奪命老妖

Originally posted by seafireson2 at 2007-5-15 02:29 PM:7 g- B6 K9 O5 b5 ]
7 N3 B4 F% f1 J
agree,
# t: T% B: K* n, m# l  @1 k我都未睇過,根本唔知係點,可能真係討論成份為主,7 S5 V2 u- n* q0 q$ d4 }
但我估同方向生果比,係小兒科,! l) U' w9 J& v& D  C
期盼方向生果比人被定性二級不雅!

: I5 q, r( \, _' O0 H5 s. ]http://www.xanga.com/cusp_07/590 ... 76362152636620.html
% B( ^4 Z& I9 U* A: z: z$ U9 [8 H已經睇左幾期,性質傾向於性教育,同某報既果d嫖妓指南,差天共地; d* i$ M- ^6 z3 P1 z+ ~
搞成咁,都係兩個原因,第一係香港人係性方面真係好保守,探討下都唔得,第二係欺善怕惡,見係學生就恰你

chicken

Read the student post and find that it's not as evil as described by the media.) k, U5 `3 o7 B9 A! E$ ?
Just some extreme-conservative people too nervous about it.

sakura310

Originally posted by d228216 at 2007-5-15 01:58 PM:
2 s$ G8 C( O* D3 j2 ~6 z  v" z有罪就要罸, 冇罪就要平反, 法庭應申張正義！ 1 K% r( J2 L/ G' u& @8 W

1 a1 f, \5 Q6 B: i- a係咪大學生根本冇關係....大學生巴閉d?? 有免死金牌???
- u* ?& U4 G$ |: T6 j" r( h5 e
4 A/ M2 Y( K& E6 s( v為自己既行為負責, 係今日既年青人最需要學習既野!

  q& h5 d% V7 A: k3 E2 K4 w3 w

0 T0 {' B! W% W! T  I  O# Q# E& ^( n絕對支持啦  T; f/ `$ G: l& X/ l6 x8 C
$ T0 D! q/ u  [
有錯就認,打就企定
: ~7 `$ v% P: ?+ O! ]' g- r- O( J; r* N* U! r3 z( g5 m1 W
無錯當然要撐到底
# K' ~* l. v3 ?4 x, A& u0 w  z( H) V* a1 y; r' }
但今次我覺得係班大學生唔0岩( e/ d; `) ~+ ^, d; h! K
! r9 d# v" L1 C+ Z9 y8 T* x/ j8 W# _
在發佈一份公眾讀物時,內容應該注意下,唔同私人交談,你講咩都得7 D% `/ e1 |$ T
2 Z( w2 E' r! U1 A+ j- Y
一份公眾讀物係好有影響力
9 Y, Y  m1 ^; ~
- B( M  w8 N9 G& L我唔認為學校方今次要幫班學生7 o2 |% _- y, x8 z- P" w7 l2 I1 M: e! |

6 K7 E  ?3 m  r1 T+ R, O唔通第時出到去做野做錯事就有亞head幫你頂?9 i) S6 Z+ C( l0 {' d% O
8 M/ s7 i$ ^6 n7 b
我唔認為lor
* Z$ N$ b9 p4 V) c  P) i& s* u4 f& I
唔係話要整死佢地  Q/ g/ a3 ]$ U" w

; n& O9 t- t# N! A# |  K* Y而係今次件事,如果判得成的話,自然起到警惕作用4 h5 u3 \- ~6 k8 r! D  F: ]' E
  C; z6 a! J6 v+ D' N
我覺得係d人將言論自由ge範圍放得太大& f) X( h7 }4 X7 y

9 l6 v9 {0 |& v5 M; Y: b& J1 f有d野係應該講,有d野係唔應該係公眾場合講的
* ^8 A, E! k& l3 w! x' k8 Q5 Q+ }
5 C6 r# l) x# e$ x8 ?* S8 Q% l* c唔係話唔應該講就係防礙言論自由
4 R! `" C# n- `. w/ P0 A" W/ Z  b
( J+ Z1 D* v3 l9 ]" k$ T6 V5 H大家都知偷錢搶錢係唔唔法,唔通咁又話政府防礙你搵錢?

浪子

睇完, 真係冇野好講, 咁所有中小學性教育書籍都可以列做不雅

hackenli

一日一金句
9 D" @9 ~* Q7 c. j% k, \/ Y"佢地有比一般市民較高o既學歷,就更應該能夠明辨是非"$ ]! c% I# G. U) s3 T' K

" T- }, q2 H) b# ]我們的大學生
9 W! [6 m- r; C. v' W
. X3 R9 R1 V4 r' a
/ ~) M3 f& _; ^/ W) A8 V8 n$ R( |( O- B" X& l% R7 X/ w4 B/ b( z
) d- _( D+ z7 m3 L# {3 y; W" n

Originally posted by easy_man at 2007-5-15 02:13 PM:& D" h7 b9 w* F) j0 j2 t
( i( X  e5 i; D0 @% L: W

& z2 ~# w. e1 }' b; @3 u, U: M' b有見地 !!!8 x0 G3 n, ]+ Q7 S! |! z% f
現今大學生部份以為...

vv1668vv

反映大學生對法律認知不足。自以為是

支持者

http://www.xanga.com/cusp_07/590 ... 76362152636620.html
1 l; f' m( v/ z, K4 w+ L8 [$ q$ s/ b* W5 i. x  B
I think the content is rather premature, i.e. not a porn stuff compare with some HK newspapers. ) b. @7 i  E9 Z* E% R/ I$ g/ U: m
I never think of any porn or sexual stuff after the reading, but just have some moment to retreat the social life in mind.
" y! \1 L% Y) o1 K, J* u$ }/ l: qI pretty sad that about the University official.. ?& e  C$ l& s- f6 ~  o7 |
It's them making the stuff worse.

bigfish

我覺得份報刊以市井中文刊出就顯得不雅, 如果轉用華麗英文刊登就乜事都冇 la/ G' f* y* I7 _) m- X
5 f  h/ J4 e' q7 @
[ Last edited by bigfish on 2007-5-15 at 05:26 PM ]

mailcool7

有錯就認,打就企定

155220

Originally posted by bigfish at 2007-5-15 17:24:8 O1 x  F3 r* {$ T2 ]% X9 \% X# f- r
我覺得份報刊以市井中文刊出就顯得不雅, 如果轉用華麗英文刊登就乜事都冇 la  A- H" l0 ^# A! g
$ D" o" g9 s/ u8 N
[ Last edited by bigfish on 2007-5-15 at 05:26 PM ]

, T0 I' u0 r7 b& ]/ L
7 ~, l: x5 P6 e% S* M) x
兩者有何分別?5 S- l9 a1 x" d" P0 |
中文就市井,英文就華麗,有咩根據?