奪命老妖

Originally posted by seafireson2 at 2007-5-15 02:29 PM:
: s2 \6 G9 M$ s) k. z* g5 x  S" M& l$ I( ^/ a0 P8 k
agree,
  u; i0 b4 d& S' d5 b# ]& T. H我都未睇過,根本唔知係點,可能真係討論成份為主,& E% ?' \2 q0 N0 W7 C
但我估同方向生果比,係小兒科,
/ ~. a9 \6 v0 ^/ b. H期盼方向生果比人被定性二級不雅!

8 R2 B3 W7 w3 b' Khttp://www.xanga.com/cusp_07/590 ... 76362152636620.html
+ i/ Y+ Y7 e& X0 e已經睇左幾期,性質傾向於性教育,同某報既果d嫖妓指南,差天共地5 o# h. @* F, d9 Y/ \7 E" ^
搞成咁,都係兩個原因,第一係香港人係性方面真係好保守,探討下都唔得,第二係欺善怕惡,見係學生就恰你

chicken

Read the student post and find that it's not as evil as described by the media.
, ^* [1 L; x3 W& B% v/ vJust some extreme-conservative people too nervous about it.

sakura310

Originally posted by d228216 at 2007-5-15 01:58 PM:+ W. c( u1 G  U' B
有罪就要罸, 冇罪就要平反, 法庭應申張正義！
& X. k; A- e( m8 A: Y
8 p: Q5 Y# \1 O6 p3 O9 D係咪大學生根本冇關係....大學生巴閉d?? 有免死金牌???$ L. h& V& u& |- T/ v$ ]

9 E/ W: A! e; l/ E. t為自己既行為負責, 係今日既年青人最需要學習既野!

- x9 E' c$ F( P1 l6 y
% R; |0 |$ ~' s絕對支持啦
& t/ {* J' [9 r9 a2 j6 F
  h, n$ I3 J7 q有錯就認,打就企定- N& f" I8 f7 [# l+ r& ^0 v9 k

: U7 T, h' M! _* C# ]7 C) `; x無錯當然要撐到底" M3 i8 b; ]5 R: G8 f* @

6 v5 _8 N4 G0 M0 J' ^( r1 S但今次我覺得係班大學生唔0岩
* u' @4 ~( G: ~
; k& T, Y* g% m8 {3 p2 L: y6 [在發佈一份公眾讀物時,內容應該注意下,唔同私人交談,你講咩都得
2 j+ K5 D2 R. `5 x0 j
2 q/ P+ \5 W9 c1 b# U8 e3 K, e6 {一份公眾讀物係好有影響力- x$ z1 ]1 j. B9 I  x: _  g% t

& U  Y" L7 A' J1 e8 \/ E8 ^我唔認為學校方今次要幫班學生
) L; N. s! D) M( e" F3 u5 R% o5 x8 Z
唔通第時出到去做野做錯事就有亞head幫你頂?
0 m6 c& W" ]# x8 Z  K3 S9 }4 Q2 f
' E" x+ k: q& ^- r我唔認為lor+ D8 Z- S4 R' R6 a. Y  f

) n; V( d$ B% |/ ]8 K; ]) l- o唔係話要整死佢地
. ?$ F$ o; S) N% f8 a0 ~5 ^) t/ B+ r& |  u, I
而係今次件事,如果判得成的話,自然起到警惕作用2 v6 H5 p' D: g' O1 D. |

: R5 U1 \# j, p7 l; [我覺得係d人將言論自由ge範圍放得太大' m  @: ]9 g& a" t- U- O
0 n& Q+ G9 z% G; ^" e. m
有d野係應該講,有d野係唔應該係公眾場合講的
* p! z: a9 [% s" B! Y, a9 G3 d) U% f1 p/ b" ^" l' F
唔係話唔應該講就係防礙言論自由
* G6 B0 Q& N* L/ A) y! _  M
$ R- w& q4 t; Q- V6 U大家都知偷錢搶錢係唔唔法,唔通咁又話政府防礙你搵錢?

浪子

睇完, 真係冇野好講, 咁所有中小學性教育書籍都可以列做不雅

hackenli

一日一金句0 y& b- b7 k; E9 }9 n
"佢地有比一般市民較高o既學歷,就更應該能夠明辨是非"
0 B2 G* o+ j3 P) T% Q& r. O) P1 ?' z& M' f
我們的大學生
6 s: {0 Y' E" n+ r2 b
1 Z+ y* B) m) U3 J* s+ c5 o% ]& j, y$ }; T# i: Z

  v; s. E' d4 v' S3 \
5 l  G! i& A* j* `

Originally posted by easy_man at 2007-5-15 02:13 PM:
+ B+ A! I, c8 p( Z% w; W
* @9 A) X! k7 j. j. D# e5 `, S/ V6 a( @; D/ Q# y/ x. m
有見地 !!!
6 H& c3 e5 Y. t. `1 r  `3 h2 w" x現今大學生部份以為...

vv1668vv

反映大學生對法律認知不足。自以為是

支持者

http://www.xanga.com/cusp_07/590 ... 76362152636620.html
8 H8 I& o: h- X- S- p0 u1 r, {
I think the content is rather premature, i.e. not a porn stuff compare with some HK newspapers. 2 O- m2 F# t8 |$ ^3 U$ \! w* t
I never think of any porn or sexual stuff after the reading, but just have some moment to retreat the social life in mind. ; P+ c& m$ b; j( M: j- r: z. n. @
I pretty sad that about the University official.
$ f& n( u* O2 v5 QIt's them making the stuff worse.

bigfish

我覺得份報刊以市井中文刊出就顯得不雅, 如果轉用華麗英文刊登就乜事都冇 la
4 Q4 R% i9 g7 d& \, j7 L! F3 H" ~" O  D
[ Last edited by bigfish on 2007-5-15 at 05:26 PM ]

mailcool7

有錯就認,打就企定

155220

Originally posted by bigfish at 2007-5-15 17:24:" D4 W) \0 Z4 G8 @  P
我覺得份報刊以市井中文刊出就顯得不雅, 如果轉用華麗英文刊登就乜事都冇 la
$ S* s% S) y( N& z1 m8 T, t- @, r4 I
[ Last edited by bigfish on 2007-5-15 at 05:26 PM ]

: }/ {. G5 w+ i
9 F0 _, z' h: R% `0 }7 `兩者有何分別?. y5 o9 X& p% G& d0 F- v
中文就市井,英文就華麗,有咩根據?