奪命老妖

Originally posted by seafireson2 at 2007-5-15 02:29 PM:
, [+ W: n- q) O3 c  l  h( o* b2 b0 N
9 H) s  L+ m" ^+ m' iagree,
/ ?* g. l) m# W8 _我都未睇過,根本唔知係點,可能真係討論成份為主,/ y$ `; a- @* |( p, `
但我估同方向生果比,係小兒科,
1 t. ~" T* z" X: |9 j期盼方向生果比人被定性二級不雅!

7 Z4 H/ w- `& E& T; F5 x( T1 T: `
http://www.xanga.com/cusp_07/590 ... 76362152636620.html
4 Z) N  ?2 C4 U& P! m已經睇左幾期,性質傾向於性教育,同某報既果d嫖妓指南,差天共地
- `- T# |2 }7 w3 s: Z& [/ [搞成咁,都係兩個原因,第一係香港人係性方面真係好保守,探討下都唔得,第二係欺善怕惡,見係學生就恰你

chicken

Read the student post and find that it's not as evil as described by the media.
8 d8 W, T$ F9 {; v8 u, T# dJust some extreme-conservative people too nervous about it.

sakura310

Originally posted by d228216 at 2007-5-15 01:58 PM:
8 I8 _- |# f/ R$ a% l7 Z2 I: V有罪就要罸, 冇罪就要平反, 法庭應申張正義！
- |( Y# L, j7 G: Z/ r$ V
, p3 J" z! y9 B係咪大學生根本冇關係....大學生巴閉d?? 有免死金牌???5 L8 M' V0 j* f$ A- p! O9 x8 h- t

- v3 g2 h/ F5 K( R為自己既行為負責, 係今日既年青人最需要學習既野!

" u' _' {7 o+ T/ u2 ?. w$ @9 ]
9 n7 e/ w  f' [( z! a
絕對支持啦
. Z! Z  }% T# }
1 k) s/ f" q  b  V4 Z  Q0 V% |- j* u- V有錯就認,打就企定
3 V7 ]. k7 B/ ]8 y* s, d' H2 m
8 C3 T1 Q2 R0 X! u9 ^4 {/ c" q無錯當然要撐到底
% B& n  V6 m9 u$ y% U" G$ G# [( }; I. g) }7 I  x
但今次我覺得係班大學生唔0岩; v$ E- u% r% r& Z
$ u+ Y( c- t4 u' L
在發佈一份公眾讀物時,內容應該注意下,唔同私人交談,你講咩都得
2 V9 {9 m/ N8 I( S/ J; z8 ~) j# F$ G4 O: N0 W. O! s* ?( O
一份公眾讀物係好有影響力1 r. w* C/ {) U: {  h

; A7 U1 Q: b. h- L8 @我唔認為學校方今次要幫班學生3 d# s0 }% ~' {
' a* g) R; f4 M  o
唔通第時出到去做野做錯事就有亞head幫你頂?
' N% `+ {$ A9 |
1 w$ O- T" [. v我唔認為lor5 C4 {4 F6 |' S0 E* j7 N
1 h  w) c6 f7 W' l- b
唔係話要整死佢地7 G* q  Z1 r! P# {( [
1 \: M, Z1 z) I/ f0 B
而係今次件事,如果判得成的話,自然起到警惕作用
  U- p3 ?; \! F5 _3 R; l) d( A
: x* D1 |% s- n6 J; d# K我覺得係d人將言論自由ge範圍放得太大4 w6 v  n  A6 g  M* L0 l$ T5 i  v

2 E, {5 B  u" u* _有d野係應該講,有d野係唔應該係公眾場合講的, b7 r! W. L# q: D9 m* m, B" E
- o& }& T9 B3 K! n0 C7 P, k2 o
唔係話唔應該講就係防礙言論自由8 C+ s  r6 K. l* ^3 M( k3 b  e0 v, |! `

" [6 r+ d' q) W6 p大家都知偷錢搶錢係唔唔法,唔通咁又話政府防礙你搵錢?

浪子

睇完, 真係冇野好講, 咁所有中小學性教育書籍都可以列做不雅

hackenli

一日一金句
3 D& D" ]8 z; |2 R"佢地有比一般市民較高o既學歷,就更應該能夠明辨是非"
) ?: H! L3 d% V7 ^8 u) z
" `2 [' k/ J* H: C6 l1 V我們的大學生
8 p+ f) I) f% u' I
6 x/ _* u2 U2 G, K% Q
6 J/ ~" Z5 K' ]2 s, q
9 L; q  g# U* S# a9 S, O/ |$ E2 j: m9 R4 p

Originally posted by easy_man at 2007-5-15 02:13 PM:
. K2 m* y  _/ ]+ Q) C
/ [/ U& h4 P% h9 x
" s% w* D/ I8 \- q7 D9 K8 b有見地 !!!
- n. j+ l6 l# R6 x現今大學生部份以為...

vv1668vv

反映大學生對法律認知不足。自以為是

支持者

http://www.xanga.com/cusp_07/590 ... 76362152636620.html
% z* T; T8 c- x  o
' a" ^4 U9 y1 c( F: ^I think the content is rather premature, i.e. not a porn stuff compare with some HK newspapers.
/ R2 ^2 J, H# c6 s/ LI never think of any porn or sexual stuff after the reading, but just have some moment to retreat the social life in mind. : A. q6 R4 t, X# C, ~/ m& y: x
I pretty sad that about the University official.. l. ~- p  L* ?2 r* S( R: s1 d) }
It's them making the stuff worse.

bigfish

我覺得份報刊以市井中文刊出就顯得不雅, 如果轉用華麗英文刊登就乜事都冇 la
5 M; h7 e0 Z% r6 K% Q
* b4 Q: {+ [# z[ Last edited by bigfish on 2007-5-15 at 05:26 PM ]

mailcool7

有錯就認,打就企定

155220

Originally posted by bigfish at 2007-5-15 17:24:/ V- Q3 d, \7 {2 R; t# Z
我覺得份報刊以市井中文刊出就顯得不雅, 如果轉用華麗英文刊登就乜事都冇 la
) S* D: M$ K! X* [5 K6 g- V- D6 a% A  S( m! f4 ]" `5 B
[ Last edited by bigfish on 2007-5-15 at 05:26 PM ]

5 j/ t) \  Z; z% ?; |3 m* q

% U3 c& ?# T, H- e, j兩者有何分別?" e+ t. ~# R% X2 |$ h
中文就市井,英文就華麗,有咩根據?