
+ x8 m; i  K/ @  |$ B5 z兩者有何分別?7 n% T+ V5 U3 q6 Y" |! u- _; U
中文就市井,英文就華麗,有咩根據?