奪命老妖

Originally posted by seafireson2 at 2007-5-15 02:29 PM:
4 X# C  ]3 b, ~6 }" Q/ j
$ [6 f  b+ s0 f4 Nagree,  T6 u! n' Q. ]3 [8 p( p
我都未睇過,根本唔知係點,可能真係討論成份為主,
/ W  P& U* X/ Y% F但我估同方向生果比,係小兒科,
: \  N" ^$ r1 ?% |5 d  l. p期盼方向生果比人被定性二級不雅!

& i  d# V) X- E3 J  Z0 G
http://www.xanga.com/cusp_07/590 ... 76362152636620.html
, Q) B& E8 o1 h6 D. F已經睇左幾期,性質傾向於性教育,同某報既果d嫖妓指南,差天共地
. c. Q/ L+ `( g搞成咁,都係兩個原因,第一係香港人係性方面真係好保守,探討下都唔得,第二係欺善怕惡,見係學生就恰你

chicken

Read the student post and find that it's not as evil as described by the media.
/ e- j0 t' B# ], R* v# yJust some extreme-conservative people too nervous about it.

sakura310

Originally posted by d228216 at 2007-5-15 01:58 PM:
3 A- S8 b& E" \% D! [+ `有罪就要罸, 冇罪就要平反, 法庭應申張正義！   @' w8 j: |9 o8 S( o9 D' n+ ~8 @
" M9 k0 R( y7 {. M
係咪大學生根本冇關係....大學生巴閉d?? 有免死金牌???) Z, d& R7 w- _

- A# ~2 @5 u! F/ ^% A1 R為自己既行為負責, 係今日既年青人最需要學習既野!

( N0 l% M: r* n. U- l1 O  }
& q! c1 s5 u8 r* A# \( K5 s% l. G
絕對支持啦3 E& L& B$ {0 @. T9 c

# ~  I$ Q! c8 z有錯就認,打就企定
  G& v9 F: V0 _3 ]4 `
% m* B1 J) K% G無錯當然要撐到底& y! ]; A5 w, n; R# X3 r0 O

7 C" M! I) @( k! S! P% V5 ~2 `但今次我覺得係班大學生唔0岩; E# y0 X2 Y  e* ?
* k, B& S8 V% ^  ?& O# ^. h3 Q% R, x8 A
在發佈一份公眾讀物時,內容應該注意下,唔同私人交談,你講咩都得4 k& A5 w+ D2 g) @
. r. Z6 y1 Z) E. ^' G7 w/ b8 W
一份公眾讀物係好有影響力
+ q6 Z0 v0 J/ l! s9 p
6 m. G1 i  X# S' k我唔認為學校方今次要幫班學生4 w6 S" b2 s, c" y/ l# F2 ~' d8 M
4 N$ v2 l  j( @8 z5 c) f
唔通第時出到去做野做錯事就有亞head幫你頂?
& T% R7 [3 R: i" ^, c1 t; v% O0 d8 @3 E" H# \0 q
我唔認為lor
$ s; a% `3 @6 E* ~# A: N7 N6 ~0 T9 ]% g5 F1 r/ t
唔係話要整死佢地
+ t+ K7 }! V: k, K0 p3 S
9 C' T& @9 q+ V" y0 ^, X$ q而係今次件事,如果判得成的話,自然起到警惕作用
6 I9 R0 w$ o) a9 \: \9 @4 D
  h. J! _; j/ t( q; o我覺得係d人將言論自由ge範圍放得太大' y0 @" Y: O/ \& A

; F$ l  Y7 p7 u4 B有d野係應該講,有d野係唔應該係公眾場合講的5 a2 ?3 x8 v0 p# G6 v' V
& K1 d8 y: H1 R* J  i* I) F
唔係話唔應該講就係防礙言論自由+ `+ f; N' @: v$ m# c

* o- L4 ~5 T9 ~5 ~  o' T大家都知偷錢搶錢係唔唔法,唔通咁又話政府防礙你搵錢?

浪子

睇完, 真係冇野好講, 咁所有中小學性教育書籍都可以列做不雅

hackenli

一日一金句
8 D) k+ l# ?; m9 M/ y"佢地有比一般市民較高o既學歷,就更應該能夠明辨是非"
$ ^' s; X6 L3 M& D" t) g1 s) W6 p; z- {; z+ ~' {
我們的大學生/ P6 s; ?1 O/ y; p( `6 Z. z

; C, W# t2 P  v5 X/ k
- [" ]+ X9 ^0 _
; |  z  ]1 [; `# ?( l1 o2 v& B# [$ _

Originally posted by easy_man at 2007-5-15 02:13 PM:
; t$ `3 H( u: O( P/ q! |) H2 b/ n5 F( s1 e
& C) `1 g" ^- S' {8 ?5 u
有見地 !!!
# v" _! k. i: T% y現今大學生部份以為...

vv1668vv

反映大學生對法律認知不足。自以為是

支持者

http://www.xanga.com/cusp_07/590 ... 76362152636620.html
/ ]9 q! U. d/ W' h1 |9 T+ M5 S* s
3 ~) e# \. D# |; J( E! A' EI think the content is rather premature, i.e. not a porn stuff compare with some HK newspapers.
/ u( Z( B5 R+ R2 b5 P; s3 z8 b1 mI never think of any porn or sexual stuff after the reading, but just have some moment to retreat the social life in mind. & i8 u# F  m3 I4 \3 B
I pretty sad that about the University official.5 s( }5 Q9 B+ X0 F: {
It's them making the stuff worse.

bigfish

我覺得份報刊以市井中文刊出就顯得不雅, 如果轉用華麗英文刊登就乜事都冇 la3 F9 u7 T' B* o) h" s% _

7 P; h* G: G7 `) [* L[ Last edited by bigfish on 2007-5-15 at 05:26 PM ]

mailcool7

有錯就認,打就企定

155220

Originally posted by bigfish at 2007-5-15 17:24:# v+ R4 L8 l' T) U
我覺得份報刊以市井中文刊出就顯得不雅, 如果轉用華麗英文刊登就乜事都冇 la4 ^9 q/ p0 @" ~; @+ z
4 R2 W/ N6 b  `
[ Last edited by bigfish on 2007-5-15 at 05:26 PM ]

7 x$ P5 h2 m1 T9 u
, I  I, C6 N4 m9 E1 N# ~) z
兩者有何分別?
( ]4 Z9 P5 s; ?& _, s6 j中文就市井,英文就華麗,有咩根據?