奪命老妖

Originally posted by seafireson2 at 2007-5-15 02:29 PM:* ]' ^: n3 z6 S+ i6 w( A2 T
/ D+ F  o, |; u2 U6 |
agree,% R2 W/ D; e- C* ~& E
我都未睇過,根本唔知係點,可能真係討論成份為主,, B5 F# ?7 Q% e$ r3 b6 o: p
但我估同方向生果比,係小兒科,
" p/ i: m/ u+ s# D0 \$ r期盼方向生果比人被定性二級不雅!

8 ~; Q4 T6 X4 L9 x) Uhttp://www.xanga.com/cusp_07/590 ... 76362152636620.html
. R* Z6 u" K/ E; f( L. G3 w: Z已經睇左幾期,性質傾向於性教育,同某報既果d嫖妓指南,差天共地  I& Q& ^$ X) T3 P. c* s9 b6 m
搞成咁,都係兩個原因,第一係香港人係性方面真係好保守,探討下都唔得,第二係欺善怕惡,見係學生就恰你

chicken

Read the student post and find that it's not as evil as described by the media.
+ P/ d" c! f$ y' J, _, LJust some extreme-conservative people too nervous about it.

sakura310

Originally posted by d228216 at 2007-5-15 01:58 PM:
) y5 r& I9 x& Q有罪就要罸, 冇罪就要平反, 法庭應申張正義！ ; ~- B7 O$ W- [

" t3 r# a0 Q/ O, _0 P3 o( o7 t8 K係咪大學生根本冇關係....大學生巴閉d?? 有免死金牌???
" K+ c% N/ f1 [! l9 t! K6 Z
, @: t: @  Q" ~, m& @. G為自己既行為負責, 係今日既年青人最需要學習既野!

) _4 ~9 F! K2 ]. K; ^. N1 y2 B$ z( R. k$ S
絕對支持啦
, m( ^6 J' {/ S  r% s) \, m9 H- u8 k' A* O* k
有錯就認,打就企定
( P% }: \, j8 b: X6 o  P% U( S
無錯當然要撐到底3 y" N) p4 y5 ]$ P2 W
$ {; m9 s1 Y' c* u8 o
但今次我覺得係班大學生唔0岩/ L' L; d) b6 \$ E4 u0 [
* r. @2 B& K8 r  M- i
在發佈一份公眾讀物時,內容應該注意下,唔同私人交談,你講咩都得; D$ y) R3 i" g( L: S5 U% y
3 ]" ]* F; m- j7 t2 _/ z0 @' h6 k7 ]
一份公眾讀物係好有影響力+ Z4 J) M- B- m* K2 G" Z

- }% m( o* ]/ _: _# D+ j我唔認為學校方今次要幫班學生
# \  q" b, J4 A0 @8 k) N  y9 k4 ~" H4 a5 x
唔通第時出到去做野做錯事就有亞head幫你頂?& N6 f3 F2 Q1 [  L# y; R

% G2 w  k! m9 W- {) ]/ o我唔認為lor
% |' X1 l+ R. f, @% ^
# A3 F  e( d, S$ V唔係話要整死佢地
# e* \4 U+ I9 u7 V2 p" W. R  ]. Z6 g
' J% w. W  d. N而係今次件事,如果判得成的話,自然起到警惕作用
7 x! G+ B; d7 T0 e; c3 A. Y
6 ]7 A1 {# V# ^4 ~& T3 B! m我覺得係d人將言論自由ge範圍放得太大
! y8 b0 L) {* G0 \9 q" g6 Y% I- ~/ D, F6 s9 I' Q1 p
有d野係應該講,有d野係唔應該係公眾場合講的
& C& o6 E4 P( x& e
1 B1 e) ]% B% G( g/ p3 A唔係話唔應該講就係防礙言論自由
4 N, m; o% \- C2 ?* A4 u
0 x5 `5 e+ Y' N; ?# p大家都知偷錢搶錢係唔唔法,唔通咁又話政府防礙你搵錢?

浪子

睇完, 真係冇野好講, 咁所有中小學性教育書籍都可以列做不雅

hackenli

一日一金句2 w, \' S: F6 ?# S, `. E0 {
"佢地有比一般市民較高o既學歷,就更應該能夠明辨是非"+ G8 F, ^% Y  K( W9 E
. C7 v, c1 G, H; Q+ @$ c/ b
我們的大學生5 L. O! [9 V" O! g4 K# G/ `* }( J
7 X( r3 J# ?6 R+ l

3 F1 G3 @. S" L* W
( k: p- {2 W% N0 {; K3 J
9 H6 x! a' D5 Z2 Z

Originally posted by easy_man at 2007-5-15 02:13 PM:8 w7 i$ n1 l. C. l* g. S! d

) W# N1 ^8 Y# A: A; g
: c( V: f; `( V有見地 !!!4 C1 k0 O* T9 I
現今大學生部份以為...

vv1668vv

反映大學生對法律認知不足。自以為是

支持者

http://www.xanga.com/cusp_07/590 ... 76362152636620.html* @) \- I( k9 {. h( J/ A6 S7 [3 q6 z

+ J- y7 }% z4 W7 KI think the content is rather premature, i.e. not a porn stuff compare with some HK newspapers. 3 n; X* ^4 T: ?, a/ M) a
I never think of any porn or sexual stuff after the reading, but just have some moment to retreat the social life in mind.
  ~( s) f" I- r' f- X$ E$ v# [I pretty sad that about the University official.& q. k% ~. g' G  O
It's them making the stuff worse.

bigfish

我覺得份報刊以市井中文刊出就顯得不雅, 如果轉用華麗英文刊登就乜事都冇 la9 l) q& n4 s/ K( _& t
( A1 S! ^: `* c
[ Last edited by bigfish on 2007-5-15 at 05:26 PM ]

mailcool7

有錯就認,打就企定

155220

Originally posted by bigfish at 2007-5-15 17:24:
" ^( q7 u2 e: Q( g; x0 E我覺得份報刊以市井中文刊出就顯得不雅, 如果轉用華麗英文刊登就乜事都冇 la
# {. x0 {3 |6 [5 K- b8 T
  E2 t5 o& p+ d; u7 M) ?[ Last edited by bigfish on 2007-5-15 at 05:26 PM ]

5 r# D2 L& d  Z2 }$ d6 H3 Q7 @6 K" {* Q
! M. n; W+ Z1 Y& C兩者有何分別?2 _; \2 _3 j7 ?0 I
中文就市井,英文就華麗,有咩根據?