奪命老妖

Originally posted by seafireson2 at 2007-5-15 02:29 PM:2 O  V6 f6 r  u8 G# @1 M* `
- @7 v: u! P: g1 y) a
agree,* I9 i% ]5 |- |3 q  a
我都未睇過,根本唔知係點,可能真係討論成份為主,1 C4 {- D9 H2 ?0 }/ V2 n
但我估同方向生果比,係小兒科,3 I: `+ }! Q+ W8 Z" [% q
期盼方向生果比人被定性二級不雅!

' k) [  D6 B0 c2 d" uhttp://www.xanga.com/cusp_07/590 ... 76362152636620.html
2 a  l! F5 B% w8 B" a* q已經睇左幾期,性質傾向於性教育,同某報既果d嫖妓指南,差天共地
8 B% |7 `4 ^' h: s搞成咁,都係兩個原因,第一係香港人係性方面真係好保守,探討下都唔得,第二係欺善怕惡,見係學生就恰你

chicken

Read the student post and find that it's not as evil as described by the media.' ^3 _9 r- F3 r
Just some extreme-conservative people too nervous about it.

sakura310

Originally posted by d228216 at 2007-5-15 01:58 PM:) h* E* n, t: a3 _5 u$ L
有罪就要罸, 冇罪就要平反, 法庭應申張正義！ 7 q- x: P% b1 O8 o! o  B
7 H( x8 u; @6 I# \0 Q
係咪大學生根本冇關係....大學生巴閉d?? 有免死金牌???
6 v$ x8 V& @3 V
* ?: L6 J! F: m, s為自己既行為負責, 係今日既年青人最需要學習既野!

8 h: Z  H! A! n4 Z% Y

  B& q/ O0 w$ v  J+ o絕對支持啦6 o$ l9 P; C; k! p' _8 F# [( V/ X

2 z, r% W, I, V+ Z4 I- W' W# a( G有錯就認,打就企定
& K) Q' l! s& O/ ^8 y8 }" ?' G+ q7 X' |  X# q# R
無錯當然要撐到底1 V8 `+ ~# \( n, z4 r: Z

" {9 j4 C$ a$ W0 T- g$ T# Q. G3 o但今次我覺得係班大學生唔0岩6 S1 T& p( m# f

% c4 A3 |- F) M+ D6 X& |5 Y( R1 O在發佈一份公眾讀物時,內容應該注意下,唔同私人交談,你講咩都得& _! Y, J1 k7 {8 |

: B9 i7 k+ x. W# X! p& x一份公眾讀物係好有影響力
8 a) `' T0 r  G6 ~7 H
4 Q2 K0 x+ {% Y% n2 E4 {% J, S) K我唔認為學校方今次要幫班學生
4 e+ I' u( b; Q( ?8 _
5 [5 [' h1 v0 y* g唔通第時出到去做野做錯事就有亞head幫你頂?
  X3 v; R+ C2 h( t5 E: G/ y4 _8 i' n! b- a, y6 R* l
我唔認為lor5 P: p  s! [: Q2 ]# d, |
( z, M& P' O. l
唔係話要整死佢地
% l* c. L7 w* [; z; M! u8 P! x6 l' l: A: ^0 C
而係今次件事,如果判得成的話,自然起到警惕作用2 g8 u2 p- {( u2 V7 S" i  p

, v& O8 @5 D# q我覺得係d人將言論自由ge範圍放得太大
5 q0 z8 F1 u$ g$ g' g/ N- a$ x2 D! A  `1 p+ v+ D; v8 a) H; ?
有d野係應該講,有d野係唔應該係公眾場合講的- f  X. W9 Q# f' d+ G, l
) L/ {5 B- ?! B( S
唔係話唔應該講就係防礙言論自由
3 f8 k8 A1 v5 J: g  @4 L: b1 N8 x2 T
& i4 O( D% a/ e( l. E& A大家都知偷錢搶錢係唔唔法,唔通咁又話政府防礙你搵錢?

浪子

睇完, 真係冇野好講, 咁所有中小學性教育書籍都可以列做不雅

hackenli

一日一金句
# q' w2 q2 t. H4 R# Q"佢地有比一般市民較高o既學歷,就更應該能夠明辨是非"
; A+ X+ k  M1 U  R9 S, \2 Y5 J! E  U3 ^( q9 q1 g3 e# @9 [
我們的大學生
7 ]2 t7 z9 M' Z% Q7 `/ d: [% u) O9 t. t
# U7 u) N6 _1 [' X; T5 y# ?4 I. |! T3 @6 T" e+ ]
9 O' C: j* |( b1 }
# p- z; b' w$ @& M( F# m4 z1 G

Originally posted by easy_man at 2007-5-15 02:13 PM:! B2 Z( e! |+ D2 j, M% t
" G! L; f3 B8 `# Q' @* V) C
5 k$ {' ~  @: {8 Z
有見地 !!!, E3 m/ y( y$ p
現今大學生部份以為...

vv1668vv

反映大學生對法律認知不足。自以為是

支持者

http://www.xanga.com/cusp_07/590 ... 76362152636620.html
- M* D. c% C+ w6 m/ \1 {' |, `0 i1 p7 }% L9 b( V  ]
I think the content is rather premature, i.e. not a porn stuff compare with some HK newspapers. ( w9 S) P! v& v; v. ^" P
I never think of any porn or sexual stuff after the reading, but just have some moment to retreat the social life in mind. , l' o6 t7 m  v& ^! Y
I pretty sad that about the University official.
3 u/ i7 f8 c; eIt's them making the stuff worse.

bigfish

我覺得份報刊以市井中文刊出就顯得不雅, 如果轉用華麗英文刊登就乜事都冇 la
3 {; }' R; _. P) f* f* R) W& z" x
. `- U) O6 s3 k% d% Q[ Last edited by bigfish on 2007-5-15 at 05:26 PM ]

mailcool7

有錯就認,打就企定

155220

Originally posted by bigfish at 2007-5-15 17:24:
0 R& P) C' ~' @' f0 \我覺得份報刊以市井中文刊出就顯得不雅, 如果轉用華麗英文刊登就乜事都冇 la
3 o# T: m7 E' t2 }4 b$ P- ]+ D* o* x& @
[ Last edited by bigfish on 2007-5-15 at 05:26 PM ]

9 S( G3 J4 M' h# m; z: N; ]) H3 \$ Q* N7 w% Q. R0 F5 B
兩者有何分別?6 c4 P2 n9 \7 b8 A6 V
中文就市井,英文就華麗,有咩根據?