奪命老妖

Originally posted by seafireson2 at 2007-5-15 02:29 PM:
( Z8 x; |' C) w! \& g% O9 Z) K8 \/ Y6 {( o! ], `  K. U
agree,& N* m2 h5 c5 |8 ~" H
我都未睇過,根本唔知係點,可能真係討論成份為主,  D) n' f3 A" n4 F
但我估同方向生果比,係小兒科,
' c, |  E! L8 j9 p9 c期盼方向生果比人被定性二級不雅!

% Y/ x3 [; z' ?) G  E' Z( t
http://www.xanga.com/cusp_07/590 ... 76362152636620.html
5 A( y) J8 J9 H7 u( X1 n已經睇左幾期,性質傾向於性教育,同某報既果d嫖妓指南,差天共地
$ z# y) l2 a; [6 V% w搞成咁,都係兩個原因,第一係香港人係性方面真係好保守,探討下都唔得,第二係欺善怕惡,見係學生就恰你

chicken

Read the student post and find that it's not as evil as described by the media.
8 c7 m. P6 s2 T" ?* jJust some extreme-conservative people too nervous about it.

sakura310

Originally posted by d228216 at 2007-5-15 01:58 PM:
- |8 T" t2 {% H1 Z2 n( C! `; V有罪就要罸, 冇罪就要平反, 法庭應申張正義！ 1 T! |" g4 a2 {& K: O9 r& V' `& u
( w; p" n: |) Y$ q6 ^
係咪大學生根本冇關係....大學生巴閉d?? 有免死金牌???
; m! X% u& m( U0 B% I% t; Q1 c- l* ~# Y# k* j, M1 \, m6 u# g% I0 O
為自己既行為負責, 係今日既年青人最需要學習既野!

/ w" _2 t2 g% M) a7 S' l
( i2 C+ u* d, ~* {4 S! M$ G絕對支持啦5 [1 W0 E5 m8 p9 L+ \$ C( m0 G

3 r( E6 f. t4 U有錯就認,打就企定
3 v1 m% |7 f  L4 n) \
5 m  h: k( `: l) ^! c2 |6 d無錯當然要撐到底
- f( P9 H5 i( n1 Q
. n8 R6 }# v( V2 g2 a) P但今次我覺得係班大學生唔0岩
9 i! R4 [; J& }  ^  |, s" \: d
6 o% E- }- |5 X' }# K在發佈一份公眾讀物時,內容應該注意下,唔同私人交談,你講咩都得
9 X6 ~* [; {+ j/ u+ f
* l0 K7 r4 I5 s! @  G: x' a一份公眾讀物係好有影響力
2 {- D3 _. g7 P. w' w% Y5 ]/ b
/ s8 ^& @( f* D* l4 O% G我唔認為學校方今次要幫班學生
3 o( f- T% c5 k, \  U* r) s2 f; i$ C
唔通第時出到去做野做錯事就有亞head幫你頂?  E0 Z) Z' \  u) V) I5 L3 r: |
& q* l5 F$ V" A. D( x; d2 V( h) Q
我唔認為lor
" A/ Z5 M* {7 L  T3 U' D+ a
% K7 K" y3 D- h9 i% p唔係話要整死佢地
4 b, ~7 q) U8 v- o5 n
8 R$ l( o6 w7 `2 p9 r5 V' Y而係今次件事,如果判得成的話,自然起到警惕作用
7 U) D5 C* A' [$ t. G, B/ C4 Y' r! E1 Y* ^, j1 b6 _7 r# f2 D  ?
我覺得係d人將言論自由ge範圍放得太大3 l, V- z% j+ t) R# ?8 u

* L  D5 x3 t" Q有d野係應該講,有d野係唔應該係公眾場合講的
9 m6 j; \7 Y7 a3 x: D; \+ ?2 _) @
9 l* L4 }. Z6 _( P唔係話唔應該講就係防礙言論自由. l. f3 V5 g* o
7 a$ w/ O7 X+ {6 ?, B
大家都知偷錢搶錢係唔唔法,唔通咁又話政府防礙你搵錢?

浪子

睇完, 真係冇野好講, 咁所有中小學性教育書籍都可以列做不雅

hackenli

一日一金句
7 D, X6 L4 f! A"佢地有比一般市民較高o既學歷,就更應該能夠明辨是非"
' G+ X$ j1 c3 I% r
7 J( J' T* X2 p+ Z我們的大學生
; {8 n; z( P9 z% G
9 z8 Q. g, N( _. L( H1 P8 ]! V+ S: v9 V( e  t6 ~# I( k  r: P

  e; C/ w/ u$ Z/ D1 l5 o
9 C& s1 `6 I+ Y% Q+ G

Originally posted by easy_man at 2007-5-15 02:13 PM:
* L% R# H9 A6 j! I0 I+ G
1 S( G$ l- o- \3 M0 C" U
; `: C3 q. b6 h  T有見地 !!!
8 n, _8 p* s7 e" ~6 n現今大學生部份以為...

vv1668vv

反映大學生對法律認知不足。自以為是

支持者

http://www.xanga.com/cusp_07/590 ... 76362152636620.html
( s  B+ F  W8 q, Z- {+ U
+ @7 I$ ~6 N6 S% l6 l5 wI think the content is rather premature, i.e. not a porn stuff compare with some HK newspapers.
, D  a* H1 }; O. r: m9 gI never think of any porn or sexual stuff after the reading, but just have some moment to retreat the social life in mind.
8 @0 w% f; j" y% mI pretty sad that about the University official.
0 m: r/ c( r5 M  ?It's them making the stuff worse.

bigfish

我覺得份報刊以市井中文刊出就顯得不雅, 如果轉用華麗英文刊登就乜事都冇 la# X! a/ z, s. G6 s2 e

- T% [2 ]9 i# m2 m$ a$ L[ Last edited by bigfish on 2007-5-15 at 05:26 PM ]

mailcool7

有錯就認,打就企定

155220

Originally posted by bigfish at 2007-5-15 17:24:
- d. z% }& M, d! O7 |2 t我覺得份報刊以市井中文刊出就顯得不雅, 如果轉用華麗英文刊登就乜事都冇 la3 i; V, h* z+ j' E' c. _# t2 h4 d6 F

5 K* L9 U, P2 d: e8 u+ |' E3 q3 u[ Last edited by bigfish on 2007-5-15 at 05:26 PM ]

8 I7 q$ r: x* K- U8 G3 P! M' z

0 P" \+ E/ Z# |! U& V' t: ?兩者有何分別?# g: F3 I) z4 L3 Y/ h' D; f- l
中文就市井,英文就華麗,有咩根據?