奪命老妖

Originally posted by seafireson2 at 2007-5-15 02:29 PM:' e( p8 Q+ n5 O$ H  e4 c) Z

1 T; L: R1 q2 I- o5 b. B; `. |3 Nagree,
7 m* h$ E( c% C* C我都未睇過,根本唔知係點,可能真係討論成份為主,
: J; S% q$ d3 @! j+ A但我估同方向生果比,係小兒科,/ W/ R5 E% Q) I+ _' s
期盼方向生果比人被定性二級不雅!

- b% t" R4 k5 V+ m2 f! o% K# ?http://www.xanga.com/cusp_07/590 ... 76362152636620.html
( G/ j; M5 _# a6 R) N已經睇左幾期,性質傾向於性教育,同某報既果d嫖妓指南,差天共地/ r+ W$ s/ k4 p& X
搞成咁,都係兩個原因,第一係香港人係性方面真係好保守,探討下都唔得,第二係欺善怕惡,見係學生就恰你

chicken

Read the student post and find that it's not as evil as described by the media.# Q9 v  g  z2 u
Just some extreme-conservative people too nervous about it.

sakura310

Originally posted by d228216 at 2007-5-15 01:58 PM:
% v6 l2 F% m4 p* K! j8 G' H有罪就要罸, 冇罪就要平反, 法庭應申張正義！ / V9 Y$ Z6 g5 q+ h
& z& b$ H& s3 {0 Y
係咪大學生根本冇關係....大學生巴閉d?? 有免死金牌???8 ~4 }6 Y; \% R2 _' f) d
$ z- [) m( z4 D. K
為自己既行為負責, 係今日既年青人最需要學習既野!

/ t4 _2 c, @* Q: J5 K) R0 \% ?! c$ A
$ z  d  |+ S5 P. ?# z0 Z6 E絕對支持啦
3 g/ w( Z- h: S; A7 T( V+ i
5 ~0 `# b5 z( `& B  h有錯就認,打就企定
  m3 Z$ ~$ q& t( J* z+ \  l% P4 q5 c$ z! H
無錯當然要撐到底
1 ]* A$ t0 ~) x/ K  {8 o4 }
; U5 D3 V3 y, Q8 A$ |  U但今次我覺得係班大學生唔0岩. A5 U! v; J1 j0 s! t. k
# n3 i# {. N, {- e, L! E( A
在發佈一份公眾讀物時,內容應該注意下,唔同私人交談,你講咩都得
6 P5 U0 I. o- I! e4 ~9 ]: H4 g
一份公眾讀物係好有影響力
& z, A5 G) i/ Q, q
- B% O; D9 S0 f% l' s* p7 o$ O我唔認為學校方今次要幫班學生. I! w4 a% G- g8 @: S

; X( \+ B- [0 @' w) s8 Y  s# V唔通第時出到去做野做錯事就有亞head幫你頂?
% z7 {5 P& m& X. @9 v6 b8 v" {
" \- [+ n3 o" ]9 X4 d. Z- {. v, E我唔認為lor
- R4 _4 k3 o5 c, R3 s# B0 _
* _/ k7 c: F8 W0 @9 p+ ?2 r唔係話要整死佢地5 D3 }* \9 M& ?' `/ s

& e3 Z* F$ I9 ~! u% i而係今次件事,如果判得成的話,自然起到警惕作用/ U% ~4 `' I1 r2 p: `' H
5 E* ^( p2 o+ w2 F) P+ r
我覺得係d人將言論自由ge範圍放得太大
" R: _/ z, @/ ?: M4 d* j* c8 k( T+ r. T% K
有d野係應該講,有d野係唔應該係公眾場合講的+ J3 z1 ~/ `/ W; i3 j

% C3 i& S! O. @! a/ L; J唔係話唔應該講就係防礙言論自由
9 u; K7 C8 T: A: I$ s3 M+ s& _/ Y4 W  a" }$ j8 e
大家都知偷錢搶錢係唔唔法,唔通咁又話政府防礙你搵錢?

浪子

睇完, 真係冇野好講, 咁所有中小學性教育書籍都可以列做不雅

hackenli

一日一金句
$ g9 N) M$ q' F* Y* n. Z"佢地有比一般市民較高o既學歷,就更應該能夠明辨是非"% w1 _, U6 w$ U- d

. F# D: [* p! g% P, S) W8 T7 a我們的大學生3 A6 t- q; m* ?$ `! O2 v; q$ E
+ u+ X- ^# X9 V1 V4 Y( G
9 V# d& d+ B' W7 U2 R0 w

0 i$ _. Y8 ?0 J) t  F, U
! B& z4 x5 q/ Z

Originally posted by easy_man at 2007-5-15 02:13 PM:: X9 A6 [+ R/ Y
/ d  O3 U" N+ h+ n/ v) Q6 Y

6 s4 j( O) q$ g4 J- c# t( d' P4 F有見地 !!!# K( B( g" W: w" M2 H3 H! B1 L
現今大學生部份以為...

vv1668vv

反映大學生對法律認知不足。自以為是

支持者

http://www.xanga.com/cusp_07/590 ... 76362152636620.html
  ]* L5 y7 b- r0 b3 k/ ]8 p, h2 g4 ~* [8 C' X- N
I think the content is rather premature, i.e. not a porn stuff compare with some HK newspapers.
8 [3 A- K% Q  v* |; Z9 ~; sI never think of any porn or sexual stuff after the reading, but just have some moment to retreat the social life in mind.
! A3 l( }, }- II pretty sad that about the University official.7 B8 t! p$ E6 Z- {1 H
It's them making the stuff worse.

bigfish

我覺得份報刊以市井中文刊出就顯得不雅, 如果轉用華麗英文刊登就乜事都冇 la
9 q4 C8 v6 {3 _
, H2 N3 q4 y  ^% J! B6 A[ Last edited by bigfish on 2007-5-15 at 05:26 PM ]

mailcool7

有錯就認,打就企定

155220

Originally posted by bigfish at 2007-5-15 17:24:
4 P' j& H( d' L5 X0 x我覺得份報刊以市井中文刊出就顯得不雅, 如果轉用華麗英文刊登就乜事都冇 la: ~6 a( G8 b: A% h" w  \
. f# X$ T5 L& [, M  f0 L
[ Last edited by bigfish on 2007-5-15 at 05:26 PM ]

  ]+ L$ ?$ d: }8 s7 P& o# q/ K) d& E  t8 l
兩者有何分別?
6 l8 n  o) p( E& K9 e4 Y0 [中文就市井,英文就華麗,有咩根據?