奪命老妖

Originally posted by seafireson2 at 2007-5-15 02:29 PM:
0 B' f& g# p  a0 u
/ b) C( G( `0 R3 v& u$ ~" }agree,2 T: }, G% W; ^5 l
我都未睇過,根本唔知係點,可能真係討論成份為主,4 ]4 a) @% ^4 r
但我估同方向生果比,係小兒科," }8 K3 r: t5 R  N# L$ J* Q! O/ K# F
期盼方向生果比人被定性二級不雅!

+ J! P4 {$ s. _# P, `/ v0 R( phttp://www.xanga.com/cusp_07/590 ... 76362152636620.html
8 U  T; F! ^5 ]- f已經睇左幾期,性質傾向於性教育,同某報既果d嫖妓指南,差天共地
9 T! b0 W2 t& ]: }搞成咁,都係兩個原因,第一係香港人係性方面真係好保守,探討下都唔得,第二係欺善怕惡,見係學生就恰你

chicken

Read the student post and find that it's not as evil as described by the media.
! L$ H* c  d5 h% b3 \8 kJust some extreme-conservative people too nervous about it.

sakura310

Originally posted by d228216 at 2007-5-15 01:58 PM:$ c9 F* Z6 W1 j2 N! U/ u6 z# P, |) P
有罪就要罸, 冇罪就要平反, 法庭應申張正義！
' I7 z) v* x7 k. P: O! @/ J" \8 s8 C% Q$ |, A  K! l! I" [6 ~
係咪大學生根本冇關係....大學生巴閉d?? 有免死金牌???  A# o8 X6 H) b

6 B) ]+ _8 a2 @* ?% o8 x4 o為自己既行為負責, 係今日既年青人最需要學習既野!

* y' n+ D8 L  |/ ~- \# c% I
$ R; e  o+ z" l& S
絕對支持啦, ?, S2 u. [. j5 Q, e/ j

) g2 z- G/ @5 P9 u3 p9 i有錯就認,打就企定
' ?2 d+ {6 K9 [+ _" t
6 a! D$ N2 t6 n* ^1 h無錯當然要撐到底
$ E8 n$ s7 ^. p9 y5 U1 p# X1 O* l! ^0 h4 ^8 t* n' E% K
但今次我覺得係班大學生唔0岩' {5 C' o* s7 C
4 k; @0 ~& o9 U" ]
在發佈一份公眾讀物時,內容應該注意下,唔同私人交談,你講咩都得) L# q4 N: A3 o

( @4 f+ {3 ~0 j" s/ {  g& m. O" ]一份公眾讀物係好有影響力
( \8 R+ z" h. Y9 y1 R0 q
: P0 @1 d* o6 |* l7 u" d我唔認為學校方今次要幫班學生
% q4 G' z' k* w7 O7 [, a9 k4 I9 Y; W5 F  }4 U
唔通第時出到去做野做錯事就有亞head幫你頂?5 W- l7 W0 \& E9 ]1 m" i
0 u+ x% @4 p( T: O; `( ^1 Z
我唔認為lor
# S7 n) L  C9 @/ Z' e  z* ?5 s# l9 P
唔係話要整死佢地$ q/ V/ h3 T" q0 g1 E5 I2 U- G9 x
$ p  F2 S' S0 O+ C
而係今次件事,如果判得成的話,自然起到警惕作用
! q5 N. N3 ^+ x& m! }8 A, p' s) t+ F8 `7 e/ J
我覺得係d人將言論自由ge範圍放得太大! |, @( L, m+ G! {% U4 m

# V( p) g8 F" A有d野係應該講,有d野係唔應該係公眾場合講的( Z# G2 L8 i' L, n5 a+ |
- c1 M! K9 U& ]+ r, i8 s& [
唔係話唔應該講就係防礙言論自由
4 g  t$ }$ Q! x9 c, G% g& {+ J: _$ F. Z) r) F3 Y8 s
大家都知偷錢搶錢係唔唔法,唔通咁又話政府防礙你搵錢?

浪子

睇完, 真係冇野好講, 咁所有中小學性教育書籍都可以列做不雅

hackenli

一日一金句! A- u  Z; @2 W: ]8 I' U1 V
"佢地有比一般市民較高o既學歷,就更應該能夠明辨是非"0 w$ w1 K' E5 J
0 ^- p% N$ }" w; U
我們的大學生( q* l5 W9 D* \' {! a# I8 M

; f; q1 Q" j- l% L5 A
7 R, X, q4 x% i) k/ g1 ~  J, U* U3 }% f8 e/ ~+ ]) m, b
: R! T/ w# E" R- L  u

Originally posted by easy_man at 2007-5-15 02:13 PM:
# p. H8 _  D1 @7 _% T
: s, z2 K- v. J; [5 q. z9 i1 G: b6 t3 W( g- p
有見地 !!!6 R) S# g( T# n- W; j
現今大學生部份以為...

vv1668vv

反映大學生對法律認知不足。自以為是

支持者

http://www.xanga.com/cusp_07/590 ... 76362152636620.html
$ h' X3 }# J9 `( |  f# l6 o
! c  Q& _- f  YI think the content is rather premature, i.e. not a porn stuff compare with some HK newspapers.
. P! I5 l) o5 t2 SI never think of any porn or sexual stuff after the reading, but just have some moment to retreat the social life in mind. , o3 h! d6 ?4 D( x4 R  I
I pretty sad that about the University official.
- `7 x' A0 G: F8 O0 @  E) CIt's them making the stuff worse.

bigfish

我覺得份報刊以市井中文刊出就顯得不雅, 如果轉用華麗英文刊登就乜事都冇 la
' B# q' q+ n; o& z2 K* L" U+ J
9 |7 }$ ]2 @; J4 f& `[ Last edited by bigfish on 2007-5-15 at 05:26 PM ]

mailcool7

有錯就認,打就企定

155220

Originally posted by bigfish at 2007-5-15 17:24:
5 z% F8 C- ]2 c3 [我覺得份報刊以市井中文刊出就顯得不雅, 如果轉用華麗英文刊登就乜事都冇 la
+ d, g0 _6 H1 ]- J! f7 `6 k5 a* f) Z, o9 j- L7 r
[ Last edited by bigfish on 2007-5-15 at 05:26 PM ]

% F* S+ }7 Q) L8 {& ?+ y; ~6 l& `6 W  F0 S* y+ o' Y
兩者有何分別?' X- Y% K0 o2 p+ z/ l; d" g2 V
中文就市井,英文就華麗,有咩根據?