奪命老妖

Originally posted by seafireson2 at 2007-5-15 02:29 PM:; F. [' g& ^4 f7 a/ B& {/ b

3 Q  R% r: I1 sagree,
( ~" Y! [" N8 a我都未睇過,根本唔知係點,可能真係討論成份為主,
9 Q% l9 Y# e/ |0 |* S: u但我估同方向生果比,係小兒科,2 Y6 q0 J8 Z8 K0 ?7 V
期盼方向生果比人被定性二級不雅!

; i/ Y0 c" A' B8 J7 G* I8 E
http://www.xanga.com/cusp_07/590 ... 76362152636620.html
7 C  I. v$ ~, M2 g3 E. B+ _) ]已經睇左幾期,性質傾向於性教育,同某報既果d嫖妓指南,差天共地
8 {: r. ]1 C* o/ ^( g1 K' O搞成咁,都係兩個原因,第一係香港人係性方面真係好保守,探討下都唔得,第二係欺善怕惡,見係學生就恰你

chicken

Read the student post and find that it's not as evil as described by the media.
$ a9 R2 G& X1 H" v' hJust some extreme-conservative people too nervous about it.

sakura310

Originally posted by d228216 at 2007-5-15 01:58 PM:1 d- U0 O1 i+ H! x0 q4 T0 W
有罪就要罸, 冇罪就要平反, 法庭應申張正義！
4 E4 F3 i' E! b" }, |' H. u$ O0 K, x5 N4 F1 i
係咪大學生根本冇關係....大學生巴閉d?? 有免死金牌???! }4 ^) {5 U1 X9 a
- |. L$ c0 o5 J- ?- h
為自己既行為負責, 係今日既年青人最需要學習既野!

5 t  J  H+ T8 i* m
+ E4 y% T. |# G& h$ H) k# M! v絕對支持啦/ T) Y2 Z8 ^" n+ z

% Q. \0 t) p$ [8 O" D有錯就認,打就企定; ?# E# D: K6 n3 p

1 g: D# N2 l, D+ ]2 ^無錯當然要撐到底
6 Q) Q; L% S4 `* [: f
) T# i8 |8 C' Z5 B+ H但今次我覺得係班大學生唔0岩( t) D+ {# Q8 \9 K7 p
$ P* Q+ i0 T" V, E% @: c2 w
在發佈一份公眾讀物時,內容應該注意下,唔同私人交談,你講咩都得
, v# g( V7 z+ R6 u
6 a6 z) S: _  \$ F- ?" I一份公眾讀物係好有影響力
+ F( Z! g8 I6 b% J1 t9 n
2 y8 M+ H+ b( z我唔認為學校方今次要幫班學生
4 e! R# c" O, M3 O7 n8 s
7 q4 F. [  d, `8 C4 g唔通第時出到去做野做錯事就有亞head幫你頂?
6 Q- b) G# R' c5 z. V1 }" S' W& F
# j. l2 t+ l% {) {9 q  {- U8 O我唔認為lor
2 G7 \9 S) c! a. ]( s# C0 H+ i7 e/ O# L
唔係話要整死佢地
: X, t4 V; ]# _% v
1 `' l, c* M7 E, U) o6 }1 R) W而係今次件事,如果判得成的話,自然起到警惕作用
8 e! E8 K3 ~. i- N) F6 O, z
8 X3 W) ^8 n9 k# R/ ^5 K* K5 S我覺得係d人將言論自由ge範圍放得太大0 B. C* a; q3 f& u, h1 Y- o

' f/ X4 s/ S2 K, {. f有d野係應該講,有d野係唔應該係公眾場合講的* G- d4 D* j: |) t) F$ Z' W, Z
% e, M; Q! v9 n
唔係話唔應該講就係防礙言論自由
* q& \* ^- n2 @
; w* W! A5 ~4 g" ?$ N0 K大家都知偷錢搶錢係唔唔法,唔通咁又話政府防礙你搵錢?

浪子

睇完, 真係冇野好講, 咁所有中小學性教育書籍都可以列做不雅

hackenli

一日一金句
0 B  F- J7 z3 H- |4 l: ]' T- ["佢地有比一般市民較高o既學歷,就更應該能夠明辨是非"
; G( P+ x5 j" o+ j0 T
' b: k* ?! w& s4 a8 [6 T" j我們的大學生# v3 Y; M, }, i) R; `: _% P# j
, R& s2 J0 }# M: a( C$ s6 G
' _7 i# s3 C4 k1 B0 F! y* ~$ X, P: M5 N
; y0 S% P) ~' Q
) C8 h7 g/ ]& V6 R* f

Originally posted by easy_man at 2007-5-15 02:13 PM:& S8 r" P! f. _* D. A' S
, E( d4 j) d! t, q/ N! J" _1 M

+ \# V4 M- a. l, {1 i/ r* C5 [有見地 !!!8 V* P: W6 @! C- r: N
現今大學生部份以為...

vv1668vv

反映大學生對法律認知不足。自以為是

支持者

http://www.xanga.com/cusp_07/590 ... 76362152636620.html
5 }; h5 T5 ]4 \: P) _. O, E: d* ^; W# @; H1 z
I think the content is rather premature, i.e. not a porn stuff compare with some HK newspapers. 9 {: l3 o  V. n6 T" p' C7 }# k
I never think of any porn or sexual stuff after the reading, but just have some moment to retreat the social life in mind.
6 Z+ U+ Z: F( @! {" OI pretty sad that about the University official.) J% w5 M5 K2 t7 X
It's them making the stuff worse.

bigfish

我覺得份報刊以市井中文刊出就顯得不雅, 如果轉用華麗英文刊登就乜事都冇 la
, y3 L# r' D6 W8 K# e  t5 W
2 R6 q# I) P" I8 ?[ Last edited by bigfish on 2007-5-15 at 05:26 PM ]

mailcool7

有錯就認,打就企定

155220

Originally posted by bigfish at 2007-5-15 17:24:, @" D( a9 F" U; l7 P; W4 F5 J
我覺得份報刊以市井中文刊出就顯得不雅, 如果轉用華麗英文刊登就乜事都冇 la
3 i8 a& @6 n& C  c$ q  Y* W9 K/ `
[ Last edited by bigfish on 2007-5-15 at 05:26 PM ]

$ D' I+ i2 f2 l. s. e% p' z! B* ~7 ~
; a3 `1 O; _; y, \0 ~% w: Z
兩者有何分別?
1 N' w: A+ v" q中文就市井,英文就華麗,有咩根據?