奪命老妖

Originally posted by seafireson2 at 2007-5-15 02:29 PM:8 P; B9 Z* W) n' B& j1 j

  Z4 \! a1 v6 O) g* fagree," O, V) W8 q& |! R/ D1 Q, z" {+ X: o
我都未睇過,根本唔知係點,可能真係討論成份為主,
& s6 e. L' m8 t# t3 b0 o# l. m但我估同方向生果比,係小兒科,
5 e: m! S( ^9 d8 H: _* \8 G( n6 U期盼方向生果比人被定性二級不雅!

* O/ m  X- v! a5 Nhttp://www.xanga.com/cusp_07/590 ... 76362152636620.html/ ]! o: k3 u0 G) }3 O+ G
已經睇左幾期,性質傾向於性教育,同某報既果d嫖妓指南,差天共地
! n1 _( D% ~) }6 \9 S搞成咁,都係兩個原因,第一係香港人係性方面真係好保守,探討下都唔得,第二係欺善怕惡,見係學生就恰你

chicken

Read the student post and find that it's not as evil as described by the media.# a2 s% N: b$ E/ Y+ g
Just some extreme-conservative people too nervous about it.

sakura310

Originally posted by d228216 at 2007-5-15 01:58 PM:
# w. J1 `% }5 E' f$ f有罪就要罸, 冇罪就要平反, 法庭應申張正義！ % c9 @' \, {! i$ t' L

. J2 O8 o% S" T+ m$ Q: [! W3 B係咪大學生根本冇關係....大學生巴閉d?? 有免死金牌???7 a( H7 ^2 v% j% @5 I% Q5 b- F* J4 S1 \+ ^
0 M  J1 d% J) l- H) a! m& ~
為自己既行為負責, 係今日既年青人最需要學習既野!

* q3 D$ c2 ]- V/ j$ `! H

( h# ]2 B. A: x5 J. Q. M1 l- L絕對支持啦
5 A3 k" Z5 v8 S: C# F
2 ~' B& H. V9 p6 @9 k  J: |! a有錯就認,打就企定
2 K1 p- S' u+ ^7 O5 u* s& Z' J4 x+ u; h- M6 d
無錯當然要撐到底8 h" b7 n/ _, m5 x- ]/ J# L" k5 L

( O! E" R5 `3 }但今次我覺得係班大學生唔0岩
* `: Y6 t5 R+ x7 y% I' L- z) S7 V  H: e9 \2 k/ t
在發佈一份公眾讀物時,內容應該注意下,唔同私人交談,你講咩都得
# b% B4 w3 e7 C! V
; Y# q8 c. [. @, a一份公眾讀物係好有影響力6 J5 c5 u9 ^8 Z3 t* @* T! A
2 u3 D& i) e8 d2 C& o
我唔認為學校方今次要幫班學生1 c+ Z* Z9 t/ J% i4 p* W

; w# U! `1 c  ~2 A4 @; `+ j8 Q唔通第時出到去做野做錯事就有亞head幫你頂?
# [, u1 {4 T$ T3 [+ ^1 C% ?- b' ]$ M
( o2 b8 e. a5 @& l我唔認為lor
4 F" p5 |2 H; R5 n/ N" c, w
- n) G  p3 L) l$ c- u唔係話要整死佢地
( u! T. q5 j  ?+ a# I; Y: c2 |; j, x' [' [% ]
而係今次件事,如果判得成的話,自然起到警惕作用$ _- F& P, k9 w; \8 {
+ O( Y1 P& {# \, K6 _
我覺得係d人將言論自由ge範圍放得太大
0 w8 X. f. x% Z: ^' e
  L6 _! r4 z$ h+ S9 Y有d野係應該講,有d野係唔應該係公眾場合講的
7 T! }7 t& B4 a2 h  V% s* w
& K/ a  h& t2 L4 N唔係話唔應該講就係防礙言論自由: _1 L) s+ _8 |/ d

2 y! U0 ^0 \4 H1 V大家都知偷錢搶錢係唔唔法,唔通咁又話政府防礙你搵錢?

浪子

睇完, 真係冇野好講, 咁所有中小學性教育書籍都可以列做不雅

hackenli

一日一金句
) q! ^3 z0 S" C. u"佢地有比一般市民較高o既學歷,就更應該能夠明辨是非"2 _6 P. c6 X2 U. u

2 J; Q7 Y( [6 f0 `我們的大學生3 i8 b1 |" k; L( o& x

' W. ?2 C6 o! s" d: [
& Y2 J  ]5 {, q4 |  J* ]. ~
4 H' T. D7 r6 d/ v1 q  }" y0 y: R; T$ a; T/ N4 `- h

Originally posted by easy_man at 2007-5-15 02:13 PM:
; j1 V/ O, I8 @- A8 e. v
, m' s# B) {2 K5 S
, T+ P0 k" E! E& \+ f有見地 !!!
1 o9 S4 u# `- M; Q& ~: ~5 P9 h現今大學生部份以為...

vv1668vv

反映大學生對法律認知不足。自以為是

支持者

http://www.xanga.com/cusp_07/590 ... 76362152636620.html
, x* S  n6 R2 W# h$ c
6 r$ W5 l: b% M' s# _# FI think the content is rather premature, i.e. not a porn stuff compare with some HK newspapers.
- \2 [# ?8 j/ F' Q6 N% iI never think of any porn or sexual stuff after the reading, but just have some moment to retreat the social life in mind. ; M; J$ K* `, N, I9 M: `
I pretty sad that about the University official.6 n$ n. w9 z) G' ?6 T' d9 _
It's them making the stuff worse.

bigfish

我覺得份報刊以市井中文刊出就顯得不雅, 如果轉用華麗英文刊登就乜事都冇 la2 a2 `' j% \. P0 Y
2 I1 {, ]' k* V. T& U# X, @
[ Last edited by bigfish on 2007-5-15 at 05:26 PM ]

mailcool7

有錯就認,打就企定

155220

Originally posted by bigfish at 2007-5-15 17:24:+ O4 ]5 B8 b6 U6 B& ~
我覺得份報刊以市井中文刊出就顯得不雅, 如果轉用華麗英文刊登就乜事都冇 la
0 j5 m& O- y. L6 T( G& U5 d0 {4 {2 u8 C
[ Last edited by bigfish on 2007-5-15 at 05:26 PM ]

! K: D6 J7 ]/ o
0 x+ a( z# B5 K% P: X兩者有何分別?4 Q9 N! k; p3 i; F- p
中文就市井,英文就華麗,有咩根據?